Summary:
Adding documentation for the CLI for 2 reasons:
1. It's not immediately clear to most how the CLI is part of `react-native` and not the node module they installed. This begins clarifying.
2. I plan on adding some additional documentation to this section pending an upcoming PR I've discussed with Mike.
screen shot provided:
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/11097
Differential Revision: D4237028
Pulled By: mkonicek
fbshipit-source-id: c1dc50fe1be7f6947a33ee6472b5862306888055
Summary:
As said in #10944, there's not yet some good infos on how to profile the javascript.
I'm adding a mention to two ways of doing it (`react-addons-perf` and chrome profiler), feel free to correct me on this.
I almost added an example for `react-addons-perf` but I'm not sure what's the correct way to use. Here's the way I use it:
```javascript
import Perf from 'react-addons-perf';
....
componentDidMount() {
console.log('start perf tracking');
Perf.start();
setTimeout(() => {
console.log('stop perf tracking');
Perf.stop();
Perf.printExclusive();
}, 10000);
}
...
```
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/10974
Differential Revision: D4221630
Pulled By: mkonicek
fbshipit-source-id: 918f837b9c7169c3dd835e653c78159b801fb946
Summary:
Thanks for submitting a pull request! Please provide enough information so that others can review your pull request:
> **Unless you are a React Native release maintainer and cherry-picking an *existing* commit into a current release, ensure your pull request is targeting the `master` React Native branch.**
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem does the pull request solve?
Prefer **small pull requests**. These are much easier to review and more likely to get merged. Make sure the PR does only one thing, otherwise please split it.
**Test plan (required)**
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes UI.
Make sure tests pass on both Travis and Circle CI.
**Code formatting**
Look around. Match the style of the rest of the codebase. See also the simple [style guide](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guide).
For more info, see
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/10484
Differential Revision: D4057708
Pulled By: javache
fbshipit-source-id: e38216092195e5a38bd3afb43c4521cc4edb66ba
Summary:
P.S, now we have four docs about navigator(s). But from my POV, the content are more or less repeated, and the logic is a little messy. I suggest someone to reforge these docs, in a more vivid and evolutionary way. Thank you!
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9975
Differential Revision: D3907167
Pulled By: JoelMarcey
fbshipit-source-id: 9db05f8a3d70f28c6104e7cc6a2813e7eaa9f6fa
Summary:
We had rendering support for prev links, but we never had any previous links in our metadata. Only next links. This adds that support to both Guides and APIs.
**For guides**: `previous` is manually inserted into the metadata of the actual markdown file.
**For APIs/Components**: `previous` is established via code within `extractDocs.js`
> This isn't totally perfect. For example, the transition from the last guide to the first API/component has a next link from the guide, but not a previous link from the API since the way you get the previous links are different from guides and APIs. But this gets us really close.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/8754
Differential Revision: D3557972
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: e270bb51e7a4f59f61dad28ae0928d27d0af3d4a
Summary:
I spent so much time trying to optimize my JS without noticing this.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/8285
Differential Revision: D3468707
fbshipit-source-id: bd5ff38ca2501891318b4be3c75bdaa10a4c64da
Gant Laborde
Martin Konicek
Emil Guareno
sunnylqm
Joel Marcey
Emilio Srougo
Dan Seethaler
Konstantin Raev
Felix Oghină
Pedro Madruga
Brent Vatne
