Summary:
public
Blending semitransparent pixels against their background is fairly a fairly expensive operation on mobile GPUs. To reduce blending, React Native has a system called "background color propagation", where the background color of parent views is automatically inherited by child views unless explicitly overridden. This means that translucent pixels can be blended directly against a known background color, avoiding the need to do this dynamically on the GPU.
In practice, this is only useful for views that do their own drawing, which is basically just `<Image/>` and `<Text/>` components, and for image components it only really matters when the image has an alpha component.
The automatic background propagation is a bit of a hack, and often does the wrong thing - for example if a view overflows its bounds, or if it overlaps a sibling, the background color will often be incorrect and need to be manually disabled. Because the only place that it provides a significant performance benefit is for text, this diff disables the behavior for everything except `<Text/>` nodes. It might still be useful for `<Image/>` nodes too, but looking through the examples in UIExplorer, the number of places where it does the wrong thing for images outnumbers the cases where it provides significant reduction in blending.
Note that this diff does not prevent you from eliminating blending on image components by manually setting an opaque background color, nor does it stop you from disabling color propagation on text components by manually setting a transparent background.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D2811031
fb-gh-sync-id: 2eb08918c9031c582a3dd2d40e04b27a663dac82
Summary:
public
The iOS border rendering code did not follow the CSS spec in cases where the sum of adjacent border radii was greater than the width of the view, resulting in drawing glitches such as pixel smear and borders appearing stretched or squashed.
This diff brings our implementation closer to spec-compliance in these cases. I also fixed a longstanding issue with ghostly diagonal lines appearing at the corners due to antialiasing rounding errors!
Fixes
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/1572https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/2089https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/4604
Reviewed By: tadeuzagallo
Differential Revision: D2811249
fb-gh-sync-id: c3dd2721e0a01a432fa4dc78daa05680595edd08
Summary:
We don't (yet) treat these the same as any other modules because we still have special resolution rules for them in the packager allowing the use of `providesModule`, but I believe this allows people to use npm react in their RN projects and not have duplicate copies of React. Fixesfacebook/react-native#2985.
This relies on fbjs 0.6, which includes `.flow` files alongside the `.js` files to allow them to be typechecked without additional configuration. This also uses react 0.14.5, which shims a couple of files (as `.native.js`) to avoid DOM-specific bits. Once we fix these in React, we will use the same code on web and native. Hopefully we can also remove the packager support I'm adding here for `.native.js`.
This diff is not the desired end state for us – ideally the packager would know nothing of react or fbjs, and we'll get there eventually by not relying on `providesModule` in order to load react and fbjs modules. (fbjs change posted here but not merged yet: https://github.com/facebook/fbjs/pull/84.)
This should also allow relay to work seamlessly with RN, but I haven't verified this.
public
Reviewed By: sebmarkbage
Differential Revision: D2786197
fb-gh-sync-id: ff50f28445e949edc9501f4b599df7970813870d
Summary:
Support dashed and dotted border styles on iOS
public
Reviewed By: nicklockwood
Differential Revision: D2773579
fb-gh-sync-id: f4b99943f38e849602295a86bdb1780c0abbc8e8
Summary: this change will allow the slider to have different thumb images .
Sets an image for the thumb. It only supports static images
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/3849
Reviewed By: svcscm
Differential Revision: D2665699
Pulled By: nicklockwood
fb-gh-sync-id: 3a767e43170074e2419067d5c8eae61668ebb5e9
Summary: See #3888 for why this is necessary. Essentially, `[NSBundle mainBundle]` loads the file path for the target app which is the only way to reference images.
cc javache nicklockwood
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/3889
Reviewed By: svcscm
Differential Revision: D2615580
Pulled By: nicklockwood
fb-gh-sync-id: d06ce0987dde666b06bb5a7edf609ed45f325d2c
Summary: public
Re-recorded UIExplorerIntegrationTests::testTextExample snapshot to include
new opaque nested text example.
Reviewed By: nicklockwood
Differential Revision: D2610584
fb-gh-sync-id: 119dbf381f0b412ed8705597b03b367c5098b80d
Summary: public
If the frame is set, or the image view moves to a window, we should attempt to load the "real" image. The sizing logic shouldn't kick in if we're only displaying the default image.
Resolves https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/3460.
Reviewed By: tadeuzagallo
Differential Revision: D2555316
fb-gh-sync-id: c0c13070ee080bad2b30ca01d9d5173bead406e3
Summary: @public
Take a step back and de-batch the bridge calls so we can have better profiling data and a better starting point to work on future optimisations. Also gave a 10~15% win on first render.
Reviewed By: @javache
Differential Revision: D2493674
fb-gh-sync-id: 05165fdd00645bdf43e844bb0c4300a2f63e7038
Summary:
- Enables async/await in .babelrc and transformer.js
- Adds regenerator to package.json. Users still need to explicitly require the regenerator runtime -- this is so that you only pay for what you use.
- Update AsyncStorage examples in UIExplorer to use async/await
- Update promise tests in UIExplorer to use async/await in addition to the promise API
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1765
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Summary:
Because we don't want to integrate Animated inside of the core of React, we can only pass Animated.Value to styles of <Animated.View>. TouchableOpacity unfortunately used cloneElement. This means that we should have asked every single call site to replace their children to Animated.View. This isn't great.
The other solution is to stop using cloneElement and instead wrap the children inside of an <Animated.View>. This has many advantages:
- We no longer use cloneElement so we're no longer messing up with elements that are not our own.
- Refs are now working correctly for children elements
- No longer need to enforce that there's only one child and that this child is a native element
The downside is that we're introducing a <View> into the hierarchy. Sadly with CSS there is no way to have a View that doesn't affect layout. What we need to do is to remove the inner <View> and transfer all the styles to the TouchableOpacity. It is annoying but fortunately a pretty mechanical process.
I think that having a wrapper is the best solution. I will investigate to see if we can make wrappers on TouchableHighliht and TouchableWithoutFeedback as well.
**Upgrade Path:**
If the child is a View, move the style of the View to TouchableOpacity and remove the View itself.
```
<TouchableOpacity onPress={...}>
<View style={...}>
...
</View>
</TouchableOpacity>
-->
<TouchableOpacity onPress={...} style={...}>
...
</TouchableOpacity>
```
If the child is an Image or Text, on all the examples at Facebook it worked without any change. But it is a great idea to double check them anyway.
Summary:
Get the system font instead of Helvetica programmatically and add a virtual fontName called "System" that defaults to whatever the current system font is.
#1611
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1635
Github Author: LYK <dalinaum@gmail.com>
Summary:
Remove layout-only views. Works by checking properties against a list of known properties that only affect layout. The `RCTShadowView` hierarchy still has a 1:1 correlation with the JS nodes.
This works by adjusting the tags and indices in `manageChildren`. For example, if JS told us to insert tag 1 at index 0 and tag 1 is layout-only with children whose tags are 2 and 3, we adjust it so we insert tags 2 and 3 at indices 0 and 1. This keeps changes out of `RCTView` and `RCTScrollView`. In order to simplify this logic, view moves are now processed as view removals followed by additions. A move from index 0 to 1 is recorded as a removal of view at indices 0 and 1 and an insertion of tags 1 and 2 at indices 0 and 1. Of course, the remaining indices have to be offset to take account for this.
The `collapsible` attribute is a bit of a hack to force `RCTScrollView` to always have one child. This was easier than rethinking out the logic there, but we could change this later.
Summary:
Remove layout-only views. Works by checking properties against a list of known properties that only affect layout. The `RCTShadowView` hierarchy still has a 1:1 correlation with the JS nodes.
This works by adjusting the tags and indices in `manageChildren`. For example, if JS told us to insert tag 1 at index 0 and tag 1 is layout-only with children whose tags are 2 and 3, we adjust it so we insert tags 2 and 3 at indices 0 and 1. This keeps changes out of `RCTView` and `RCTScrollView`. In order to simplify this logic, view moves are now processed as view removals followed by additions. A move from index 0 to 1 is recorded as a removal of view at indices 0 and 1 and an insertion of tags 1 and 2 at indices 0 and 1. Of course, the remaining indices have to be offset to take account for this.
The `collapsible` attribute is a bit of a hack to force `RCTScrollView` to always have one child. This was easier than rethinking out the logic there, but we could change this later.
@public
Test Plan: There are tests in `RCTUIManagerTests.m` that test the tag- and index-manipulation logic works. There are various scenarios including add-only, remove-only, and move. In addition, two scenario tests verify that the optimization works by checking the number of views and shadow views after various situations happen.
Summary:
@public
For some weird reason sometimes displayName is undefined on the OSS tests, manually
set it for now to unbreak the tests.
Test Plan: Run the tests on OSS
Summary:
@public
The test file is getting compiled when hitting cmd+R which fails for 64-bit
devices even if not trying to run tests. Change back to runtime check to fix.
Test Plan:
cmd+R works for iPhone 6, cmd+U fails as expected on iPhone 6, works
for iPhone 5
Andreas Drivenes
Nick Lockwood
Ben Alpert
Milen Dzhumerov
Manuel Nakamurakare
Pieter De Baets
Pawel Sienkowski
Mark Miyashita
Josh Berdine
Justin Spahr-Summers
Tadeu Zagallo
Pieter De Baets
Alexey Lang
Spencer Ahrens
James Ide
lh_wang
Christopher Chedeau
Alex Akers
LYK
KJlmfe
chaceliang