Summary:
Apparently, if a gesture recognizer got 'reset', OS does not call `touchesCancelled:` method, so we have to do it manually.
To implement this we have to split `_dispatchTouches:eventType:` into two methods: the first converts Objective-C touches to C++ touches, the second consumes that. We have to do this because during reset we don't have a collection of UIKit touches.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D13072807
fbshipit-source-id: 677e2febf9f96dcdfaadfadf5b9ab3893f93e796
Summary: Every C++ engineer (except me several months ago) knows that `operator []` can mutate the collection (Yeah! Don't ask), so this is especially dangerous if your hash function is broken (see the previous diff).
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D13072805
fbshipit-source-id: 4436a8ff12fb27a57bfb6ee0ff986d7a9a825549
Summary:
Without this fix the PointerHasher hashed not a pointer, but an address where the pointer is stored, which is obviously incorrect.
The incorrect hash function compromised the whole `_activeTouches` caused many issues with logically invalid invariants (e.g. removing element from the collection silently didn't work).
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D13072804
fbshipit-source-id: d68289e940fe21e2df08a31439619b7e2fe0fa13
Summary: This change drops the year from the copyright headers and the LICENSE file.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D9727774
fbshipit-source-id: df4fc1e4390733fe774b1a160dd41b4a3d83302a
Summary:
This diff includes two changes:
1. Even though `RCTViewComponentView` conforms to `RCTTouchableComponentViewProtocol`, it never implemented this protocol. This diff makes the correction.
2. Make the necessary changes to `RCTSurfaceTouchHandler` required by the changes in `RCTTouchableComponentViewProtocol`. This means modifying the `ActiveTouch` struct to hold `SharedTouchEventEmitter`s. It also means passing in the touch point to the `componentView`'s `touchEventEmitterAtPoint` method.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D9696909
fbshipit-source-id: 3d4a833f7dbae6d0238a0807eb2220250ccbae3d
Summary:
@public
After reading about move-semantic and rvalue refs I realized that we (I) definitely overuse `auto &&` (aka universal reference) construction. Even if this is harmless, does not look good and idiomatic.
Whenever I used that from a semantical point of view I always meant "I need an alias for this" which is actually "read-only reference" which is `const auto &`.
This is also fit good to our policy where "everything is const (immutable) by default".
Hence I change that to how it should be.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D8475637
fbshipit-source-id: 0a691ededa0e798db8ffa053bff0f400913ab7b8
Summary:
Using `EventHandlers` name was a bad idea, and I cannot tolerate it anymore.
The worst part of it is that when you have a collection of `EventHandlers` objects you cannot use plural word to describe it because `EventHandlers` is an already plural word.
And, this object is actually an event emitter, the thing on which we call events.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D8247723
fbshipit-source-id: b3303a4b9529bd6d32bb8ca0378287ebefaedda8
Summary:
RCTSurfaceTouchHandler is a complete rewrite of RCTTouchHandler which uses direct Fabric-specific event dispatching pipeline and several new approaches to managing active events (such as high-performant C++ collections, better management of identifier pool, and so on).
Besides that, the new implementation is much more W3C compliant that it used to be (see old TODOs near `receiveTouches()` implementation in Javascript).
So, touch events work now!
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D8246713
fbshipit-source-id: 218dc15cd8f982237de7e2497ff36a7bfe6d37cc
Valentin Shergin
Héctor Ramos
Ramanpreet Nara