Summary:
Started from here - https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/1120. Most functionality for annotations were missing so I started implementing and somehow got caught up until the entire thing was done.
2 new events:
- callout presses (left / right)
- annotation presses
6 new properties for annotations:
- hasLeftCallout
- hasRightCallout
- onLeftCalloutPress
- onRightCalloutPress
- animateDrop
- id
1 new property for MapView
- onAnnotationPress
---
Now the important thing is, that I implemented all of this the way "I would do it". I am not sure this is the 'reacty' way so please let me know my mistakes 😄
The problem is that there is no real way to identify annotations which makes it difficult to distinguish which one got clicked. The idea is to pass a `id` and whether it has callouts the entire way with the annotation. I had to
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1247
Github Author: David Mohl <me@dave.cx>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
Remove layout-only views. Works by checking properties against a list of known properties that only affect layout. The `RCTShadowView` hierarchy still has a 1:1 correlation with the JS nodes.
This works by adjusting the tags and indices in `manageChildren`. For example, if JS told us to insert tag 1 at index 0 and tag 1 is layout-only with children whose tags are 2 and 3, we adjust it so we insert tags 2 and 3 at indices 0 and 1. This keeps changes out of `RCTView` and `RCTScrollView`. In order to simplify this logic, view moves are now processed as view removals followed by additions. A move from index 0 to 1 is recorded as a removal of view at indices 0 and 1 and an insertion of tags 1 and 2 at indices 0 and 1. Of course, the remaining indices have to be offset to take account for this.
The `collapsible` attribute is a bit of a hack to force `RCTScrollView` to always have one child. This was easier than rethinking out the logic there, but we could change this later.
@public
Test Plan: There are tests in `RCTUIManagerTests.m` that test the tag- and index-manipulation logic works. There are various scenarios including add-only, remove-only, and move. In addition, two scenario tests verify that the optimization works by checking the number of views and shadow views after various situations happen.
Summary:
Added the ``scalesPageToFit`` prop to ``WebView``. This allows ``UIWebView`` to handle user zoom and scale.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1631
Github Author: alvaromb <amedina@apsl.net>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
The activity indicator was treated as a zero-width element without an explicit width. Fill it in so the style dimensions match what is displayed on the screen.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1156
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan:
Render an ActivityIndicator with a background, and see that the background shows up as a square behind the spinner instead of not showing up at all (since it was 0px wide previously).
Summary:
As discussed in our internal group, think this is a fairly easy error to run into so I added some explanation.
@frantic / @vjeux open to better wording here, but I tried to explain how setting the height directly is discouraged and it's probably better to pipe `flex: 1` all the way down.
I didn't regenerate the website since the script assumes some permissions (push permission to master repo) and has some missing npm dependencies (and after fixing that, still had some obscure error :P )
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1633
Github Author: Peter Cottle <pcottle@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
This is a proposal to add `getScrollResponder` to all ScrollView-like components, including ListView. This allows multiple higher-order scroll views to be composed while allowing the owner of the top-level scroll view to call `scrollableView.getScrollResponder().scrollTo(...)` regardless of whether `scrollableView` is a ScrollView, ListView, InvertedScrollView, etc.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/766
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
This is a proposal to add `getScrollResponder` to all ScrollView-like components, including ListView. This allows multiple higher-order scroll views to be composed while allowing the owner of the top-level scroll view to call `scrollableView.getScrollResponder().scrollTo(...)` regardless of whether `scrollableView` is a ScrollView, ListView, InvertedScrollView, etc.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/766
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
@public
This PR adds quite a bit of functionality to the Touchable components, allowing the ms delays of each of the handlers (`onPressIn, onPressOut, onPress, onLongPress`) to be configured.
It adds the following props to `TouchableWithoutFeedback, TouchableOpacity, and TouchableHighlight`:
```javascript
/**
* Delay in ms, from the release of the touch, before onPress is called.
*/
delayOnPress: React.PropTypes.number,
/**
* Delay in ms, from the start of the touch, before onPressIn is called.
*/
delayOnPressIn: React.PropTypes.number,
/**
* Delay in ms, from the release of the touch, before onPressOut is called.
*/
delayOnPressOut: React.PropTypes.number,
/**
* Delay in ms, from onPressIn, before onLongPress is called.
*/
delayOnLongPress: React.PropTypes.number,
```
`TouchableHighlight` also gets an additional set of props:
```javascript
/**
* Delay in ms, from the start of the touch, before the highlight is shown.
*/
delayHighlightShow: React.PropTypes.number,
/**
* Del
...
```
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1255
Github Author: jmstout <git@jmstout.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
ActivityIndicator was forwarding all of its props except `style` to the inner native view. This meant that onLayout would report a zero-sized frame that was relative to the wrapper view instead of the parent of the ActivityIndicator.
This diff adds `onLayout` to the wrapper view instead of the native view.
In general, all components that forward props need to be audited in this manner.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1292
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan: `<ActivityIndicator onLayout={...} />` reports the size of the spinner plus a position relative to its parent view.
Summary:
`TextInput` does not automatically forward all props using the spread operator so we need to explicitly forward the `onLayout` prop.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1296
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan:
Mount a TextInput component with an `onLayout` prop and see that the callback handler is invoked with the TextInput's frame.
Summary:
Pretty sure this shouldn't be @provides
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/837
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
