New logo words

This commit is contained in:
Mike Thompson 2017-08-05 15:31:01 +10:00
parent 906ab9c885
commit 15402df301
1 changed files with 9 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -18,26 +18,27 @@ wielded nunchucks.
Great, unexplained works encourage fan theories, and the re-frame <br>
logo is no exception.
One noisy group thinks @martinklepsch simply wanted to <br>
`Put the 'f' back into infinity`. They have t-shirts.
One noisy group insists that @martinklepsch's design is assertively <br>
trying to `Put the 'f' back into infinity`. They have t-shirts.
Another group speculates that he created the logo as a bifarious <br>
rainbow homage to Frank Lloyd Wright's masterpiece, the Guggenheim <br>
Museum. A classic case of premature abstraction and over engineering <br>
if you ask me. Their theory, not the Guggenheim.
Museum. Which is surely a classic case of premature abstraction <br>
and over engineering. Their theory, not the Guggenheim.
![](/images/logo/Guggenheim.jpg)
The infamous "Bad Touch" faction look at the logo and see the cljs <br>
logo mating noisily with re-frame's official architecture diagram. <br>
Attend one of their parties and you have a 50% chance of arrest.
Yes, its true, their parties are completely awesome, but you will <br>
need someone to bail you out of jail later.
![](/images/logo/Genesis.png)
The Functional Fundamentalists, a stern bunch, see the logo as a <br>
For the Functional Fundamentalists, a stern bunch, the logo is a <br>
flowing poststructuralist rebuttal of OO's vowel duplication and <br>
horizontal adjacency. Their alternative approach, FF, is apparently <br>
fine because "everyone loves a fricative".
horizontal adjacency. Their alternative approach, FF, is fine, apparently, <br>
because "everyone loves a fricative".
For his part, @martinklepsch has never confirmed any theory, teasing <br>
us instead with coded clues like "Will you please stop emailing me" <br>