Summary:
I'm working on deploying haste2 with jest. This updates all the files that require changes for this to work and they are backwards compatible with the current version of jest.
* package.json was just outdated. I think haste1's liberal handling with collisions made this a "non-issue"
* env.js didn't properly set up ErrorUtils, also unsure why that isn't a problem in jest right now already?
* some things were mocking things they shouldn't
* Because of the regex that matches against providesModule and System.import, it isn't possible to list module names more than once. We have multiple tests reusing the same providesModule ids and using System.import with modules that only exist virtually within that test. Splitting up the strings makes the regexes work (we do the same kind of splitting on www sometimes if we need to) and using different providesModule names in different test files fixes the problem. I think the BundlesLayoutIntegration-test is going to be deleted, so this doesn't even matter.
public
Reviewed By: voideanvalue
Differential Revision: D2809681
fb-gh-sync-id: 8fe6ed8b5a1be28ba141e9001de143e502693281
Summary:
The JavaScript ecosystem doesn't have the notion of a built-in native module loader. Even Node is decoupled from its module loader. The module loader system is just JS that runs on top of the global `process` object which has all the built-in goodies.
Additionally there is no such thing as a global require. That is something unique to our providesModule system. In other module systems such as node, every require is contextual. Even registered npm names are localized by version.
The only global namespace that is accessible to the host environment is the global object. Normally module systems attaches itself onto the hooks provided by the host environment on the global object.
Currently, we have two forms of dispatch that reaches directly into the module system. executeJSCall which reaches directly into require. Everything now calls through the BatchedBridge module (except one RCTLog edge case that I will fix). I propose that the executors calls directly onto `BatchedBridge` through an instance on the global so that everything is guaranteed to go through it. It becomes the main communication hub.
I also propose that we drop the dynamic requires inside of MessageQueue/BatchBridge and instead have the modules register themselves with the bridge.
executeJSCall was originally modeled after the XHP equivalent. The XHP equivalent was designed that way because the act of doing the call was the thing that defined a dependency on the module from the page. However, that is not how React Native works.
The JS side is driving the dependencies by virtue of requiring new modules and frameworks and the existence of dependencies is driven by the JS side, so this design doesn't make as much sense.
The main driver for this is to be able to introduce a new module system like Prepack's module system. However, it also unlocks the possibility to do dead module elimination even in our current module system. It is currently not possible because we don't know which module might be called from native.
Since the module system now becomes decoupled we could publish all our providesModule modules as npm/CommonJS modules using a rewrite script. That's what React Core does.
That way people could use any CommonJS bundler such as Webpack, Closure Compiler, Rollup or some new innovation to create a JS bundle.
This diff expands the executeJSCalls to the BatchedBridge's three individual pieces to make them first class instead of being dynamic. This removes one layer of abstraction. Hopefully we can also remove more of the things that register themselves with the BatchedBridge (various EventEmitters) and instead have everything go through the public protocol. ReactMethod/RCT_EXPORT_METHOD.
public
Reviewed By: vjeux
Differential Revision: D2717535
fb-gh-sync-id: 70114f05483124f5ac5c4570422bb91a60a727f6
Summary: @public
Take a step back and de-batch the bridge calls so we can have better profiling data and a better starting point to work on future optimisations. Also gave a 10~15% win on first render.
Reviewed By: @javache
Differential Revision: D2493674
fb-gh-sync-id: 05165fdd00645bdf43e844bb0c4300a2f63e7038
Summary:
@public
The current implementation of `MessageQueue` is huge, over-complicated and spread
across `MethodQueue`, `MethodQueueMixin`, `BatchedBridge` and `BatchedBridgeFactory`
Refactored in a simpler way, were it's just a `MessageQueue` class and `BatchedBridge`
is only an instance of it.
Test Plan:
I had to make some updates to the tests, but no real update to the native side.
There's also tests covering the `remoteAsync` methods, and more integration tests for UIExplorer.
Verified whats being used by Android, and it should be safe, also tests Android tests have been pretty reliable.
Manually testing: Create a big hierarchy, like `<ListView>` example. Use the `TimerMixin` example to generate multiple calls.
Test the failure callback on the `Geolocation` example.
All the calls go through this entry point, so it's hard to miss if it's broken.
Christoph Pojer
Sebastian Markbage
Tadeu Zagallo
Bill Fisher