status-im/open-bounty
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/status-im/open-bounty.git synced 2025-01-23 16:01:15 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

gpg decision: provide context around Github check

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Martin Klepsch 2018-02-19 11:00:11 +01:00
parent a8623c4154
commit 796b034486
1 changed files with 9 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
doc/decisions/0002-sign-commits-with-gpg.md
View File

@ -17,6 +17,11 @@ Naturally security is a concern that should be taken into consideration.
Currently an attacker might get access to an account of a team member
and pose as that developer, merging PRs and pushing changes.
Status.im as a company is also encouraging the use of GPG signing and
has a Pull Request check in place on Github. This check will mark PRs
as failing if the commits come from an organization member and have not
been GPG-signed.
## Decision
In order to verify that commits in the repository are actually authored by the specified
@ -29,6 +34,9 @@ It also introduces some complexity because contributors who want to sign
their commits need to set up the appropriate tooling. Due to that we will
not require outside contributors to sign their commits for now.
Adopting GPG signing for contributors will also make our PR checks pass
allowing us to more easily discern actually broken and working PRs.
## Consequences
GPG signing is only making things safer if we have a trusted way of
@ -41,4 +49,4 @@ and we'll have to wait to see what comes out of that.
## Appendix
- [GitHub's instructions for setting up GPG signing](https://help.github.com/articles/signing-commits-using-gpg/)
- More discussion around the usefulness of GPG signing in [issue #285](https://github.com/status-im/open-bounty/issues/285)
- More discussion around the usefulness of GPG signing in [issue #285](https://github.com/status-im/open-bounty/issues/285)