Summary:
This adds support for `false` values in `package.json` `"browser"` and `"react-native"` mappings.
All `false` values are not longer silently ignored, but redirected to an empty file.
Fixes#9854#9518
Reviewed By: bestander
Differential Revision: D3876521
fbshipit-source-id: 96d1ba03518812bc88c51672c374956eabd40c9b
Summary:
The original method getNativeProps in ViewManagerPropertyUpdater.java create more HashMaps and putAll method need to re-hash the key again to avoid conflicts. This pull request pass the map as params to avoid the problem and update ReactPropertyProcessor.java to adapt the change.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9916
Differential Revision: D3873152
fbshipit-source-id: 089840e5272265662cdbf58d88580f9203153b69
Summary:
Without this, `Libraries/Network/RCTNetworking.mm` is not matched,
causing a "Native module cannot be null" error when integrating into
an existing Swift iOS project.
I've tested this fix with an iOS Swift project following the
"Integration With Existing Apps" [1] tutorial and the error does
not appear.
[1] https://facebook.github.io/react-native/docs/integration-with-existing-apps.html
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9904
Differential Revision: D3873011
fbshipit-source-id: d69395190d3865aa1fc87966a37981b53beea115
Summary:
This adds support for sticky headers on Android. The implementation if based primarily on the iOS one (https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/master/React/Views/RCTScrollView.m#L272) and adds some stuff that was missing to be able to handle z-index, view clipping, view hierarchy optimization and touch handling properly.
Some notable changes:
- Add `ChildDrawingOrderDelegate` interface to allow changing the `ViewGroup` drawing order using `ViewGroup#getChildDrawingOrder`. This is used to change the content view drawing order to make sure headers are drawn over the other cells. Right now I'm only reversing the drawing order as drawing only the header views last added a lot of complexity especially because of view clipping and I don't think it should cause issues.
- Add `collapsableChildren` prop that works like `collapsable` but applies to every child of the view. This is needed to be able to reference sticky headers by their indices otherwise some subviews can get optimized out and break indexes.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9456
Differential Revision: D3827366
Pulled By: fred2028
fbshipit-source-id: d346068734c5b987518794ab23e13914ed13b5c4
Summary:
since #9456 has been landed, it's the time to add ListViewPagingExample to the example list for Android
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9930
Differential Revision: D3871517
fbshipit-source-id: dafa8ab2d704bcc5e7bc25b5fcec18a1a6cfa28a
Summary:
Both of the links were pointing to the same (`react`) repo, but shouldn't have.
Obvious enough :)
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9923
Differential Revision: D3870481
Pulled By: JoelMarcey
fbshipit-source-id: b35c963c65fd0b253d076d83a4a1276c134b81d2
Summary:
This adds support for sticky headers on Android. The implementation if based primarily on the iOS one (https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/master/React/Views/RCTScrollView.m#L272) and adds some stuff that was missing to be able to handle z-index, view clipping, view hierarchy optimization and touch handling properly.
Some notable changes:
- Add `ChildDrawingOrderDelegate` interface to allow changing the `ViewGroup` drawing order using `ViewGroup#getChildDrawingOrder`. This is used to change the content view drawing order to make sure headers are drawn over the other cells. Right now I'm only reversing the drawing order as drawing only the header views last added a lot of complexity especially because of view clipping and I don't think it should cause issues.
- Add `collapsableChildren` prop that works like `collapsable` but applies to every child of the view. This is needed to be able to reference sticky headers by their indices otherwise some subviews can get optimized out and break indexes.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9456
Differential Revision: D3827366
fbshipit-source-id: cab044cfdbe2ccb98e1ecd3e02ed3ceaa253eb78
Summary:
(I changed a ton from when I previously submitted this PR so please take another look if you already did.)
PROBLEM: the no-longer-maintained `esprima-fb` parser does not support class properties, leading our website docgen to die if we use class properties, which we're gonna do real soon now
SOLUTION: use `flow-parser` instead, which the flow team is maintaining including all the fancy-pants ES? stuff that FB uses internally.
This removes the `esprima-fb` parser from jsdocs and replaces it with `flow-parser`. It's almost the same, I checked by diffing all the parser json output and it only had a few irrelevant differences. I had to add a file of constants so that we could remove esprima-fb altogether, too.
This also adds a couple unit tests, so that we can test that jsDocs works programmatically. They don't run if you run the regular RN tests, you have to run `npm test` from the `/website/` subdirectory.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9890
Differential Revision: D3865629
Pulled By: bestander
fbshipit-source-id: 8f561b78ca4a02f3f7b45e55904ec2fa911e3bb6
Summary:
For example, I could have a root named `random` and another root named `randomColor`.
A child of `randomColor` would **incorrectly** pass as a descendant of `random`.
So this commit changes `isDescendant` to do 2 things:
- check for exact matches (eg: the path is a root)
- call `startsWith` like before, but append `path.sep` to avoid false positives
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9831
Differential Revision: D3864968
fbshipit-source-id: 7fe04913579aa0741840fc925216283304ae3433
Summary: Introduce `overflow:scroll` so that scrolling can be implemented without the current overflow:visible hackiness. Currently we use AT_MOST to measure in the cross axis but not in the main axis. This was done to enable scrolling containers where children are not constraint in the main axis by their parent. This caused problems for non-scrolling containers though as it meant that their children cannot be measured correctly in the main axis. Introducing `overflow:scroll` fixes this.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D3855801
fbshipit-source-id: 3c365f9e6ef612fd9d9caaaa8c650e9702176e77
Summary:
This piece of code can assemble all transitive dependencies of a set of entry modules. It is supposed to replace `ResolutionRequest.getOrderedDependencies`.
It has the following advantages:
- has minimal API surface to other components of the system (uses two functions, exposes one function)
- allows to separate concerns into loading + transforming files, resolving dependencies, gathering all modules belonging to a bundle (this code), and bundling
- allows to specify multiple entry points
- allows to use any kind of dependency ID as entry point (haste IDs, node module IDs, relative paths, absolute paths – depends on the resolver)
- allows to skip files, which allows callers to incrementally update previously retrieved collections of modules
Reviewed By: cpojer
Differential Revision: D3627346
fbshipit-source-id: 84b7aa693ca6e89ba3c1ab2af9a004e2e0aaed3d
Summary: Introduce `overflow:scroll` so that scrolling can be implemented without the current overflow:visible hackiness. Currently we use AT_MOST to measure in the cross axis but not in the main axis. This was done to enable scrolling containers where children are not constraint in the main axis by their parent. This caused problems for non-scrolling containers though as it meant that their children cannot be measured correctly in the main axis. Introducing `overflow:scroll` fixes this.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D3855801
fbshipit-source-id: 6077b0bcb68fe5ddd4aa22926acab40ff4d83949
Summary: This makes the `hash` property of asset data depend on asset file contents rather than modification time of files. That means that bundles will be consistent across different checkouts.
Reviewed By: martinbigio
Differential Revision: D3856815
fbshipit-source-id: 8bfea4e0a714f48fc6a4ae5ed2a1426dc8d5868e
Summary:
We've enabled getters in .flowconfig, so Flow will now understand react-native.js. We no longer need to maintain a separate file for Flow.
cc bestander
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9892
Differential Revision: D3862560
Pulled By: bestander
fbshipit-source-id: 9efb66bc885dbac80c18b4b5e3cf5362495928a9
Summary:
Very simple PR to add the shorcuts for windows/linux to the web debuger interface so it's less mac-centric.
**Test plan**: Open the debugger and see the shorcuts for windows/linux/mac
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9812
Differential Revision: D3862570
fbshipit-source-id: 54605af66b674d176b3cbbb9efcfa93f84fcd552
Summary: This is to be able to depend on ReactClippingViewGroup from BaseViewManager. Devs using ReactClippingViewGroup may need to update their imports when updating past this commit.
Reviewed By: lexs
Differential Revision: D3835328
fbshipit-source-id: 290c08b130d837e553b68a90377bd9a30b7ec6dc
Summary:
This automatically changes the size of the modal by listening to dialog size changes and propagating
those changes through UIManager.
In detail: I've looked into three ways of doing this:
1. Send `onSizeChanged` events/info from the View to the CSSNode directly. This is kinda hacky because you would need to hold a reference to the CSSNode somewhere, either in the View or in the ViewManager. But then you'll have to take care of the lifecycle of the CSSNode, so that you don't update it after it has been dismissed. Not great.
2. The version we went for, is to just update the size of the corresponding CSSNode in the same way we do it for root nodes: we inform the UIManager that the size of the root node has changed, and it will propagate that change, triggering a `dispatchViewUpdates` if none is underway, so that the layout is updated.
3. The other solution we thought of is to treat the Modal as a root view. This would mean rendering an application with the tag of the Modal as the root of the application. That tag would be received by calling some method into UIManager and ReactModalHostManager to create a new RootView, create a Dialog and plop the root view in it. The idea was to maintain the JS API that we now have, but make the implementation more correct (ie. since both RootView and the Modal must deal with touch handling), and could have other benefits (ie. no hacks necessary for making the inspector work on top of modals). However, the change is not trivial and I don't know just how much code would have to be changed to make this work correctly. We might revisit this at a later stage, after we've done more work on having several root views at the same time in the app.
Reviewed By: foghina
Differential Revision: D3841379
fbshipit-source-id: f5e363e27041b785cf44eb59da04bc789306ddb9
Summary:
If the packager is already watching `/path/to/MyProject`, and it finds symlinks inside `/path/to/MyProject/node_modules` that point to `/path/to/MyProject/path/to/somewhere/else`, there's no need to add the latter to the project roots.
**Test Plan:** replicate an aforementioned project set-up, and verify that only `/path/to/MyProject` is a project root for the packager, while files in `/path/to/MyProject/path/to/somewhere/else` can still be imported so long as they're part of an npm-style package (e.g. `/path/to/MyProject/path/to/somewhere/else/package.json` exists).
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9819
Differential Revision: D3852591
Pulled By: mkonicek
fbshipit-source-id: 558ab3f835ee3d2bf6174c31595e242992f75601
Pieter De Baets
James Ide
David Aurelio
Charles Dick
leeight
ransj
Spencer Ahrens
Andrew Nicolaou
Janic Duplessis
Neo
Fred Liu
Andy Street
Joshua May
aleclarsoniv
Chris Hopman
Kevin Lacker
Eric Rozell
Emil Sjolander
Satyajit Sahoo
Damien
Andrew Y. Chen
Aaron Chiu
Andrei Coman
Spike Brehm
zimeng
Philipp von Weitershausen
Yann Pringault
