Summary: Locking down view style so that invalid styles can't be passed into View.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D9309097
fbshipit-source-id: 69e7e3c5626609cfd47c167027a55470c42228c8
Summary: No new errors in this version. Just removed a bunch of unused suppressions
Reviewed By: TheSavior
Differential Revision: D8754160
fbshipit-source-id: 2f02240b6d65edecba5d9ed603c7703462547a7f
Summary: There was an inverted expression leading to logspew. Fix this.
Reviewed By: TheSavior
Differential Revision: D8758023
fbshipit-source-id: 7a83c68db6c95f2b5db6dcc7d7780fc66321b49e
Summary:
We're unifying on flow types, and propTypes require non-trivial resources to initialize in aggregate.
Some open source code might depend on extracting ScrollView.propTypes which will now fail. To fix, simplly remove these dependencies and use flow or typescript for verifying correct prop usage instead.
Reviewed By: TheSavior
Differential Revision: D8726371
fbshipit-source-id: 19e9540794db97a9e356615b544759a0753fd68c
Summary:
As we migrate over to static typing solutions for props, we cannot rely on always having `propTypes` available at runtime.
This gets us started on that journey by removing the native prop validation that happens when we require native components.
bypass-lint
Reviewed By: TheSavior
Differential Revision: D7976854
fbshipit-source-id: f3ab579a7f0f8cfb716b0eb7fd4625f8168f3d96
Summary:
This PR removes the need for having the `providesModule` tags in all the modules in the repository.
It configures Flow, Jest and Metro to get the module names from the filenames (`Libraries/Animated/src/nodes/AnimatedInterpolation.js` => `AnimatedInterpolation`)
* Checked the Flow configuration by running flow on the project root (no errors):
```
yarn flow
```
* Checked the Jest configuration by running the tests with a clean cache:
```
yarn jest --clearCache && yarn test
```
* Checked the Metro configuration by starting the server with a clean cache and requesting some bundles:
```
yarn run start --reset-cache
curl 'localhost:8081/IntegrationTests/AccessibilityManagerTest.bundle?platform=android'
curl 'localhost:8081/Libraries/Alert/Alert.bundle?platform=ios'
```
[INTERNAL] [FEATURE] [All] - Removed providesModule from all modules and configured tools.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/18995
Reviewed By: mjesun
Differential Revision: D7729509
Pulled By: rubennorte
fbshipit-source-id: 892f760a05ce1fddb088ff0cd2e97e521fb8e825
Summary:
Trying this again with a fresh pullrequest as the old one kept having issued due to rebasing.
Fixes#16635
the issue is a little serious if you use a scrollview which contains textinput, you will never get a chance to input something since keyboard will always be dismissed because of on-drag event if your scroll-view use the property: keyboardDismissMode ='on-drag'
verify the issue #16635 and tested this fix worked
[ANDROID] [BUGFIX] [ScrollView] - Check that isTouching is also set when dismissing keyboard with on-drag android.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/18785
Differential Revision: D7569815
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 2a07369297ce9ce5a7714e513ccb480ee7011a4d
Summary:
Nested scrolling in scrollViews, listViews and flatLists are enabled on iOS by default, but needs to be enabled manually on Android. This PR introduces a `nestedScrollEnabled` property to ScrollViews to support nested scrolling on Android 21 and above.
Enabling nested scroll will resolve issues with coordinator layout in android and required to support a collapsing toolbar.
Tested on the test app. We are also using this property in our app currently to support scrolling behaviour required by coordinator layouts.
[ANDROID] [ENHANCEMENT] [ScrollView] - Added a prop to enable nested scrolling
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/18299
Reviewed By: sahrens
Differential Revision: D7256604
Pulled By: mdvacca
fbshipit-source-id: fb8b7f1b5bed39837a2066db7f2a8798d52a3fd6
Summary:
Includes React Native and its dependencies Fresco, Metro, and Yoga. Excludes samples/examples/docs.
find: ^(?:( *)|( *(?:[\*~#]|::))( )? *)?Copyright (?:\(c\) )?(\d{4})\b.+Facebook[\s\S]+?BSD[\s\S]+?(?:this source tree|the same directory)\.$
replace: $1$2$3Copyright (c) $4-present, Facebook, Inc.\n$2\n$1$2$3This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the\n$1$2$3LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.
Reviewed By: TheSavior, yungsters
Differential Revision: D7007050
fbshipit-source-id: 37dd6bf0ffec0923bfc99c260bb330683f35553e
Summary:
Sticky headers for inverted lists should still stick at the top of the list instead of the bottom.
Tested by adding the inverted prop to the SectionList example in RNTester.
It does add a prop to ScrollView but it's very specific to the inverted list implementation, not sure if it should be documented.
[GENERAL][ENHANCEMENT][LISTS] - Support sticky headers for inverted Lists
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/17762
Differential Revision: D6830784
Pulled By: sahrens
fbshipit-source-id: 6841fdd46e04b30547659d85ff54c3a21c61a8a2
Summary:
Builds off of cae7179c94
- Make the prop a dictionary for more configuration options
- Rename `maintainPositionAtOrBeyondIndex` -> `maintainVisibleContentPosition` + `minIndexForVisible`
- Add autoscroll threshold feature
Given the async native of RN JS and background layout, there is no way to trigger the scrollTo from JS without risking a delay, so we add the feature in native code.
== Test Plan ==
ScrollViewExample:
https://youtu.be/pmY8pxC9PRs
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D6729160
fbshipit-source-id: 70f9bae460ce84567857a4f696da78ce9b3b834c
Summary:
== Problem / Background ==
Most lists paginate in a single direction (standard infinite list), but some paginate in both directions. Most common example is a chat thread where new messages show up on the bottom, and old content can be loaded by scrolling up. Comment threads are another example.
Right now, adding content to the bottom of a scroll view is smooth - the content doesn't jump. But when adding to the top of the scrollview, the content gets pushed down, which is jarring (note this may appear reversed because of inverting the list which is common for chat applications).
== Approach ==
The basic idea is simple - we set a flag in JS, then for every uimanager transaction, we record which is the first eligible and visible view in the ScrollView, and compare it's new origin to the old one. If it has changed, we update the contentOffset of the ScrollView to compensate.
This is done by observing `willPerformMounting` directly (only from scrollviews that have this new property set), and then observing the prev state with prependUIBlock and making the update synchronously in addUIBlock to avoid any flicker.
There is also a way to skip views that we don't care about, like a spinner at the top of the view that we don't want to stay in place - we actually want it to get pushed up by the new content, replaced visually in the viewport.
== Notes ==
Most chat applications will probably want to do a scrollToTop when new content comes in and the user is already scrolled at or near the bottom.
This is glitchy if visible children are re-ordered, which could be fixed with additional logic, but it doesn't come up in the type of applications we're targetting here so punting on that.
== Test Plan ==
https://youtu.be/4GcqDGz9eOE
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D6696921
fbshipit-source-id: 822e7dfcb207006cd1ba098356324ea81f619428
Summary:
`ScrollView` has a bunch of `onFoo` handlers for scrolling-related events, most of which have a proptype defined and are documented. However, `onScrollBeginDrag` and `onScrollEndDrag` do not currently have a proptype and are not currently documented (as noted at https://stackoverflow.com/a/41793747/1709587). It seems reasonable to bring consistency and to provide documentation of these otherwise hard-to-discover props.
I haven't added or run any tests, and don't plan to do so (beyond waiting and seeing that no existing checks fail in CircleCI).
I have also created a PR to update the documentation at https://github.com/facebook/react-native-website/pull/99
*(None needed; this isn't a functionality change.)*
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/17368
Differential Revision: D6642695
Pulled By: TheSavior
fbshipit-source-id: fa40ed2ae6d5947a161b816a47441d8f5d4d9c4d
Summary:
Solves https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/13034
Now the `ScrollView` mock has all the methods available.
React Native tests pass.
To test this specific part of the code,
```sh
$ react-native init Test
$ cd Test/
$ yarn add react-navigation
```
Then, add a simple project that uses `react-navigation`:
```js
import React from 'react';
import { Text } from 'react-native';
import { StackNavigator } from 'react-navigation';
class HomeScreen extends React.Component {
static navigationOptions = {
title: 'Welcome',
};
render() {
return <Text>Hello, Navigation!</Text>;
}
}
const SimpleApp = StackNavigator({
Home: { screen: HomeScreen },
});
export default SimpleApp
```
Run the default render tests:
```js
$ npm run test
```
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/13048
Differential Revision: D4746028
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: cb1791978d15be7f5d14b7b22979388066ad6caa
Summary:
Touch cancel events are currently being ignored by the ScrollView component. Currently scrollview responds both to scroll events and touchStart/touchMove/touchEnd events.
The reason why ScrollView listens to touchStart/touchEnd is so that it can update its `state.isTouching` param. This parameter then is used in `scrollResponderHandleScrollShouldSetResponder` to make the decision if scrollview should set the responder or not. So if `isTouching` is true (we've received touchStart) then ScrollView want to became a JS responder. This in turn is important for the case where we receive scroll events that does not necessarily need to trigger responder change, e.g. we don't want Scrollview to become JS responder if scroll events have been triggered by `scrollTo` in which case setting responder would put the whole responder system in a bogus state (note that responder can be released only by touchEnd or touchCancel, so if there is no touchEnd that follows scroll event then ScrollView will remain the responder and this would break next touch interaction).
It is therefore crucial for the ScrollView to reset `isTouching` state when touchCancel arrives, as otherwise the next scroll event would incorrectly trigger responder change.
On top of that ScrollView seems to be the only component in RN's core that registers to handle touchEnd but ignores touchCancel, which stands agains the comment added to `RCTRootView.cancelTouches` [here](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/commit/c14cc123d#diff-9cd70243bd2af75c613e29972bb1b41cR127).
This problem is difficult to test with a pure RN native app, as on Android it does not surface because of the `responderIgnoreScroll` flag that is being added to every scroll event, and it essentially makes the responder system ignore scroll events so they would never trigger responder change. On the other hand on iOS the cancel events are pretty rare. With pure RN app they can only be triggered by a "system" level interaction (e.g. when system alert dialog appears or when home button is clicked and there is a touch interaction happening). This issue becomes more prominent when RN app is embedded in a more sophisticated application that may use [`RCTRootView.cancelTouches`](1e8f3b1102/React/Base/RCTRootView.h (L130)) method to block RNs gesture recognizers in some cases or with third-party libraries that deals with touch events like [react-native-gesture-handler](https://github.com/kmagiera/react-native-gesture-handler) that also calls into the method when native touch interaction is detected.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/16004
Differential Revision: D6003063
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: f6495ffc57a5f996117b5bd80478bb1a58d2d799
Summary:
We're spreading this in via `...ViewPropTypes` also. Having both confuses
flow when you try to pass style (even though they're identical), when the
types are defined via `React.ElementProps`
Reviewed By: jingc
Differential Revision: D6028659
fbshipit-source-id: 203e29682d34f1648a47d9ddbaef0c9630fbcb99
Summary:
I don't think a test plan is required here! 😛
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/16243
Differential Revision: D6005196
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 3b46346e57e0d9971078c4807a4fa0045a8366b1
Summary:
When false, ScrollView disables use of pinch gestures to zoom in and out. This allows ScrollView's pinch gesture responder to be disabled to only allow zooming programmatically. The default value is ~false~ true.
**Test Plan**
Tested that pinch gesture responder is disabled when pinchEnabled=false.
/cc nicklockwood sahrens
🍺
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/10037
Differential Revision: D5491953
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: eae16f92ec616e415b4ddacfccb84c697582daf9
Summary:
In iOS11, Apple added a new layout feature called "Safe Areas" (this blog post talks a bit about it: https://www.bignerdranch.com/blog/wwdc-2017-large-titles-and-safe-area-layout-guides/).
UIScrollView is one component that is affected by this change in Apple's API. When the `contentInsetAdjustmentBehavior` is set to `automatic`, for example, it will adjust the insets (and override any manually set insets) automatically based on whether or not there's a UINavigationBar, a UITabBar, a visible status bar, etc on the screen. Frustratingly, Apple decided to default to `Automatic` for this behavior, which will cause any apps that set contentInset/contentContainerStyle padding to have their values offset by, at the very least, the size of the status bar, when they compile their app for iOS 11. Here's more information about this behavior: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/uikit/uiscrollview/2902261-contentinsetadjustmentbehavior?language=objc
Mostly, this is a really straightforward change -- it simply adds a new iOS-only prop to ScrollView that allows setting `contentInsetAdjustmentBehavior`. But I did decide to default the behavior to `never`, so that it mimics the behavior we've seen in iOS < 11. I think it's good to keep something as crucial as scrollview content insets non-magical, and also keep it behaving similarly between platforms.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/15023
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D5517552
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: c9ce4bf331b3d243228268d826fdd4dcee99981d
Summary:
In iOS11, Apple added a new layout feature called "Safe Areas" (this blog post talks a bit about it: https://www.bignerdranch.com/blog/wwdc-2017-large-titles-and-safe-area-layout-guides/).
UIScrollView is one component that is affected by this change in Apple's API. When the `contentInsetAdjustmentBehavior` is set to `automatic`, for example, it will adjust the insets (and override any manually set insets) automatically based on whether or not there's a UINavigationBar, a UITabBar, a visible status bar, etc on the screen. Frustratingly, Apple decided to default to `Automatic` for this behavior, which will cause any apps that set contentInset/contentContainerStyle padding to have their values offset by, at the very least, the size of the status bar, when they compile their app for iOS 11. Here's more information about this behavior: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/uikit/uiscrollview/2902261-contentinsetadjustmentbehavior?language=objc
Mostly, this is a really straightforward change -- it simply adds a new iOS-only prop to ScrollView that allows setting `contentInsetAdjustmentBehavior`. But I did decide to default the behavior to `never`, so that it mimics the behavior we've seen in iOS < 11. I think it's good to keep something as crucial as scrollview content insets non-magical, and also keep it behaving similarly between platforms.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/15023
Differential Revision: D5441491
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: 7b56ea290f7f6eca5f1d996ff8488f40b866c2e6
Eli White
Gabe Levi
Wen-Chien Chen
Spencer Ahrens
Tim Yung
Rubén Norte
Bjørn-Erik Andreasen
Peter van der Zee
tuncaulubilge
Sophie Alpert
Brian Vaughn
Janic Duplessis
Martin Sherburn
Semen Zhydenko
Jimmy Zhuang
Mark Amery
Álvaro Medina Ballester
Avik Chaudhuri
David Vacca
Andrew Chen (Eng)
Krzysztof Magiera
Peter Ruibal
Masayuki Iwai
Yann Pringault
Sam Goldman
Matt Bruce
Marshall Roch
Caleb Meredith
Jake Murzy
Adam Miskiewicz
Saad Ismail
