Summary:
The flow type for View using createReactClass was essentially `any`, allowing any Prop to be passed in, only pseudo enforced at run time via propTypes.
This diff converts View away from createReactClass and instead uses ReactNative.NativeComponent. This was previously typed as any as well which didn't buy us much. This change converts View to be an ES6 React class component to ensure proptypechecking, and exposes the methods copied from NativeMethodsMixin.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D5933888
fbshipit-source-id: eae63b818203e0e86741f9f154ec9cf3498369e2
Summary:
We have a bunch of components internally that use accessibilityLabel in invalid ways.
View was originally typed as any so invalid usages weren't caught. In order to fix these we have to move forward with getting back to flow having no errors. We are weakening these types to get there and we can tighten them again later.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D7203260
fbshipit-source-id: 2282eba14899c620de5b4b1c1b2670b157f2fc9e
Summary:
<!--
Thank you for sending the PR! We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes.
Help us understand your motivation by explaining why you decided to make this change.
You can learn more about contributing to React Native here: http://facebook.github.io/react-native/docs/contributing.html
Happy contributing!
-->
* To be on par with Apple TV support, this makes it possible to run React Native apps on Android TV devices (See also: https://react-native.canny.io/feature-requests/p/android-tv-support)
* These changes also make it possible to navigate through the app using D-PAD buttons that are present on some mobile devices
* Since these changes affect, among others, `ReactRootView.java` and `Touchable.js` code and are closely related to Apple TV implementation, it makes sense for them to be included in the core
- React native apps can be launched on Android TV devices and properly render their content
- Navigation is possible using left, right, top, bottom arrows from the remote (or D-PAD)
- Touchable components can handle D-PAD center button press events and correctly fire their `onPress` handlers
- Touchable components will receive `onPressIn` and `onPressOut` events and can react to focus/blur changes appropriately (just like on Apple TV)
- `Platform` constants allow to check if the react-native app is running on TV (`Platform.isTV`)
- `ScrollView`s behave correctly (same as native implementation) when switching to view outside bounds – that is, the container would scroll such that the newly focused element is fully visible
- Native "clicking" sounds are played when moving between focusable elements
- Play/Pause click event is send to `TVEventHandler`
- Rewind and FastForward events are send to `TVEventHandler`
- Back button behaves as a normal Android back button
- Diagonal buttons work correctly on Android TV, e.g. if there is no button directly to the right from the focused one, but there is one to the right but a bit higher/lower it will grab focus
- Dev menu can be accessed by long pressing fast forward button
A demo showing RNTester app running on Android TV device (Amazon Fire TV Stick) can be found here:
[![RNAndroidTVDemo](http://img.youtube.com/vi/EzIQErHhY20/0.jpg)](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzIQErHhY20)
- `TextInput` will not work on Android TV devices. There's an issue with native `ReactEditText` implementation that prevents it from receiving focus. This makes it impossible to navigate to `TextInput`.
This will be fixed next, but will be included in a separate Pull Request
- ~Overlay permissions cannot be granted on Android TV devices running Android version >= 6.0
This is because the overlay permission can only be granted by firing an Intent to open settings page (`ACTION_MANAGE_OVERLAY_PERMISSION`). Since this page does not exist on TV devices the permission cannot be requested. This will make the app crash when trying to open dev menu (⌘+M) or displaying a redbox error.
Note: This does not affect devices running Android version < 6.0 (for example Amazon Fire TV Stick)~
This is now fixed by: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/16596
* Launch the RNTester app on Android TV device.
* Ensure it launches without a crash
* Ensure basic navigation is possible
* Ensure Touchable components can receive select events
* Ensure the changes do not break current Android and iOS mobile devices functionality.
* Ensure the changes do not break current Apple TV functionality.
[RNAndroidTVDemo video](http://img.youtube.com/vi/EzIQErHhY20/0.jpg)
* Added `ReactAndroidTVViewManager` that handles TV `KeyEvent`s and dispatches events to JS - This is the core that enables basic navigation functionality on Android TV devices
* Following the above change we copy `TVEventHandler.ios.js` into `TVEventHandler.android.js` to enable JS to pick up those native navigation events and dispatch them further to subscribed views. (Note: We do not have a native `TVNavigationEventEmitter` implementation on Android, thus this file is slightly modified, e.g. it does pass `null` to `NativeEventEmitter` constructor)
* Added `uiMode` to `AndroidInfoModule`. (**Note**: This required changing `extends BaseJavaModule` to `extends ReactContextBaseJavaModule` to be able to use `getSystemService` which requires `Context` instance!
* Added `isTV` constants to both `Platform.ios.js` (keeping the deprecated `isTVOS` as well) and `Platform.android.js`
* Changed condition check on `Touchable.js` to use the newly added `isTV` flag to properly handle TV navigation events on Android as well
* Added `LEANBACK_LAUNCHER` to `RNTester` `intent-filter` so that it is possible to launch it on Android TV devices.
* See also a PR to `react-native-website` repo with updated docs for Android TV: https://github.com/facebook/react-native-website/pull/59
- [ ] Fix `TextInput` components handling by allowing them to be focused and making a proper navigation between them (and/or other components) possible. One thing to note here that the default behavior to immediately open software keyboard when focused on `TextInput` field will need to be adjusted on Android TV as well)
- [x] Fix overlay permissions issue by changing the way redbox/dev menu are displayed (see: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/16596)
- [ ] Adjust placement of TV-related files (e.g. the `TVEventHandler.js` file is placed inside `AppleTV` directory which is not accurate, since it does handle Android TV events as well)
Previous discussion: https://github.com/SoftwareMansion/react-native/pull/1
<!--
Help reviewers and the release process by writing your own release notes
**INTERNAL and MINOR tagged notes will not be included in the next version's final release notes.**
CATEGORY
[----------] TYPE
[ CLI ] [-------------] LOCATION
[ DOCS ] [ BREAKING ] [-------------]
[ GENERAl ] [ BUGFIX ] [-{Component}-]
[ INTERNAL ] [ ENHANCEMENT ] [ {File} ]
[ IOS ] [ FEATURE ] [ {Directory} ] |-----------|
[ ANDROID ] [ MINOR ] [ {Framework} ] - | {Message} |
[----------] [-------------] [-------------] |-----------|
[CATEGORY] [TYPE] [LOCATION] - MESSAGE
EXAMPLES:
[IOS] [BREAKING] [FlatList] - Change a thing that breaks other things
[ANDROID] [BUGFIX] [TextInput] - Did a thing to TextInput
[CLI] [FEATURE] [local-cli/info/info.js] - CLI easier to do things with
[DOCS] [BUGFIX] [GettingStarted.md] - Accidentally a thing/word
[GENERAL] [ENHANCEMENT] [Yoga] - Added new yoga thing/position
[INTERNAL] [FEATURE] [./scripts] - Added thing to script that nobody will see
-->
[ANDROID] [FEATURE] [TV] - Added support for Android TV devices
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/16500
Differential Revision: D6536847
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 17bbb11e8583b97f195ced5fd9762f8902fb8a3d
Summary:
Hi! I would like to contribute to React Native, and I am just starting out. I forked the repo and found that it has quite a lot of ESLint warnings – many of which were automatically fixable. This PR is simply the result of running `yarn lint --fix` from the root folder.
Most changes are removing trailing spaces from comments.
Haven't really done any manual testing, since I haven't done any code changes manually. `yarn test` runs fine, `yarn flow` runs fine, `yarn prettier` is satisfied.
N/A
[INTERNAL][MINOR][] - Fix ESLint warnings
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/18047
Differential Revision: D7054948
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: d53e692698d1687de5821c3fb5cdb76a5e03b71e
Summary:
Includes React Native and its dependencies Fresco, Metro, and Yoga. Excludes samples/examples/docs.
find: ^(?:( *)|( *(?:[\*~#]|::))( )? *)?Copyright (?:\(c\) )?(\d{4})\b.+Facebook[\s\S]+?BSD[\s\S]+?(?:this source tree|the same directory)\.$
replace: $1$2$3Copyright (c) $4-present, Facebook, Inc.\n$2\n$1$2$3This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the\n$1$2$3LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.
Reviewed By: TheSavior, yungsters
Differential Revision: D7007050
fbshipit-source-id: 37dd6bf0ffec0923bfc99c260bb330683f35553e
Summary:
Currently `isInAParentText` context works as imaginary `isInAAncestorText` context (not like a real `isInAParentText`).
Let's imagine we have hierarchy like:
`View -> Text -> Text* -> View* -> Text* -> Text* -> View*`
With current implementation all nodes marked with asterisk have `isInAParentText` context, which is incorrect (because some of them actually in View context).
With the new implemetations it will work like this:
`View -> Text -> Text* -> View* -> Text -> Text* -> View*`
So, only nodes which have <Text> (or <TextInput>) as a parent will have `isInAParentText` context.
This change allows to select proper `Text` vs. `VirtualText` component in cases where <Text> and <View> components can interleave each other.
Reviewed By: sahrens
Differential Revision: D6690495
fbshipit-source-id: f7c59b23d0eaf68a1d08036b858d99c9547f7878
Summary:
This feature has been requested by customers. Our previous (pre-react) application had support for custom accessibility actions.
This feature allows UI elements to provide a list of custom actions that can be read when VoiceOver is enabled. UI elements expose one accessibility action by default. Some UI elements may support multiple actions though other mechanisms like tap and hold. To expose these actions in an accessible way iOS provides custom accessibility actions.
Feature was tested in the iOS simulator using the Accessibility Inspector. Custom actions were added to a button and observed in the tool. Custom actions were also invoked using the tool and then stepped through in the debugger.
The feature was also tested on an iPhone. VoiceOver was enabled on the device and custom actions were observed for controls that exposed them.
We have been using this feature in our app for some time as well.
[IOS] [ENHANCEMENT] [Accessibility] - Added support for custom accessibility actions
Eric Davison
Microsoft Corp.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/17020
Differential Revision: D6472283
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: 4ac4697dca07028e87ffe71b70c00280e7f2043c
Summary:
Now that the Component and API docs are no longer auto-generated, we need to consolidate on a new format for our jsdoc comments. Any help from the community will be appreciated.
In this initial pull request, we'll be tackling the following docs:
- `AccessibilityInfo`, an API doc.
- `ActivityIndicator`, a Component doc.
- `View`, a Component doc.
This top comment will serve as a style guide, and when in doubt, please refer to the individual commits in this PR.
Each commit should update a single component or API, along with any relevant markdown files.
- Documentation in the JavaScript source files should be succinct. Any verbosity should be moved over to the markdown docs in the website...
- ...by adding a link to the relevant method/prop on the website to every comment block.
- Avoid markdown style links in JavaScript source files, opt for plain old URIs.
Let code document itself:
- If a method is Flow typed, the comment block does not need to repeat this information.
- If a param can be one of several values, and the type definition is easily determined from the code, the values should not be repeated in the comment block. Again, move this to the markdown doc if not present already.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/16790
Differential Revision: D6353840
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 9712c459acc33092aae9909f3dd0b58a00b26afc
Summary:
The relevant changes in the PR are to Libraries/StyleSheet/EdgeInsetsPropType.js; the rest are just removals of FlowIgnores.
The definition of the relevant types is [here](https://github.com/facebook/flow/blob/master/lib/react.js#L262-L271).
The long and short of it is that for whatever reason, Flow is unable to realize that `ReactPropsChainableTypeChecker` is a subtype of `ReactPropsCheckType` unless we assert it. Once we explicitly hint this to the typechecker, it realizes that `EdgeInsetsPropType` is indeed a valid React PropType, and stops complaining that it isn't.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/16437
Differential Revision: D6109742
Pulled By: sahrens
fbshipit-source-id: e4e10720b68c912d0372d810409f389b65d7f4b1
Summary:
Platforms that plug in to react-native may require additional props that are specific to those platforms. For example, already in react-native there are props that are specific to Android (`accessibilityComponentType`, `needsOffscreenAlphaCompositing`, etc.), props that are specific to iOS (`accessibilityTraits`, `shouldRasterizeIOS`, etc.) and props that are specific to tvOS (`isTVSelectable`, `tvParallaxProperties`, etc.).
I need to add properties to `react-native-windows`, and I'd prefer not to override the entire `ViewPropTypes` file as it is a risk that things in react-native-windows fall out of sync with react-native.
Fixes#15173
<!--
Thank you for sending the PR!
If you changed any code, please provide us with clear instructions on how you verified your changes work. In other words, a test plan is *required*. Bonus points for screenshots and videos!
Please read the Contribution Guidelines at https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md to learn more about contributing to React Native.
Happy contributing!
-->
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/15175
Differential Revision: D5481444
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 3da08716d03ccdf317ec447536eea3699dd7a760
Summary:
This replaces all uses of `React.createClass` with `createReactClass` from the `create-react-class` package, attempting to match use of `var` and `const` according to local style.
Fixes#14620
Refs #14712
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/14729
Differential Revision: D5321810
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: ae7b40640b2773fd89c3fb727ec87f688bebf585
Summary: We deprecated `transformMatrix` and `decomposedMatrix` in D3239960 10 months ago. This revision finally removes remains of this functionality from native code.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D4515760
fbshipit-source-id: b4d5b7e834ac4a775f4992b28270b4ff961889a6
Summary: Exports Flow types for the props related to accessibility.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D4498562
fbshipit-source-id: 2fb6e78d4ceaf9f26b6ea88d515b7b28f570de52
Summary:
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem does the pull request solve?
I had tried fixing a broken link in a previous commit (#11453). My commit was merged, but it did not resolve the underlying problem. I have looked into how links should be formed for the docs and have fixed the original problem as well as updated all other links to be consistent.
Previous link formats:
- /docs/sample.html <-- broken link
- sample.html <-- broken link
- https://facebook.github.io/react-native/docs/sample.html <-- works
- /react-native/docs/sample.html <-- works
- docs/sample.html <-- works (permalink format)
This PR updates all links to the permalink format.
**Test plan (required)**
I ran the website locally and manually tested half of the links in each category. They all worked.
```
$ cd website
$ npm install && npm start
```
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/12064
Differential Revision: D4489153
Pulled By: mkonicek
fbshipit-source-id: bf0231d941ba147317595c3b3466dc579a887169
Summary: `'invariant'` can only be resolved by chance if node modules have been installed with npm3 or yarn, as it is a transitive dependency of `babel-traverse`. This changes the import to the direct dependency `fbjs/lib/invariant`.
Reviewed By: jeanlauliac, astreet
Differential Revision: D4462471
fbshipit-source-id: 5c841845012ed22a7c6264d46326a47807948513
Summary: Since we don't support this, we should throw early. Also tries to improve the error message when adding a node that doesn't have a YogaNode to a node that can't measure itself.
Reviewed By: andreicoman11
Differential Revision: D4421542
fbshipit-source-id: e0be8cdd763091145e5e6af2db91515f4d236b37
Summary:
This fixes measuring of items in the main axis of a container. Previously items were in a lot of cases measured with UNSPECIFIED instead of AT_MOST. This was to support scrolling containers. The correct way to handle scrolling containers is to instead provide them with their own overflow value to activate this behavior. This is also similar to how the web works.
This is a breaking change. Most of your layouts will continue to function as before however some of them might not. Typically this is due to having a `flex: 1` style where it is currently a no-op due to being measured with an undefined size but after this change it may collapse your component to take zero size due to the implicit `flexBasis: 0` now being correctly treated. Removing the bad `flex: 1` style or changing it to `flexGrow: 1` should solve most if not all layout issues your see after this diff.
Reviewed By: majak
Differential Revision: D3876927
fbshipit-source-id: 81ea1c9d6574dd4564a3333f1b3617cf84b4022f
Summary:
This adds support for sticky headers on Android. The implementation if based primarily on the iOS one (https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/master/React/Views/RCTScrollView.m#L272) and adds some stuff that was missing to be able to handle z-index, view clipping, view hierarchy optimization and touch handling properly.
Some notable changes:
- Add `ChildDrawingOrderDelegate` interface to allow changing the `ViewGroup` drawing order using `ViewGroup#getChildDrawingOrder`. This is used to change the content view drawing order to make sure headers are drawn over the other cells. Right now I'm only reversing the drawing order as drawing only the header views last added a lot of complexity especially because of view clipping and I don't think it should cause issues.
- Add `collapsableChildren` prop that works like `collapsable` but applies to every child of the view. This is needed to be able to reference sticky headers by their indices otherwise some subviews can get optimized out and break indexes.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9456
Differential Revision: D3827366
Pulled By: fred2028
fbshipit-source-id: d346068734c5b987518794ab23e13914ed13b5c4
Summary:
This adds support for sticky headers on Android. The implementation if based primarily on the iOS one (https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/master/React/Views/RCTScrollView.m#L272) and adds some stuff that was missing to be able to handle z-index, view clipping, view hierarchy optimization and touch handling properly.
Some notable changes:
- Add `ChildDrawingOrderDelegate` interface to allow changing the `ViewGroup` drawing order using `ViewGroup#getChildDrawingOrder`. This is used to change the content view drawing order to make sure headers are drawn over the other cells. Right now I'm only reversing the drawing order as drawing only the header views last added a lot of complexity especially because of view clipping and I don't think it should cause issues.
- Add `collapsableChildren` prop that works like `collapsable` but applies to every child of the view. This is needed to be able to reference sticky headers by their indices otherwise some subviews can get optimized out and break indexes.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9456
Differential Revision: D3827366
fbshipit-source-id: cab044cfdbe2ccb98e1ecd3e02ed3ceaa253eb78
Summary: Introduce `overflow:scroll` so that scrolling can be implemented without the current overflow:visible hackiness. Currently we use AT_MOST to measure in the cross axis but not in the main axis. This was done to enable scrolling containers where children are not constraint in the main axis by their parent. This caused problems for non-scrolling containers though as it meant that their children cannot be measured correctly in the main axis. Introducing `overflow:scroll` fixes this.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D3855801
fbshipit-source-id: 3c365f9e6ef612fd9d9caaaa8c650e9702176e77
Summary: Introduce `overflow:scroll` so that scrolling can be implemented without the current overflow:visible hackiness. Currently we use AT_MOST to measure in the cross axis but not in the main axis. This was done to enable scrolling containers where children are not constraint in the main axis by their parent. This caused problems for non-scrolling containers though as it meant that their children cannot be measured correctly in the main axis. Introducing `overflow:scroll` fixes this.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D3855801
fbshipit-source-id: 6077b0bcb68fe5ddd4aa22926acab40ff4d83949
Summary: This removes `node_modules/react` from the list of directories that are used for haste module resolutions. Modules required from React are now imported with `require('react/lib/…')`.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D3509863
fbshipit-source-id: 32cd34e2b8496f0a6676dbe6bb1eacc18124c01e
Summary:
Ensure all `props` have documentation. Add more details to current `props`.
Provide more information to the API in general.
> Would like to try to integrate the React Native Web Player for the initial
> example, but not right now.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/8341
Differential Revision: D3475105
Pulled By: caabernathy
fbshipit-source-id: 00ad30b2359831740715517278bec1d0231e089d
Summary:Fix bad wording in the docs change I did in #6534
cc mkonicek
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/6598
Differential Revision: D3085957
Pulled By: vjeux
fb-gh-sync-id: 2b45ac72acf089be6cf8e815aac430a2ce9d08ed
shipit-source-id: 2b45ac72acf089be6cf8e815aac430a2ce9d08ed
Summary:The docs for touchEvents was really unclear and assumed that you know what `pointer-events` does in CSS. This is confusing especially for native developers, see [this issue](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/36068392/set-userinteractionenabled-false-in-react-native/36096413) on stack overflow.
I added a short description to the prop and all the possible enum values and made it so the comment that explain why it is a prop and not a style doesn't appear on the website as it is not really relevant there.
**Test plan (required)**
Tested by running the website locally.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/6534
Differential Revision: D3075198
Pulled By: mkonicek
fb-gh-sync-id: 57c8444fc83a31599dc872c361b142531cdd4885
shipit-source-id: 57c8444fc83a31599dc872c361b142531cdd4885
Summary:Follow-up to https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/5084
This…
- changes all requires within RN to `require('fbjs/lib/…')`
- updates `.flowconfig`
- updates `packager/blacklist.js`
- adapts tests
- removes things from `Libraries/vendor/{core,emitter}` that are also in fbjs
- removes knowledge of `fbjs` from the packager
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/5084
Reviewed By: bestander
Differential Revision: D2926835
fb-gh-sync-id: 2095e22b2f38e032599d1f2601722b3560e8b6e9
shipit-source-id: 2095e22b2f38e032599d1f2601722b3560e8b6e9
Summary:New prop `hitSlop` allows extending the touch area of Touchable components. This makes it easier to touch small buttons without needing to change your styles.
It takes `top`, `bottom`, `left`, and `right` same as the `pressRetentionOffset` prop. When a touch is moved, `hitSlop` is combined with `pressRetentionOffset` to determine how far the touch can move off the button before deactivating the button.
On Android I had to add a new file `ids.xml` to generate a unique ID to use for the tag where I store the `hitSlop` state. The iOS side is more straightforward.
terribleben worked on the iOS and JS parts of this diff.
Fixes#110
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/5720
Differential Revision: D2941671
Pulled By: androidtrunkagent
fb-gh-sync-id: 07e3eb8b6a36eebf76968fdaac3c6ac335603194
shipit-source-id: 07e3eb8b6a36eebf76968fdaac3c6ac335603194
Summary:
public
This diff improves the implementation of 3D touch by adding a `forceTouchAvailable` constant to View that can be used to check if the feature is supported.
I've also added an example of how you can use the `force` property of the touch event to measure touch pressure in React Native.
Reviewed By: vjeux
Differential Revision: D2864926
fb-gh-sync-id: 754c54989212ce4e4863716ceaba59673f0bb29d
Summary:
In Android, Fresco's default rounding corners support mode is BITMAP_ONLY which doesn't work in all cases (such as animated GIF's, some scale types, etc.).
Specifying the new "overlayColor" property on an Image will cause Fresco to switch to the other rounding corners mode, OVERLAY_COLOR, and will draw rounded corners by overlaying the solid color specified.
Fresco's behaviour is explained here: http://frescolib.org/docs/rounded-corners-and-circles.html
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/5366
Reviewed By: svcscm
Differential Revision: D2854696
Pulled By: mkonicek
fb-gh-sync-id: 251701ee8a64acbfc22694e9d4661c40eef75725
Summary:
public
React Native currently exposes the iOS layer shadow properties more-or-less directly, however there are a number of problems with this:
1) Performance when using these properties is poor by default. That's because iOS calculates the shadow by getting the exact pixel mask of the view, including any tranlucent content, and all of its subviews, which is very CPU and GPU-intensive.
2) The iOS shadow properties do not match the syntax or semantics of the CSS box-shadow standard, and are unlikely to be possible to implement on Android.
3) We don't expose the `layer.shadowPath` property, which is crucial to getting good performance out of layer shadows.
This diff solves problem number 1) by implementing a default `shadowPath` that matches the view border for views with an opaque background. This improves the performance of shadows by optimizing for the common usage case. I've also reinstated background color propagation for views which have shadow props - this should help ensure that this best-case scenario occurs more often.
For views with an explicit transparent background, the shadow will continue to work as it did before ( `shadowPath` will be left unset, and the shadow will be derived exactly from the pixels of the view and its subviews). This is the worst-case path for performance, however, so you should avoid it unless absolutely necessary. **Support for this may be disabled by default in future, or dropped altogether.**
For translucent images, it is suggested that you bake the shadow into the image itself, or use another mechanism to pre-generate the shadow. For text shadows, you should use the textShadow properties, which work cross-platform and have much better performance.
Problem number 2) will be solved in a future diff, possibly by renaming the iOS shadowXXX properties to boxShadowXXX, and changing the syntax and semantics to match the CSS standards.
Problem number 3) is now mostly moot, since we generate the shadowPath automatically. In future, we may provide an iOS-specific prop to set the path explicitly if there's a demand for more precise control of the shadow.
Reviewed By: weicool
Differential Revision: D2827581
fb-gh-sync-id: 853aa018e1d61d5f88304c6fc1b78f9d7e739804
Summary:
Problem: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/4708
Solution: Added a ColorPropType that validates the color used by the dev
Notes:
1) I'm working a Win8.1 machine and couldn't build the react-native using the github repo. As soon as I figure that out, I'll probably figure how to run the tests and how to add some for this feature.
2) It's my first pull request. Be gentle :)
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/4866
Reviewed By: bestander, svcscm
Differential Revision: D2783672
Pulled By: nicklockwood
fb-gh-sync-id: ca22aa3c0999188075681b5d20fff0631496e238
Summary: public
RCTUIManager is a public module with several useful methods, however, unlike most such modules, it does not have a JS wrapper that would allow it to be required directly.
Besides making it more cumbersome to use, this also makes it impossible to modify the UIManager API, or smooth over differences between platforms in the JS layer without breaking all of the call sites.
This diff adds a simple JS wrapper file for the UIManager module to make it easier to work with.
Reviewed By: tadeuzagallo
Differential Revision: D2700348
fb-gh-sync-id: dd9030eface100b1baf756da11bae355dc0f266f
Summary: This PR includes a working interface to Android's `elevation` property implemented as an RN style. Elevation is the only (easy) [platform-supported way to create shadows](http://developer.android.com/training/material/shadows-clipping.html). For it to work note that you must be running on Android 5.0+, and add `elevation` to a view with a `backgroundColor` set. These are platform limitations.
This PR is not intended to be merged in its current state, but rather to inform the discussion from #2768. At a minimum, before merging we would need to add the elevation style to the docs and rebase this to master (**EDIT** I have now rebased on master because from v0.14.2 too many commits were being pulled in -- haven't tested it since the rebase though). Additionally, it might be good to add tests, although I couldn't find any for the Android code. I'm happy to get that done if this feature gets signed off by the React Native team.
Finally, as I argued in #2768 I think that `elevation` is a useful abstraction ov
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/4180
Reviewed By: svcscm
Differential Revision: D2684746
Pulled By: mkonicek
fb-gh-sync-id: 825f3ccd20c4b0eea9d11b5f0e3a6b018b7e4378
Summary: Got bitten lately by View.js returning different component based on `__DEV__`
Adding a warning in the render method that should make it cleaner in the future that this method is not actually being used in prod mode.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/4322
Reviewed By: svcscm
Differential Revision: D2691880
Pulled By: vjeux
fb-gh-sync-id: 119672740969a857ab6288b7914d52e8d40a1d95
Summary: public
In a previous diff I've removed a need for using View attributes in requireNativeComponent. Thanks to that we can now use requireNativeComponent in View module. In a follow up diff I'll be getting rid of ReactNativeViewAttributes.
Reviewed By: sahrens
Differential Revision: D2676088
fb-gh-sync-id: d5d6e50f4629bd7982b90f3496e1fd22078e96a8
Summary: Decouple processStyle from the main reconciliation. It is now a process
extension to the style attribute `transform`. This effectively decouples a
large portion of special cases and helper dependencies from the reconciler.
The transform attribute becomes translated into the transformMatrix attribute on
the native side so this becomes a little weird in that I have to special case
it. I don't think it is worth while having a general solution for this so I
intend to rename the native attribute to `transform` and just have it accept the
resolved transform. Then I can remove the special cases.
The next step is generalizing the flattenStyle function and optimizing it.
@public
Reviewed By: @vjeux
Differential Revision: D2460465
fb-gh-sync-id: 243e7fd77d282b401bc2c028aec8d57f24522a8e
Summary: Move the ViewAttributes and StyleAttributes configuration into the
Components library since they're coupled and change with the
native component configuration.
This also decouples StyleAttributes from the reconciler by adding it
to the ReactViewAttributes.
To do that, I refactored the property diffing to allow for recursive
configurations. Now an attribute configuration can be a nested object,
a custom configuration (diff/process) or true.
The requireNativeComponent path incorrectly gets its attributes set up
on the root validAttributes instead of the nested style object.
So I also have to add the nested form. Effectively these currently allow
these attributes on props or nested.
@public
Reviewed By: @vjeux
Differential Revision: D2456842
fb-gh-sync-id: cd5405bd8316c2fcb016d06c61244ce7719c26c0
Summary:
We currently wait until after views have been updated on the main thread before sending layout events. This means that any code that relies on those events to update the UI will lag the atual layout by at least one frame.
This changes the RCTUIManager to send the event immediately after layout has occured on the shadow thread. This noticably improves the respinsiveness of the layout example in UIExplorer, which now updates the dimension labels immediately instead of waiting until after the layout animation has completed.
Summary:
Remove layout-only views. Works by checking properties against a list of known properties that only affect layout. The `RCTShadowView` hierarchy still has a 1:1 correlation with the JS nodes.
This works by adjusting the tags and indices in `manageChildren`. For example, if JS told us to insert tag 1 at index 0 and tag 1 is layout-only with children whose tags are 2 and 3, we adjust it so we insert tags 2 and 3 at indices 0 and 1. This keeps changes out of `RCTView` and `RCTScrollView`. In order to simplify this logic, view moves are now processed as view removals followed by additions. A move from index 0 to 1 is recorded as a removal of view at indices 0 and 1 and an insertion of tags 1 and 2 at indices 0 and 1. Of course, the remaining indices have to be offset to take account for this.
The `collapsible` attribute is a bit of a hack to force `RCTScrollView` to always have one child. This was easier than rethinking out the logic there, but we could change this later.