Summary:
The docs heavily implied that this method returned a notification object or null directly, like popInitialNotification used to do. In fact, it returns a promise. This change clarifies this.
Note that:
- This is purely a comment change, so no testing required.
- I've adhered to the 80 character line limit, and can't think of any other style rules you might have that could apply here.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9052
Differential Revision: D3662807
Pulled By: javache
fbshipit-source-id: 7a2573e03d7704b2d62a3499d350506ae73e8d77
Summary:
I believe it is beneficial to explicitly state that this is possible.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/8543
Differential Revision: D3663264
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: cb95e31d8c1d2d38929dac3e3bfda26aa6054a11
Summary:
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem does the pull request solve?
Example code for "Using Navigators" under "THE BASICS" does not work. renderScene needs to return the components, not just instantiate them.
**Test plan (required)**
I copy-paste and ran the code but did not get anything rendered. I added a return statement before the component which made it work.
Arrow functions need a return statement when supplying a { block of code }.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9161
Differential Revision: D3663200
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: a8732dd1098de7c8ea915f459adb3403a8168f19
Summary:
The issue here is that sometimes `this.options()` is not `[options]` but contains different stuff, esp. if your command accepts arguments.
This commit reverts its original behaviour and passes custom `examples` property that we use instead.
Tested, can be shipped right away.
Differential Revision: D3662179
fbshipit-source-id: 4b2af3487464d46e2007388230e675ce3575f797
Summary:
The examples: 2048 and TicTacToe will display errors when click the run on Xcode. I imported RCTNetwork and RCTImage for 2048 and RCTNetwork for TicTacToe and it works on the simulator.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9123
Differential Revision: D3662099
Pulled By: javache
fbshipit-source-id: 2e2d88336ea83eae58088f4cc1d5003ba2a2f71b
Summary:
Sometimes is handy to check if a React node is a descendant of another node or not. For instance, I want to check if the focused `TextInput` is descendant of an specific `ScrollView`:
```js
const currentlyFocusedField = TextInput.State.currentlyFocusedField()
UIManager.viewIsAncestorOf(
currentlyFocusedField,
this.getInnerViewNode(),
(isAncestor) => {
if (isAncestor) {
console.log('The focused field is a descendant of this ScrollView!')
}
}
)
```
This function uses the same strategy as the `measureLayout` method to check if one node is an ancestor of other node. As the `measureLayout` method, this is performed outside the main thread.
By now I've only implemented the iOS version and its tests, but if this function is going to be merged I'll implement the Android version too. I have objc experience but no Java or Android, so I prefer to validate this functionality before jumping into developing the Android part.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7876
Differential Revision: D3662045
Pulled By: javache
fbshipit-source-id: b9668e8ea94fd01db76651f16243926cf9c2566f
Summary:
When compiling 0.31-rc1 was having issues with xcode running the package script and failing (ie not running and returning the --help info) Was due to this - simply changing the flag to --reset-cache instead of --reset-cache true worked miracles.
**Test plan (required)**
Ran packager without and runs but doesn't build the package, runs with small change and works now. Can copy paste output if you want but it's pretty super verbose for this small change.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9177
Differential Revision: D3661831
fbshipit-source-id: 3cebc543806b8fe3e413f83c59c9fb74e5e078f4
Summary:
Prior to the RNPM integration, command names would match the second argument passed to the react-native-cli. Now the command names contain some usage information (such as non-flag CLI arguments). This commit splits the name of the commands and checks that against the second command line argument.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9171
Differential Revision: D3661799
fbshipit-source-id: dc2aa9cd9e69dde3c5b877aeb77a17c4f6427075
Summary:
The example of `BackAndroid` caused a bit of confusion for beginners (see #8822), so I thought we should clarify the functionality a bit. I added a comment indicating that a user would have to implement `this.onMainScreen` and `this.goBack` on their own, this was the original problem.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/8829
Differential Revision: D3660332
fbshipit-source-id: d84a29586c6a1a439f386e6b88220d7b0a275129
Summary:
**This is the first part of `React.createClass` -> ES2015 classes migration.
1. Rewritten UI Explorer ActivityIndicator example to ES2015 classes
2. Removed TimerMixin from example.
Motivation:
- ES2015 classes do not support mixins so due to the classes / pure functions as "best practices" it would be better to avoid mixins in examples.
- TimerMixin is covered later and is out of scope of current example.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/8342
Differential Revision: D3659349
fbshipit-source-id: e1c6f1a3091d60c589303fe6da55b8d132adedc3
Summary:
Thanks for submitting a pull request! Please provide enough information so that others can review your pull request:
> **Unless you are a React Native release maintainer and cherry-picking an *existing* commit into a current release, ensure your pull request is targeting the `master` React Native branch.**
(You can skip this if you're fixing a typo or adding an app to the Showcase.)
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem does the pull request solve?
Prefer **small pull requests**. These are much easier to review and more likely to get merged. Make sure the PR does only one thing, otherwise please split it.
**Test plan (required)**
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes UI.
Make sure tests pass on both Travis and Circle CI.
**Code formatting**
Look around. Match the style of the rest of the codebase. See also the simple [style guide](https://github.com/face
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9175
Differential Revision: D3658765
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: bc8a37fdd6393a2107b33c9fd1b8620cb5a7c07c
Summary:
This diff addresses the issues raised by kmagiera in https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7884. Transforms should be applied in the order they are defined, just like in `processTransform.js`. A scale applied before a translation, for instance, should give a different result than a translation applied before a scale.
We leverage CATransform3D to do the heavy lifting. A concatenated transform is passed all the way to `RCTViewPropertyMapper`. It is compared with the transform currently applied to the view, and if different, applied. The same approach is used for opacity.
I think it makes the most sense to do this diffing in `RCTViewPropertyMapper`, as opposed to creating and cleaning up an `_updatedPropsDictionary` each frame in `RCTTransformAnimatedNode` and `RCTStyleAnimatedNode`. The node should keep its full value; applying a minimal set of altered props is an optimization. The higher up this optimization is implemented, the more assumptions it makes. e.g. that there will only ever be a sing
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9050
Differential Revision: D3658139
fbshipit-source-id: ad6286762ef734084cbdf83c9bd9241190302d34
Summary:
The logic in `setRtl` is wrong. You would expect that `{rtl: true}` would set the layout direction to RTL, instead it currently does the opposite.
This commit fixes the issue.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9132
Differential Revision: D3657134
fbshipit-source-id: f946698b548988541de7da5565d2ab122746ecf0
Summary:
cc Kureev
Disabling symlink resolver temporarily because it breaks launchPackager.command.
Waiting for a PR with a fix to enable both
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9166
Differential Revision: D3655846
Pulled By: matryoshcow
fbshipit-source-id: da0bfc64f5fd9d747db2b97d669fcb98250faf39
Summary:
This diff enables network inspection for WebSocket APIs, so by now XMLHttpRequest, Fetch and WebSocket are all supported. Android and iOS are both supported.
This diff monkey-patches the RCTWebSocketModule which WebSocket API builds on, and now it is able to intercept all WebSocket requests when app is running. The intercepted information of a WebSocket includes url, protocols, status, messages (sent and received), close reason, server close event and server error information, etc.
Reviewed By: davidaurelio
Differential Revision: D3641770
fbshipit-source-id: 393df0da74ed95b1fd60e38b0d67ed61b3dd5ff3
Summary: In previous `XHRInterceptor`, it sometimes crashes when restarting the network inspector because the id of the XHR objects are not unique all time. Fix this in diff by adding a global id "generator" for all intercepted xhr objects in order to make it safe across inspector restarts.
Reviewed By: davidaurelio
Differential Revision: D3641624
fbshipit-source-id: f9a1589f278023243aa182d3da93ce69c985587c
Summary:
This pull request fixes cases where the `error` argument of the `onUnhandled` method in `Libraries/Promise.js` is undefined. Previously this would result in a redbox with the helpful message: `Cannot read property message of undefined`. With this pull request, unhandled promise rejections result in the desired yellowbox saying that a promise rejection went unhandled.
I still do not know what would cause the error argument to be undefined, but this change makes the module behave as expected in an app I am building.
cc bestander
Relevant issue: #8452
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9119
Differential Revision: D3655589
Pulled By: bestander
fbshipit-source-id: a975a0ab58701240ba06574c04521cd542700ff7
Summary:
We have a lot of small-ish calls to JSC and within the bridge that add up during TTI. This gives us a way to measure them in aggregate in a reasonable way.
From the comments:
MicroProfiler is a performance profiler for measuring the cumulative impact of
a large number of small-ish calls. This is normally a problem for standard profilers
like Systrace because the overhead of the profiler itself skews the timings you
are able to collect. This is especially a problem when doing nested calls to
profiled functions, as the parent calls will contain the overhead of their profiling
plus the overhead of all their childrens' profiling.
MicroProfiler attempts to be low overhead by 1) aggregating timings in memory and
2) trying to remove estimated profiling overhead from the returned timings.
To remove estimated overhead, at the beginning of each trace we calculate the
average cost of profiling a no-op code section, as well as invoking the average
cost of invoking the system clock. The former is subtracted out for each child
profiler section that is invoked within a parent profiler section. The latter is
subtracted from each section, child or not.
The usage is similar to Systrace: you put a MICRO_PROFILER_BLOCK in the block you want to profile and C++ RAII will handle timing it.
After MicroProfiler::stopProfiling() is called, a table of tracing data is emitted
to glog (which shows up in logcat on Android).
Differential Revision: D3635319
fbshipit-source-id: 01390b8ac76a68dd425cba2adfdde6e4957440cc
Summary:
Thanks for submitting a pull request! Please provide enough information so that others can review your pull request:
> **Unless you are a React Native release maintainer and cherry-picking an *existing* commit into a current release, ensure your pull request is targeting the `master` React Native branch.**
(You can skip this if you're fixing a typo or adding an app to the Showcase.)
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem does the pull request solve?
Prefer **small pull requests**. These are much easier to review and more likely to get merged. Make sure the PR does only one thing, otherwise please split it.
**Test plan (required)**
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes UI.
Make sure tests pass on both Travis and Circle CI.
**Code formatting**
Look around. Match the style of the rest of the codebase. See also the simple [style guide](https://github.com/face
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9141
Differential Revision: D3650195
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 2a4bb06f92109b36bec761259e13a5782cc9929b
Summary: We now reach in and use the Scroller directly, reimplementing fling() and onOverScrolled(). I verified that in Android 4.1.2 ScrollView#mScroller exists as a private on ScrollView, but there's still potential that this could break things if OEMs have modified ScrollView so we just log a warning if we can't get access to that field.
Reviewed By: foghina
Differential Revision: D3650008
fbshipit-source-id: e52909bf9d6008f6d1ecd458aee25fe82ffaac19
ExplodingCabbage
Vojtech Novak
Seph Soliman
Slavik Manukyan
Mike Grabowski
Konstantin Raev
R0CKSTAR
alvaromb
Kureev Alexey
Emil Sjolander
Tom Hayden
Eric Rozell
Gabe Levi
Daniel Schmidt
Chris Hopman
Artyom Trityak
Daniel Braun
Alex Leventer
Ryan Gomba
Pieter De Baets
Lukas Piatkowski
androidtrunkagent
xujinyang
Siqi Liu
Charles Dick
danieldunderfelt
Andy Street
Nathan Azaria
Maria Mateescu
Will Moritz