Summary:
This fixes measuring of items in the main axis of a container. Previously items were in a lot of cases measured with UNSPECIFIED instead of AT_MOST. This was to support scrolling containers. The correct way to handle scrolling containers is to instead provide them with their own overflow value to activate this behavior. This is also similar to how the web works.
This is a breaking change. Most of your layouts will continue to function as before however some of them might not. Typically this is due to having a `flex: 1` style where it is currently a no-op due to being measured with an undefined size but after this change it may collapse your component to take zero size due to the implicit `flexBasis: 0` now being correctly treated. Removing the bad `flex: 1` style or changing it to `flexGrow: 1` should solve most if not all layout issues your see after this diff.
Reviewed By: majak
Differential Revision: D3876927
fbshipit-source-id: 81ea1c9d6574dd4564a3333f1b3617cf84b4022f
Summary:
This version of the css-layout project includes support for .NET projects. Up in the air is how many configurations of .NET projects we allow for, such as Portable Class Libraries, Universal Windows Platform, .NET Core, etc. Still needs integration with Buck.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/css-layout/pull/220
Reviewed By: lucasr
Differential Revision: D3909367
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: aaaa9c4ff2d3452649f256c3268cf873cf33a0b9
Summary: Introduce `overflow:scroll` so that scrolling can be implemented without the current overflow:visible hackiness. Currently we use AT_MOST to measure in the cross axis but not in the main axis. This was done to enable scrolling containers where children are not constraint in the main axis by their parent. This caused problems for non-scrolling containers though as it meant that their children cannot be measured correctly in the main axis. Introducing `overflow:scroll` fixes this.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D3855801
fbshipit-source-id: 3c365f9e6ef612fd9d9caaaa8c650e9702176e77
Summary: Introduce `overflow:scroll` so that scrolling can be implemented without the current overflow:visible hackiness. Currently we use AT_MOST to measure in the cross axis but not in the main axis. This was done to enable scrolling containers where children are not constraint in the main axis by their parent. This caused problems for non-scrolling containers though as it meant that their children cannot be measured correctly in the main axis. Introducing `overflow:scroll` fixes this.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D3855801
fbshipit-source-id: 6077b0bcb68fe5ddd4aa22926acab40ff4d83949
Summary:
When an absolutely positioned node appeared inside an overflow:hidden
parent, we were limiting its height. This is inconsistent with how
layout behaves on the web.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/css-layout/pull/218
Reviewed By: lucasr
Differential Revision: D3797285
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 98f98e77aa26edce86b9882c1cac284799b69a27
Summary:
Consistently namespace all of css-layout's public C API with "CSS". The only function that needed to be renamed was isUndefined, which I renamed to CSSValueIsUndefined.
Fixes#210.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/css-layout/pull/211
Reviewed By: lucasr
Differential Revision: D3674922
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 1752f477bde45586db112fe2654d0404cc52e1d1
Summary: The new CSSLayout have a wrong calculate for the getRelativePosition. So use the getLeadingPosition will get 0 instead of return undefined. Fix it with using isLeadingPosDefined.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D3640799
fbshipit-source-id: 50d3bd2ea4c0d8bf96ba34297425ba269b0535cd
Summary:
The current CSSLayout can't support RTL because wrong calculation for absolute position.
This change is mainly to fix the issue: https://github.com/facebook/css-layout/issues/197
Three main problems I fixed:
1. Calculate the position in the same way as margin, boarder, and padding. So that to fix the absolute problem.
2. Fix one wrong calculation for leading value when we only know the trailing value. It was hard code for the LTR situation. Now I changed it to depends on the main Axis.
3. Expose getter and setter function for RN to read layout direction and start/end position value.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D3616949
fbshipit-source-id: ae7a47cc0a5d02b42b95f87232be51ab144056d9
Kazuki Sakamoto
Emil Sjolander
mattpodwysocki
Adam Comella
rh389
ymmuse
James Ide
Mengjue Wang
Wenjing Wang