Summary: `autoresizingMask` is supposed to be set outside self class, this is UIKit convention.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D4697098
fbshipit-source-id: 7e0aa5d3032184de980b3cecafebbc4ce8ef9ada
Summary:
Nothing actually changed except the deprecation.
Existed `intrinsicSize` was already implemented as `intrinsicContentSize` and this change only removes redundancy.
Moreover, we do not need `rootViewDidChangeIntrinsicSize` delegate method anymore; this is now mentioned in its description.
Depends on D4577890
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D4589344
fbshipit-source-id: 16ed62cbf6bf72678bd7f7c11d4812c5aa36c743
Summary:
Now RCTRootView is much more reliable citizen of UIKit, it got:
* Implemented `sizeThatFits:`;
* Implemented `instrinsicContentSize`;
* Notifying superview via `setNeedsLayout` about changed size.
All it make possible painless integration of ReactNative-powered widgets inside existing native apps.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D4577890
fbshipit-source-id: 9897cb002c9d658a97fd436240c2ac947ba2084b
Summary:
Now things look much more clear, I hope.
This diff:
* Introduces new property of `RCTRootShadowView` `availableSize` which represents exactly what we transmit to layout engine;
* Illuminates conflict between logical `availableSize` and explicitly specified size of DOM node (current `size`);
* Splits overcomplicated `setSize:forView:` method into two unrelated ones;
* Changes actual values of `RCTRootViewSizeFlexibility` enum constants for simpler usage;
* Completely removes `sizeFlexibility` concept from `RCTRootShadowView` (in favor of special values of `availableSize`);
* Makes the code clearer finally.
This is beginning of big effort to improve `RCTRootView` and co.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D4562834
fbshipit-source-id: f5baaf2859ea430d44645a6b5d35f222f15a668e
Summary:
This diff refactors the view update process into two stages:
1. The `reactSubviews` array is set, whose order matches the order of the JS components and shadowView components, as specified by the UIManager.
2. The `didUpdateReactSubviews` method is called, which actually inserts the reactSubviews into the view hierarchy.
This simplifies a lot of the hacks we had for special-case treatment of subviews: In many cases we don't want to actually insert `reactSubviews` into the parentView, and we had a bunch of component-specific solutions for that (typically overriding all of the reactSubviews methods to store views in an array). Now, we can simply override the `didUpdateReactSubviews` method for those views to do nothing, or do something different.
Reviewed By: wwjholmes
Differential Revision: D3396594
fbshipit-source-id: 92fc56fd31db0cfc66aac3d1634a4d4ae3903085
Summary:
As per https://twitter.com/olebegemann/status/738656134731599872, our use of "main thread" to mean "main queue" seems to be unsafe.
This diff replaces the `NSThread.isMainQueue` checks with dispatch_get_specific(), which is the recommended approach.
I've also replaced all use of "MainThread" terminology with "MainQueue", and taken the opportunity to deprecate the "sync" param of `RCTExecuteOnMainThread()`, which, while we do still use it in a few places, is incredibly unsafe and shouldn't be encouraged.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3384910
fbshipit-source-id: ea7c216013372267b82eb25a38db5eb4cd46a089
Summary:It was hard to understand which parts of the shadowview API are designed to be called only on the root view, and which were applicable to any view.
This diff extracts rootview-specific logic out into a new RCTRootShadowView class.
Reviewed By: majak
Differential Revision: D3063905
fb-gh-sync-id: ef890cddfd7625fbd4bf5454314b441acdb03ac8
shipit-source-id: ef890cddfd7625fbd4bf5454314b441acdb03ac8
Summary:
public
A lot of the core modules have to use private methods in the bridge, specially
since the `RCTBatchedBridge` interface is never exposed. That was leading to a
lot of different private bridge categories spread across different modules,
which makes harder to identify which modules are affected by private API changes.
Replace all the categories with a single private header.
Reviewed By: nicklockwood
Differential Revision: D2757564
fb-gh-sync-id: 793158b9082d542b74a6094ed0db4d5dc3a88f78
Summary:
The JavaScript ecosystem doesn't have the notion of a built-in native module loader. Even Node is decoupled from its module loader. The module loader system is just JS that runs on top of the global `process` object which has all the built-in goodies.
Additionally there is no such thing as a global require. That is something unique to our providesModule system. In other module systems such as node, every require is contextual. Even registered npm names are localized by version.
The only global namespace that is accessible to the host environment is the global object. Normally module systems attaches itself onto the hooks provided by the host environment on the global object.
Currently, we have two forms of dispatch that reaches directly into the module system. executeJSCall which reaches directly into require. Everything now calls through the BatchedBridge module (except one RCTLog edge case that I will fix). I propose that the executors calls directly onto `BatchedBridge` through an instance on the global so that everything is guaranteed to go through it. It becomes the main communication hub.
I also propose that we drop the dynamic requires inside of MessageQueue/BatchBridge and instead have the modules register themselves with the bridge.
executeJSCall was originally modeled after the XHP equivalent. The XHP equivalent was designed that way because the act of doing the call was the thing that defined a dependency on the module from the page. However, that is not how React Native works.
The JS side is driving the dependencies by virtue of requiring new modules and frameworks and the existence of dependencies is driven by the JS side, so this design doesn't make as much sense.
The main driver for this is to be able to introduce a new module system like Prepack's module system. However, it also unlocks the possibility to do dead module elimination even in our current module system. It is currently not possible because we don't know which module might be called from native.
Since the module system now becomes decoupled we could publish all our providesModule modules as npm/CommonJS modules using a rewrite script. That's what React Core does.
That way people could use any CommonJS bundler such as Webpack, Closure Compiler, Rollup or some new innovation to create a JS bundle.
This diff expands the executeJSCalls to the BatchedBridge's three individual pieces to make them first class instead of being dynamic. This removes one layer of abstraction. Hopefully we can also remove more of the things that register themselves with the BatchedBridge (various EventEmitters) and instead have everything go through the public protocol. ReactMethod/RCT_EXPORT_METHOD.
public
Reviewed By: vjeux
Differential Revision: D2717535
fb-gh-sync-id: 70114f05483124f5ac5c4570422bb91a60a727f6
Summary: public
The WebView executor has no benefits compared to the JSC executor (slower, no extra debugging tools...),
and it's pretty hacky (since it injects the code in a script tag we have to check for tags in the comments and etc...).
Reviewed By: nicklockwood, javache
Differential Revision: D2636465
fb-gh-sync-id: 0d0f8a59e2c12fe7905b02060b3938c894d2802b
Valentin Shergin
Alexey Lang
Pieter De Baets
Skotch Vail
Nick Lockwood
Marc Horowitz
Martin Kralik
Oleg Lokhvitsky
Tadeu Zagallo
Sebastian Markbage
Pawel Sienkowski
Robert Fleischmann