Summary:
This should fix the failing ImageSnapshotTest that was added to the IntegrationTests for iOS and tvOS.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/12391
Differential Revision: D4578345
Pulled By: javache
fbshipit-source-id: 13ff305276c46256fcdbb9fc070a8c08cdc0dd0a
Summary: Now layout direction (LTR or LTR) can be specified not only for whole app but also for view subtree via `direction` style property.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D4510206
fbshipit-source-id: 4e56c5886b6e42f2343165eb76be897e681c5ba4
Summary:
**Motivation**
Ability to customize slider colors is desirable to match the brand. Currently iOS allows using images for slider parts, but android doesn't have any customization options. This PR adds support for customizing `thumbTintColor`, `trackTintColor` and `progressTintColor`.
**Test plan (required)**
Run UIExplorer example with the changes and verify everything works fine.
cc brentvatne
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/11946
Differential Revision: D4427474
fbshipit-source-id: ec3a38db600bac6108691a4cfa15e2409143b9f3
Summary:
* Motivation *
Second PR for Apple TV support.
* Test plan *
Apple TV tests have been added to scripts/objc-test.sh
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/10227
Differential Revision: D3974064
Pulled By: javache
fbshipit-source-id: 36dffb4517efa489e40fa713a30655d1d76ef646
Summary: Move all JS to a js/ subfolder so we get some overview of this folder again.
Reviewed By: bestander
Differential Revision: D3542598
fbshipit-source-id: 7637133fe4152f4d39e461b443b38510272d5bc8
Summary:Fixes #6735
On font sizes smaller than 20, iOS will swap SystemFont to SF version optimised for smaller sizes which does not have ultralight and thin. That results in ultralight and light example to be rendered with the same weight.
Bumping to `20` makes it render differently as per below screenshot https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/2464966/14622260/0789e500-05c9-11e6-920a-8c948a5b79b4.png
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7044
Differential Revision: D3212565
Pulled By: mkonicek
fb-gh-sync-id: 5ffad136c7f4126c271366640c89673f30a99218
fbshipit-source-id: 5ffad136c7f4126c271366640c89673f30a99218
Summary:
public
Blending semitransparent pixels against their background is fairly a fairly expensive operation on mobile GPUs. To reduce blending, React Native has a system called "background color propagation", where the background color of parent views is automatically inherited by child views unless explicitly overridden. This means that translucent pixels can be blended directly against a known background color, avoiding the need to do this dynamically on the GPU.
In practice, this is only useful for views that do their own drawing, which is basically just `<Image/>` and `<Text/>` components, and for image components it only really matters when the image has an alpha component.
The automatic background propagation is a bit of a hack, and often does the wrong thing - for example if a view overflows its bounds, or if it overlaps a sibling, the background color will often be incorrect and need to be manually disabled. Because the only place that it provides a significant performance benefit is for text, this diff disables the behavior for everything except `<Text/>` nodes. It might still be useful for `<Image/>` nodes too, but looking through the examples in UIExplorer, the number of places where it does the wrong thing for images outnumbers the cases where it provides significant reduction in blending.
Note that this diff does not prevent you from eliminating blending on image components by manually setting an opaque background color, nor does it stop you from disabling color propagation on text components by manually setting a transparent background.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D2811031
fb-gh-sync-id: 2eb08918c9031c582a3dd2d40e04b27a663dac82
Summary:
public
The iOS border rendering code did not follow the CSS spec in cases where the sum of adjacent border radii was greater than the width of the view, resulting in drawing glitches such as pixel smear and borders appearing stretched or squashed.
This diff brings our implementation closer to spec-compliance in these cases. I also fixed a longstanding issue with ghostly diagonal lines appearing at the corners due to antialiasing rounding errors!
Fixes
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/1572https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/2089https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/4604
Reviewed By: tadeuzagallo
Differential Revision: D2811249
fb-gh-sync-id: c3dd2721e0a01a432fa4dc78daa05680595edd08
Summary:
Support dashed and dotted border styles on iOS
public
Reviewed By: nicklockwood
Differential Revision: D2773579
fb-gh-sync-id: f4b99943f38e849602295a86bdb1780c0abbc8e8
Summary: this change will allow the slider to have different thumb images .
Sets an image for the thumb. It only supports static images
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/3849
Reviewed By: svcscm
Differential Revision: D2665699
Pulled By: nicklockwood
fb-gh-sync-id: 3a767e43170074e2419067d5c8eae61668ebb5e9
Summary: public
Re-recorded UIExplorerIntegrationTests::testTextExample snapshot to include
new opaque nested text example.
Reviewed By: nicklockwood
Differential Revision: D2610584
fb-gh-sync-id: 119dbf381f0b412ed8705597b03b367c5098b80d
Summary: public
If the frame is set, or the image view moves to a window, we should attempt to load the "real" image. The sizing logic shouldn't kick in if we're only displaying the default image.
Resolves https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/3460.
Reviewed By: tadeuzagallo
Differential Revision: D2555316
fb-gh-sync-id: c0c13070ee080bad2b30ca01d9d5173bead406e3
Summary:
Get the system font instead of Helvetica programmatically and add a virtual fontName called "System" that defaults to whatever the current system font is.
#1611
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1635
Github Author: LYK <dalinaum@gmail.com>
Summary:
Remove layout-only views. Works by checking properties against a list of known properties that only affect layout. The `RCTShadowView` hierarchy still has a 1:1 correlation with the JS nodes.
This works by adjusting the tags and indices in `manageChildren`. For example, if JS told us to insert tag 1 at index 0 and tag 1 is layout-only with children whose tags are 2 and 3, we adjust it so we insert tags 2 and 3 at indices 0 and 1. This keeps changes out of `RCTView` and `RCTScrollView`. In order to simplify this logic, view moves are now processed as view removals followed by additions. A move from index 0 to 1 is recorded as a removal of view at indices 0 and 1 and an insertion of tags 1 and 2 at indices 0 and 1. Of course, the remaining indices have to be offset to take account for this.
The `collapsible` attribute is a bit of a hack to force `RCTScrollView` to always have one child. This was easier than rethinking out the logic there, but we could change this later.
Summary:
Remove layout-only views. Works by checking properties against a list of known properties that only affect layout. The `RCTShadowView` hierarchy still has a 1:1 correlation with the JS nodes.
This works by adjusting the tags and indices in `manageChildren`. For example, if JS told us to insert tag 1 at index 0 and tag 1 is layout-only with children whose tags are 2 and 3, we adjust it so we insert tags 2 and 3 at indices 0 and 1. This keeps changes out of `RCTView` and `RCTScrollView`. In order to simplify this logic, view moves are now processed as view removals followed by additions. A move from index 0 to 1 is recorded as a removal of view at indices 0 and 1 and an insertion of tags 1 and 2 at indices 0 and 1. Of course, the remaining indices have to be offset to take account for this.
The `collapsible` attribute is a bit of a hack to force `RCTScrollView` to always have one child. This was easier than rethinking out the logic there, but we could change this later.
@public
Test Plan: There are tests in `RCTUIManagerTests.m` that test the tag- and index-manipulation logic works. There are various scenarios including add-only, remove-only, and move. In addition, two scenario tests verify that the optimization works by checking the number of views and shadow views after various situations happen.
dlowder-salesforce
Valentin Shergin
Satyajit Sahoo
Pieter De Baets
Sokovikov
Jacob Parker
Konstantin Raev
Tucker Connelly
Fabian Eichinger
Nick Lockwood
Mike Grabowski
Skotch Vail
Andreas Drivenes
Milen Dzhumerov
Manuel Nakamurakare
Josh Berdine
Justin Spahr-Summers
Pieter De Baets
Alexey Lang
lh_wang
Spencer Ahrens
LYK
KJlmfe
Alexsander Akers
chaceliang
James Ide
Tadeu Zagallo
