Summary: Introduces an API to register a weakly-held listener for the reload (Cmd+R) command. This allows external infrastructure to hook into the reload command before the `RCTBridge` object is even created.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D4286980
fbshipit-source-id: 51012fb8cbeb433dc880d9d98d847b07fdbb4c4f
Summary:
At the moment, posting RCTReloadNotification in any circumstance causes all RCTBridge instances to reload. This change scopes the notification to the bridge for which it was intended.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/8762
Differential Revision: D3831914
fbshipit-source-id: ff29574f574ecd1a403057ddd0458dea38f0136e
Summary:
As per https://twitter.com/olebegemann/status/738656134731599872, our use of "main thread" to mean "main queue" seems to be unsafe.
This diff replaces the `NSThread.isMainQueue` checks with dispatch_get_specific(), which is the recommended approach.
I've also replaced all use of "MainThread" terminology with "MainQueue", and taken the opportunity to deprecate the "sync" param of `RCTExecuteOnMainThread()`, which, while we do still use it in a few places, is incredibly unsafe and shouldn't be encouraged.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3384910
fbshipit-source-id: ea7c216013372267b82eb25a38db5eb4cd46a089
Summary:
Enable double tap R on iOS, consistent with Android.
Keep the existing Cmd+R on iOS because people are already used to it.
Make Cmd+Key and Double Key both invalid when focus is in textview or textfield.
Also try to add Cmd+R in Android, but seems no good.
Reviewed By: nicklockwood
Differential Revision: D3343907
fbshipit-source-id: 68f7e3b0393711c137e1d932db33e1b6a2a19e09
Summary:Interface to `RCTBatchedBridge` was being declared in two different implementation files. This is suboptimal, since it makes it hard to mock that class in a test.
So I've merged and moved these two definitions in `RCTBridge+Private.h`, so it's still obvious it's a private class, but can be included if you really need it.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3126135
fb-gh-sync-id: 173e4c5c2925be387b92deb7f99952ca7bf28588
fbshipit-source-id: 173e4c5c2925be387b92deb7f99952ca7bf28588
Summary: This diff adds support for initializing the bridge on an arbitrary thread. This is helpful if you want to defer bridge creation, or prevent it from delaying your app startup.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D2965725
fb-gh-sync-id: 8065fa89e850031c72ee4427351300986985e9de
shipit-source-id: 8065fa89e850031c72ee4427351300986985e9de
Summary:Initializing native modules can block the main thread for tens of milliseconds when it starts up, making it difficult to instantiate the bridge on demand without causing a performance blip.
This diff splits up the initialization of modules so that - although they still happen on the main thread - they don't block the thread continuously.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D2965438
fb-gh-sync-id: 38c9c9d281e4672b5874d68b57d4c60d1d268344
shipit-source-id: 38c9c9d281e4672b5874d68b57d4c60d1d268344
Summary: The module initialization process is complex and full of race conditions. This diff adds a set of unit tests that verify that modules setup happens in the correct order, and enforces all the various conditions for main/background init.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D2994145
fb-gh-sync-id: 92ea84508cdeeb280ff0fb9e9b2dffa8dbc37e66
shipit-source-id: 92ea84508cdeeb280ff0fb9e9b2dffa8dbc37e66
Summary: This makes room for local development without touching OSS code.
Reviewed By: tadeuzagallo
Differential Revision: D2986122
fb-gh-sync-id: 2f23088a078b0f0fb4b74946490fd5b67b01c0ac
shipit-source-id: 2f23088a078b0f0fb4b74946490fd5b67b01c0ac
Summary:
This caused issues for me when I tried to provide a native module on init that was also KVO'd (and dynamically subclassed)
On closer inspection, it also seems highly inconsistent to register these classes in DEBUG mode but have them fail silently in production. Reducing the difference between debug and release seems like a safer option.
public
Reviewed By: nicklockwood
Differential Revision: D2819838
fb-gh-sync-id: 79ab72b1152c89eae38c965ff7724aba59a00949
Summary:
public
Implement all the necessary glue code for several diffs submitted before to get Hot Loading work end to end:
- Simplify `HMRClient`: we don't need to make it stateful allowing to enable and disable it because both when we enable and disable the interface we need to reload the bundle.
- On the native side we introduced a singleton to process the bundle URL. This new class might alter the url to include the `hot` attribute. I'm not 100% sure this is the best way to implement this but we cannot use `CTLSettings` for this as it's are not available on oss and I didn't want to contaminate `RCTBridge` with something specific to hot loading. Also, we could potentially use this processor for other things in the future. Please let me know if you don't like this approach or you have a better idea :).
- Use this processor to alter the default bundle URL and request a `hot` bundle when hot loading is enabled. Also make sure to enable the HMR interface when the client activates it on the dev menu.
- Add packager `hot` option.
- Include gaeron's `react-transform` on Facebook's JS transformer.
The current implementation couples a bit React Native to this feature because `react-transform-hmr` is required on `InitializeJavaScriptAppEngine`. Ideally, the packager should accept an additional list of requires and include them on the bundle among all their dependencies. Note this is not the same as the option `runBeforeMainModule` as that one only adds a require to the provided module but doesn't include all the dependencies that module amy have that the entry point doesn't. I'll address this in a follow up task to enable asap hot loading (9536142)
I had to remove 2 `.babelrc` files from `react-proxy` and `react-deep-force-update`. There's an internal task for fixing the underlaying issue to avoid doing this horrible hack (t9515889).
Reviewed By: vjeux
Differential Revision: D2790806
fb-gh-sync-id: d4b78a2acfa071d6b3accc2e6716ef5611ad4fda
Summary:
public
Thanks to the new lazy initialization system for modules, `RCTDidCreateNativeModules` no longer does what the name implies.
Previously, `RCTDidCreateNativeModules` was fired after all native modules had been initialized. Now, it simply fires each time the bridge is reloaded. Modules are created on demand when they are needed, so most of the assumptions about when `RCTDidCreateNativeModules` will fire are now incorrect.
This diff deprecates `RCTDidCreateNativeModules`, and adds a new notification, `RCTDidInitializeModuleNotification`, which fires each time a module a new module is instantiated.
If you need to access a module at any time you can just call `-[bridge moduleForClass:]` and the module will be instantiated on demand. If you want to access a module *only* after it has already been instantiated, you can use the `RCTDidInitializeModuleNotification` notification.
Reviewed By: tadeuzagallo
Differential Revision: D2755036
fb-gh-sync-id: 25bab6d5eb6fcd35d43125ac45908035eea01487
Summary:
public
A lot of the core modules have to use private methods in the bridge, specially
since the `RCTBatchedBridge` interface is never exposed. That was leading to a
lot of different private bridge categories spread across different modules,
which makes harder to identify which modules are affected by private API changes.
Replace all the categories with a single private header.
Reviewed By: nicklockwood
Differential Revision: D2757564
fb-gh-sync-id: 793158b9082d542b74a6094ed0db4d5dc3a88f78
Summary:
A component can be backed by native "node" that can change its internal state, which would result in a new UI after the next layout. Since js has no way of knowing that this has happened it wouldn't trigger a layout if nothing in js world has changed. Therefore we need a way how to trigger layout from native code.
This diff does it by adding methods `layoutIfNeeded` on the uimanager and `isBatchActive` on the bridge.
When `layoutIfNeeded` is called it checks whether a batch is in progress. If it is we do nothing, since at it's end layout happens. If a batch is not in progress we immidiately do layout.
I went with the easiest way how to implement this - `isBatchActive` is a public method on the bridge. It's not ideal, but consistent with other methods for modules.
public
Reviewed By: jspahrsummers, nicklockwood
Differential Revision: D2748896
fb-gh-sync-id: f3664c4af980d40a463b538e069b26c9ebad6300
Summary:
The JavaScript ecosystem doesn't have the notion of a built-in native module loader. Even Node is decoupled from its module loader. The module loader system is just JS that runs on top of the global `process` object which has all the built-in goodies.
Additionally there is no such thing as a global require. That is something unique to our providesModule system. In other module systems such as node, every require is contextual. Even registered npm names are localized by version.
The only global namespace that is accessible to the host environment is the global object. Normally module systems attaches itself onto the hooks provided by the host environment on the global object.
Currently, we have two forms of dispatch that reaches directly into the module system. executeJSCall which reaches directly into require. Everything now calls through the BatchedBridge module (except one RCTLog edge case that I will fix). I propose that the executors calls directly onto `BatchedBridge` through an instance on the global so that everything is guaranteed to go through it. It becomes the main communication hub.
I also propose that we drop the dynamic requires inside of MessageQueue/BatchBridge and instead have the modules register themselves with the bridge.
executeJSCall was originally modeled after the XHP equivalent. The XHP equivalent was designed that way because the act of doing the call was the thing that defined a dependency on the module from the page. However, that is not how React Native works.
The JS side is driving the dependencies by virtue of requiring new modules and frameworks and the existence of dependencies is driven by the JS side, so this design doesn't make as much sense.
The main driver for this is to be able to introduce a new module system like Prepack's module system. However, it also unlocks the possibility to do dead module elimination even in our current module system. It is currently not possible because we don't know which module might be called from native.
Since the module system now becomes decoupled we could publish all our providesModule modules as npm/CommonJS modules using a rewrite script. That's what React Core does.
That way people could use any CommonJS bundler such as Webpack, Closure Compiler, Rollup or some new innovation to create a JS bundle.
This diff expands the executeJSCalls to the BatchedBridge's three individual pieces to make them first class instead of being dynamic. This removes one layer of abstraction. Hopefully we can also remove more of the things that register themselves with the BatchedBridge (various EventEmitters) and instead have everything go through the public protocol. ReactMethod/RCT_EXPORT_METHOD.
public
Reviewed By: vjeux
Differential Revision: D2717535
fb-gh-sync-id: 70114f05483124f5ac5c4570422bb91a60a727f6
Summary: public
The `bridge.modules` dictionary provides access to all native modules, but this API requires that every module is initialized in advance so that any module can be accessed.
This diff introduces a better API that will allow modules to be initialized lazily as they are needed, and deprecates `bridge.modules` (modules that use it will still work, but should be rewritten to use `bridge.moduleClasses` or `-[bridge moduleForName/Class:` instead.
The rules are now as follows:
* Any module that overrides `init` or `setBridge:` will be initialized on the main thread when the bridge is created
* Any module that implements `constantsToExport:` will be initialized later when the config is exported (the module itself will be initialized on a background queue, but `constantsToExport:` will still be called on the main thread.
* All other modules will be initialized lazily when a method is first called on them.
These rules may seem slightly arcane, but they have the advantage of not violating any assumptions that may have been made by existing code - any module written under the original assumption that it would be initialized synchronously on the main thread when the bridge is created should still function exactly the same, but modules that avoid overriding `init` or `setBridge:` will now be loaded lazily.
I've rewritten most of the standard modules to take advantage of this new lazy loading, with the following results:
Out of the 65 modules included in UIExplorer:
* 16 are initialized on the main thread when the bridge is created
* A further 8 are initialized when the config is exported to JS
* The remaining 41 will be initialized lazily on-demand
Reviewed By: jspahrsummers
Differential Revision: D2677695
fb-gh-sync-id: 507ae7e9fd6b563e89292c7371767c978e928f33
Paco Estevez Garcia
Ben Nham
Dmitry Zakharov
Alex Dvornikov
Marc Horowitz
Pieter De Baets
Alexey Lang
Adam Ernst
Ben Roth
Siqi Liu
Nick Lockwood
Martin Kralik
Martín Bigio
Tadeu Zagallo
Justin Spahr-Summers
Sebastian Markbage