Merge pull request #287 from devinrhode2/patch-2

README, add reason to consider adopting re-frame
This commit is contained in:
Mike Thompson 2016-12-15 20:32:17 +11:00 committed by GitHub
commit 84cd88bd6a

View File

@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ Perhaps:
that embraces those paradigms?
3. You're taking a [Functional Design and Programming course](http://www.eli.sdsu.edu/courses/fall15/cs696/index.html) at San Diego State University
and you have a re-frame/reagent assignment due. You've left the reading a bit late, right? I remember those days.
4. re-frame is impressively buzzword compliant: it has reactivity,
4. You've taken interest in cycle.js, reactive streams/rxjs, elm, or pux (purescript) and want to use those same patterns with clojurescript.
5. re-frame is impressively buzzword compliant: it has reactivity,
unidirectional data flow, pristinely pure functions,
interceptors, coeffects, conveyor belts, statechart-friendliness (FSM)
and claims an immaculate hammock conception. It also has a charming