Summary: Updated networking and geolocation to use the new events system.
Reviewed By: bestander
Differential Revision: D3346129
fbshipit-source-id: 957716e54d7af8c4a6783f684098e92e92f19654
Summary: Updated networking and geolocation to use the new events system.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3339945
fbshipit-source-id: 01d307cf8a0aea3a404c87c6205132c42290abb1
Summary: Updated networking and geolocation to use the new events system.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3339945
fbshipit-source-id: f1332fb2aab8560e4783739e223c1f31d583cfcf
Summary: AppState now subclasses NativeEventEmitter instead of using global RCTDeviceEventEmitter.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3310488
fbshipit-source-id: f0116599223f4411307385c0dab683659d8d63b6
Summary:
The `EmitterSubscription.remove()` method was previously calling `this.subscriber.removeSubscription(this)` directly, bypassing the mechanism in `NativeEventEmitter` that keeps track of the number of subscriptions.
This meant that native event modules (subclasses of `RCTEventEmitter`) would keep sending events even after all the listeners had been removed. This wasn't a huge overhead, since these modules are singletons and only send one message over the bridge per event, regardless of the number of listeners, but it's still undesirable.
This fixes the problem by routing the `EmitterSubscription.remove()` method through the `EventEmitter` so that `NativeEventEmitter` can apply the additional native calls.
I've also improved the architecture so that each `NativeEventEmitter` uses its own `EventEmitter`, but they currently all still share the same `EventSubscriptionVendor` so that legacy code which registers events via `RCTDeviceEventEmitter` still works.
Reviewed By: vjeux
Differential Revision: D3292361
fbshipit-source-id: d60e881d50351523d2112473703bea826641cdef
Summary:
This is a solution for the problem I raised in https://www.facebook.com/groups/react.native.community/permalink/768218933313687/
I've added a new native base class, `RCTEventEmitter` as well as an equivalent JS class/module `NativeEventEmitter` (RCTEventEmitter.js and EventEmitter.js were taken already).
Instead of arbitrary modules sending events via `bridge.eventDispatcher`, the idea is that any module that sends events should now subclass `RCTEventEmitter`, and provide an equivalent JS module that subclasses `NativeEventEmitter`.
JS code that wants to observe the events should now observe it via the specific JS module rather than via `RCTDeviceEventEmitter` directly. e.g. to observer a keyboard event, instead of writing:
const RCTDeviceEventEmitter = require('RCTDeviceEventEmitter');
RCTDeviceEventEmitter.addListener('keyboardWillShow', (event) => { ... });
You'd now write:
const Keyboard = require('Keyboard');
Keyboard.addListener('keyboardWillShow', (event) => { ... });
Within a component, you can also use the `Subscribable.Mixin` as you would previously, but instead of:
this.addListenerOn(RCTDeviceEventEmitter, 'keyboardWillShow', ...);
Write:
this.addListenerOn(Keyboard, 'keyboardWillShow', ...);
This approach allows the native `RCTKeyboardObserver` module to be created lazily the first time a listener is added, and to stop sending events when the last listener is removed. It also allows us to validate that the event strings being observed and omitted match the supported events for that module.
As a proof-of-concept, I've converted the `RCTStatusBarManager` and `RCTKeyboardObserver` modules to use the new system. I'll convert the rest in a follow up diff.
For now, the new `NativeEventEmitter` JS module wraps the `RCTDeviceEventEmitter` JS module, and just uses the native `RCTEventEmitter` module for bookkeeping. This allows for full backwards compatibility (code that is observing the event via `RCTDeviceEventEmitter` instead of the specific module will still work as expected, albeit with a warning). Once all legacy calls have been removed, this could be refactored to something more elegant internally, whilst maintaining the same public interface.
Note: currently, all device events still share a single global namespace, since they're really all registered on the same emitter instance internally. We should move away from that as soon as possible because it's not intuitive and will likely lead to strange bugs if people add generic events such as "onChange" or "onError" to their modules (which is common practice for components, where it's not a problem).
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3269966
fbshipit-source-id: 1412daba850cd373020e1086673ba38ef9193050
Pieter De Baets
Nick Lockwood
Konstantin Raev