Summary:
This makes RCTTouchHandler follow the same logic when sending touch event
coordinates as `UIManager.measure`.
This is important as UIManager.measure is used in `Touchable.js` aka the mother
of all touch events in RN.
In particular, this will make touch events correctly handled for places where RN is embedded into other screens.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D6838102
fbshipit-source-id: 70cad52606ea931cb637d8aa2d4845818eea0647
Summary:
React Native uses JSON to marshal the data across the bridge.
And because of this we have to avoid using NaN and INF values in events and other pieces of data that suppose to be transfered to/from JS side.
(We also don't want to introduce additional wrapping/escaping semantics for perfomance reasons.)
So, we have to gate all particular cases where there is a possibility of NaN or INF values, and replace these value with something meaningful for each particular case.
We are using `0` as NaN substitution here because:
* NaN in touch event is super rare case;
* Conversion to `0` is fast;
* `0` is okay value for product code in most cases;
* In all cases `0` is decent analog to "undefined position on screen" for touch event;
* Nobody will explicitly handle NaN case in product code, just because it is super rare case and actually indicates that something else went wrong.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D4918669
fbshipit-source-id: e95fa29e59dcdc40b57519e307b74c1f293da188
Summary:
* It complicates Touch Handling mechanism.
* The same functionality can be (and should be) implemented via overriding standard `hitTest:` method.
* It was marked as deprecated a while ago.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D4667776
fbshipit-source-id: 2e047c3308563a2849ea351a242270f0800fead2
Summary:
On iPad we may get two touch cancel events in direct succession. They would have the same coalescing key, which would result in unsuccesful attempt to coalesce them.
This diff fixes it by making sure two cancel events cannot have the same coalescing key.
(An alternative fix would be implementing coalescing logic for cancel events, but that sounds more complicated. It would be neccessary if there is a legit scenario where big number of cancel events are emitted in succesion.)
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3292405
fbshipit-source-id: 1f269771dc81fdd637cf6ac3ee4725e5e2fec679
Summary:Turns our using the same coalescing key until a person removes all fingers off screen is not ideal.
It doesn't work in a case where the first finger starts moving on screen and then a second finger joins it later (almost any pinch gesture),
since we would try to coalesce move events from the start when only one finger was touching screen with events where two fingers were moving on screen.
That doesn't work and results in a crash.
I've changed the logic for generating the coalescing key in order to prevent this.
We no longer have a single key for a single gesture, but we change the key each time amount of fingers increases ("touchStart") or decreases ("touchEnd").
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3138275
fb-gh-sync-id: c32230ba401819fe3a70d1752b286d849520be89
fbshipit-source-id: c32230ba401819fe3a70d1752b286d849520be89
Summary:
This diff finally makes touch events to be emitted to js from the same object as scroll events. Thanks to changes in previous diffs this means the js will now process them in the right order.
This diff on its own would cause us to send events to js on every frame while dragging a finger on the screen. This is something we tried to avoid with event coalescing in the past, and gets fixed in the following diff D2884595.
public
___
**This diff is part of a larger stack. This is a high level overview about what’s going on here.**
This stack of diffs fixes an issue where scroll events and touch events wouldn’t be processed in the correct order on js side.
Current state of world:
* touch events are send to js immediately when they happen (this makes js respond to touches as soon as possible)
* scroll events are buffered, coalesced and send at the beginning of each js frame (coalescing helps in a case where js is busy processing for several native frames and would get all scroll event for that period afterwards)
How did I change this?
1. I’ve made touch events go through the same class every other event (scroll events included) go, RCTEventDispatcher. This gives us a single place to handle all events.
2. I’ve changed RCTEventDispatcher to flush all buffered events every time it gets a touch event before dispatching the touch. This fixes the original ordering issue.
3. I’ve made “touchMove” behave the same way as scroll events do - they are buffered and coalesced. Since “touchMove” events are fired as often as scroll events (while you drag your finger around), doing only 2. would bring back the issue buffering was fixing.
All of this together effectively still keeps the order of events right, avoids overloading js in the important case we care about. The only downside is an increased latency for “touchMove” events, since they are to longer send to js immediately.
(Even better solution would be changing the native->js event passing system to be pull based instead of push based. That way js would always request touches that has happened since the last time it has asked, which would make it get them as soon as it’s possible to process them and native could do coalescing at that point.
However this change has a much bigger scope, so I’m going with this stack of diffs for now.)
Reviewed By: nicklockwood
Differential Revision: D2884593
fb-gh-sync-id: 749a4dc6256f93fde0d8733687394b080ddd4484
Summary:
public
This diff improves the implementation of 3D touch by adding a `forceTouchAvailable` constant to View that can be used to check if the feature is supported.
I've also added an example of how you can use the `force` property of the touch event to measure touch pressure in React Native.
Reviewed By: vjeux
Differential Revision: D2864926
fb-gh-sync-id: 754c54989212ce4e4863716ceaba59673f0bb29d
Summary:
This adds the first of the three 3dTouch API types, that found on the touch event.
It adds the `force` prop to touch events when running on iOS 9 devices:
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/3055
Reviewed By: svcscm
Differential Revision: D2860540
Pulled By: nicklockwood
fb-gh-sync-id: 95a3eb433837c844f755b3ed4a3dfcb28452c284
Summary: public
Added lightweight genarics annotations to make the code more readable and help the compiler catch bugs.
Fixed some type bugs and improved bridge validation in a few places.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D2600189
fb-gh-sync-id: f81e22f2cdc107bf8d0b15deec6d5b83aacc5b56
Summary:
Our events all follow a common pattern, so there's no good reason why the configuration should be so verbose. This diff eliminates that redundancy, and gives us the freedom to simplify the underlying mechanism in future without further churning the call sites.
Summary:
@public
This removes the last piece of data that was still stored on the DATA section,
`RCT_IMPORT_METHOD`. JS calls now dynamically populate a lookup table simultaneously
on JS and Native, instead of creating a mapping at load time.
Test Plan: Everything still runs, tests are green.
Summary:
@public
I've increased the warning levels in the OSS frameworks, which caught a bunch of minor issues. I also fixed some new errors in Xcode 7 relating to designated initializers and TLS security.
Test Plan:
* Test the sample apps and make sure they still work.
* Run tests.
Summary:
This bug was causing a redbox when touching rapidly because multiple touches had the same identifier. This code was meant to ensure that a unique ID is found, but it was checking against the wrong property in the react touch array.
I don't think this was really affecting prod, because the invariant is guarded by a __DEV__ check
@public
Test Plan:
- Start several touches at once (or just rapidly jam fingers on your device), and you won't see a redbox
- Also verify that single touches, touch moves, and multi touches work as before
Summary:
These two arrays aren't used. The code is easier to read without them
@public
Test Plan: Tap around UIExplorer and verify multi-touch and responder system behavior works the same
Summary:
Apparently British spelling is "cancelled", American is "canceled"? Picking "cancelled" for consistency with UIKit.
@public
Test Plan: landcastle
Summary:
When touches end or cancel, update self.state in
RCTTouchHandler to let iOS know that we are in an ended/canceled state.
This way we won't eat other touches because it still thinks we're in a
began/changed state.
@public
Test Plan:
Scrolling in the back swipe area no longer busts gesture
recognition in Wilde.
Mehdi Mulani
Valentin Shergin
Rob Hogan
littlesome
Martin Kralik
Nick Lockwood
Matt Apperson
Pieter De Baets
Ben Alpert
Tadeu Zagallo
Eric Vicenti