Summary:
Some of the log statements inside argument blocks in RCTModuleMethod were directly accessing ivars, thereby causing a retain cycle that retained the class. I've fixed this by making the access explicit via weakSelf.
Summary:
The bridge implementation on React Android does not currently support boxed numeric/boolean types (the equivalent of NSNumber arguments on iOS), nor does Java support Objective-C's nil messaging system that transparently casts nil to zero, false, etc for primitive types.
To avoid platform incompatibilities, we now treat all primitive arguments as non-nullable rather than silently converting NSNull -> nil -> 0/false.
We also now enforce that NSNumber * objects must be explicitly marked as `nonnull` (this restriction may be lifted in future if/when Android supports boxed numbers).
Other object types are still assumed to be nullable unless specifically annotated with `nonnull`.
Summary:
This diff adds support for enforcing nullability in the arguments for exported methods.
We previously supported use of the nullable/nonnull attributes on method arguments, but didn't do anything to ensure that they were respected.
Now, if an argument is marked as nonnull, and a null value is sent for that argument, it will display a redbox.
In future, nonnull will be assumed by default, but for now we assume that un-annotated arguments can be null (to avoid breaking existing code).
Summary:
React Native will now use JSONKit if it's already available in the project, otherwise it will fall back to using NSJSONSerialization as before. This provides a small performance boost to JSON parsing in some cases.
Summary:
Remove `RCTGetExecutorID` and `RCTSetExecutorID`, it wasn't used anymore since
the bridge was refactored into `RCTBridge` and `RCTBatchedBridge`.
Summary:
Get the system font instead of Helvetica programmatically and add a virtual fontName called "System" that defaults to whatever the current system font is.
#1611
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1635
Github Author: LYK <dalinaum@gmail.com>
Summary:
Remove layout-only views. Works by checking properties against a list of known properties that only affect layout. The `RCTShadowView` hierarchy still has a 1:1 correlation with the JS nodes.
This works by adjusting the tags and indices in `manageChildren`. For example, if JS told us to insert tag 1 at index 0 and tag 1 is layout-only with children whose tags are 2 and 3, we adjust it so we insert tags 2 and 3 at indices 0 and 1. This keeps changes out of `RCTView` and `RCTScrollView`. In order to simplify this logic, view moves are now processed as view removals followed by additions. A move from index 0 to 1 is recorded as a removal of view at indices 0 and 1 and an insertion of tags 1 and 2 at indices 0 and 1. Of course, the remaining indices have to be offset to take account for this.
The `collapsible` attribute is a bit of a hack to force `RCTScrollView` to always have one child. This was easier than rethinking out the logic there, but we could change this later.
Summary:
Remove layout-only views. Works by checking properties against a list of known properties that only affect layout. The `RCTShadowView` hierarchy still has a 1:1 correlation with the JS nodes.
This works by adjusting the tags and indices in `manageChildren`. For example, if JS told us to insert tag 1 at index 0 and tag 1 is layout-only with children whose tags are 2 and 3, we adjust it so we insert tags 2 and 3 at indices 0 and 1. This keeps changes out of `RCTView` and `RCTScrollView`. In order to simplify this logic, view moves are now processed as view removals followed by additions. A move from index 0 to 1 is recorded as a removal of view at indices 0 and 1 and an insertion of tags 1 and 2 at indices 0 and 1. Of course, the remaining indices have to be offset to take account for this.
The `collapsible` attribute is a bit of a hack to force `RCTScrollView` to always have one child. This was easier than rethinking out the logic there, but we could change this later.
@public
Test Plan: There are tests in `RCTUIManagerTests.m` that test the tag- and index-manipulation logic works. There are various scenarios including add-only, remove-only, and move. In addition, two scenario tests verify that the optimization works by checking the number of views and shadow views after various situations happen.
Summary:
@public
I've increased the warning levels in the OSS frameworks, which caught a bunch of minor issues. I also fixed some new errors in Xcode 7 relating to designated initializers and TLS security.
Test Plan:
* Test the sample apps and make sure they still work.
* Run tests.
Summary:
@public
This is the first of a few diffs that change the way the executors are handled
by the bridge.
For they are just promoted to modules, so they are automatically loaded by the bridge.
Test Plan:
Tested on UIExplorer, Catalyst and MAdMan.
Tested all the 3 executors, everything looks fine.
Nick Lockwood
Spencer Ahrens
Frédéric Sagnes
Tadeu Zagallo
Alex Akers
LYK
chaceliang
Hannes Verlinde