Summary:
The `ScrollView` component tells the native side the subview indices of the views to make sticky. The problem is that, once layout-only views are collapsed, the indices are no longer reflective of the original views to make stick to the top.
Summary:
Android WebView now supports the prop "injectedJavaScript", too.
It's time to rename "injectedJavascriptIOS" to "injectedJavaScript" for API
consistency between IOS and Android.
Summary:
Remove layout-only views. Works by checking properties against a list of known properties that only affect layout. The `RCTShadowView` hierarchy still has a 1:1 correlation with the JS nodes.
This works by adjusting the tags and indices in `manageChildren`. For example, if JS told us to insert tag 1 at index 0 and tag 1 is layout-only with children whose tags are 2 and 3, we adjust it so we insert tags 2 and 3 at indices 0 and 1. This keeps changes out of `RCTView` and `RCTScrollView`. In order to simplify this logic, view moves are now processed as view removals followed by additions. A move from index 0 to 1 is recorded as a removal of view at indices 0 and 1 and an insertion of tags 1 and 2 at indices 0 and 1. Of course, the remaining indices have to be offset to take account for this.
The `collapsible` attribute is a bit of a hack to force `RCTScrollView` to always have one child. This was easier than rethinking out the logic there, but we could change this later.
Summary:
@public
The API and implementation of `shouldInjectAJAXHandler` is very opinionated, and it does not solve many of the use cases that we'd like to address.
Since `shouldInjectAJAXHandler` is basically juts injecting JS to the web page, we should let developer inject whatever JS that address different issues that they want to fix.
Test Plan:
Test this snippet at <Playground />
```
<WebView
url="http://www.facebook.com"
injectedJavascriptIOS="document.body.style.border='solid 10px red'"
/>
```
Summary:
Hi,
I've updated the NavigatorIOS component to allow setting the translucent property.
usage is:
```
<NavigatorIOS
translucent={false}
/>
```
This is my first contrib to react-native, so apologies if I've missed something.
Cheers,
Owen
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1273
Github Author: Owen Kelly <owen@novede.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
Started from here - https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/1120. Most functionality for annotations were missing so I started implementing and somehow got caught up until the entire thing was done.
2 new events:
- callout presses (left / right)
- annotation presses
6 new properties for annotations:
- hasLeftCallout
- hasRightCallout
- onLeftCalloutPress
- onRightCalloutPress
- animateDrop
- id
1 new property for MapView
- onAnnotationPress
---
Now the important thing is, that I implemented all of this the way "I would do it". I am not sure this is the 'reacty' way so please let me know my mistakes 😄
The problem is that there is no real way to identify annotations which makes it difficult to distinguish which one got clicked. The idea is to pass a `id` and whether it has callouts the entire way with the annotation. I had to
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1247
Github Author: David Mohl <me@dave.cx>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
Remove layout-only views. Works by checking properties against a list of known properties that only affect layout. The `RCTShadowView` hierarchy still has a 1:1 correlation with the JS nodes.
This works by adjusting the tags and indices in `manageChildren`. For example, if JS told us to insert tag 1 at index 0 and tag 1 is layout-only with children whose tags are 2 and 3, we adjust it so we insert tags 2 and 3 at indices 0 and 1. This keeps changes out of `RCTView` and `RCTScrollView`. In order to simplify this logic, view moves are now processed as view removals followed by additions. A move from index 0 to 1 is recorded as a removal of view at indices 0 and 1 and an insertion of tags 1 and 2 at indices 0 and 1. Of course, the remaining indices have to be offset to take account for this.
The `collapsible` attribute is a bit of a hack to force `RCTScrollView` to always have one child. This was easier than rethinking out the logic there, but we could change this later.
@public
Test Plan: There are tests in `RCTUIManagerTests.m` that test the tag- and index-manipulation logic works. There are various scenarios including add-only, remove-only, and move. In addition, two scenario tests verify that the optimization works by checking the number of views and shadow views after various situations happen.
Summary:
Added the ``scalesPageToFit`` prop to ``WebView``. This allows ``UIWebView`` to handle user zoom and scale.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1631
Github Author: alvaromb <amedina@apsl.net>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
The activity indicator was treated as a zero-width element without an explicit width. Fill it in so the style dimensions match what is displayed on the screen.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1156
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan:
Render an ActivityIndicator with a background, and see that the background shows up as a square behind the spinner instead of not showing up at all (since it was 0px wide previously).
Summary:
As discussed in our internal group, think this is a fairly easy error to run into so I added some explanation.
@frantic / @vjeux open to better wording here, but I tried to explain how setting the height directly is discouraged and it's probably better to pipe `flex: 1` all the way down.
I didn't regenerate the website since the script assumes some permissions (push permission to master repo) and has some missing npm dependencies (and after fixing that, still had some obscure error :P )
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1633
Github Author: Peter Cottle <pcottle@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
This is a proposal to add `getScrollResponder` to all ScrollView-like components, including ListView. This allows multiple higher-order scroll views to be composed while allowing the owner of the top-level scroll view to call `scrollableView.getScrollResponder().scrollTo(...)` regardless of whether `scrollableView` is a ScrollView, ListView, InvertedScrollView, etc.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/766
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
@public
This PR adds quite a bit of functionality to the Touchable components, allowing the ms delays of each of the handlers (`onPressIn, onPressOut, onPress, onLongPress`) to be configured.
It adds the following props to `TouchableWithoutFeedback, TouchableOpacity, and TouchableHighlight`:
```javascript
/**
* Delay in ms, from the release of the touch, before onPress is called.
*/
delayOnPress: React.PropTypes.number,
/**
* Delay in ms, from the start of the touch, before onPressIn is called.
*/
delayOnPressIn: React.PropTypes.number,
/**
* Delay in ms, from the release of the touch, before onPressOut is called.
*/
delayOnPressOut: React.PropTypes.number,
/**
* Delay in ms, from onPressIn, before onLongPress is called.
*/
delayOnLongPress: React.PropTypes.number,
```
`TouchableHighlight` also gets an additional set of props:
```javascript
/**
* Delay in ms, from the start of the touch, before the highlight is shown.
*/
delayHighlightShow: React.PropTypes.number,
/**
* Del
...
```
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1255
Github Author: jmstout <git@jmstout.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
ActivityIndicator was forwarding all of its props except `style` to the inner native view. This meant that onLayout would report a zero-sized frame that was relative to the wrapper view instead of the parent of the ActivityIndicator.
This diff adds `onLayout` to the wrapper view instead of the native view.
In general, all components that forward props need to be audited in this manner.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1292
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan: `<ActivityIndicator onLayout={...} />` reports the size of the spinner plus a position relative to its parent view.
Summary:
`TextInput` does not automatically forward all props using the spread operator so we need to explicitly forward the `onLayout` prop.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1296
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan:
Mount a TextInput component with an `onLayout` prop and see that the callback handler is invoked with the TextInput's frame.
Summary:
Pretty sure this shouldn't be @provides
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/837
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Nathan Spaun
Hedger Wang
Alex Akers
Rui Chen
Nick Lockwood
Owen Kelly
Kevin Gozali
chaceliang
David Mohl
Olivia Bishop
Felix Oghină
Andrei Coman
alvaromb
James Ide
Peter Cottle
Prathamesh Sonpatki
Gabe Levi
Adam Krell
Gabe Levi
Spencer Ahrens
Alex Kotliarskyi
jmstout
Christopher Chedeau
Krzysztof Magiera
Stan Chollet
Changgeng Li
Georgiy Kassabli
Ben Alpert
