Summary:
Clicking on a TextField with editable set to false still would trigger a keyboard event.
In this case that the TextField was a multiline, it would scroll you down to the bottom.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1855
Github Author: Christopher <hello@blick-labs.com>
Summary:
To be on par with NavigatorIOS, I added the translucent property to TabBarIOS.
Usage:
```
<TabBarIOS
translucent={false} // default is true
/>
```
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1937
Github Author: Jean Regisser <jean.regisser@gmail.com>
Summary:
The `ScrollView` component tells the native side the subview indices of the views to make sticky. The problem is that, once layout-only views are collapsed, the indices are no longer reflective of the original views to make stick to the top.
Summary:
Android WebView now supports the prop "injectedJavaScript", too.
It's time to rename "injectedJavascriptIOS" to "injectedJavaScript" for API
consistency between IOS and Android.
Summary:
Remove layout-only views. Works by checking properties against a list of known properties that only affect layout. The `RCTShadowView` hierarchy still has a 1:1 correlation with the JS nodes.
This works by adjusting the tags and indices in `manageChildren`. For example, if JS told us to insert tag 1 at index 0 and tag 1 is layout-only with children whose tags are 2 and 3, we adjust it so we insert tags 2 and 3 at indices 0 and 1. This keeps changes out of `RCTView` and `RCTScrollView`. In order to simplify this logic, view moves are now processed as view removals followed by additions. A move from index 0 to 1 is recorded as a removal of view at indices 0 and 1 and an insertion of tags 1 and 2 at indices 0 and 1. Of course, the remaining indices have to be offset to take account for this.
The `collapsible` attribute is a bit of a hack to force `RCTScrollView` to always have one child. This was easier than rethinking out the logic there, but we could change this later.
Summary:
@public
The API and implementation of `shouldInjectAJAXHandler` is very opinionated, and it does not solve many of the use cases that we'd like to address.
Since `shouldInjectAJAXHandler` is basically juts injecting JS to the web page, we should let developer inject whatever JS that address different issues that they want to fix.
Test Plan:
Test this snippet at <Playground />
```
<WebView
url="http://www.facebook.com"
injectedJavascriptIOS="document.body.style.border='solid 10px red'"
/>
```
Summary:
Hi,
I've updated the NavigatorIOS component to allow setting the translucent property.
usage is:
```
<NavigatorIOS
translucent={false}
/>
```
This is my first contrib to react-native, so apologies if I've missed something.
Cheers,
Owen
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1273
Github Author: Owen Kelly <owen@novede.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
Started from here - https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/1120. Most functionality for annotations were missing so I started implementing and somehow got caught up until the entire thing was done.
2 new events:
- callout presses (left / right)
- annotation presses
6 new properties for annotations:
- hasLeftCallout
- hasRightCallout
- onLeftCalloutPress
- onRightCalloutPress
- animateDrop
- id
1 new property for MapView
- onAnnotationPress
---
Now the important thing is, that I implemented all of this the way "I would do it". I am not sure this is the 'reacty' way so please let me know my mistakes 😄
The problem is that there is no real way to identify annotations which makes it difficult to distinguish which one got clicked. The idea is to pass a `id` and whether it has callouts the entire way with the annotation. I had to
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1247
Github Author: David Mohl <me@dave.cx>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
Remove layout-only views. Works by checking properties against a list of known properties that only affect layout. The `RCTShadowView` hierarchy still has a 1:1 correlation with the JS nodes.
This works by adjusting the tags and indices in `manageChildren`. For example, if JS told us to insert tag 1 at index 0 and tag 1 is layout-only with children whose tags are 2 and 3, we adjust it so we insert tags 2 and 3 at indices 0 and 1. This keeps changes out of `RCTView` and `RCTScrollView`. In order to simplify this logic, view moves are now processed as view removals followed by additions. A move from index 0 to 1 is recorded as a removal of view at indices 0 and 1 and an insertion of tags 1 and 2 at indices 0 and 1. Of course, the remaining indices have to be offset to take account for this.
The `collapsible` attribute is a bit of a hack to force `RCTScrollView` to always have one child. This was easier than rethinking out the logic there, but we could change this later.
@public
Test Plan: There are tests in `RCTUIManagerTests.m` that test the tag- and index-manipulation logic works. There are various scenarios including add-only, remove-only, and move. In addition, two scenario tests verify that the optimization works by checking the number of views and shadow views after various situations happen.
Summary:
Added the ``scalesPageToFit`` prop to ``WebView``. This allows ``UIWebView`` to handle user zoom and scale.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1631
Github Author: alvaromb <amedina@apsl.net>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
The activity indicator was treated as a zero-width element without an explicit width. Fill it in so the style dimensions match what is displayed on the screen.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1156
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan:
Render an ActivityIndicator with a background, and see that the background shows up as a square behind the spinner instead of not showing up at all (since it was 0px wide previously).
Summary:
As discussed in our internal group, think this is a fairly easy error to run into so I added some explanation.
@frantic / @vjeux open to better wording here, but I tried to explain how setting the height directly is discouraged and it's probably better to pipe `flex: 1` all the way down.
I didn't regenerate the website since the script assumes some permissions (push permission to master repo) and has some missing npm dependencies (and after fixing that, still had some obscure error :P )
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1633
Github Author: Peter Cottle <pcottle@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
This is a proposal to add `getScrollResponder` to all ScrollView-like components, including ListView. This allows multiple higher-order scroll views to be composed while allowing the owner of the top-level scroll view to call `scrollableView.getScrollResponder().scrollTo(...)` regardless of whether `scrollableView` is a ScrollView, ListView, InvertedScrollView, etc.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/766
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
This is a proposal to add `getScrollResponder` to all ScrollView-like components, including ListView. This allows multiple higher-order scroll views to be composed while allowing the owner of the top-level scroll view to call `scrollableView.getScrollResponder().scrollTo(...)` regardless of whether `scrollableView` is a ScrollView, ListView, InvertedScrollView, etc.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/766
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
