Summary:The 200ms timeout was causing resource issues and causing a lot of overhead when you're not running the devtools, since it will basically create a new socket every 200ms.
Also clean up the way we do logging so it's completely compiled out in prod, and standardize all the names we use for threading to lowercase react.
Reviewed By: frantic
Differential Revision: D3115975
fb-gh-sync-id: e6e51c0621d8e9fc4eadb864acd678b8b5d322a1
fbshipit-source-id: e6e51c0621d8e9fc4eadb864acd678b8b5d322a1
Summary:Previously, (mostly touch and scroll) event handling on iOS worked in a hybrid way:
* All incoming coalesce-able events would be pooled and retrieved by js thread in the beginning of its frame (all of this happens on js thread)
* Any non-coalesce-able event would be immediately dispatched on a js thread (triggered from main thread), and if there would be pooled coalesce-able events they would be immediately dispatched at first too.
This behavior has a subtle race condition, where two events are produced (on MT) in one order and received in js in different order.
See https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/5246#issuecomment-198326673 for further explanation of this case.
The new event handling is (afaik) what Android already does. When an event comes we add it into a pool of events and dispatch a block on js thread to inform js there are events to be processed. We keep track of whether we did so, so there is at most one of these blocks waiting to be processed. When the block is executed js will process all events that are in pool at that time (NOT at time of enqueuing the block).
This creates a single way of processing events and makes it impossible to process them in different order in js.
The tricky part was making sure we don't coalesce events across gestures/different scrolls. Before this was achieved by knowing that gestures and scrolls start/end with non-coalesce-able event, so the pool never contained events that shouldn't be coalesced together. That "assumption" doesn't hold now.
I've re-added `coalescingKey` and made touch and scroll events use it to prevent coalescing events of the same type that should remain separate in previous diffs (see dependencies).
On top of it it decreases latency in events processing in case where we get only coalesce-able events. Previously these would be processed at begging of the next js frame, even when js would be free and could process them sooner. This delay is done, since they would get processed as soon as the enqueued block would run.
To illustrate this improvement let's look at these two systraces.
Before: https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/713625/14021417/47b35b7a-f1d3-11e5-93dd-4363edfa1923.png
After: https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/713625/14021415/4798582a-f1d3-11e5-8715-425596e0781c.png
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3092867
fb-gh-sync-id: 29071780f00fcddb0b1886a46caabdb3da1d5d84
fbshipit-source-id: 29071780f00fcddb0b1886a46caabdb3da1d5d84
Summary: This was previously removed in D2884587, but we will need it going forward. See D3092867 for reasons why it's necessary again.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3092848
fb-gh-sync-id: 0d10dbac4148fcc8e035d32d8eab50f876d99e88
fbshipit-source-id: 0d10dbac4148fcc8e035d32d8eab50f876d99e88
Summary:Interface to `RCTBatchedBridge` was being declared in two different implementation files. This is suboptimal, since it makes it hard to mock that class in a test.
So I've merged and moved these two definitions in `RCTBridge+Private.h`, so it's still obvious it's a private class, but can be included if you really need it.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3126135
fb-gh-sync-id: 173e4c5c2925be387b92deb7f99952ca7bf28588
fbshipit-source-id: 173e4c5c2925be387b92deb7f99952ca7bf28588
Summary:`flowIDMap` lives on the bridge to map from the IDs used for the flow events in
JS and the ones generated by `RCTProfile` in the native side.
It was being accessed from multiple threads (the various modules' queues in the
bridge and the JS thread), so we lock before touching it.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3102745
fb-gh-sync-id: 93d012d124e8b5d1a390c10a98ef5e3a068ccf63
fbshipit-source-id: 93d012d124e8b5d1a390c10a98ef5e3a068ccf63
Summary:It was hard to understand which parts of the shadowview API are designed to be called only on the root view, and which were applicable to any view.
This diff extracts rootview-specific logic out into a new RCTRootShadowView class.
Reviewed By: majak
Differential Revision: D3063905
fb-gh-sync-id: ef890cddfd7625fbd4bf5454314b441acdb03ac8
shipit-source-id: ef890cddfd7625fbd4bf5454314b441acdb03ac8
Summary: For RAM bundling we don't want to hold the entire bundle in memory as that approach doesn't scale. Instead we want to seek and read individual sections as they're required. This rev does that by detecting the type of bundle we're dealing with by reading the first 4 bytes of it. If we're dealing with a RAM Bundle we bail loading.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3026205
fb-gh-sync-id: dc4c745d6f00aa7241203899e5ba136915efa6fe
shipit-source-id: dc4c745d6f00aa7241203899e5ba136915efa6fe
Summary:I've tested this manually, but I'm not sure how to write a test for this. Hopefully someone can help out there. The least I could do is provide a starting point for a PR to be accepted.
Additionally, I've renamed the existing `NSLineBreakMode` enum converter (inside `RCTConvert`) to use dashes in the names instead of camelcase (eg: `word-wrapping` instead of `wordWrapping`).
Fixes#6338
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/6339
Differential Revision: D3052391
Pulled By: nicklockwood
fb-gh-sync-id: 1536dfc139d7995095e9ee9d5f13ca86f90783c5
shipit-source-id: 1536dfc139d7995095e9ee9d5f13ca86f90783c5
Summary: This diff adds support for initializing the bridge on an arbitrary thread. This is helpful if you want to defer bridge creation, or prevent it from delaying your app startup.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D2965725
fb-gh-sync-id: 8065fa89e850031c72ee4427351300986985e9de
shipit-source-id: 8065fa89e850031c72ee4427351300986985e9de
Summary:Initializing native modules can block the main thread for tens of milliseconds when it starts up, making it difficult to instantiate the bridge on demand without causing a performance blip.
This diff splits up the initialization of modules so that - although they still happen on the main thread - they don't block the thread continuously.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D2965438
fb-gh-sync-id: 38c9c9d281e4672b5874d68b57d4c60d1d268344
shipit-source-id: 38c9c9d281e4672b5874d68b57d4c60d1d268344
Summary: The module initialization process is complex and full of race conditions. This diff adds a set of unit tests that verify that modules setup happens in the correct order, and enforces all the various conditions for main/background init.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D2994145
fb-gh-sync-id: 92ea84508cdeeb280ff0fb9e9b2dffa8dbc37e66
shipit-source-id: 92ea84508cdeeb280ff0fb9e9b2dffa8dbc37e66
Summary: This property is now in the bridge.
Reviewed By: tadeuzagallo
Differential Revision: D2985894
fb-gh-sync-id: 38821e0c5998bc96fc8f6164fbbc82c721f5c5ad
shipit-source-id: 38821e0c5998bc96fc8f6164fbbc82c721f5c5ad
Summary: This makes room for local development without touching OSS code.
Reviewed By: tadeuzagallo
Differential Revision: D2986122
fb-gh-sync-id: 2f23088a078b0f0fb4b74946490fd5b67b01c0ac
shipit-source-id: 2f23088a078b0f0fb4b74946490fd5b67b01c0ac
Summary:This adds a `takeSnapshot` method to UIManager that can be used to capture screenshots as an image.
The takeSnapshot method accepts either 'screen', 'window' or a view ref as an argument.
You can also specify the size, format and quality of the captured image.
I've added an example of capturing a screenshot at UIExplorer > Snapshot / Screenshot.
I've also added an example of sharing a screenshot to the UIExplorer > ActionSheetIOS demo.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D2958351
fb-gh-sync-id: d2eb93fea3297ec5aaa312854dd6add724a7f4f8
shipit-source-id: d2eb93fea3297ec5aaa312854dd6add724a7f4f8
Summary:
This commit adds the delegate hooks so that local notifications get
passed onto the JS and adds a new event listener type for local
notifications.
Also add functions to clear local notifications
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/2084
Reviewed By: svcscm
Differential Revision: D2908096
Pulled By: nicklockwood
fb-gh-sync-id: 759d299ea35abea177e72934076297d666d3ea20
shipit-source-id: 759d299ea35abea177e72934076297d666d3ea20
Summary:
public
Lazy export of module constants required a sync dispatch to the main thread, which was deadlocking in some of our projects.
This moves the constants export to the initial bridge init, which may slightly increase initial startup time, but avoids the deadlock.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D2911295
fb-gh-sync-id: 0d14a629ac4fc7ee21acd293c09595c18232659b
shipit-source-id: 0d14a629ac4fc7ee21acd293c09595c18232659b
Summary:
public
Expose JS hooks to create flow events in systrace (the nice arrows to show async work flow) +
add support to the showing all the work enqueued from the JS thread as added in D2743733
Depends on D2743733
Reviewed By: jspahrsummers
Differential Revision: D2815293
fb-gh-sync-id: 4278f61a67a6e78cf2704bacce34b1389328c6df
Summary:
This is a final diff in the stack, which makes us not send a bazillion events to js after it's been busy while an user dragged his finger on a screen (resulting in ~two events per frame).
I made "touchMove" event to be coalescable, which makes us not send anything while dragging (since this makes both scroll events and touch move events coalesced and not being send until either next js frame or the next different touch event occurs).
This change is far from perfect. The event name is a hard coded string and the coalescing works with some (reasonable) assumptions on internal structure of these touch events. Which may or may not be really true. It would be great if someone could comment on these.
I'm thinking about making the touches more strongly typed. Any thoughts on this?
public
___
//This diff is part of a larger stack. For high level overview what's going on jump to D2884593.//
Reviewed By: nicklockwood
Differential Revision: D2884595
fb-gh-sync-id: f3c2f13430679e2bf52e0c7a3689650b3acae42f
Summary:
This diff finally makes touch events to be emitted to js from the same object as scroll events. Thanks to changes in previous diffs this means the js will now process them in the right order.
This diff on its own would cause us to send events to js on every frame while dragging a finger on the screen. This is something we tried to avoid with event coalescing in the past, and gets fixed in the following diff D2884595.
public
___
**This diff is part of a larger stack. This is a high level overview about what’s going on here.**
This stack of diffs fixes an issue where scroll events and touch events wouldn’t be processed in the correct order on js side.
Current state of world:
* touch events are send to js immediately when they happen (this makes js respond to touches as soon as possible)
* scroll events are buffered, coalesced and send at the beginning of each js frame (coalescing helps in a case where js is busy processing for several native frames and would get all scroll event for that period afterwards)
How did I change this?
1. I’ve made touch events go through the same class every other event (scroll events included) go, RCTEventDispatcher. This gives us a single place to handle all events.
2. I’ve changed RCTEventDispatcher to flush all buffered events every time it gets a touch event before dispatching the touch. This fixes the original ordering issue.
3. I’ve made “touchMove” behave the same way as scroll events do - they are buffered and coalesced. Since “touchMove” events are fired as often as scroll events (while you drag your finger around), doing only 2. would bring back the issue buffering was fixing.
All of this together effectively still keeps the order of events right, avoids overloading js in the important case we care about. The only downside is an increased latency for “touchMove” events, since they are to longer send to js immediately.
(Even better solution would be changing the native->js event passing system to be pull based instead of push based. That way js would always request touches that has happened since the last time it has asked, which would make it get them as soon as it’s possible to process them and native could do coalescing at that point.
However this change has a much bigger scope, so I’m going with this stack of diffs for now.)
Reviewed By: nicklockwood
Differential Revision: D2884593
fb-gh-sync-id: 749a4dc6256f93fde0d8733687394b080ddd4484
Summary:
This diff adds an implementation of `RCTEvent` protocol which represents touch events.
It's basically a copy of this code: c14cc123d5/React/Base/RCTTouchHandler.m (L194-L196)
which is replaced using `RCTTouchEvent` in the next diff (D2884593).
public
___
//This diff is part of a larger stack. For high level overview what's going on jump to D2884593.//
Reviewed By: nicklockwood
Differential Revision: D2884592
fb-gh-sync-id: e35addcf15a7012f89644200a08f5856c7f57299
Summary:
Currently only scroll events are send through `sendEvent`, and all of them are can be coalesced. In future (further in the stack) touch events will go through there as well, but they won't support coalescing.
In order to ensure js processes touch and scroll events in the same order as they were created, we will flush the coalesced events when we encounter one that cannot be coalesced.
public
___
//This diff is part of a larger stack. For high level overview what's going on jump to D2884593.//
Reviewed By: nicklockwood
Differential Revision: D2884591
fb-gh-sync-id: a3d0e916843265ec57f16aad2f016a79764dcce8
Summary:
I want to use the `RCTEvent` protocol for touch events as well. That's why I'm removing not very well defined `body` property and replacing it with `arguments` method, which will return an array that will be passed directly to the js call.
I think this makes sense because there is no unified arguments format for all events and and the called js method (`moduleDotMethod`) is already event specific.
This way touch events and scroll events can result in calling a completely different js function with a completely different arguments (what they indeed currently do).
public
___
//This diff is part of a larger stack. For high level overview what's going on jump to D2884593.//
Reviewed By: nicklockwood
Differential Revision: D2884590
fb-gh-sync-id: 2c1885c3414e255d8572c0fbbbfe62a23d94dd06
Summary:
This property was never used, so I'm removing it.
public
___
//This diff is part of a larger stack. For high level overview what's going on jump to D2884593.//
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D2884587
fb-gh-sync-id: acd5e576cd13a02e77225f3b308232f8331d3b61
Summary:
`RCTBaseEvent` was never used. This diff removes it.
public
___
//This diff is part of a larger stack. For high level overview what's going on jump to D2884593.//
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D2884585
fb-gh-sync-id: 66a6afcda3b5baec7f768682da215570f6d33bb1
Summary:
public
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/5494 added a new `source` property to WebView on Android that provides a better API, as well as allowing for request headers to be set.
This diff ports that functionality over to iOS, so we can have a consistent API cross-platform.
I've also extended the API to include `method` (GET or POST) and `body` when setting the WebView content with a URI, and `baseUrl` when setting static HTML.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D2884643
fb-gh-sync-id: 83f24494bdbb4e1408aa8f3b7428fee33888ae3a
Summary:
public
This diff improves the implementation of 3D touch by adding a `forceTouchAvailable` constant to View that can be used to check if the feature is supported.
I've also added an example of how you can use the `force` property of the touch event to measure touch pressure in React Native.
Reviewed By: vjeux
Differential Revision: D2864926
fb-gh-sync-id: 754c54989212ce4e4863716ceaba59673f0bb29d
Summary:
This adds the first of the three 3dTouch API types, that found on the touch event.
It adds the `force` prop to touch events when running on iOS 9 devices:
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/3055
Reviewed By: svcscm
Differential Revision: D2860540
Pulled By: nicklockwood
fb-gh-sync-id: 95a3eb433837c844f755b3ed4a3dfcb28452c284
Summary:
public
NSJSONSerialization throws an exception when it encounters bad JSON data, including NaN values, which may not be a programming error.
This diff adds code to catch those exceptions and convert to an error. Also, if no error handling is in place, RCTJSONStringify will now display a redbox, and attempt to recover by sanitizing the JSON data and retrying.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D2854778
fb-gh-sync-id: 18e6990af0d91083496d6a0b75c31a94ed9454a5
Alex Kotliarskyi
Alexey Lang
Pieter De Baets
Martin Kralik
Tadeu Zagallo
Marc Horowitz
Adam Ernst
Nick Lockwood
Michelle Hwang
Martín Bigio
aleclarsoniv
Mike Grabowski
Walter Luh
Adam Miskiewicz
slycoder
Christopher Chedeau
Matt Apperson
