Merge branch 'master' into develop

This commit is contained in:
mike-thompson-day8 2015-05-08 15:46:59 +10:00
commit 802d5142f8
1 changed files with 15 additions and 18 deletions

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# re-frame: Derived Values, Flowing
# re-frame: Derived Values, Flowing
> This, milord, is my family's axe. We have owned it for almost nine hundred years, see. Of course,
@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ Either:
## re-frame
re-frame is a pattern for writing [SPAs] in ClojureScript, using [Reagent].
re-frame is a pattern for writing [SPAs] in ClojureScript, using [Reagent].
This repo contains both a **description of this pattern** and a **reference implementation**.
@ -56,16 +56,16 @@ Features:
It also has a charming xkcd reference (soon)
and a hilarious, insiders-joke T-shirt, ideal for conferences (in design).
What could possibly go wrong?
## Using re-frame
[![Build Status](https://travis-ci.org/Day8/re-frame.png?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.org/Day8/re-frame)
re-frame is available from clojars. Add the following to your project dependencies:
re-frame is available from clojars. Add the following to your project dependencies:
[![Clojars Project](http://clojars.org/re-frame/latest-version.svg)](http://clojars.org/re-frame)
__Warning__: That was the summary. What follows is a long-ish tutorial/explanation.
__Warning__: That was the summary. What follows is a long-ish tutorial/explanation.
## Tutorial Table of Contents
@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ __Warning__: That was the summary. What follows is a long-ish tutorial/explanat
- [Talking To A Server](#talking-to-a-server)
- [The CPU Hog Problem](#the-cpu-hog-problem)
- [In Summary](#in-summary)
- [Where Do I Go Next](#Where-Do-I-Go-Next)
- [Where Do I Go Next](#where-do-i-go-next)
- [Licence](#licence)
## What Problem Does It Solve?
@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ Not much about re-frame is original or clever. You'll find
no ingenious use of functional zippers, transducers or core.async.
Re-frame does use Reagent's features in a novel way.
And I did actively reject the current ClojureScript fashion of using
And I did actively reject the current ClojureScript fashion of using
Cursors. And, yes, the event middleware concept has turned out nicely.
But, for the most part, re-frame is simply a mashup of
emerging ideas.
@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ Right, so that was a lot of words. Some code to clarify:
(ns example1
(:require-macros [reagent.ratom :refer [reaction]]) ;; reaction is a macro
(:require [reagent.core :as reagent]))
(def app-db (reagent/atom {:a 1})) ;; our root ratom (signal)
(def ratom2 (reaction {:b (:a @app-db)})) ;; reaction wraps a computation, returns a signal
@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ Here is a slightly more interesting (parameterised) component (function):
(def n (reagent/atom "re-frame"))
;; call our `component` function, passing in a ratom
(greet n)
(greet n)
;; ==> [:div "Hello " "re-frame"] returns a vector
```
@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ might as well bite the bullet here and now ... and, anyway, it is pretty easy...
(defn greet ;; a component - data in, Hiccup out.
[name] ;; name is a ratom
[:div "Hello " @name]) ;; dereference name here, to extract the value within
(def n (reagent/atom "re-frame"))
;; The computation '(greet n)' returns Hiccup which is stored into 'hiccup-ratom'
@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ So let's now look at how to write and register the subscription handler for `:cu
[db, [sid cid]] ;; query fns are given 'app-db', plus vector given to subscribe
(assert (= sid :customer-query)) ;; subscription id was the first vector
(reaction (get-in @db [:path :to :a :map cid]))) ;; re-runs each time db changes
;; register our query handler
(register-sub
:customer-query ;; the id (the name of the query()
@ -754,7 +754,7 @@ In a component, we could use this query via `subscribe`:
num (reaction (count @items)) ;; Woh! a reaction based on the subscription
top-20 (reaction (take 20 @items))] ;; Another dependent reaction
(fn []
[:div
[:div
(str "there's " @num " of these suckers. Here's top 20") ;; rookie mistake to leave off the @
(into [:div ] (map item-render @top-20))]))) ;; item-render is another component, not shown
```
@ -966,7 +966,7 @@ and sometimes with async results.
But the `app-db` mutation is ultimately handled by re-frame (it does the `reset!). That leaves your event
handlers pure. As a result, they tend to be easy to test and understand. Many are almost trivial.
There's more to event handlers than can be covered here in this introductory tutorial. Read up on
There's more to event handlers than can be covered here in this introductory tutorial. Read up on
issues like Middleware [in the Wiki](https://github.com/Day8/re-frame/wiki#handler-middleware).
### Routing
@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ modify `app-db` themselves. That is always done in a handler.
- if you kick off an HTTP request in a handler, then organise for the on-success or on-fail handlers
to dispatch their outcome. All events are handled via dispatch. on-success should never ever change
`app-db`.
The [wiki](https://github.com/Day8/re-frame/wiki/Talking-To-Servers) has more on the subject.
## The CPU Hog Problem
@ -1186,7 +1186,7 @@ Your next steps with re-frame should be:
- use the lein template: https://github.com/Day8/re-frame-template
- read more in the Wiki: https://github.com/Day8/re-frame/wiki
You might also be interested in James MacAulay's excellent work (not re-frame!):
You might also be interested in James MacAulay's excellent work (not re-frame!):
https://github.com/jamesmacaulay/zelkova
If you want reusable layout and widget components, consider this sister project:
@ -1211,6 +1211,3 @@ Distributed under The MIT License (MIT) - See LICENSE.txt
[datascript]:https://github.com/tonsky/datascript
[Hoplon]:http://hoplon.io/
[Pedestal App]:https://github.com/pedestal/pedestal-app