Summary:
Thanks for submitting a pull request! Please provide enough information so that others can review your pull request:
(You can skip this if you're fixing a typo or adding an app to the Showcase.)
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem does the pull request solve?
Prefer **small pull requests**. These are much easier to review and more likely to get merged. Make sure the PR does only one thing, otherwise please split it.
**Test plan (required)**
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes UI.
Make sure tests pass on both Travis and Circle CI.
**Code formatting**
Look around. Match the style of the rest of the codebase. See also the simple [style guide](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guide).
For more info, see the ["Pull Requests" section of our "Contributing" guidelines](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/mas
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7535
Differential Revision: D3509757
fbshipit-source-id: 70ff6c9c137c766ccb1173921f08571f48cb4f0b
Summary:
I used the reproducible steps as described in origin bug ticket #7987 as test plan.
This has the same contents as PR #8130 but then against master per janicduplessis request.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/8134
Differential Revision: D3491126
fbshipit-source-id: a22669dc998f82b36fbe31d882d0a29f0912e2ee
Summary: Rename the forceRTL to allowRTL so that make it much clear to read. And change a typo.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D3489235
fbshipit-source-id: b9803dfbcda2f764b7e752c9810cfc7a0b9fe39b
Summary: Provide function that could read the language currently used in the app, so the isRTL is using the app current using language to set isRTL.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D3480654
fbshipit-source-id: dea3ef4769296f594f7f32da2961b4fec1b99a7a
Summary: Create isDeviceLanguageRTL function to connect the OS language with isRTL. Now even if a new app could support RTL language, without setting forceRTL at JS side it won't directly change into RTL layout.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D3473109
fbshipit-source-id: ac1410c910e980d44750bb88cad7615febb9e076
Summary:
88c6e7a22b / D3446871 broke the OSS version of React where React.xcodeproj isn't autogenerated.
**Test plan:** UIExplorer example works again.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/8288
Differential Revision: D3466246
Pulled By: javache
fbshipit-source-id: 1240b755b0df54ddfde016d0122640293e50caeb
Summary: This diff build the connection between the native code and js code so that the js could get IsRTL value and us ForceRTL function.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D3447013
fbshipit-source-id: 9f6c7f71cef0add7bd5beb0ba2b1543f0cabc2b3
Summary: Create a module for React Native to get IsRTL information and set ForceRTL function.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D3446871
fbshipit-source-id: 736edf138a89d222818071370ac49dc54bda63b7
Summary:
Issue we were seeing: scrollview would clip its cells when it was resized to 0 height and moved offscreen, but it wouldn't add it back when it was resized and moved back
Why this was happening: scrollview wouldn't rerun its un/clipping logic after the first run unless 1/it has 0x0 frame or 2/it has been scrolled. Neither was happening here.
Fix: run the un/clipping logic when scrollview's frame has been changed since the last clipping.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3436996
fbshipit-source-id: 1a8cfeb72b425fcc80815d30743fa308b9c75ab6
Summary:
We already do this on Android, and it allows uw to avoid doing this global object lookup for every call. Since there's only a couple of global functions we ever call, we should consider caching all of them in the new bridge.
I didn't ValueProtect/ValueUnprotect since these are already globals, and those methods are not exposed on the JSC wrapper.
Reviewed By: mhorowitz
Differential Revision: D3411487
fbshipit-source-id: 7feaf8803665b77d649e84edad875d31c5acee4b
Summary:
Implemented automatic IP detection for iOS, based on #6345 and #6362.
As the previous pull requests did, this works by writing the IP address of the host to a file.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/8091
Differential Revision: D3427657
Pulled By: javache
fbshipit-source-id: 3f534c9b32c4d6fb9615fc2e2c3c3aef421454c5
Summary: Expose the ability to provide extra information to Systrace events from JS. This is specifically useful for instrumenting generic recursive method that are defined completely through their params.
Reviewed By: tadeuzagallo
Differential Revision: D3423595
fbshipit-source-id: 7f2dedf02bf901401a6b391b85b1a0bb6782349c
Summary:
Fix a bug that happens when views are added and removed in the same manageChildren block with a delete animation. What happens is that the inserted view is not inserted at the proper index if the deleted view index is smaller than the inserted one. This is because the view is not immediately removed from the subviews array so we need to offset the insert index for each view that is going to be deleted with an animation and is before the inserted view.
To do this I separated `_removeChildren` into 2 different functions, one for animated delete and one for normal delete. The animated one returns an array of `RCTComponent` that are going to be animated. We can then use this array to offset the insert index.
**Test plan (required)**
Tested that this fixed the bug in an app where I noticed it, also tested the UIExplorer example to make sure LayoutAnimations still worked properly.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7942
Differential Revision: D3417194
Pulled By: bestander
fbshipit-source-id: 9145a783e520c6718dd023a1e006646acb09cb7c
Summary:
Fix a bug that happens when views are added and removed in the same manageChildren block with a delete animation. What happens is that the inserted view is not inserted at the proper index if the deleted view index is smaller than the inserted one. This is because the view is not immediately removed from the subviews array so we need to offset the insert index for each view that is going to be deleted with an animation and is before the inserted view.
To do this I separated `_removeChildren` into 2 different functions, one for animated delete and one for normal delete. The animated one returns an array of `RCTComponent` that are going to be animated. We can then use this array to offset the insert index.
**Test plan (required)**
Tested that this fixed the bug in an app where I noticed it, also tested the UIExplorer example to make sure LayoutAnimations still worked properly.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7942
Differential Revision: D3417194
Pulled By: nicklockwood
fbshipit-source-id: 790f4ac15a8552323b359e6466cecfa80418c63c
Summary: Converted the zIndex property on iOS to NSInteger instead of double. This is consistent with the CSS spec, and helps to simplify the Android implementation.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3411491
fbshipit-source-id: 902ebc29aac39a65f7e8707a28607655f9f5052c
Summary:
After cleaning up JS SourceMap code, these native methods are not needed anymore.
On iOS it saves another 30+ Mb during development.
Reviewed By: javache, astreet
Differential Revision: D3348975
fbshipit-source-id: a68ae9b00b4dbaa374b421029ae676fc69ae5a75
Summary:
This diff implement the CSS z-index for React Native iOS views. We've had numerous pull request for this feature, but they've all attempted to use the `layer.zPosition` property, which is problematic for two reasons:
1. zPosition only affects rendering order, not event processing order. Views with a higher zPosition will appear in front of others in the hierarchy, but won't be the first to receive touch events, and may be blocked by views that are visually behind them.
2. when using a perspective transform matrix, views with a nonzero zPosition will be rendered in a different position due to parallax, which probably isn't desirable.
See https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7825 for further discussion of this problem.
So instead of using `layer.zPosition`, I've implemented this by actually adjusting the order of the subviews within their parent based on the zIndex. This can't be done on the JS side because it would affect layout, which is order-dependent, so I'm doing it inside the view itself.
It works as follows:
1. The `reactSubviews` array is set, whose order matches the order of the JS components and shadowView components, as specified by the UIManager.
2. `didUpdateReactSubviews` is called, which in turn calls `sortedSubviews` (which lazily generates a sorted array of `reactSubviews` by zIndex) and inserts the result into the view.
3. If a subview is added or removed, or the zIndex of any subview is changed, the previous `sortedSubviews` array is cleared and `didUpdateReactSubviews` is called again.
To demonstrate it working, I've modified the UIExplorer example from https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7825
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3365717
fbshipit-source-id: b34aa8bfad577bce023f8af5414f9b974aafd8aa
Summary:
This diff refactors the view update process into two stages:
1. The `reactSubviews` array is set, whose order matches the order of the JS components and shadowView components, as specified by the UIManager.
2. The `didUpdateReactSubviews` method is called, which actually inserts the reactSubviews into the view hierarchy.
This simplifies a lot of the hacks we had for special-case treatment of subviews: In many cases we don't want to actually insert `reactSubviews` into the parentView, and we had a bunch of component-specific solutions for that (typically overriding all of the reactSubviews methods to store views in an array). Now, we can simply override the `didUpdateReactSubviews` method for those views to do nothing, or do something different.
Reviewed By: wwjholmes
Differential Revision: D3396594
fbshipit-source-id: 92fc56fd31db0cfc66aac3d1634a4d4ae3903085
Summary:
This is a followup for "Add Shortcut "Double R" to Reload JS in iOS".
Please see the previous two revisions:[[ D3371536 | D3371536 ]], [[ D3343907 | D3343907 ]]
In previous revisions, we only tested with the iOS UIExplorer app, without testing in the iOS Catalyst app, where the key shortcuts we added are always invoked in TextInput components. It's due to a bug with the `UIApplicationDelegate`. Just fix this bug in this revision and successfully tested in the Catalyst app.
Reviewed By: mkonicek
Differential Revision: D3391045
fbshipit-source-id: 8b76fbfe7592218b02dd22502d25eebbc59f3cbc
Summary:
As per https://twitter.com/olebegemann/status/738656134731599872, our use of "main thread" to mean "main queue" seems to be unsafe.
This diff replaces the `NSThread.isMainQueue` checks with dispatch_get_specific(), which is the recommended approach.
I've also replaced all use of "MainThread" terminology with "MainQueue", and taken the opportunity to deprecate the "sync" param of `RCTExecuteOnMainThread()`, which, while we do still use it in a few places, is incredibly unsafe and shouldn't be encouraged.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3384910
fbshipit-source-id: ea7c216013372267b82eb25a38db5eb4cd46a089
Summary:
The `removeClippedSubviews` feature works by umounting views from the hierarchy if they move outside the bounds of their parent.
This was previously restricted to clipping views which had `overflow: hidden`, since we cannot efficiently check whether the subviews of a view go outside its bounds, and so clipping a view that has potentially overflowing children becomes an expensive recursive operation.
The problem with this is that `overflow: visible` is the default, and it's not well documented nor easy to tell that `removeClippedSubviews` has been set up correctly (i.e. with all children having `overflow: hidden`).
When I checked, I found that `removeClippedSubviews` was not working on any of the examples in UIExplorer, nor in several of our internal apps, because the views inside the ListView has `overflow: visible`. This was probably caused by an infra change at some point, but I'm not sure how long it's been broken.
It's vanishingly unlikely that anyone would ever deliberately want subviews to overflow their bounds in this scenario, so I've updated the logic to simply ignore the `overflow` property and assume that views should be clipped if you are using the `removeClippedSubviews` property on the parent.
Cons / Breaking changes: in some rare circumstances, a view might get clipped prematurely if its parent is outside the scrollview bounds, but it itself is inside. This doesn't occur in practice in any of our products, and could be worked around with additional wrapper views if it did.
Pros: removeClippedSubviews is now much easier to use, and much more likely to work as intended, so most list-based apps should see a performance improvement.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3385316
fbshipit-source-id: 1c0064a4c21340a971ba80d794062a356ae6cfb3
Summary:
RCTScrollView was calling `dockClosestSectionHeader` in `reactBridgeDidFinishTransaction`, which triggers a layout update. The reason for this was in case the `stickyHeaderIndexes` property was updated, which would require the headers to be adjusted.
However, doing this in `reactBridgeDidFinishTransaction` had the affect of causing `layoutSubviews` to be called repeatedly every frame even if nothing had changed and the scrollview wasn't moving, which was especially expensive when combined with the `removeClippedSubviews` logic, that loops through every view to calculate if it needs to be clipped.
This fix moves the `dockClosestSectionHeader` call into `didUpdateProps`, and checks that the stickyHeaderIndexes have actually changed before calling it.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3387607
fbshipit-source-id: c71e00c6fac48337a63d7fee7c7c23e016acf24e