Summary:
Sometimes, when we implement some custom RN view, we have to proxy all accessible atributes directly to some subview which actually has accesible content. So, in other words, this allows bypass some axillary views in terms of accessibility.
Concreate example which this approach supposed to fix:
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/14200/files#diff-e5f6b1386b7ba07fd887bca11ec828a4R208
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D5143860
fbshipit-source-id: 6d7ce747f28e5a31d32c925b8ad8fd4b98ce1de1
Summary: Previosly `borderWidth` did not affect actual content inset (which was a problem).
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D5072483
fbshipit-source-id: d43cba7414a9335b9f9fd4d1565d7aee403cce0e
Summary:
This avoids reordering views because it created some bugs when the native hierarchy is different from the shadow views. This leverages `layer.zPosition` and takes z-index in consideration when we check what view should be the target of a touch.
**Test plan**
Tested that this fixes some layout issues that occurred when using sticky headers in the Expo home screen.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/14011
Differential Revision: D5108437
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: 0abfe85666e9d236a190e6f54cdd5453cacfbcac
Summary:
* It complicates Touch Handling mechanism.
* The same functionality can be (and should be) implemented via overriding standard `hitTest:` method.
* It was marked as deprecated a while ago.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D4667776
fbshipit-source-id: 2e047c3308563a2849ea351a242270f0800fead2
Summary:
Pair `reactWillMakeFirstResponder` and `reactDidMakeFirstResponder` was replaced with just `reactFocus` method
which is supposed to incapsulate all "focus" and "focus-later-if-needed" functionality.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D4664626
fbshipit-source-id: 8d3b7935ca26d32ba1d1826a585cce0396fcc885
Summary: Reveting the recent view clipping changes, since it doesn't work well with modals and the fix is not super simple.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D4204490
fbshipit-source-id: 510f2b04c604b3f3a223dc4accb424b030876fbe
Summary:
There was a bug in the view clipping logic.
Clipping works on uiview hierarchy, but I've been using `reactSuperview` to get clipping rect for my parent.
This is incorrect in a case where these two hierarchies don't match and there are some views between a view and its `reactSuperview`.
So we should really use normal `superview`. A minor complication is that `superview` is `nil` if we are clipped.
We could remember what our last `superview` was, but that's extra data we have to manage. Instead I use one clever trick to avoid doing so.
(Let me know if it makes sense based on my inline documentation.)
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D4182647
fbshipit-source-id: 779cbcec0bd08eb270c3727c9c5cb9c080c4a2a4
Summary:
React view hierarchy doesn't have to always match uiview hierarchy. Plus if we clip view we loose knowledge about view's react superview if we just use `self.superview` as react superview.
This diff fixes it by storing a strong ref to reactSuperview in an associated object.
This is needed for new view clipping implementation (see the dependent diff).
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D4081844
fbshipit-source-id: 9317d9db46fbd474382c5469b7922f88e5ee7568
Summary: Converted the zIndex property on iOS to NSInteger instead of double. This is consistent with the CSS spec, and helps to simplify the Android implementation.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3411491
fbshipit-source-id: 902ebc29aac39a65f7e8707a28607655f9f5052c
Summary:
This diff implement the CSS z-index for React Native iOS views. We've had numerous pull request for this feature, but they've all attempted to use the `layer.zPosition` property, which is problematic for two reasons:
1. zPosition only affects rendering order, not event processing order. Views with a higher zPosition will appear in front of others in the hierarchy, but won't be the first to receive touch events, and may be blocked by views that are visually behind them.
2. when using a perspective transform matrix, views with a nonzero zPosition will be rendered in a different position due to parallax, which probably isn't desirable.
See https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7825 for further discussion of this problem.
So instead of using `layer.zPosition`, I've implemented this by actually adjusting the order of the subviews within their parent based on the zIndex. This can't be done on the JS side because it would affect layout, which is order-dependent, so I'm doing it inside the view itself.
It works as follows:
1. The `reactSubviews` array is set, whose order matches the order of the JS components and shadowView components, as specified by the UIManager.
2. `didUpdateReactSubviews` is called, which in turn calls `sortedSubviews` (which lazily generates a sorted array of `reactSubviews` by zIndex) and inserts the result into the view.
3. If a subview is added or removed, or the zIndex of any subview is changed, the previous `sortedSubviews` array is cleared and `didUpdateReactSubviews` is called again.
To demonstrate it working, I've modified the UIExplorer example from https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7825
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3365717
fbshipit-source-id: b34aa8bfad577bce023f8af5414f9b974aafd8aa
Summary:
This diff refactors the view update process into two stages:
1. The `reactSubviews` array is set, whose order matches the order of the JS components and shadowView components, as specified by the UIManager.
2. The `didUpdateReactSubviews` method is called, which actually inserts the reactSubviews into the view hierarchy.
This simplifies a lot of the hacks we had for special-case treatment of subviews: In many cases we don't want to actually insert `reactSubviews` into the parentView, and we had a bunch of component-specific solutions for that (typically overriding all of the reactSubviews methods to store views in an array). Now, we can simply override the `didUpdateReactSubviews` method for those views to do nothing, or do something different.
Reviewed By: wwjholmes
Differential Revision: D3396594
fbshipit-source-id: 92fc56fd31db0cfc66aac3d1634a4d4ae3903085
Summary:
This implements #5073. It adds a static method `PixelRatio.pixel()` which returns the smallest drawable line width, primarily for use in styles.
It also updates the example apps to use the new function.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/5076
Reviewed By: svcscm
Differential Revision: D2799849
Pulled By: nicklockwood
fb-gh-sync-id: b83a77790601fe882affbf65531114e7c5cf4bdf
Summary:
public
Blending semitransparent pixels against their background is fairly a fairly expensive operation on mobile GPUs. To reduce blending, React Native has a system called "background color propagation", where the background color of parent views is automatically inherited by child views unless explicitly overridden. This means that translucent pixels can be blended directly against a known background color, avoiding the need to do this dynamically on the GPU.
In practice, this is only useful for views that do their own drawing, which is basically just `<Image/>` and `<Text/>` components, and for image components it only really matters when the image has an alpha component.
The automatic background propagation is a bit of a hack, and often does the wrong thing - for example if a view overflows its bounds, or if it overlaps a sibling, the background color will often be incorrect and need to be manually disabled. Because the only place that it provides a significant performance benefit is for text, this diff disables the behavior for everything except `<Text/>` nodes. It might still be useful for `<Image/>` nodes too, but looking through the examples in UIExplorer, the number of places where it does the wrong thing for images outnumbers the cases where it provides significant reduction in blending.
Note that this diff does not prevent you from eliminating blending on image components by manually setting an opaque background color, nor does it stop you from disabling color propagation on text components by manually setting a transparent background.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D2811031
fb-gh-sync-id: 2eb08918c9031c582a3dd2d40e04b27a663dac82
Summary: public
Added lightweight genarics annotations to make the code more readable and help the compiler catch bugs.
Fixed some type bugs and improved bridge validation in a few places.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D2600189
fb-gh-sync-id: f81e22f2cdc107bf8d0b15deec6d5b83aacc5b56
Summary: public
This has been broken for a while. The styles in the JS were being set on the container instead of the activity view itself.
Also, due to the way frames were set directly on layer properties instead of the view, resizing didn't work properly because the UIImageView inside the UIActivityView was not being realligned when the bounds changed. This also caused problems for other controls such as maps, where it was fixed with a method override, but the simpler solution is just to set the view center and bounds directly.
Before: {F23631143}
After: {F23631144}
Reviewed By: javache, tadeuzagallo
Differential Revision: D2575156
fb-gh-sync-id: e82e56d36648e7c924df77da1750e03037b5d5be
Summary:
Currently, the system for mapping JS event handlers to blocks is quite clean on the JS side, but is clunky on the native side. The event property is passed as a boolean, which can then be checked by the native side, and if true, the native side is supposed to send an event via the event dispatcher.
This diff adds the facility to declare the property as a block instead. This means that the event side can simply call the block, and it will automatically send the event. Because the blocks for bubbling and direct events are named differently, we can also use this to generate the event registration data and get rid of the arrays of event names.
The name of the event is inferred from the property name, which means that the property for an event called "load" must be called `onLoad` or the mapping won't work. This can be optionally remapped to a different property name on the view itself if necessary, e.g.
RCT_REMAP_VIEW_PROPERTY(onLoad, loadEventBlock, RCTDirectEventBlock)
If you don't want to use this mechanism then for now it is still possible to declare the property as a BOOL instead and use the old mechanism (this approach is now deprecated however, and may eventually be removed altogether).
Summary:
@public
I've increased the warning levels in the OSS frameworks, which caught a bunch of minor issues. I also fixed some new errors in Xcode 7 relating to designated initializers and TLS security.
Test Plan:
* Test the sample apps and make sure they still work.
* Run tests.
Summary:
@public
This fixes an issue with the containerBackgroundColor property of `<Text>` nodes, where containerBackgroundColor was being overridden by the backgroundColor. I also fixed up the example so that it demonstrates the feature more clearly.
Test Plan:
* Check UIExplorer text example
* Run Catalyst snapshot tests and check MAdMan, Groups
Valentin Shergin
Janic Duplessis
Martin Kralik
Nick Lockwood
Satish Sampath
Pieter De Baets
Kyle Corbitt
Christopher Chedeau