Summary:
Pair `reactWillMakeFirstResponder` and `reactDidMakeFirstResponder` was replaced with just `reactFocus` method
which is supposed to incapsulate all "focus" and "focus-later-if-needed" functionality.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D4664626
fbshipit-source-id: 8d3b7935ca26d32ba1d1826a585cce0396fcc885
Summary:
This fixes a bug that causes properties to keep stale values because they were not restored to their default after being removed when their value was controlled by native animated.
To fix this we restore default values in `disconnectFromView` by updating views with null values for all props that we modified previously. However this causes another issue where we lose any props that were set by the normal process because NativeAnimated operations are always executed after UIManager operatations. To fix this I added a way to hook into UIManager view updating process to be able to execute NativeAnimated operations either before or after updating native views.
In the case of disconnecting we want to do it before updating views so that it does: Value changed by native animated -> value restored to default -> (optional) value updated by normal prop.
This PR also depends on #10658.
**Test plan**
Tested that this fixed a particular bug in an app that uses ex-navigation + native animations where a navbar w
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/11819
Differential Revision: D4752566
Pulled By: javache
fbshipit-source-id: 68ee28200ffeba859ae1b98ac753bd7dcb8910f0
Summary:
Various fixes of xcode projects and cleaning up some warnings
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/13109
Differential Revision: D4762652
Pulled By: lacker
fbshipit-source-id: b452976a58962439de4adecc8e703264af40cb38
Summary:
The `UIManager` already has a lot of responsibilities and is deeply
tied with React Native's view architecture. This diff separates out a
`DeviceInfo` native module to provide information about screen dimensions and
font scale, etc.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D4713834
fbshipit-source-id: f2ee93acf876a4221c29a8c731f5abeffbb97974
Summary:
Moving setting `availableSize` for `RCTRootShadowView` on earlier stage allows to prevent situations where `availableSize` is not specified yet, but Yoga layout is already happening.
Because `availableSize` equals {infinity, infinity} by default (in this case), Yoga returns a lot of nodes with infinit metrics, which confises UIKit.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D4672170
fbshipit-source-id: f9d8c84799dcbdb6b9230ddef6284d84df268833
Summary:
A related Android PR is #11008.
Font scale was exposed through:
- The `getContentSizeMultiplier` method
- The `didUpdateContentSizeMultiplier` event
These are now deprecated. The reason is that there was already an API that exposed font scale. However, it was Android only. We now expose font scale through that API on iOS as well. Specifically:
- Font scale is now available as `PixelRatio.getFontScale()`.
- The `change` event on the `Dimensions` object now fires when font scale changes.
This change also adds support for `Dimensions.get('screen')` on iOS. Previously, only `Dimensions.get('window')` was available on iOS. The motivation is that, [according to this comment](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/11008#issuecomment-275123609), we'd like to deprecate `window` dimensions in favor of `screen` dimensions in the future.
**Test plan (required)**
Verified that `PixelRatio.getFontScale()` and the `change` event work properly in a test app.
Adam Comella
Microsoft Corp.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/12268
Differential Revision: D4673642
Pulled By: mkonicek
fbshipit-source-id: 2602204da6998a96216e06f5321f28f6603e4972
Summary:
Nothing actually changed except the deprecation.
Existed `intrinsicSize` was already implemented as `intrinsicContentSize` and this change only removes redundancy.
Moreover, we do not need `rootViewDidChangeIntrinsicSize` delegate method anymore; this is now mentioned in its description.
Depends on D4577890
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D4589344
fbshipit-source-id: 16ed62cbf6bf72678bd7f7c11d4812c5aa36c743
Summary:
Now things look much more clear, I hope.
This diff:
* Introduces new property of `RCTRootShadowView` `availableSize` which represents exactly what we transmit to layout engine;
* Illuminates conflict between logical `availableSize` and explicitly specified size of DOM node (current `size`);
* Splits overcomplicated `setSize:forView:` method into two unrelated ones;
* Changes actual values of `RCTRootViewSizeFlexibility` enum constants for simpler usage;
* Completely removes `sizeFlexibility` concept from `RCTRootShadowView` (in favor of special values of `availableSize`);
* Makes the code clearer finally.
This is beginning of big effort to improve `RCTRootView` and co.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D4562834
fbshipit-source-id: f5baaf2859ea430d44645a6b5d35f222f15a668e
Summary:
Motivation:
* `RCTShadowView`'s `frame` property actually represents computed layout of the view. We must not use it as a setter for yoga node styles;
* Using `frame` and `setLeftTop` in existing way actually works only for view with absolute positioning, so it is super rare and special case;
* Internally, setting `frame` only make sense to `RootView`, and in that case there we always must not change `origin` we are introducing `setSize` method.
Changes:
* `[-RCTShadowView setFrame:]` was removed, `frame` property is readonly now;
* `[-RCTShadowView setLeftTop:]` was removed; no replacement provided;
* `[-RCTShadowView size]` read-write property was added;
* `[-RCTUIManager setFrame:forView:]` was deprecated, use (just introduced) `setSize:forView:` instead;
* `[-RCTUIManager setSize:forView:]` was added.
If you are still need some of removed methods, you are probably doing something wrong. Consider using `setIntrinsicContentSize`-family methods,
`setSize`-family methods, or (in the worst case) accessing `yogaNode` directly.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D4491384
fbshipit-source-id: 56dd84567324c5a86e4c870a41c38322dc1224d2
Summary:
In theory, we should be able to animate any non-layout property, including custom ones. While there is still work to be done on the native side to fully enable this, we should start by dropping the prop whitelist.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/10658
Differential Revision: D4379031
Pulled By: ericvicenti
fbshipit-source-id: fe9c30ea101e93a8b260d7d09a909fafbb82fee6
Summary:
On certain devices (in my case, any iPad Pro model), listening to `DeviceEventEmitter.didUpdateDimensions` would call back *before* the interface change takes places (i.e. calling `Dimensions.get()` in this callback would return wrong values). Turns out that we were listening for the wrong native event.
Edit to add: now using `[RCTSharedApplication() statusBarOrientation]` to get the current orientation. Not yet sure why, but the `userInfo` provided by the notification was returning the wrong orientation *only* on the first time you rotate the device.
This fixes the open issue: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/7340
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/11350
Differential Revision: D4348186
Pulled By: javache
fbshipit-source-id: cb2cfb9cccfc459ad4b46a5af2bec4c973132ae8
Summary:
To make React Native play nicely with our internal build infrastructure we need to properly namespace all of our header includes.
Where previously you could do `#import "RCTBridge.h"`, you must now write this as `#import <React/RCTBridge.h>`. If your xcode project still has a custom header include path, both variants will likely continue to work, but for new projects, we're defaulting the header include path to `$(BUILT_PRODUCTS_DIR)/usr/local/include`, where the React and CSSLayout targets will copy a subset of headers too. To make Xcode copy headers phase work properly, you may need to add React as an explicit dependency to your app's scheme and disable "parallelize build".
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D4213120
fbshipit-source-id: 84a32a4b250c27699e6795f43584f13d594a9a82
Summary: Correct header import paths, update podspec so we point at the copy in ReactCommon (and can eventually remove the copy under React)
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4204501
fbshipit-source-id: e979a010092f025b2cdc289e1e5f22fc7b65a8d1
Summary:
Corresponding Android PR: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/11008
This gives apps the ability to find out the current scaling factor for fonts on the device. An event was also added so that apps can find out when this value changes.
**Test plan (required)**
Verified that the getter and the event work properly in a test app. Also, this change is used in my team's app.
Adam Comella
Microsoft Corp.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/11010
Differential Revision: D4207620
Pulled By: ericvicenti
fbshipit-source-id: b3f6f4a412557ba97e1f5fb63446c7ff9a2ff753
Summary:
First commit for Apple TV support: changes to existing Objective-C code so that it will compile correctly for tvOS.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9649
Differential Revision: D3916021
Pulled By: javache
fbshipit-source-id: 34acc9daf3efff835ffe38c43ba5d4098a02c830
Summary:
Include CSSLayout headers in the same way as other project headers, ie `#import <CSSLayout/CSSLayout.h>` becomes `#import "CSSLayout.h"`. CSSLayout is not a framework or system dependency, so shouldn't (AFAIK) be included with angle brackets. Doing so breaks framework builds, such as when RN is used as a pod in a swift project.
In combination with https://github.com/facebook/css-layout/pull/217 this fixes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/9014 (specifically swift cocoapods projects). There is then no need for a separate CSSLayout pod subspec.
Tests run on the RN project in isolation (with changes inside `CSSLayout` itself also applied) and against a dummy swift project with RN included as a pod.
NB: This effectively reverts https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9015 and may break non-swift cocoapods projects unless https://github.com/facebook/css-layout/pull/217 is merged and synced first.
Update: As discussed with alloy and emilsjolander, wrap these imports in a preprocess
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9544
Differential Revision: D3821791
Pulled By: javache
fbshipit-source-id: d27ac8be9ce560d03479b43d3db740cd196c24da
Summary: added API to in UIManager to find the rootTag/View of any reactTag based on its layout (shadow views) hierarchy (not to be used by JS)
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3750410
fbshipit-source-id: 68611e39930d53ece478f25245ddc7f7838daaa6
Summary:
Sometimes is handy to check if a React node is a descendant of another node or not. For instance, I want to check if the focused `TextInput` is descendant of an specific `ScrollView`:
```js
const currentlyFocusedField = TextInput.State.currentlyFocusedField()
UIManager.viewIsAncestorOf(
currentlyFocusedField,
this.getInnerViewNode(),
(isAncestor) => {
if (isAncestor) {
console.log('The focused field is a descendant of this ScrollView!')
}
}
)
```
This function uses the same strategy as the `measureLayout` method to check if one node is an ancestor of other node. As the `measureLayout` method, this is performed outside the main thread.
By now I've only implemented the iOS version and its tests, but if this function is going to be merged I'll implement the Android version too. I have objc experience but no Java or Android, so I prefer to validate this functionality before jumping into developing the Android part.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7876
Differential Revision: D3662045
Pulled By: javache
fbshipit-source-id: b9668e8ea94fd01db76651f16243926cf9c2566f
Summary:
Fix a bug that happens when views are added and removed in the same manageChildren block with a delete animation. What happens is that the inserted view is not inserted at the proper index if the deleted view index is smaller than the inserted one. This is because the view is not immediately removed from the subviews array so we need to offset the insert index for each view that is going to be deleted with an animation and is before the inserted view.
To do this I separated `_removeChildren` into 2 different functions, one for animated delete and one for normal delete. The animated one returns an array of `RCTComponent` that are going to be animated. We can then use this array to offset the insert index.
**Test plan (required)**
Tested that this fixed the bug in an app where I noticed it, also tested the UIExplorer example to make sure LayoutAnimations still worked properly.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7942
Differential Revision: D3417194
Pulled By: bestander
fbshipit-source-id: 9145a783e520c6718dd023a1e006646acb09cb7c
Summary:
Fix a bug that happens when views are added and removed in the same manageChildren block with a delete animation. What happens is that the inserted view is not inserted at the proper index if the deleted view index is smaller than the inserted one. This is because the view is not immediately removed from the subviews array so we need to offset the insert index for each view that is going to be deleted with an animation and is before the inserted view.
To do this I separated `_removeChildren` into 2 different functions, one for animated delete and one for normal delete. The animated one returns an array of `RCTComponent` that are going to be animated. We can then use this array to offset the insert index.
**Test plan (required)**
Tested that this fixed the bug in an app where I noticed it, also tested the UIExplorer example to make sure LayoutAnimations still worked properly.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7942
Differential Revision: D3417194
Pulled By: nicklockwood
fbshipit-source-id: 790f4ac15a8552323b359e6466cecfa80418c63c
Summary:
This diff implement the CSS z-index for React Native iOS views. We've had numerous pull request for this feature, but they've all attempted to use the `layer.zPosition` property, which is problematic for two reasons:
1. zPosition only affects rendering order, not event processing order. Views with a higher zPosition will appear in front of others in the hierarchy, but won't be the first to receive touch events, and may be blocked by views that are visually behind them.
2. when using a perspective transform matrix, views with a nonzero zPosition will be rendered in a different position due to parallax, which probably isn't desirable.
See https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7825 for further discussion of this problem.
So instead of using `layer.zPosition`, I've implemented this by actually adjusting the order of the subviews within their parent based on the zIndex. This can't be done on the JS side because it would affect layout, which is order-dependent, so I'm doing it inside the view itself.
It works as follows:
1. The `reactSubviews` array is set, whose order matches the order of the JS components and shadowView components, as specified by the UIManager.
2. `didUpdateReactSubviews` is called, which in turn calls `sortedSubviews` (which lazily generates a sorted array of `reactSubviews` by zIndex) and inserts the result into the view.
3. If a subview is added or removed, or the zIndex of any subview is changed, the previous `sortedSubviews` array is cleared and `didUpdateReactSubviews` is called again.
To demonstrate it working, I've modified the UIExplorer example from https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7825
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3365717
fbshipit-source-id: b34aa8bfad577bce023f8af5414f9b974aafd8aa
Summary:
This diff refactors the view update process into two stages:
1. The `reactSubviews` array is set, whose order matches the order of the JS components and shadowView components, as specified by the UIManager.
2. The `didUpdateReactSubviews` method is called, which actually inserts the reactSubviews into the view hierarchy.
This simplifies a lot of the hacks we had for special-case treatment of subviews: In many cases we don't want to actually insert `reactSubviews` into the parentView, and we had a bunch of component-specific solutions for that (typically overriding all of the reactSubviews methods to store views in an array). Now, we can simply override the `didUpdateReactSubviews` method for those views to do nothing, or do something different.
Reviewed By: wwjholmes
Differential Revision: D3396594
fbshipit-source-id: 92fc56fd31db0cfc66aac3d1634a4d4ae3903085
Summary:
As per https://twitter.com/olebegemann/status/738656134731599872, our use of "main thread" to mean "main queue" seems to be unsafe.
This diff replaces the `NSThread.isMainQueue` checks with dispatch_get_specific(), which is the recommended approach.
I've also replaced all use of "MainThread" terminology with "MainQueue", and taken the opportunity to deprecate the "sync" param of `RCTExecuteOnMainThread()`, which, while we do still use it in a few places, is incredibly unsafe and shouldn't be encouraged.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3384910
fbshipit-source-id: ea7c216013372267b82eb25a38db5eb4cd46a089
Summary: The view update cycle in UIManager was relying on a bunch of boolean values boxes as NSNumbers in parallel arrays. This diff packs those values into a struct, which is more efficient and easier to maintain.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3365346
fbshipit-source-id: d9cbf2865421f76772c1761b13992d40ec3675f0
Valentin Shergin
Pieter De Baets
Janic Duplessis
Pieter De Baets
Ashwin Bharambe
Adam Comella
Ryan Gomba
Mani Ghasemlou
Emil Sjolander
rcaferati
Douglas Lowder
rh389
Kevin Gozali
alvaromb
Wenjing Wang
Skotch Vail
Konstantin Raev
Nick Lockwood
Nathan Azaria
