Add Rich Hickey Video

README.md

@@ -36,9 +36,9 @@ Perhaps:
     In this space, re-frame is very old, hopefully in a Gandalf kind of way. 
     First designed in Dec 2014, it pre-dates the official Elm Architecture, and
     although thankfully influenced by early-Elm concepts like `foldp` and `lift`, we took a slightly
-    different path and, over time, pioneering concepts like event handler middleware, 
-    coeffect accretion, and deduplicated signal graphs.
-5.  Which brings us to the most important point. re-frame is impressively buzzword compliant: it has reactivity,
+    different path and, over time, pioneered concepts like event handler middleware, 
+    coeffect accretion, and de-duplicated signal graphs.
+5.  Which brings us to the most important point: re-frame is impressively buzzword compliant. It has reactivity,
     unidirectional data flow, pristinely pure functions,
     interceptors, coeffects, conveyor belts, statechart-friendliness (FSM)
     and claims an immaculate hammock conception. It also has a charming

docs/ApplicationState.md

@@ -105,22 +105,26 @@ source of data is elsewhere.
 6. The ability to do time travel debugging, even in a production setting. More soon.
 
 
-### Get You A Leveragable Schema
+### Create A Leveragable Schema
 
-You really need a schema for `app-db`.
+You really need a `spec` schema for `app-db`. The derived power is immense.
 
 Of course, that means you'll have to learn [spec](http://clojure.org/about/spec) and there's
 some overhead in that, so maybe, just maybe, in your initial experiments, you can 
-get away without one. But not for long.  Promise me you'll write a `spec`.  Good.
+get away without one. But not for long.  Promise me you'll write a `spec`.  Promise me.  Okay, good.
 
 The [todomvc example](https://github.com/Day8/re-frame/tree/master/examples/todomvc)
 shows how to use a spec.  Look in `src/db.cljs` for the spec itself, and then in `src/events.cljs` for
 how to write code which checks `app-db` against this spec after every single event has been 
 processed. 
 
-Specs are more leveragable than types. Watch how: <br>
+Specs are more leveragable than types. This is a big interesting idea which is not yet mainstream. 
+Watch how: <br>
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNTQ-M_uSo8
 
+Also, the mighty Rich Hickey (poor audio):<br>
+https://vimeo.com/195711510
+
 *** 
 
 Previous:  [This Repo's README](../README.md)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;