Summary:
Perhaps there is a better way to do this, curious to hear it!
- If momentum scroll is active when `scrollEnabled` is toggled, the momentum scroll continues and the onMomentumScrollEnd event fires, which is the same as on iOS.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/5656
Reviewed By: svcscm
Differential Revision: D2889897
Pulled By: dmmiller
fb-gh-sync-id: b2f44d2bcb48373f9945f6afd966447a118df717
Summary:
The issue is that the ScrollResponder mixin assumes that the native scrollable node is the top level element and gets it using `React.findNodeHandle(this)` but since Android wraps the native `ScrollView` component with the `RefreshControl`, it finds the native `RefreshControl` node instead and the scroll command gets ignored because it doesn't exists.
This adds a hook to ScrollResponder mixin to allow specifying what is the native scrollable node.
The bug can be reproduced using this https://gist.github.com/janicduplessis/871c0b6d3ad0acaacba9 in UIExplorer.
Fixes#5725
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/5736
Reviewed By: svcscm
Differential Revision: D2896125
Pulled By: nicklockwood
fb-gh-sync-id: 0a00a20551421982c5bc519c542774877ba15c9b
Summary:
public
The current `ScrollView.scrollTo()` API is confusing due to the `(y, x)` parameter order, and the boolean `animated` argument. E.g.
ScrollView.scrollTo(5, 0, true) // what do these arguments mean?
This diff replaces the API with a configuration object, so the arguments are all explicit:
ScrollView.scrollTo({x: 0, y: 5, animated: true}) // much better
The `scrollTo()` method checks the argument types, and provides backwards compatibility with the old argument format for now. Using the old API will generate a warning, and this will eventually be upgraded to an error.
Reviewed By: davidaurelio
Differential Revision: D2892287
fb-gh-sync-id: cec4d504242391267c6e863816b6180ced7a7d5e
Summary:
Original Android's refreshControl in ScrollView is tightly coupled with AndroidSwipeRefreshLayout. If someone use `ref=` for RefreshControl in ScrollView, it does nothing since RefreshControl in Android return null.
This change allows customized RefreshControl especially for `ref=` as well as making ScrollView's code clearer.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/5623
Reviewed By: svcscm
Differential Revision: D2890072
Pulled By: nicklockwood
fb-gh-sync-id: a8fc7746bcc050a6e46fedf3583979f4cb9021b6
Summary:
To allow smoother API changes for users we often deprecate props and keep them around for a while before removing them. Right now it is all done manually, this adds a consistent way to show a warning when using a deprecated prop.
This also adds a deprecation warning of the website generated from the deprecatedPropType.
<img width="643" alt="screen shot 2016-01-26 at 7 43 08 pm" src="https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/2677334/12600172/7af28fb0-c465-11e5-85e5-3786852bf522.png">
It also changes places where we added the warnings manually to use deprecatedPropType instead.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/5566
Reviewed By: svcscm
Differential Revision: D2874629
Pulled By: nicklockwood
fb-gh-sync-id: c3c63bae7bbec26cc146029abd9aa5efbe73f795
Summary:
Expose a `decelerationNormalEnabled` flag on WebView, which, when enabled, will WebView's ScrollView's `decelerationRate` to `UIScrollViewDecelerationRateNormal`. This gives the WebView the same "momentum" style scrolling as other iOS views.
This was discussed with ide in #5447. Please let me know if there's anything I'm missing, or anything else you'd like to see in this pull request.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/5527
Reviewed By: svcscm
Differential Revision: D2870312
Pulled By: nicklockwood
fb-gh-sync-id: 7dbfd06a349e3365a5df40c3bacf25a4fdb306cf
Summary:
public
This diff deprecates `scrollResponderScrollWithoutAnimationTo` and replaces it with an optional `animated` param in `scrollResponderScrollTo`. This is more consistent with our other APIs.
Using the old `ScrollResponder.scrollResponderScrollWithoutAnimationTo` or `ScrollView.scrollWithoutAnimationTo` functions will still work, but will trigger a warning.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D2823479
fb-gh-sync-id: 259966512104ca7b3995c9586144812a91b8d3e9
Summary:
Exposes the doc for RefreshControl and add a link to the component page in ScrollView.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/5209
Reviewed By: svcscm
Differential Revision: D2818217
Pulled By: mkonicek
fb-gh-sync-id: eb1ae70103e6a02af3a12866509f68eacc413dfd
Summary:
Both iOS and Android currently support some sort of native pull to refresh control but the API was very different. I tried implementing a component based on PullToRefreshViewAndroid but that works on both platforms.
I liked the idea of wrapping the ListView or ScrollView with the PullToRefreshView component and allow styling the refresh view with platform specific props if needed. I also like the fact that 'refreshing' is a controlled prop so there is no need to keep a ref to the component or to the stopRefreshing function.
It is a pretty rough start so I'm looking for feedback and ideas to improve on the API before cleaning up everything.
On iOS we could probably deprecate the onRefreshStart property of the ScrollView and implement the native stuff in a PullToRefreshViewManager. We could then add props to customize the look of the UIRefreshControl (tintColor). We could also deprecate the Android only component and remove it later.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/4915
Reviewed By: svcscm
Differential Revision: D2799246
Pulled By: nicklockwood
fb-gh-sync-id: 75872c12143ddbc05cc91900ab4612e477ca5765
Summary:
Allows you to do:
```
var { RecyclerViewBackedScrollView } = require('react-native')
```
Rather than:
```
var RecyclerViewBackedScrollView = require('react-native/Libraries/Components/ScrollView/RecyclerViewBackedScrollView')
```
Also...
- Export `ScrollView` by default rather than `UnimplementedView` for `RecyclerViewBackedScrollView` on iOS -- this makes it easier on the user, so you don't have to always do a conditional for: `if IOS then use ScrollView else use RecyclerViewBackedScrollView`. I can't think of a case where this would lead to undesirable behaviour.
- Add `RecyclerViewBackedScrollView` to `MainReactPackage`
- Fix an issue with `MapView` that threw a red-screen when trying to access constants on Android because there is no `MapView` in open source and MapView.js doesn't have a platform extension.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/4514
Reviewed By: svcscm
Differential Revision: D2753466
Pulled By: mkonicek
fb-gh-sync-id: 0b6e2133975c911d5117e7531cb9093faf314c52
Summary:
public
This adds support for
onScrollBeginDrag/End
onMomentumScrolBegin/End
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D2739035
fb-gh-sync-id: 2a49d1df54e5f5cd82008bdb0ffde0881ba39aff
Summary: The recent commits for RecyclerViewBackedScrollView introduced a bunch of Flow errors.
Disable Flow for now in `ReactNativeViewPool` as it looks like that file doesn't use Flow :)
public
Reviewed By: gabelevi
Differential Revision: D2679974
fb-gh-sync-id: 71512f403e3fa271f6c0fa1a64e877ca1750f675
Summary: public
Changed ListView to use onLayout and onContentSizeChange (new) events instead of measure. Updated ScrollView implementation to support contentSizeChange event with an implementation based on onLayout attached to the content view. For RecyclerViewBackedScrollView we need to generate that event directly as it doesn't have a concept of content view.
This greatly improves performance of ListView that uses RecyclerViewBackedScrollView
Reviewed By: mkonicek
Differential Revision: D2679460
fb-gh-sync-id: ba26462d9d3b071965cbe46314f89f0dcfd9db9f
Summary: `ScrollView.scrollWithoutAnimationTo` is supported on iOS but not Android. This is an existing API, and this diff adds Android support.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/2695
Reviewed By: @svcscm
Differential Revision: D2452630
Pulled By: @mkonicek
Summary:
The `ScrollView` component tells the native side the subview indices of the views to make sticky. The problem is that, once layout-only views are collapsed, the indices are no longer reflective of the original views to make stick to the top.
Summary:
Remove layout-only views. Works by checking properties against a list of known properties that only affect layout. The `RCTShadowView` hierarchy still has a 1:1 correlation with the JS nodes.
This works by adjusting the tags and indices in `manageChildren`. For example, if JS told us to insert tag 1 at index 0 and tag 1 is layout-only with children whose tags are 2 and 3, we adjust it so we insert tags 2 and 3 at indices 0 and 1. This keeps changes out of `RCTView` and `RCTScrollView`. In order to simplify this logic, view moves are now processed as view removals followed by additions. A move from index 0 to 1 is recorded as a removal of view at indices 0 and 1 and an insertion of tags 1 and 2 at indices 0 and 1. Of course, the remaining indices have to be offset to take account for this.
The `collapsible` attribute is a bit of a hack to force `RCTScrollView` to always have one child. This was easier than rethinking out the logic there, but we could change this later.
Summary:
Remove layout-only views. Works by checking properties against a list of known properties that only affect layout. The `RCTShadowView` hierarchy still has a 1:1 correlation with the JS nodes.
This works by adjusting the tags and indices in `manageChildren`. For example, if JS told us to insert tag 1 at index 0 and tag 1 is layout-only with children whose tags are 2 and 3, we adjust it so we insert tags 2 and 3 at indices 0 and 1. This keeps changes out of `RCTView` and `RCTScrollView`. In order to simplify this logic, view moves are now processed as view removals followed by additions. A move from index 0 to 1 is recorded as a removal of view at indices 0 and 1 and an insertion of tags 1 and 2 at indices 0 and 1. Of course, the remaining indices have to be offset to take account for this.
The `collapsible` attribute is a bit of a hack to force `RCTScrollView` to always have one child. This was easier than rethinking out the logic there, but we could change this later.
@public
Test Plan: There are tests in `RCTUIManagerTests.m` that test the tag- and index-manipulation logic works. There are various scenarios including add-only, remove-only, and move. In addition, two scenario tests verify that the optimization works by checking the number of views and shadow views after various situations happen.
Summary:
As discussed in our internal group, think this is a fairly easy error to run into so I added some explanation.
@frantic / @vjeux open to better wording here, but I tried to explain how setting the height directly is discouraged and it's probably better to pipe `flex: 1` all the way down.
I didn't regenerate the website since the script assumes some permissions (push permission to master repo) and has some missing npm dependencies (and after fixing that, still had some obscure error :P )
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1633
Github Author: Peter Cottle <pcottle@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
This is a proposal to add `getScrollResponder` to all ScrollView-like components, including ListView. This allows multiple higher-order scroll views to be composed while allowing the owner of the top-level scroll view to call `scrollableView.getScrollResponder().scrollTo(...)` regardless of whether `scrollableView` is a ScrollView, ListView, InvertedScrollView, etc.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/766
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Austin Kuo
Keith Norman
Brent Vatne
Janic Duplessis
Nick Lockwood
Kudo Chien
August Flanagan
Jean Regisser
Dave Miller
Justas Brazauskas
Pieter De Baets
Roman Telicak
Martin Konicek
Krzysztof Magiera
EwanThomas
rxb
James Ide
Andrei Coman
Philipp von Weitershausen
Rui Chen
Ben Alpert
Spencer Ahrens
Alex Akers
chaceliang
Peter Cottle
Gabe Levi
Tadeu Zagallo
Brent Vatne
