status-im/re-frame
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/status-im/re-frame.git synced 2025-02-22 23:08:20 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

New logo words

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Mike Thompson 2017-08-05 15:31:01 +10:00
parent 906ab9c885
commit 15402df301
1 changed files with 9 additions and 8 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

17
docs/The-re-frame-logo.md
View File

@ -18,26 +18,27 @@ wielded nunchucks.
Great, unexplained works encourage fan theories, and the re-frame <br> Great, unexplained works encourage fan theories, and the re-frame <br>
logo is no exception. logo is no exception.
One noisy group thinks @martinklepsch simply wanted to <br> One noisy group insists that @martinklepsch's design is assertively <br>
`Put the 'f' back into infinity`. They have t-shirts. trying to `Put the 'f' back into infinity`. They have t-shirts.
Another group speculates that he created the logo as a bifarious <br> Another group speculates that he created the logo as a bifarious <br>
rainbow homage to Frank Lloyd Wright's masterpiece, the Guggenheim <br> rainbow homage to Frank Lloyd Wright's masterpiece, the Guggenheim <br>
Museum. A classic case of premature abstraction and over engineering <br> Museum. Which is surely a classic case of premature abstraction <br>
if you ask me. Their theory, not the Guggenheim. and over engineering. Their theory, not the Guggenheim.
![](/images/logo/Guggenheim.jpg) ![](/images/logo/Guggenheim.jpg)
The infamous "Bad Touch" faction look at the logo and see the cljs <br> The infamous "Bad Touch" faction look at the logo and see the cljs <br>
logo mating noisily with re-frame's official architecture diagram. <br> logo mating noisily with re-frame's official architecture diagram. <br>
Attend one of their parties and you have a 50% chance of arrest. Yes, its true, their parties are completely awesome, but you will <br>
need someone to bail you out of jail later.
![](/images/logo/Genesis.png) ![](/images/logo/Genesis.png)
The Functional Fundamentalists, a stern bunch, see the logo as a <br> For the Functional Fundamentalists, a stern bunch, the logo is a <br>
flowing poststructuralist rebuttal of OO's vowel duplication and <br> flowing poststructuralist rebuttal of OO's vowel duplication and <br>
horizontal adjacency. Their alternative approach, FF, is apparently <br> horizontal adjacency. Their alternative approach, FF, is fine, apparently, <br>
fine because "everyone loves a fricative". because "everyone loves a fricative".
For his part, @martinklepsch has never confirmed any theory, teasing <br> For his part, @martinklepsch has never confirmed any theory, teasing <br>
us instead with coded clues like "Will you please stop emailing me" <br> us instead with coded clues like "Will you please stop emailing me" <br>