Summary:
Currently, the system for mapping JS event handlers to blocks is quite clean on the JS side, but is clunky on the native side. The event property is passed as a boolean, which can then be checked by the native side, and if true, the native side is supposed to send an event via the event dispatcher.
This diff adds the facility to declare the property as a block instead. This means that the event side can simply call the block, and it will automatically send the event. Because the blocks for bubbling and direct events are named differently, we can also use this to generate the event registration data and get rid of the arrays of event names.
The name of the event is inferred from the property name, which means that the property for an event called "load" must be called `onLoad` or the mapping won't work. This can be optionally remapped to a different property name on the view itself if necessary, e.g.
RCT_REMAP_VIEW_PROPERTY(onLoad, loadEventBlock, RCTDirectEventBlock)
If you don't want to use this mechanism then for now it is still possible to declare the property as a BOOL instead and use the old mechanism (this approach is now deprecated however, and may eventually be removed altogether).
Summary:
Our events all follow a common pattern, so there's no good reason why the configuration should be so verbose. This diff eliminates that redundancy, and gives us the freedom to simplify the underlying mechanism in future without further churning the call sites.
Summary:
RCTNetworkImageView and RCTStaticImage had significant overlap in functionality, but each had a different subset of features and bugs.
This diff merges most of the functionality of RCTNetworkImageView into RCTStaticImage, eliminating some bugs in the former, such as constant redrawing when properties were changed.
I've also removed the onLoadAbort event for now (as it wasn't implemented), and renamed the other events to match the web specs for `<img>` and XHMLHttpRequest. The API is essentially what Adobe proposed here: http://blogs.adobe.com/webplatform/2012/01/13/html5-image-progress-events/
The following features have not yet been ported from RCTNetworkImageView:
- Background color compositing. It's not clear that this adds much value and it increases memory consumption, etc.
- Image request cancelling when images are removed from view. Again, it's not clear if this is a huge benefit, but if it is it should be combined with other optimisations, such as unloading offscreen images.
(Note that this only affects the open source fork. For now, internal apps will still use FBNetworkImageView for remote images.)
Nick Lockwood