Summary: This removes `node_modules/react` from the list of directories that are used for haste module resolutions. Modules required from React are now imported with `require('react/lib/…')`.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D3509863
fbshipit-source-id: 32cd34e2b8496f0a6676dbe6bb1eacc18124c01e
Summary:
Ensure all `props` have documentation. Add more details to current `props`.
Provide more information to the API in general.
> Would like to try to integrate the React Native Web Player for the initial
> example, but not right now.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/8341
Differential Revision: D3475105
Pulled By: caabernathy
fbshipit-source-id: 00ad30b2359831740715517278bec1d0231e089d
Summary:Fix bad wording in the docs change I did in #6534
cc mkonicek
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/6598
Differential Revision: D3085957
Pulled By: vjeux
fb-gh-sync-id: 2b45ac72acf089be6cf8e815aac430a2ce9d08ed
shipit-source-id: 2b45ac72acf089be6cf8e815aac430a2ce9d08ed
Summary:The docs for touchEvents was really unclear and assumed that you know what `pointer-events` does in CSS. This is confusing especially for native developers, see [this issue](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/36068392/set-userinteractionenabled-false-in-react-native/36096413) on stack overflow.
I added a short description to the prop and all the possible enum values and made it so the comment that explain why it is a prop and not a style doesn't appear on the website as it is not really relevant there.
**Test plan (required)**
Tested by running the website locally.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/6534
Differential Revision: D3075198
Pulled By: mkonicek
fb-gh-sync-id: 57c8444fc83a31599dc872c361b142531cdd4885
shipit-source-id: 57c8444fc83a31599dc872c361b142531cdd4885
Summary:New prop `hitSlop` allows extending the touch area of Touchable components. This makes it easier to touch small buttons without needing to change your styles.
It takes `top`, `bottom`, `left`, and `right` same as the `pressRetentionOffset` prop. When a touch is moved, `hitSlop` is combined with `pressRetentionOffset` to determine how far the touch can move off the button before deactivating the button.
On Android I had to add a new file `ids.xml` to generate a unique ID to use for the tag where I store the `hitSlop` state. The iOS side is more straightforward.
terribleben worked on the iOS and JS parts of this diff.
Fixes#110
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/5720
Differential Revision: D2941671
Pulled By: androidtrunkagent
fb-gh-sync-id: 07e3eb8b6a36eebf76968fdaac3c6ac335603194
shipit-source-id: 07e3eb8b6a36eebf76968fdaac3c6ac335603194
Summary:
public
This diff improves the implementation of 3D touch by adding a `forceTouchAvailable` constant to View that can be used to check if the feature is supported.
I've also added an example of how you can use the `force` property of the touch event to measure touch pressure in React Native.
Reviewed By: vjeux
Differential Revision: D2864926
fb-gh-sync-id: 754c54989212ce4e4863716ceaba59673f0bb29d
Summary: public
RCTUIManager is a public module with several useful methods, however, unlike most such modules, it does not have a JS wrapper that would allow it to be required directly.
Besides making it more cumbersome to use, this also makes it impossible to modify the UIManager API, or smooth over differences between platforms in the JS layer without breaking all of the call sites.
This diff adds a simple JS wrapper file for the UIManager module to make it easier to work with.
Reviewed By: tadeuzagallo
Differential Revision: D2700348
fb-gh-sync-id: dd9030eface100b1baf756da11bae355dc0f266f
Summary: Got bitten lately by View.js returning different component based on `__DEV__`
Adding a warning in the render method that should make it cleaner in the future that this method is not actually being used in prod mode.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/4322
Reviewed By: svcscm
Differential Revision: D2691880
Pulled By: vjeux
fb-gh-sync-id: 119672740969a857ab6288b7914d52e8d40a1d95
Summary: public
In a previous diff I've removed a need for using View attributes in requireNativeComponent. Thanks to that we can now use requireNativeComponent in View module. In a follow up diff I'll be getting rid of ReactNativeViewAttributes.
Reviewed By: sahrens
Differential Revision: D2676088
fb-gh-sync-id: d5d6e50f4629bd7982b90f3496e1fd22078e96a8
Summary:
We currently wait until after views have been updated on the main thread before sending layout events. This means that any code that relies on those events to update the UI will lag the atual layout by at least one frame.
This changes the RCTUIManager to send the event immediately after layout has occured on the shadow thread. This noticably improves the respinsiveness of the layout example in UIExplorer, which now updates the dimension labels immediately instead of waiting until after the layout animation has completed.
Summary:
Remove layout-only views. Works by checking properties against a list of known properties that only affect layout. The `RCTShadowView` hierarchy still has a 1:1 correlation with the JS nodes.
This works by adjusting the tags and indices in `manageChildren`. For example, if JS told us to insert tag 1 at index 0 and tag 1 is layout-only with children whose tags are 2 and 3, we adjust it so we insert tags 2 and 3 at indices 0 and 1. This keeps changes out of `RCTView` and `RCTScrollView`. In order to simplify this logic, view moves are now processed as view removals followed by additions. A move from index 0 to 1 is recorded as a removal of view at indices 0 and 1 and an insertion of tags 1 and 2 at indices 0 and 1. Of course, the remaining indices have to be offset to take account for this.
The `collapsible` attribute is a bit of a hack to force `RCTScrollView` to always have one child. This was easier than rethinking out the logic there, but we could change this later.
Summary:
Remove layout-only views. Works by checking properties against a list of known properties that only affect layout. The `RCTShadowView` hierarchy still has a 1:1 correlation with the JS nodes.
This works by adjusting the tags and indices in `manageChildren`. For example, if JS told us to insert tag 1 at index 0 and tag 1 is layout-only with children whose tags are 2 and 3, we adjust it so we insert tags 2 and 3 at indices 0 and 1. This keeps changes out of `RCTView` and `RCTScrollView`. In order to simplify this logic, view moves are now processed as view removals followed by additions. A move from index 0 to 1 is recorded as a removal of view at indices 0 and 1 and an insertion of tags 1 and 2 at indices 0 and 1. Of course, the remaining indices have to be offset to take account for this.
The `collapsible` attribute is a bit of a hack to force `RCTScrollView` to always have one child. This was easier than rethinking out the logic there, but we could change this later.
@public
Test Plan: There are tests in `RCTUIManagerTests.m` that test the tag- and index-manipulation logic works. There are various scenarios including add-only, remove-only, and move. In addition, two scenario tests verify that the optimization works by checking the number of views and shadow views after various situations happen.
Summary:
ActivityIndicator was forwarding all of its props except `style` to the inner native view. This meant that onLayout would report a zero-sized frame that was relative to the wrapper view instead of the parent of the ActivityIndicator.
This diff adds `onLayout` to the wrapper view instead of the native view.
In general, all components that forward props need to be audited in this manner.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1292
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan: `<ActivityIndicator onLayout={...} />` reports the size of the spinner plus a position relative to its parent view.
Summary:
Simply add an `onLayout` callback to a native view component, and the callback
will be invoked with the current layout information when the view is mounted and
whenever the layout changes.
The only limitation is that scroll position and other stuff the layout system
isn't aware of is not taken into account. This is because onLayout events
wouldn't be triggered for these changes and if they are desired they should be
tracked separately (e.g. with `onScroll`) and combined.
Also fixes some bugs with LayoutAnimation callbacks.
@public
Test Plan:
- Run new LayoutEventsExample in UIExplorer and see it work correctly.
- New integration test passes internally (IntegrationTest project seems busted).
- New jest test case passes.
{F22318433}
```
2015-05-06 15:45:05.848 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "Running application "UIExplorerApp" with appParams: {"rootTag":1,"initialProps":{}}. __DEV__ === true, development-level warning are ON, performance optimizations are OFF"
2015-05-06 15:45:05.881 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "received text layout event
", {"target":27,"layout":{"y":123,"x":12.5,"width":140.5,"height":18}}
2015-05-06 15:45:05.882 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "received image layout event
", {"target":23,"layout":{"y":12.5,"x":122,"width":50,"height":50}}
2015-05-06 15:45:05.883 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "received view layout event
", {"target":22,"layout":{"y":70.5,"x":20,"width":294,"height":204}}
2015-05-06 15:45:05.897 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "received text layout event
", {"target":27,"layout":{"y":206.5,"x":12.5,"width":140.5,"height":18}}
2015-05-06 15:45:05.897 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "received view layout event
", {"target":22,"layout":{"y":70.5,"x":20,"width":294,"height":287.5}}
2015-05-06 15:45:09.847 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "layout animation done."
2015-05-06 15:45:09.847 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "received image layout event
", {"target":23,"layout":{"y":12.5,"x":82,"width":50,"height":50}}
2015-05-06 15:45:09.848 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "received view layout event
", {"target":22,"layout":{"y":110.5,"x":60,"width":214,"height":287.5}}
2015-05-06 15:45:09.862 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "received text layout event
", {"target":27,"layout":{"y":206.5,"x":12.5,"width":120,"height":68}}
2015-05-06 15:45:09.863 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "received image layout event
", {"target":23,"layout":{"y":12.5,"x":55,"width":50,"height":50}}
2015-05-06 15:45:09.863 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "received view layout event
", {"target":22,"layout":{"y":128,"x":60,"width":160,"height":337.5}}
```