Summary: It's been more than two years; I think everyone already migrated and learned the new behavior.
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D6829885
fbshipit-source-id: a86d56fb7235a137e9ce6e360d7ae2224b047313
Summary:
This is a complete rewrite of RCTText, the part of React Native which manages Text and TextInput components.
Key points:
* It's understandable now. It follows a simple architectural pattern, and it's easy to debug and iterate. Text flow layout is a first-class citizen in React Native layout system now, not just a wired special case. It also brings entirely new possibilities such as nested interleaving <Text> and <View> components.
* All <Text>-specific APIs were removed from UIManager and co (it's about ~16 public methods which were used exclusively only by <Text>).
* It relies on new Yoga measurement/cloning API and on-dirty handler. So, it removes built-in dirty propagation subsystem from RN completely.
* It caches string fragments properly and granularly on a per-node basis which makes updating text-containing components more performant.
* It does not instantiate UIView for virtual components which reduces memory utilization.
* It drastically improves <TextInput> capabilities (e.g. rich text inside single line <TextInput> is now supported).
Screenshots:
https://cl.ly/2j3r1V0L0324https://cl.ly/3N2V3C3d3q3R
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6617326
fbshipit-source-id: 35d4d81b35c9870e9557d0211c0e934e6072a41e
Summary:
Motivation:
* Current implementation of `didUpdateReactSubviews` relies on `processUpdatedProperties:parentProperties:` method of RCTShadowView, which we plan to remove.
* The existing implementation does not call handlers on unmounted nodes (because they are not part of traversing tree), which is not correct.
* The current implementation is tight with RCTComponentData, which is conceptually wrong, it should be a UIManager thing.
* The new implementation must be much more performant because of simplicity. (We can measure it only after removing `processUpdatedProperties`.)
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6595780
fbshipit-source-id: a517207c17b5d5db839c9ce99a37136292acf78c
Summary:
The previous file/class name convention seemed cool... but now it drives me BANANAS! It makes all this code really hard to maintain.
So, evething were renamed following common modern RN convention.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6605090
fbshipit-source-id: 88ca13d793a5d2adaac2b7922ec6bd4654aacec5
Summary: As it was mentioned in previous diffs, we are removing this because it overcomplicates rendering layer and provides (almost) no benefits (and cannot be implemented 100% accurate way).
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6582560
fbshipit-source-id: 0778db96a45dd8e2520268d5d00792677cb01a20
Summary:
This was leftovers from old implementation of zIndex feature.
Janic janicduplessis refactored this and moved all logic to UIView layer, so we don't need this prop anymore in shadow realm.
More info: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/14011
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6574414
fbshipit-source-id: 2cae19350765689784d7884ed875878d39b4e3f1
Summary: It saves 8 bytes per shadowView instance, and it is more logical because it does nothing by default.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D5997804
fbshipit-source-id: c985a11aeea881e95911469e10c8c27429a2718a
Summary:
This is required for D5874536, wherein I'll be introducing direction-aware props for borders.
When a view's border changes due to a direction update, only the frames of its children update. Therefore, only the children `UIView`s get a chance to be re-rendered. This is incorrect because the view that's had its borders changed also needs to re-render. So, I keep a track of the layout direction in a property on all shadow views. Then, when I update that prop within `applyLayoutNode`, I push shadow views into the `viewsWithNewFrames` set.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D5944488
fbshipit-source-id: 3f23e9973f3555612920703cdb6cec38e6360d2d
Summary:
Shame on me.
Naming can be hard. We have to use positive logic to avoid this kind of bugs. :(
In the bright future we also have to rename `isYogaLeafNode` to something with positive logic, like `canHaveYogaChildNodes`.
But before we can do this, we have to have solid plan how to unify it with Android.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D5780917
fbshipit-source-id: 1ddaaea06f5618b91528cc87f1433a55b5fae4ac
Summary:
That's interesting!
If we apply `display: none;` style to some node, Yoga will stop calculation layout for this subtree (which is reasonable).
So, from RN perspective we have to stop applying layout for hidden subtree because it is meaningless and causes another errors.
Note: We do actually not support `display: none;` yet. It stops computing layout, but it does not hide the views!
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D5168651
fbshipit-source-id: 29a9385c76a0f9d637285fc0d268ccc39879ca0a
Summary:
Override `canHaveSubviews` in RCTShadowView subclass to disallow any nested content.
For now, this prop will be checked only in DEV mode for performance reasons.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D5189083
fbshipit-source-id: 87087dd806e1fd7320128dab969b13642174f81c
Summary:
This avoids reordering views because it created some bugs when the native hierarchy is different from the shadow views. This leverages `layer.zPosition` and takes z-index in consideration when we check what view should be the target of a touch.
**Test plan**
Tested that this fixes some layout issues that occurred when using sticky headers in the Expo home screen.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/14011
Differential Revision: D5108437
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: 0abfe85666e9d236a190e6f54cdd5453cacfbcac
Summary:
Fixes the sizing of items so that under most scenarios it calcultes its height by it's content for non exact measurings. This introduces a new useLegacyStretchBehaviour flag on the config to opt out of this change as it is breaking.
See facebook/yoga#505
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/506
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4954016
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: d28bd5d174cd76951fb94df85e3b0cfab7f81ff7
Summary: Helps mitigate part of https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/12245 while we wait for a more comprehensive solution.
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D4571776
fbshipit-source-id: 185cd1b0d3af37724136a37471df412c2000dfe4
Summary:
This diff adds display:none support to React Native. This enables hiding components which still calling their render method and keeping them within the state of your application. This enables preserving state in a component even though the component is not visible. Previously this was often implemented by rendering a component off screen as a work around. See below playground for usage.
```
class Playground extends React.Component {
render() {
return (
<View style={{width: '100%', height: '100%', flexDirection: 'row', backgroundColor: 'white'}}>
<View style={{width: 100, height: 100, display: 'none', backgroundColor: 'red'}}/>
<View style={{width: 100, height: 100, backgroundColor: 'blue'}}/>
</View>
);
}
}
```
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4611771
fbshipit-source-id: 0dbe0494d989df42994ab9ad5125d47f3233cc5a
Summary:
...to reflect the modern world we live in with dynamic DPI platforms :)
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/375
Reviewed By: dshahidehpour
Differential Revision: D4528518
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: e422bd4ae148e02c598a7b484a6adfa8c0e1e0c9
Summary:
Even so I know there are some opinions against ```margin: 0 auto``` it's still part of the spec: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-flexbox-1/#auto-margins and pretty usefull if you have to position via ```justify-content```.
This PR adds an implementation for that.
It adds an additonal ```YGUnitAuto``` and margins got ```YGNodeStyleSetMarginAuto``` functions as well.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/357
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4501142
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 86519f8632496f46e78a7c9dbc5b21e212e3e0c7
Summary: Now layout direction (LTR or LTR) can be specified not only for whole app but also for view subtree via `direction` style property.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D4510206
fbshipit-source-id: 4e56c5886b6e42f2343165eb76be897e681c5ba4
Summary:
Motivation:
* `RCTShadowView`'s `frame` property actually represents computed layout of the view. We must not use it as a setter for yoga node styles;
* Using `frame` and `setLeftTop` in existing way actually works only for view with absolute positioning, so it is super rare and special case;
* Internally, setting `frame` only make sense to `RootView`, and in that case there we always must not change `origin` we are introducing `setSize` method.
Changes:
* `[-RCTShadowView setFrame:]` was removed, `frame` property is readonly now;
* `[-RCTShadowView setLeftTop:]` was removed; no replacement provided;
* `[-RCTShadowView size]` read-write property was added;
* `[-RCTUIManager setFrame:forView:]` was deprecated, use (just introduced) `setSize:forView:` instead;
* `[-RCTUIManager setSize:forView:]` was added.
If you are still need some of removed methods, you are probably doing something wrong. Consider using `setIntrinsicContentSize`-family methods,
`setSize`-family methods, or (in the worst case) accessing `yogaNode` directly.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D4491384
fbshipit-source-id: 56dd84567324c5a86e4c870a41c38322dc1224d2
Summary:
Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit.
You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience.
I did some benchmarks:
```
Without Percentage Feature - Release x86:
Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms
Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms
Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms
Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms
Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms
Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms
Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms
Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms
With Percentage Feature - Release x86:
Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms
Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms
Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms
Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258
Reviewed By: dshahidehpour
Differential Revision: D4361945
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
Summary:
To make React Native play nicely with our internal build infrastructure we need to properly namespace all of our header includes.
Where previously you could do `#import "RCTBridge.h"`, you must now write this as `#import <React/RCTBridge.h>`. If your xcode project still has a custom header include path, both variants will likely continue to work, but for new projects, we're defaulting the header include path to `$(BUILT_PRODUCTS_DIR)/usr/local/include`, where the React and CSSLayout targets will copy a subset of headers too. To make Xcode copy headers phase work properly, you may need to add React as an explicit dependency to your app's scheme and disable "parallelize build".
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D4213120
fbshipit-source-id: 84a32a4b250c27699e6795f43584f13d594a9a82
Summary:
Expose aspectRatio style prop from css-layout to React Native.
This means the following will now work:
<View style={{backgroundColor: 'blue', aspectRatio: 1}}/>
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D4226472
fbshipit-source-id: c8709a7c0abbf77089a4e867879b42dcd9116f65
Valentin Shergin
Pritesh Nandgaonkar
Ramanpreet Nara
Jason Carreiro
Kellie Medlin
Janic Duplessis
Lukas Wöhrl
Pieter De Baets
Emil Sjolander
David Hart