Summary: Decouple processStyle from the main reconciliation. It is now a process
extension to the style attribute `transform`. This effectively decouples a
large portion of special cases and helper dependencies from the reconciler.
The transform attribute becomes translated into the transformMatrix attribute on
the native side so this becomes a little weird in that I have to special case
it. I don't think it is worth while having a general solution for this so I
intend to rename the native attribute to `transform` and just have it accept the
resolved transform. Then I can remove the special cases.
The next step is generalizing the flattenStyle function and optimizing it.
@public
Reviewed By: @vjeux
Differential Revision: D2460465
fb-gh-sync-id: 243e7fd77d282b401bc2c028aec8d57f24522a8e
Summary: Move the ViewAttributes and StyleAttributes configuration into the
Components library since they're coupled and change with the
native component configuration.
This also decouples StyleAttributes from the reconciler by adding it
to the ReactViewAttributes.
To do that, I refactored the property diffing to allow for recursive
configurations. Now an attribute configuration can be a nested object,
a custom configuration (diff/process) or true.
The requireNativeComponent path incorrectly gets its attributes set up
on the root validAttributes instead of the nested style object.
So I also have to add the nested form. Effectively these currently allow
these attributes on props or nested.
@public
Reviewed By: @vjeux
Differential Revision: D2456842
fb-gh-sync-id: cd5405bd8316c2fcb016d06c61244ce7719c26c0
Summary: Concolidate the creation of the "update payload" into
ReactNativeAttributePayload which now has a create
and a diff version. The create version can be used by
both mountComponent and setNativeProps. This means that
diffRawProperties moves into ReactNativeAttributePayload.
Instead of storing previousFlattenedStyle as memoized
state in the component tree, I recalculate it every
time. This allows better use of the generational GC.
However, it is still probably a fairly expensive
technique so I will follow it up with a diff that
walks both nested array trees to do the diffing in a
follow up.
This is the first diff of several steps.
@public
Reviewed By: @vjeux
Differential Revision: D2440644
fb-gh-sync-id: 1d0da4f6e2bf716f33e119df947c044abb918471
Summary: @public
UIManagerStatTracker now provides allTime and perBatch stats so it's easy to see
how bit each batch is.
Reviewed By: @vjeux
Differential Revision: D2506218
fb-gh-sync-id: 635556185245d2bd6cb149497ea60b503b2523ce
Summary:
These are the changes needed for full interop with the (as yet unreleased) new
version of React Devtools.
- the on-device inspector is minimized when devtools is open
- devtools highlight -> device and device touch -> devtools select works
- editing react native styles :)
Summary:
Remove layout-only views. Works by checking properties against a list of known properties that only affect layout. The `RCTShadowView` hierarchy still has a 1:1 correlation with the JS nodes.
This works by adjusting the tags and indices in `manageChildren`. For example, if JS told us to insert tag 1 at index 0 and tag 1 is layout-only with children whose tags are 2 and 3, we adjust it so we insert tags 2 and 3 at indices 0 and 1. This keeps changes out of `RCTView` and `RCTScrollView`. In order to simplify this logic, view moves are now processed as view removals followed by additions. A move from index 0 to 1 is recorded as a removal of view at indices 0 and 1 and an insertion of tags 1 and 2 at indices 0 and 1. Of course, the remaining indices have to be offset to take account for this.
The `collapsible` attribute is a bit of a hack to force `RCTScrollView` to always have one child. This was easier than rethinking out the logic there, but we could change this later.
Summary:
Remove layout-only views. Works by checking properties against a list of known properties that only affect layout. The `RCTShadowView` hierarchy still has a 1:1 correlation with the JS nodes.
This works by adjusting the tags and indices in `manageChildren`. For example, if JS told us to insert tag 1 at index 0 and tag 1 is layout-only with children whose tags are 2 and 3, we adjust it so we insert tags 2 and 3 at indices 0 and 1. This keeps changes out of `RCTView` and `RCTScrollView`. In order to simplify this logic, view moves are now processed as view removals followed by additions. A move from index 0 to 1 is recorded as a removal of view at indices 0 and 1 and an insertion of tags 1 and 2 at indices 0 and 1. Of course, the remaining indices have to be offset to take account for this.
The `collapsible` attribute is a bit of a hack to force `RCTScrollView` to always have one child. This was easier than rethinking out the logic there, but we could change this later.
@public
Test Plan: There are tests in `RCTUIManagerTests.m` that test the tag- and index-manipulation logic works. There are various scenarios including add-only, remove-only, and move. In addition, two scenario tests verify that the optimization works by checking the number of views and shadow views after various situations happen.
Summary:
Without this, the displayName property wasn't found when looking at
`.constructor` on a component instance. Fixesfacebook/react-devtools#92.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1471
Github Author: Ben Alpert <balpert@fb.com>
Test Plan:
Used devtools on MoviesApp and saw RCTView instead of Unknown:
{F22491590}
Sebastian Markbage
Madelaine Boyd
Spencer Ahrens
Alexsander Akers
Andy Street
Tim Yung
Ben Alpert
Dorota Kapturkiewicz
James Ide
Philipp von Weitershausen
Gabe Levi
Jared Forsyth
chaceliang
Andrei Coman
Tadeu Zagallo
Bill Fisher
Georgiy Kassabli
Martin Konicek
Krzysztof Magiera