Summary:
- Enables async/await in .babelrc and transformer.js
- Adds regenerator to package.json. Users still need to explicitly require the regenerator runtime -- this is so that you only pay for what you use.
- Update AsyncStorage examples in UIExplorer to use async/await
- Update promise tests in UIExplorer to use async/await in addition to the promise API
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1765
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Summary:
Because we don't want to integrate Animated inside of the core of React, we can only pass Animated.Value to styles of <Animated.View>. TouchableOpacity unfortunately used cloneElement. This means that we should have asked every single call site to replace their children to Animated.View. This isn't great.
The other solution is to stop using cloneElement and instead wrap the children inside of an <Animated.View>. This has many advantages:
- We no longer use cloneElement so we're no longer messing up with elements that are not our own.
- Refs are now working correctly for children elements
- No longer need to enforce that there's only one child and that this child is a native element
The downside is that we're introducing a <View> into the hierarchy. Sadly with CSS there is no way to have a View that doesn't affect layout. What we need to do is to remove the inner <View> and transfer all the styles to the TouchableOpacity. It is annoying but fortunately a pretty mechanical process.
I think that having a wrapper is the best solution. I will investigate to see if we can make wrappers on TouchableHighliht and TouchableWithoutFeedback as well.
**Upgrade Path:**
If the child is a View, move the style of the View to TouchableOpacity and remove the View itself.
```
<TouchableOpacity onPress={...}>
<View style={...}>
...
</View>
</TouchableOpacity>
-->
<TouchableOpacity onPress={...} style={...}>
...
</TouchableOpacity>
```
If the child is an Image or Text, on all the examples at Facebook it worked without any change. But it is a great idea to double check them anyway.
Summary:
Get the system font instead of Helvetica programmatically and add a virtual fontName called "System" that defaults to whatever the current system font is.
#1611
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1635
Github Author: LYK <dalinaum@gmail.com>
Summary:
Remove layout-only views. Works by checking properties against a list of known properties that only affect layout. The `RCTShadowView` hierarchy still has a 1:1 correlation with the JS nodes.
This works by adjusting the tags and indices in `manageChildren`. For example, if JS told us to insert tag 1 at index 0 and tag 1 is layout-only with children whose tags are 2 and 3, we adjust it so we insert tags 2 and 3 at indices 0 and 1. This keeps changes out of `RCTView` and `RCTScrollView`. In order to simplify this logic, view moves are now processed as view removals followed by additions. A move from index 0 to 1 is recorded as a removal of view at indices 0 and 1 and an insertion of tags 1 and 2 at indices 0 and 1. Of course, the remaining indices have to be offset to take account for this.
The `collapsible` attribute is a bit of a hack to force `RCTScrollView` to always have one child. This was easier than rethinking out the logic there, but we could change this later.
Summary:
Remove layout-only views. Works by checking properties against a list of known properties that only affect layout. The `RCTShadowView` hierarchy still has a 1:1 correlation with the JS nodes.
This works by adjusting the tags and indices in `manageChildren`. For example, if JS told us to insert tag 1 at index 0 and tag 1 is layout-only with children whose tags are 2 and 3, we adjust it so we insert tags 2 and 3 at indices 0 and 1. This keeps changes out of `RCTView` and `RCTScrollView`. In order to simplify this logic, view moves are now processed as view removals followed by additions. A move from index 0 to 1 is recorded as a removal of view at indices 0 and 1 and an insertion of tags 1 and 2 at indices 0 and 1. Of course, the remaining indices have to be offset to take account for this.
The `collapsible` attribute is a bit of a hack to force `RCTScrollView` to always have one child. This was easier than rethinking out the logic there, but we could change this later.
@public
Test Plan: There are tests in `RCTUIManagerTests.m` that test the tag- and index-manipulation logic works. There are various scenarios including add-only, remove-only, and move. In addition, two scenario tests verify that the optimization works by checking the number of views and shadow views after various situations happen.
Summary:
@public
For some weird reason sometimes displayName is undefined on the OSS tests, manually
set it for now to unbreak the tests.
Test Plan: Run the tests on OSS
Summary:
@public
The test file is getting compiled when hitting cmd+R which fails for 64-bit
devices even if not trying to run tests. Change back to runtime check to fix.
Test Plan:
cmd+R works for iPhone 6, cmd+U fails as expected on iPhone 6, works
for iPhone 5
Summary:
@public
I've increased the warning levels in the OSS frameworks, which caught a bunch of minor issues. I also fixed some new errors in Xcode 7 relating to designated initializers and TLS security.
Test Plan:
* Test the sample apps and make sure they still work.
* Run tests.
Summary:
@public
`[Bridge] Add support for JS async functions to RCT_EXPORT_METHOD` was imported but broke some internal code, reverting the `MessageQueue` that caused the issues and add a test, since the method is not used yet.
Test Plan: Run the test o/
Pieter De Baets
Pieter De Baets
Alexey Lang
Tadeu Zagallo
Spencer Ahrens
Nick Lockwood
James Ide
lh_wang
Christopher Chedeau
Alex Akers
LYK
KJlmfe
chaceliang
Adam Ernst
