Summary:
Adds a new maintainers guide, and updates the contributor's guide to be consistent with regards to this new guide.
Some additional style changes made in order to support the display of bot commands. Changed the wording for the "Edit this page on GitHub" link.
Finally, the contributor's guide is now synced to `CONTRIBUTING.md` on the repo.
```
cd website && npm start
```
Verify that `CONTRIBUTING.md` is updated whenever the website is regenerated.
Verify everything rendered correctly. Expand the details below to see screenshots.
<details>
</details>
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/15202
Differential Revision: D5494246
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: e28d5624d1e4795e212f10e8d5713d91a0eae15f
Summary:
Consolidate tips on CONTRIBUTING.md, and reduce the wall of text when opening a new issue. Hoping this will encourage more people to read through the text.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/14518
Differential Revision: D5250443
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 91213c4ceca12225d9f54d1e1e81e020c6e463b3
Summary:
I've noticed many pull requests are opened with a very short description that fails to explain the motivation behind the PR, and many more forego providing a test plan. With this PR, I am shortening the template in order to provide concise instructions that provide the essential steps above the fold in the "Open a pull request" composer window.
- We need people to open a PR against master, not stable. The exact reason for this is not important and providing an explanation takes away from other more important points.
- Test plans are essential, but their requirement appears below the fold in the current template.
- More PRs could use tests.
- Make a point of asking PR authors to follow up on CI test failures.
- The composer does not parse Markdown into HTML. Markdown is pretty readable as is, but using reference links instead of inline links should help with readability.
I observed that it will only display the first 8 lines of the PR template above the fold. Seeing t
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/12958
Differential Revision: D4718294
Pulled By: mkonicek
fbshipit-source-id: b19a29e5ed73fb78d09c7de17625b1883590075c
Summary:
We've been getting a lot of documentation PRs opened against `0.29-stable`, `0.30-stable`, and so on, instead of `master`. This is because our doc site is also based on RN release cuts, so clicking on the "Edit on GitHub" links on a document will take you to the markdown source for that release branch instead of the latest doc on `master`.
See #9095 for an example of such a PR.
In this PR we edit the link to say View on GitHub. Though it may not prevent PRs from being opened against a release branch, removing the "Edit" CTA may help in this regard.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9149
Differential Revision: D3664368
Pulled By: vjeux
fbshipit-source-id: 395c0813f736bfbe1be4b4fb1182f9060169365d
Summary:
Make it more obvious that pull requests should generally target the `master` branch. Provide visible clarity in both the `CONTRIBUTING.md` and the actual pull request template.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/8748
Differential Revision: D3566827
fbshipit-source-id: 6326f18b93594e928b1c4e0d09a739a8ccedaa62
Summary:
We got a lot of PRs on stable branches recently, this adds a note about that in CONTRIBUTING that (hopefully) people will read.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/8209
Differential Revision: D3454813
fbshipit-source-id: 4f972d9e5edc1f13b249d9f7a627f84ba9826a0a
Summary:
**motivation**
Lots of people does not sure what to do after a PR.
common questions like:
* should I keep rebasing this PR to the latest master branch ?
* should I keep squashing all commits in a PR into single one?
This may clear it a bit and makes people less nervous 😱
**Test plan (required)**
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/8081
Differential Revision: D3424076
fbshipit-source-id: 6c5f1b0b2f0bee03c647c2f8cad00b788130a5fc
Summary:Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem does the pull request solve?
> When vjeux [asked me how the documentation changes looked](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/6423#issuecomment-195608638), it wasn't obvious to me how to build and view them locally. So, I thought it might be a good idea to add instructions to the contributing document.
I was able to run the website locally when working on PR #6423 but am no longer able to now. I have since updated my local repo with a `git pull`. I've deleted the node_modules directories in both the root and website folders, rebuilding both. Still, I get the following error when I run `npm start` within the website directory (problem with the ES2015 compiling?)...
```bash
**/react-native/website/server/convert.js:134
.filter(key => key.startsWith('RN_'))
^^
SyntaxError: Unexpected token =>
at exports.runInThisContext (vm.js:73:16)
at Module._compile (
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/6510
Differential Revision: D3070560
Pulled By: vjeux
fb-gh-sync-id: 6d200bb545d0ce357500cd666dd400ec82fafa92
shipit-source-id: 6d200bb545d0ce357500cd666dd400ec82fafa92
Summary:- Simplified the PR and Issue template to make them easier to read.
- Add a very simple guide for reviewing PRs (cc bestander, feel free to add to this)
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/6295
Differential Revision: D3011905
fb-gh-sync-id: 4929921690a6996e574e6b152a9dd41087cfffdc
shipit-source-id: 4929921690a6996e574e6b152a9dd41087cfffdc
Hector Ramos
Héctor Ramos
Fadil Sutomo
Joel Marcey
Janic Duplessis
zxcpoiu
Chris Geirman
Martin Konicek
James Ide
Max
Martin Konicek
Brent Vatne
Dmitry
John Yeglinski
Brent Vatne
Spencer Ahrens
Tadeu Zagallo
Adam Barth
Spencer Ahrens
Christopher Chedeau
Christopher Chedeau
