Summary:
Includes React Native and its dependencies Fresco, Metro, and Yoga. Excludes samples/examples/docs.
find: ^(?:( *)|( *(?:[\*~#]|::))( )? *)?Copyright (?:\(c\) )?(\d{4})\b.+Facebook[\s\S]+?BSD[\s\S]+?(?:this source tree|the same directory)\.$
replace: $1$2$3Copyright (c) $4-present, Facebook, Inc.\n$2\n$1$2$3This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the\n$1$2$3LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.
Reviewed By: TheSavior, yungsters
Differential Revision: D7007050
fbshipit-source-id: 37dd6bf0ffec0923bfc99c260bb330683f35553e
Summary:
Motivation:
* Current implementation of `didUpdateReactSubviews` relies on `processUpdatedProperties:parentProperties:` method of RCTShadowView, which we plan to remove.
* The existing implementation does not call handlers on unmounted nodes (because they are not part of traversing tree), which is not correct.
* The current implementation is tight with RCTComponentData, which is conceptually wrong, it should be a UIManager thing.
* The new implementation must be much more performant because of simplicity. (We can measure it only after removing `processUpdatedProperties`.)
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6595780
fbshipit-source-id: a517207c17b5d5db839c9ce99a37136292acf78c
Summary:
We are removing `reactBridgeDidFinishTransaction`.
Why?
* It is a performance drain. Supporting this requires dispatching main-thread block on every single transaction complete;
* It has "too broad" non-conceptual semantic which encouraged using this as a "band-aid solution" for poorly designed components;
* It is conceptually incompatible with new approaches that we are trying to implement to optimize the render layer;
* It was deprecated for very long time.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6549729
fbshipit-source-id: 58094aab982c67cec3d7fa3b616c637cb84d697f
Summary:
This diff refactors the view update process into two stages:
1. The `reactSubviews` array is set, whose order matches the order of the JS components and shadowView components, as specified by the UIManager.
2. The `didUpdateReactSubviews` method is called, which actually inserts the reactSubviews into the view hierarchy.
This simplifies a lot of the hacks we had for special-case treatment of subviews: In many cases we don't want to actually insert `reactSubviews` into the parentView, and we had a bunch of component-specific solutions for that (typically overriding all of the reactSubviews methods to store views in an array). Now, we can simply override the `didUpdateReactSubviews` method for those views to do nothing, or do something different.
Reviewed By: wwjholmes
Differential Revision: D3396594
fbshipit-source-id: 92fc56fd31db0cfc66aac3d1634a4d4ae3903085
Summary: Views and shadow views might want to configure themself once all of their props were set.
So far there was no way to do it without writing some synchronization code.
This diff adds a `didSetProps` call on both uiviews and shadow views, passing names of all props that were set for convenience.
public
Reviewed By: nicklockwood
Differential Revision: D2699512
fb-gh-sync-id: 65f76e7bcbf5751d5b550261a953c463ed2f4e8a
Summary: public
Added lightweight genarics annotations to make the code more readable and help the compiler catch bugs.
Fixed some type bugs and improved bridge validation in a few places.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D2600189
fb-gh-sync-id: f81e22f2cdc107bf8d0b15deec6d5b83aacc5b56
Summary:
Currently, the system for mapping JS event handlers to blocks is quite clean on the JS side, but is clunky on the native side. The event property is passed as a boolean, which can then be checked by the native side, and if true, the native side is supposed to send an event via the event dispatcher.
This diff adds the facility to declare the property as a block instead. This means that the event side can simply call the block, and it will automatically send the event. Because the blocks for bubbling and direct events are named differently, we can also use this to generate the event registration data and get rid of the arrays of event names.
The name of the event is inferred from the property name, which means that the property for an event called "load" must be called `onLoad` or the mapping won't work. This can be optionally remapped to a different property name on the view itself if necessary, e.g.
RCT_REMAP_VIEW_PROPERTY(onLoad, loadEventBlock, RCTDirectEventBlock)
If you don't want to use this mechanism then for now it is still possible to declare the property as a BOOL instead and use the old mechanism (this approach is now deprecated however, and may eventually be removed altogether).
Summary:
Moved the view creation & property binding logic out of RCTUIManager into a separate RCTComponentData class - this follows the pattern used with the bridge.
I've also updated the property binding to use pre-allocated blocks for setting the values, which is more efficient than the previous system that re-contructed the selectors each time it was called. This should improve view update performance significantly.
Sophie Alpert
Valentin Shergin
Kellie Medlin
Nick Lockwood
Martin Kralik