Summary: Using customDirectEventTypes or customBubblingEventTypes causes a viewmanager to be initialized at app start. This diff deprecates those methods and removes their usage from RCTScrollViewManager.
Reviewed By: majak
Differential Revision: D3218973
fb-gh-sync-id: 295bef3be9623b49b0cdcbf8a56e10d9b28126d9
fbshipit-source-id: 295bef3be9623b49b0cdcbf8a56e10d9b28126d9
Summary: The notification was previously sent from a block that only existed if RCT_DEV. This makes us always send this notification.
Reviewed By: majak
Differential Revision: D3235070
fb-gh-sync-id: bf3488d439bc2253fd12cbb10f670f54bb37eb6e
fbshipit-source-id: bf3488d439bc2253fd12cbb10f670f54bb37eb6e
Summary:
Now that we support initializing the bridge off the main thread, some of the assumptions in the bridge setup process are no longer safe.
In particular we were assuming that the JS executor and injected modules could always be synchronously initialized within bridge init, but that is only safe if those modules don't need to be set up on the main thread.
The setup for those modules was sync-dispatching to the main thread if bridge init happened on a background thread, and this lead to a deadlock under certain circumstances.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3224162
fb-gh-sync-id: 7319b70f541a46ef932cfe4f776e7e192f3ce1e8
fbshipit-source-id: 7319b70f541a46ef932cfe4f776e7e192f3ce1e8
Summary: Creating a view instance just to get the default view size is quite expensive, and affects startup time for the bridge as it must be done on the main thread. I've removed these cases and simply hard-coded the sizes in the JS file. This will need to be updated if the view sizes ever change, but in practice that's very unlikely.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3218917
fb-gh-sync-id: 91a21dabb6046c5d4d5d0bec0845415cb3628ec3
fbshipit-source-id: 91a21dabb6046c5d4d5d0bec0845415cb3628ec3
Summary:This adds support for delete view animations in LayoutAnimation for iOS. It supports the same properties as the create animation (alpha, scale).
This allows making simple animations when removing a view which is normally hard to do in React since we need to not remove the view node immediately.
**Test plan**
Tested add/removing views in the UIExample explorer with and without setting a LayoutAnimation. Also tested that the completion callback still works properly. Tested that user interation during the animation is properly disabled.
I also plan to work on improving the doc for LayoutAnimation as well as making this PR for android too.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/6779
Differential Revision: D3215525
Pulled By: sahrens
fb-gh-sync-id: 526120acd371c8d1af433e8f199cfed336183775
fbshipit-source-id: 526120acd371c8d1af433e8f199cfed336183775
Summary: fixed a case where MapView could crash due to a race condition
Differential Revision: D3207304
fb-gh-sync-id: a63918d160258d76fce5d56994100a63f4c5fb68
fbshipit-source-id: a63918d160258d76fce5d56994100a63f4c5fb68
Summary:**Motivation:** In my app, I'm using a WebView that loads content from my mobile site. What I want to do is when a user presses a link on the loaded page, I want to stop the WebView's request, hijack the URL and open the URL in a new WebView, pushed to the top of the navigator stack. To me, this gives the overall app a more native feel, instead of implementing a rudimentary navbar on the main WebView to go back.
**Attempted Workarounds:** I've attempted to get similar functionality by capturing the onNavigationStateChange event in the WebView, and then within calling goBack + pushing the new view to the navigator stack. From a functionality standpoint, this works. However, from a UI standpoint, the user can clearly see the webview change states to a new page + go back before having the new view pushed on top of their nav stack.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/6886
Differential Revision: D3212447
Pulled By: mkonicek
fb-gh-sync-id: 05911e583d9ba54ddbd54a772153c80ed227731e
fbshipit-source-id: 05911e583d9ba54ddbd54a772153c80ed227731e
Summary:Hey,
I have been going through some UIAlert related issues in the repo trying to fix them, and one of the steps to start reproducing them was to put `Alert.alert()` call right inside `componentDidMount`.
However, I've started noticing strange bugs as long as I didn't set 1second timeout.
Started digging in deeper, and I've noticed the `UIAlert` gets attached to the `RCTWindow()` mainViewController.
However - since RCTDevLoadingView adds a `keyWindow`, that is the window that will be returned at the time of the call and the window `UIAlert` will be attached to.
To visualise that better - you can take a look at these two frames when app is being loaded:
<img width="371" alt="screen shot 2016-04-20 at 22 02 45" src="https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/2464966/14688596/ae8d292c-0743-11e6-8aeb-e45da391b5b5.png">
<img width="371" alt="screen shot 2016-04-20 at 22 02 58" src="https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/2464966/14688599/b30798e8-0743-11e6-951a-463fe7324c56.png">
AFAIK we do
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7098
Differential Revision: D3207395
Pulled By: javache
fb-gh-sync-id: f8dca063573ac6f2a0ec497138b2ed0a7b27788b
fbshipit-source-id: f8dca063573ac6f2a0ec497138b2ed0a7b27788b
Summary:We had an issue where a rendered modal would not end up using the full screen size, but a size computed based on its initial content.
Which is a small spinner in case of RelayContainer. So rarely we would end up with cut off view like this:
{F60650629}
This diff fixes this behavior by wrapping the content in another view. That makes the modal's wrapping VC's view resize just once when it's initially created. (Resize for the wrapping VC's view happened previously when the modal's content resized, which got us in the bad state.)
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3202299
fb-gh-sync-id: 7c4dc1dbb27654292d07aef5916aa31df5cd4302
fbshipit-source-id: 7c4dc1dbb27654292d07aef5916aa31df5cd4302
Summary:When JSC throws an error on startup (e.g. a SyntaxError) or when invoking a method that is not caught by RCTExceptionsManager, we previously just reported is a native error, with a (useless) native stack trace in the redbox. This changes that behaviour to report a JS stacktrace.
The same issue was previously reported here: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/5677
Reviewed By: majak
Differential Revision: D3037387
fb-gh-sync-id: 06f8333e0eb50dcef0b26284754262301b8a5f08
fbshipit-source-id: 06f8333e0eb50dcef0b26284754262301b8a5f08
Summary: Under some circumstances, the calloutIndex might be > number of callout views, (possibly due to a race condition?). This prevents that from crashing.
Reviewed By: tadeuzagallo
Differential Revision: D3196010
fb-gh-sync-id: 6485e64c682937431cb8598d7f3f42e8d37eeff1
fbshipit-source-id: 6485e64c682937431cb8598d7f3f42e8d37eeff1
Summary: `RCTComponentData` needs `RCTConvert` class, but it doesn't import it directly. This diff is changing it. Should be noop.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D3185141
fb-gh-sync-id: f845e3555d30c9fd9b39579194590ddf103a5a19
fbshipit-source-id: f845e3555d30c9fd9b39579194590ddf103a5a19
Summary:To use a ScrollView and RefreshControl with a translucent navigation bar you have to set the top inset to the height of that bar, allowing the content to scroll underneath. After changes to RCTRefreshControl in **v0.22**, `endRefreshing` always animates the offset to 0, hiding content behind the navigation bar. What you'd expect on iOS is for it to return to the bottom of the bar.
**Test plan**
To see this in action, refer to the UIExplorerApp. In RefreshControlExample.js if you set the ScrollView's `contentInset={{top: 100}}` you'll see the refresh control UI is where you'd expect, and after refresh the list returns to the correct position.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/6848
Differential Revision: D3157934
Pulled By: mkonicek
fb-gh-sync-id: c2186a4541fb3988677f0851eb12c259cd003750
fbshipit-source-id: c2186a4541fb3988677f0851eb12c259cd003750
Summary:All UIManager operations that affect the view hierarchy are executed via the `addUIBlock:` method, which queues them up to be executed after layout has been completed on the shadow queue.
One of the most expensive view operations is view creation, but since this doesn't actually depend on layout, there's no reason to delay it until the shadow operations have finished.
This diff modifies the `createView` method to dispatch view creation directly to the main thread instead of adding it to the UIBlock queue. This seems to result a measurable improvement in TTI.
(Credit to astreet, for implementing the same idea on Android, and thanks to oli for telling me about it!)
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3155709
fb-gh-sync-id: 3ad1da9a8fee687aa7e0e023d668192d94dba340
fbshipit-source-id: 3ad1da9a8fee687aa7e0e023d668192d94dba340
Summary:On iOS, `WebView` will get stuck when the first request fails to load. The most common case where this could happen is when a user has limited or no connectivity.
Here's a repo with a sample app that demonstrates the problem and this fix: [https://github.com/jballer/react-native-webview-reload-example](https://github.com/jballer/react-native-webview-reload-example).
**Attempted workarounds**
- `WebView.reload()` fails internally because the `UIWebView`'s `currentRequest` doesn't have its `URL` set
- Setting `WebView.source.uri` won't do anything; the JS value value is unchanged and therefore doesn't cross the native bridge.
- Unmounting and remounting the `WebView` component would lose history and context if an error occurs on a request that's not the first request.
**Test plan (manual testing)**
1. Disable network connection
1. Relaunch application or reload JS
1. Enable network connection
1. Tap "reload" button
1. Observe whether page reloads
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/6873
Differential Revision: D3159219
Pulled By: javache
fb-gh-sync-id: 8893dd20dc9f4a1a00d14a488ce657cc50287a29
fbshipit-source-id: 8893dd20dc9f4a1a00d14a488ce657cc50287a29
Summary:* Add ability to configure the app that should open when starting debugging
axemclion discussed this feature with tadeuzagallo and martinbigio on: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/5051
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/5683
Reviewed By: martinbigio
Differential Revision: D2971497
Pulled By: mkonicek
fb-gh-sync-id: 91c3ce68feed989658124bb96cb61d03dd032599
fbshipit-source-id: 91c3ce68feed989658124bb96cb61d03dd032599
Summary:Remove Trailing Spaces.
Why:
Sometimes there are conflicts with trailing spaces
Saves space
Those whose tools automatically delete them will have their pr watered down with trailing space removal
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/6787
Differential Revision: D3144704
fb-gh-sync-id: d8a62f115a3f8a8a49d5b07f56c540a02af38cf8
fbshipit-source-id: d8a62f115a3f8a8a49d5b07f56c540a02af38cf8
Summary:Turns our using the same coalescing key until a person removes all fingers off screen is not ideal.
It doesn't work in a case where the first finger starts moving on screen and then a second finger joins it later (almost any pinch gesture),
since we would try to coalesce move events from the start when only one finger was touching screen with events where two fingers were moving on screen.
That doesn't work and results in a crash.
I've changed the logic for generating the coalescing key in order to prevent this.
We no longer have a single key for a single gesture, but we change the key each time amount of fingers increases ("touchStart") or decreases ("touchEnd").
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3138275
fb-gh-sync-id: c32230ba401819fe3a70d1752b286d849520be89
fbshipit-source-id: c32230ba401819fe3a70d1752b286d849520be89
Summary:Immediate jumps on arm cannot jump further than 32mb, which might be a problem for large binaries.
+ add the missing `.thumb_func` directive.
Reviewed By: michalgr
Differential Revision: D3121148
fb-gh-sync-id: a53ad0ac70af9df84437b37f19b8a1cb49dd6fa2
fbshipit-source-id: a53ad0ac70af9df84437b37f19b8a1cb49dd6fa2
Summary:Update to latest master version of css-layout. Update integration in RCTShadow(Root)View to match.
This solves the issue with items not strechting vertically in column layouts (https://github.com/facebook/css-layout/issues/127)
Reviewed By: vjeux
Differential Revision: D3120699
fb-gh-sync-id: beba162e1255d3527e1160e9bd414a712cb10713
fbshipit-source-id: beba162e1255d3527e1160e9bd414a712cb10713
Summary:D3092867 / 1d3db4c5dc caused deadlock when chrome debugging was turned on, so it was reverted as D3128586 / 144dc30661.
The reason: I was calling `[_bridge dispatchBlock:^{ [self flushEventsQueue]; } queue:RCTJSThread];` from main thread and expecting it will `dispatch_async` to another,
since a held lock was being accessed the dispatched block and was released after the dispatch.
Turns out `RCTWebSocketExecutor` (which is used when chrome debugger is turned on) executes all blocks dispatched this way to `RCTJSThread` synchronously on the main thread.
This resulted in a deadlock. The "dispatched" block was trying to acquired lock which held by the same thread in the dispatching phase.
A fix for this is pretty simple. We will release the lock before dispatching the block.
However it's not super straightforward to see this won't introduce some race condition in a case with two threads where we would end up with events not being processed.
My thinking why that shouldn't happen goes like this: We could get in a bad state if `flushEventsQueue` would run on JS thread while `sendEvent:` is running on MT.
(I don't have a specific example how, maybe it's not possible. However when I show this case is safe we know we are good.)
The way how locking is setup in this diff the only possible scenario where these two threads would execute in these methods concurrently is JS holding the lock and MT going to enqueue another block on JS thread (since that's outside of "locked" zone).
But this scenarion can never happen, since if MT is about to enqueue the block on JS thread it means there cannot be a not yet fully executed block on JS thread.
Therefore nothing bad can happen.
So this diff brings back the reverted diff and adds to it the fix for the deadlock.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3130375
fb-gh-sync-id: 885a166f2f808551d7cd4e4eb98634d26afe6a11
fbshipit-source-id: 885a166f2f808551d7cd4e4eb98634d26afe6a11
Summary:If you're working on an app that needs to support landscape, reloading the app causes the iPhone simulator to reset its orientation to portrait every time the `RCTDevLoadingView` shows up. This is because it sets the root VC to `RCTModalHostViewController`, which currently supports only portrait orientations on iPhone. Changing the root view to a vanilla `UIViewController` fixes the issue.
**Steps to Reproduce**
1. Create a blank RN project: `react-native init RNTest`
2. Open it up and run it.
3. Rotate to landscape `Cmd+Right Arrow`.
4. Reload by pressing `Cmd+R`.
**Expected**
The simulator stays in landscape mode.
**Actual**
The simulator goes back to portrait.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/6765
Differential Revision: D3127339
Pulled By: javache
fb-gh-sync-id: e2543c90c8d116307dcefa89a417447c1f1a327f
fbshipit-source-id: e2543c90c8d116307dcefa89a417447c1f1a327f
Summary:The 200ms timeout was causing resource issues and causing a lot of overhead when you're not running the devtools, since it will basically create a new socket every 200ms.
Also clean up the way we do logging so it's completely compiled out in prod, and standardize all the names we use for threading to lowercase react.
Reviewed By: frantic
Differential Revision: D3115975
fb-gh-sync-id: e6e51c0621d8e9fc4eadb864acd678b8b5d322a1
fbshipit-source-id: e6e51c0621d8e9fc4eadb864acd678b8b5d322a1
Summary:A need for sending a scroll events outside of scrollview made D3092854 a bit clunky. This diff kinda fixes it by tightening up emitting of fake scroll events just to the only usecase we have right now.
Why not just simply construct the event in `RCTNavigator`, so we can drop the code from `RCTScrollView` altogether?
`RCTScrollEvent` is private to `RCTScrollView`, and that's good. We don't want anyone have an ability to make up scroll events. Even this existing functionality should be sunset one day when we better integrate with native gesture recognizers.
Depends on D3092867.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3120751
fb-gh-sync-id: 6519c055b983cfd48c4b4a9d619c4452e12efda1
fbshipit-source-id: 6519c055b983cfd48c4b4a9d619c4452e12efda1
Summary:Previously, (mostly touch and scroll) event handling on iOS worked in a hybrid way:
* All incoming coalesce-able events would be pooled and retrieved by js thread in the beginning of its frame (all of this happens on js thread)
* Any non-coalesce-able event would be immediately dispatched on a js thread (triggered from main thread), and if there would be pooled coalesce-able events they would be immediately dispatched at first too.
This behavior has a subtle race condition, where two events are produced (on MT) in one order and received in js in different order.
See https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/5246#issuecomment-198326673 for further explanation of this case.
The new event handling is (afaik) what Android already does. When an event comes we add it into a pool of events and dispatch a block on js thread to inform js there are events to be processed. We keep track of whether we did so, so there is at most one of these blocks waiting to be processed. When the block is executed js will process all events that are in pool at that time (NOT at time of enqueuing the block).
This creates a single way of processing events and makes it impossible to process them in different order in js.
The tricky part was making sure we don't coalesce events across gestures/different scrolls. Before this was achieved by knowing that gestures and scrolls start/end with non-coalesce-able event, so the pool never contained events that shouldn't be coalesced together. That "assumption" doesn't hold now.
I've re-added `coalescingKey` and made touch and scroll events use it to prevent coalescing events of the same type that should remain separate in previous diffs (see dependencies).
On top of it it decreases latency in events processing in case where we get only coalesce-able events. Previously these would be processed at begging of the next js frame, even when js would be free and could process them sooner. This delay is done, since they would get processed as soon as the enqueued block would run.
To illustrate this improvement let's look at these two systraces.
Before: https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/713625/14021417/47b35b7a-f1d3-11e5-93dd-4363edfa1923.png
After: https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/713625/14021415/4798582a-f1d3-11e5-8715-425596e0781c.png
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3092867
fb-gh-sync-id: 29071780f00fcddb0b1886a46caabdb3da1d5d84
fbshipit-source-id: 29071780f00fcddb0b1886a46caabdb3da1d5d84
Nick Lockwood
Pieter De Baets
Janic Duplessis
Labeeb Panampullan
Andrew Gray
Alexey Lang
Mike Grabowski
Martin Kralik
Li Jie
Sokovikov
Oleg Lokhvitsky
Ian Yu-Hsun Lin
skellyb
Justin Zeus
Emil Sjolander
Jonathan Ballerano
Mart?n Bigio
digeff
Nick
Tadeu Zagallo
Alex Kotliarskyi
Tisho Georgiev
