654 lines
29 KiB
Nim
654 lines
29 KiB
Nim
# beacon_chain
|
|
# Copyright (c) 2019-2021 Status Research & Development GmbH
|
|
# Licensed and distributed under either of
|
|
# * MIT license (license terms in the root directory or at http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT).
|
|
# * Apache v2 license (license terms in the root directory or at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0).
|
|
# at your option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed except according to those terms.
|
|
|
|
{.push raises: [Defect].}
|
|
|
|
import
|
|
std/[sequtils, intsets, deques],
|
|
chronicles,
|
|
stew/results,
|
|
../spec/[
|
|
beaconstate, state_transition_block,
|
|
datatypes, crypto, digest, helpers, network, signatures],
|
|
../consensus_object_pools/[
|
|
spec_cache, blockchain_dag, block_quarantine, spec_cache,
|
|
attestation_pool, exit_pool
|
|
],
|
|
".."/[beacon_node_types, ssz, beacon_clock],
|
|
../validators/attestation_aggregation,
|
|
../extras
|
|
|
|
logScope:
|
|
topics = "gossip_checks"
|
|
|
|
func check_attestation_block(
|
|
pool: AttestationPool, attestationSlot: Slot, blck: BlockRef):
|
|
Result[void, (ValidationResult, cstring)] =
|
|
# The voted-for block must be a descendant of the finalized block, thus it
|
|
# must at least as new than the finalized checkpoint - in theory it could be
|
|
# equal, but then we're voting for an already-finalized block which is pretty
|
|
# useless - other blocks that are not rooted in the finalized chain will be
|
|
# pruned by the chain dag, and thus we can no longer get a BlockRef for them
|
|
if not (blck.slot > pool.chainDag.finalizedHead.slot):
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Ignore, cstring(
|
|
"Voting for already-finalized block")))
|
|
|
|
# The attestation shouldn't be voting for a block that didn't exist at the
|
|
# time - not in spec, but hard to reason about
|
|
if not (attestationSlot >= blck.slot):
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Ignore, cstring(
|
|
"Voting for block that didn't exist at the time")))
|
|
|
|
# We'll also cap it at 4 epochs which is somewhat arbitrary, but puts an
|
|
# upper bound on the processing done to validate the attestation
|
|
# TODO revisit with less arbitrary approach
|
|
if not ((attestationSlot - blck.slot) <= uint64(4 * SLOTS_PER_EPOCH)):
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Ignore, cstring("Voting for very old block")))
|
|
|
|
ok()
|
|
|
|
func check_propagation_slot_range(
|
|
data: AttestationData, wallTime: BeaconTime):
|
|
Result[void, (ValidationResult, cstring)] =
|
|
let
|
|
futureSlot = (wallTime + MAXIMUM_GOSSIP_CLOCK_DISPARITY).toSlot()
|
|
|
|
if not futureSlot.afterGenesis or data.slot > futureSlot.slot:
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Ignore, cstring(
|
|
"Attestation slot in the future")))
|
|
|
|
let
|
|
pastSlot = (wallTime - MAXIMUM_GOSSIP_CLOCK_DISPARITY).toSlot()
|
|
|
|
# https://github.com/ethereum/eth2.0-specs/blob/v1.0.1/specs/phase0/p2p-interface.md#configuration
|
|
# The spec value of ATTESTATION_PROPAGATION_SLOT_RANGE is 32, but it can
|
|
# retransmit attestations on the cusp of being out of spec, and which by
|
|
# the time they reach their destination might be out of spec.
|
|
const ATTESTATION_PROPAGATION_SLOT_RANGE = 28
|
|
|
|
if pastSlot.afterGenesis and
|
|
data.slot + ATTESTATION_PROPAGATION_SLOT_RANGE < pastSlot.slot:
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Ignore, cstring(
|
|
"Attestation slot in the past")))
|
|
|
|
ok()
|
|
|
|
func check_beacon_and_target_block(
|
|
pool: var AttestationPool, data: AttestationData):
|
|
Result[BlockRef, (ValidationResult, cstring)] =
|
|
# The block being voted for (data.beacon_block_root) passes validation - by
|
|
# extension, the target block must at that point also pass validation.
|
|
# The target block is returned.
|
|
# We rely on the chain DAG to have been validated, so check for the existence
|
|
# of the block in the pool.
|
|
let blck = pool.chainDag.getRef(data.beacon_block_root)
|
|
if blck.isNil:
|
|
pool.quarantine.addMissing(data.beacon_block_root)
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Ignore, cstring("Attestation block unknown")))
|
|
|
|
# Not in spec - check that rewinding to the state is sane
|
|
? check_attestation_block(pool, data.slot, blck)
|
|
|
|
# [REJECT] The attestation's target block is an ancestor of the block named
|
|
# in the LMD vote -- i.e. get_ancestor(store,
|
|
# attestation.data.beacon_block_root,
|
|
# compute_start_slot_at_epoch(attestation.data.target.epoch)) ==
|
|
# attestation.data.target.root
|
|
let
|
|
target = get_ancestor(
|
|
blck, compute_start_slot_at_epoch(data.target.epoch), SLOTS_PER_EPOCH.int)
|
|
|
|
if not (target.root == data.target.root):
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Reject, cstring(
|
|
"attestation's target block not an ancestor of LMD vote block")))
|
|
|
|
ok(target)
|
|
|
|
func check_aggregation_count(
|
|
attestation: Attestation, singular: bool):
|
|
Result[void, (ValidationResult, cstring)] =
|
|
var onesCount = 0
|
|
# TODO a cleverer algorithm, along the lines of countOnes() in nim-stew
|
|
# But that belongs in nim-stew, since it'd break abstraction layers, to
|
|
# use details of its representation from nimbus-eth2.
|
|
|
|
for aggregation_bit in attestation.aggregation_bits:
|
|
if not aggregation_bit:
|
|
continue
|
|
onesCount += 1
|
|
if singular: # More than one ok
|
|
if onesCount > 1:
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Reject, cstring(
|
|
"Attestation has too many aggregation bits")))
|
|
else:
|
|
break # Found the one we needed
|
|
|
|
if onesCount < 1:
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Reject, cstring(
|
|
"Attestation has too few aggregation bits")))
|
|
|
|
ok()
|
|
|
|
func check_attestation_subnet(
|
|
epochRef: EpochRef, attestation: Attestation,
|
|
topicCommitteeIndex: uint64): Result[void, (ValidationResult, cstring)] =
|
|
let
|
|
expectedSubnet =
|
|
compute_subnet_for_attestation(
|
|
get_committee_count_per_slot(epochRef),
|
|
attestation.data.slot, attestation.data.index.CommitteeIndex)
|
|
|
|
if expectedSubnet != topicCommitteeIndex:
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Reject, cstring(
|
|
"Attestation's committee index not for the correct subnet")))
|
|
|
|
ok()
|
|
|
|
# https://github.com/ethereum/eth2.0-specs/blob/v1.0.1/specs/phase0/p2p-interface.md#beacon_attestation_subnet_id
|
|
proc validateAttestation*(
|
|
pool: var AttestationPool,
|
|
attestation: Attestation, wallTime: BeaconTime,
|
|
topicCommitteeIndex: uint64, checksExpensive: bool):
|
|
Result[seq[ValidatorIndex], (ValidationResult, cstring)] =
|
|
# Some of the checks below have been reordered compared to the spec, to
|
|
# perform the cheap checks first - in particular, we want to avoid loading
|
|
# an `EpochRef` and checking signatures. This reordering might lead to
|
|
# different IGNORE/REJECT results in turn affecting gossip scores.
|
|
|
|
# [REJECT] The attestation's epoch matches its target -- i.e.
|
|
# attestation.data.target.epoch ==
|
|
# compute_epoch_at_slot(attestation.data.slot)
|
|
block:
|
|
let v = check_attestation_slot_target(attestation.data)
|
|
if v.isErr():
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Reject, v.error))
|
|
|
|
# attestation.data.slot is within the last ATTESTATION_PROPAGATION_SLOT_RANGE
|
|
# slots (within a MAXIMUM_GOSSIP_CLOCK_DISPARITY allowance) -- i.e.
|
|
# attestation.data.slot + ATTESTATION_PROPAGATION_SLOT_RANGE >= current_slot
|
|
# >= attestation.data.slot (a client MAY queue future attestations for
|
|
# processing at the appropriate slot).
|
|
? check_propagation_slot_range(attestation.data, wallTime) # [IGNORE]
|
|
|
|
# The attestation is unaggregated -- that is, it has exactly one
|
|
# participating validator (len([bit for bit in attestation.aggregation_bits
|
|
# if bit == 0b1]) == 1).
|
|
? check_aggregation_count(attestation, singular = true) # [REJECT]
|
|
|
|
# The block being voted for (attestation.data.beacon_block_root) has been seen
|
|
# (via both gossip and non-gossip sources) (a client MAY queue attestations for
|
|
# processing once block is retrieved).
|
|
# The block being voted for (attestation.data.beacon_block_root) passes
|
|
# validation.
|
|
# [IGNORE] if block is unseen so far and enqueue it in missing blocks
|
|
let target = ? check_beacon_and_target_block(pool, attestation.data) # [IGNORE/REJECT]
|
|
|
|
# The following rule follows implicitly from that we clear out any
|
|
# unviable blocks from the chain dag:
|
|
#
|
|
# The current finalized_checkpoint is an ancestor of the block defined by
|
|
# attestation.data.beacon_block_root -- i.e. get_ancestor(store,
|
|
# attestation.data.beacon_block_root,
|
|
# compute_start_slot_at_epoch(store.finalized_checkpoint.epoch)) ==
|
|
# store.finalized_checkpoint.root
|
|
let
|
|
epochRef = pool.chainDag.getEpochRef(target, attestation.data.target.epoch)
|
|
|
|
# [REJECT] The committee index is within the expected range -- i.e.
|
|
# data.index < get_committee_count_per_slot(state, data.target.epoch).
|
|
if not (attestation.data.index < get_committee_count_per_slot(epochRef)):
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Reject, cstring(
|
|
"validateAttestation: committee index not within expected range")))
|
|
|
|
# [REJECT] The attestation is for the correct subnet -- i.e.
|
|
# compute_subnet_for_attestation(committees_per_slot,
|
|
# attestation.data.slot, attestation.data.index) == subnet_id, where
|
|
# committees_per_slot = get_committee_count_per_slot(state,
|
|
# attestation.data.target.epoch), which may be pre-computed along with the
|
|
# committee information for the signature check.
|
|
? check_attestation_subnet(epochRef, attestation, topicCommitteeIndex)
|
|
|
|
# [REJECT] The number of aggregation bits matches the committee size -- i.e.
|
|
# len(attestation.aggregation_bits) == len(get_beacon_committee(state,
|
|
# data.slot, data.index)).
|
|
#
|
|
# This uses the same epochRef as data.target.epoch, because the attestation's
|
|
# epoch matches its target and attestation.data.target.root is an ancestor of
|
|
# attestation.data.beacon_block_root.
|
|
if not (attestation.aggregation_bits.lenu64 == get_beacon_committee_len(
|
|
epochRef, attestation.data.slot, attestation.data.index.CommitteeIndex)):
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Reject, cstring(
|
|
"validateAttestation: number of aggregation bits and committee size mismatch")))
|
|
|
|
let
|
|
fork = pool.chainDag.headState.data.data.fork
|
|
genesis_validators_root =
|
|
pool.chainDag.headState.data.data.genesis_validators_root
|
|
attesting_indices = get_attesting_indices(
|
|
epochRef, attestation.data, attestation.aggregation_bits)
|
|
|
|
# The number of aggregation bits matches the committee size, which ensures
|
|
# this condition holds.
|
|
doAssert attesting_indices.len == 1, "Per bits check above"
|
|
let validator_index = toSeq(attesting_indices)[0]
|
|
|
|
# There has been no other valid attestation seen on an attestation subnet
|
|
# that has an identical `attestation.data.target.epoch` and participating
|
|
# validator index.
|
|
# Slightly modified to allow only newer attestations than were previously
|
|
# seen (no point in propagating older votes)
|
|
if (pool.nextAttestationEpoch.lenu64 > validator_index.uint64) and
|
|
pool.nextAttestationEpoch[validator_index].subnet >
|
|
attestation.data.target.epoch:
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Ignore, cstring(
|
|
"Validator has already voted in epoch")))
|
|
|
|
if not checksExpensive:
|
|
return ok(attesting_indices)
|
|
|
|
# The signature of attestation is valid.
|
|
block:
|
|
let v = is_valid_indexed_attestation(
|
|
fork, genesis_validators_root, epochRef, attesting_indices,
|
|
attestation, {})
|
|
if v.isErr():
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Reject, v.error))
|
|
|
|
# Only valid attestations go in the list, which keeps validator_index
|
|
# in range
|
|
if not (pool.nextAttestationEpoch.lenu64 > validator_index.uint64):
|
|
pool.nextAttestationEpoch.setLen(validator_index.int + 1)
|
|
pool.nextAttestationEpoch[validator_index].subnet =
|
|
attestation.data.target.epoch + 1
|
|
|
|
ok(attesting_indices)
|
|
|
|
# https://github.com/ethereum/eth2.0-specs/blob/v1.0.1/specs/phase0/p2p-interface.md#beacon_aggregate_and_proof
|
|
proc validateAggregate*(
|
|
pool: var AttestationPool,
|
|
signedAggregateAndProof: SignedAggregateAndProof, wallTime: BeaconTime):
|
|
Result[seq[ValidatorIndex], (ValidationResult, cstring)] =
|
|
# Some of the checks below have been reordered compared to the spec, to
|
|
# perform the cheap checks first - in particular, we want to avoid loading
|
|
# an `EpochRef` and checking signatures. This reordering might lead to
|
|
# different IGNORE/REJECT results in turn affecting gossip scores.
|
|
|
|
template aggregate_and_proof: untyped = signedAggregateAndProof.message
|
|
template aggregate: untyped = aggregate_and_proof.aggregate
|
|
|
|
# [REJECT] The aggregate attestation's epoch matches its target -- i.e.
|
|
# `aggregate.data.target.epoch == compute_epoch_at_slot(aggregate.data.slot)`
|
|
block:
|
|
let v = check_attestation_slot_target(aggregate.data)
|
|
if v.isErr():
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Reject, v.error))
|
|
|
|
# [IGNORE] aggregate.data.slot is within the last
|
|
# ATTESTATION_PROPAGATION_SLOT_RANGE slots (with a
|
|
# MAXIMUM_GOSSIP_CLOCK_DISPARITY allowance) -- i.e. aggregate.data.slot +
|
|
# ATTESTATION_PROPAGATION_SLOT_RANGE >= current_slot >= aggregate.data.slot
|
|
? check_propagation_slot_range(aggregate.data, wallTime) # [IGNORE]
|
|
|
|
# [IGNORE] The valid aggregate attestation defined by
|
|
# hash_tree_root(aggregate) has not already been seen (via aggregate gossip,
|
|
# within a verified block, or through the creation of an equivalent aggregate
|
|
# locally).
|
|
#
|
|
# This is [IGNORE] and already checked by attestation pool when aggregate is
|
|
# added.
|
|
|
|
# [IGNORE] The aggregate is the first valid aggregate received for the
|
|
# aggregator with index aggregate_and_proof.aggregator_index for the epoch
|
|
# aggregate.data.target.epoch.
|
|
# Slightly modified to allow only newer attestations than were previously
|
|
# seen (no point in propagating older votes)
|
|
if (pool.nextAttestationEpoch.lenu64 >
|
|
aggregate_and_proof.aggregator_index) and
|
|
pool.nextAttestationEpoch[
|
|
aggregate_and_proof.aggregator_index].aggregate >
|
|
aggregate.data.target.epoch:
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Ignore, cstring(
|
|
"Validator has already aggregated in epoch")))
|
|
|
|
# [REJECT] The attestation has participants -- that is,
|
|
# len(get_attesting_indices(state, aggregate.data, aggregate.aggregation_bits)) >= 1.
|
|
#
|
|
# get_attesting_indices() is:
|
|
# committee = get_beacon_committee(state, data.slot, data.index)
|
|
# return set(index for i, index in enumerate(committee) if bits[i])
|
|
#
|
|
# the attestation doesn't have participants is iff either:
|
|
# (1) the aggregation bits are all 0; or
|
|
# (2) the non-zero aggregation bits don't overlap with extant committee
|
|
# members, i.e. they counts don't match.
|
|
# But (2) would reflect an invalid aggregation in other ways, so reject it
|
|
# either way.
|
|
? check_aggregation_count(aggregate, singular = false)
|
|
|
|
# [REJECT] The block being voted for (aggregate.data.beacon_block_root)
|
|
# passes validation.
|
|
# [IGNORE] if block is unseen so far and enqueue it in missing blocks
|
|
let target = ? check_beacon_and_target_block(pool, aggregate.data)
|
|
|
|
# [REJECT] aggregate_and_proof.selection_proof selects the validator as an
|
|
# aggregator for the slot -- i.e. is_aggregator(state, aggregate.data.slot,
|
|
# aggregate.data.index, aggregate_and_proof.selection_proof) returns True.
|
|
let
|
|
epochRef = pool.chainDag.getEpochRef(target, aggregate.data.target.epoch)
|
|
|
|
if not is_aggregator(
|
|
epochRef, aggregate.data.slot, aggregate.data.index.CommitteeIndex,
|
|
aggregate_and_proof.selection_proof):
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Reject, cstring("Incorrect aggregator")))
|
|
|
|
# [REJECT] The aggregator's validator index is within the committee -- i.e.
|
|
# aggregate_and_proof.aggregator_index in get_beacon_committee(state,
|
|
# aggregate.data.slot, aggregate.data.index).
|
|
if aggregate_and_proof.aggregator_index.ValidatorIndex notin
|
|
get_beacon_committee(
|
|
epochRef, aggregate.data.slot, aggregate.data.index.CommitteeIndex):
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Reject, cstring(
|
|
"Aggregator's validator index not in committee")))
|
|
|
|
# [REJECT] The aggregate_and_proof.selection_proof is a valid signature of the
|
|
# aggregate.data.slot by the validator with index
|
|
# aggregate_and_proof.aggregator_index.
|
|
# get_slot_signature(state, aggregate.data.slot, privkey)
|
|
if aggregate_and_proof.aggregator_index >= epochRef.validator_keys.lenu64:
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Reject, cstring("Invalid aggregator_index")))
|
|
|
|
let
|
|
fork = pool.chainDag.headState.data.data.fork
|
|
genesis_validators_root =
|
|
pool.chainDag.headState.data.data.genesis_validators_root
|
|
if not verify_slot_signature(
|
|
fork, genesis_validators_root, aggregate.data.slot,
|
|
epochRef.validator_keys[aggregate_and_proof.aggregator_index],
|
|
aggregate_and_proof.selection_proof):
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Reject, cstring(
|
|
"Selection_proof signature verification failed")))
|
|
|
|
# [REJECT] The aggregator signature, signed_aggregate_and_proof.signature, is valid.
|
|
if not verify_aggregate_and_proof_signature(
|
|
fork, genesis_validators_root, aggregate_and_proof,
|
|
epochRef.validator_keys[aggregate_and_proof.aggregator_index],
|
|
signed_aggregate_and_proof.signature):
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Reject, cstring(
|
|
"signed_aggregate_and_proof signature verification failed")))
|
|
|
|
let attesting_indices = get_attesting_indices(
|
|
epochRef, aggregate.data, aggregate.aggregation_bits)
|
|
|
|
# [REJECT] The signature of aggregate is valid.
|
|
block:
|
|
let v = is_valid_indexed_attestation(
|
|
fork, genesis_validators_root, epochRef, attesting_indices,
|
|
aggregate, {})
|
|
if v.isErr():
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Reject, v.error))
|
|
|
|
# The following rule follows implicitly from that we clear out any
|
|
# unviable blocks from the chain dag:
|
|
#
|
|
# The current finalized_checkpoint is an ancestor of the block defined by
|
|
# aggregate.data.beacon_block_root -- i.e. get_ancestor(store,
|
|
# aggregate.data.beacon_block_root,
|
|
# compute_start_slot_at_epoch(store.finalized_checkpoint.epoch)) ==
|
|
# store.finalized_checkpoint.root
|
|
|
|
# Only valid aggregates go in the list
|
|
if pool.nextAttestationEpoch.lenu64 <= aggregate_and_proof.aggregator_index:
|
|
pool.nextAttestationEpoch.setLen(
|
|
aggregate_and_proof.aggregator_index.int + 1)
|
|
pool.nextAttestationEpoch[aggregate_and_proof.aggregator_index].aggregate =
|
|
aggregate.data.target.epoch + 1
|
|
|
|
ok(attesting_indices)
|
|
|
|
# https://github.com/ethereum/eth2.0-specs/blob/v1.0.1/specs/phase0/p2p-interface.md#beacon_block
|
|
proc isValidBeaconBlock*(
|
|
dag: ChainDAGRef, quarantine: var QuarantineRef,
|
|
signed_beacon_block: SignedBeaconBlock, wallTime: BeaconTime,
|
|
flags: UpdateFlags):
|
|
Result[void, (ValidationResult, BlockError)] =
|
|
logScope:
|
|
received_block = shortLog(signed_beacon_block.message)
|
|
blockRoot = shortLog(signed_beacon_block.root)
|
|
|
|
# In general, checks are ordered from cheap to expensive. Especially, crypto
|
|
# verification could be quite a bit more expensive than the rest. This is an
|
|
# externally easy-to-invoke function by tossing network packets at the node.
|
|
|
|
# [IGNORE] The block is not from a future slot (with a
|
|
# MAXIMUM_GOSSIP_CLOCK_DISPARITY allowance) -- i.e. validate that
|
|
# signed_beacon_block.message.slot <= current_slot (a client MAY queue future
|
|
# blocks for processing at the appropriate slot).
|
|
if not (signed_beacon_block.message.slot <=
|
|
(wallTime + MAXIMUM_GOSSIP_CLOCK_DISPARITY).slotOrZero):
|
|
debug "block is from a future slot",
|
|
wallSlot = wallTime.toSlot()
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Ignore, Invalid))
|
|
|
|
# [IGNORE] The block is from a slot greater than the latest finalized slot --
|
|
# i.e. validate that signed_beacon_block.message.slot >
|
|
# compute_start_slot_at_epoch(state.finalized_checkpoint.epoch)
|
|
if not (signed_beacon_block.message.slot > dag.finalizedHead.slot):
|
|
debug "block is not from a slot greater than the latest finalized slot"
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Ignore, Invalid))
|
|
|
|
# [IGNORE] The block is the first block with valid signature received for the
|
|
# proposer for the slot, signed_beacon_block.message.slot.
|
|
#
|
|
# While this condition is similar to the proposer slashing condition at
|
|
# https://github.com/ethereum/eth2.0-specs/blob/v1.0.1/specs/phase0/validator.md#proposer-slashing
|
|
# it's not identical, and this check does not address slashing:
|
|
#
|
|
# (1) The beacon blocks must be conflicting, i.e. different, for the same
|
|
# slot and proposer. This check also catches identical blocks.
|
|
#
|
|
# (2) By this point in the function, it's not been checked whether they're
|
|
# signed yet. As in general, expensive checks should be deferred, this
|
|
# would add complexity not directly relevant this function.
|
|
#
|
|
# (3) As evidenced by point (1), the similarity in the validation condition
|
|
# and slashing condition, while not coincidental, aren't similar enough
|
|
# to combine, as one or the other might drift.
|
|
#
|
|
# (4) Furthermore, this function, as much as possible, simply returns a yes
|
|
# or no answer, without modifying other state for p2p network interface
|
|
# validation. Complicating this interface, for the sake of sharing only
|
|
# couple lines of code, wouldn't be worthwhile.
|
|
#
|
|
# TODO might check unresolved/orphaned blocks too, and this might not see all
|
|
# blocks at a given slot (though, in theory, those get checked elsewhere), or
|
|
# adding metrics that count how often these conditions occur.
|
|
let
|
|
slotBlockRef = getBlockBySlot(dag, signed_beacon_block.message.slot)
|
|
|
|
if not slotBlockRef.isNil:
|
|
let blck = dag.get(slotBlockRef).data
|
|
if blck.message.proposer_index ==
|
|
signed_beacon_block.message.proposer_index and
|
|
blck.message.slot == signed_beacon_block.message.slot and
|
|
blck.signature.toRaw() != signed_beacon_block.signature.toRaw():
|
|
notice "block isn't first block with valid signature received for the proposer",
|
|
blckRef = slotBlockRef,
|
|
existing_block = shortLog(blck.message)
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Ignore, Invalid))
|
|
|
|
# [IGNORE] The block's parent (defined by block.parent_root) has been seen
|
|
# (via both gossip and non-gossip sources) (a client MAY queue blocks for
|
|
# processing once the parent block is retrieved).
|
|
#
|
|
# And implicitly:
|
|
# [REJECT] The block's parent (defined by block.parent_root) passes validation.
|
|
let parent_ref = dag.getRef(signed_beacon_block.message.parent_root)
|
|
if parent_ref.isNil:
|
|
# Pending dag gets checked via `ChainDAGRef.add(...)` later, and relevant
|
|
# checks are performed there. In usual paths beacon_node adds blocks via
|
|
# ChainDAGRef.add(...) directly, with no additional validity checks.
|
|
debug "parent unknown, putting block in quarantine",
|
|
current_slot = wallTime.toSlot()
|
|
if not quarantine.add(dag, signed_beacon_block):
|
|
debug "Block quarantine full"
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Ignore, MissingParent))
|
|
|
|
# [REJECT] The current finalized_checkpoint is an ancestor of block -- i.e.
|
|
# get_ancestor(store, block.parent_root,
|
|
# compute_start_slot_at_epoch(store.finalized_checkpoint.epoch)) ==
|
|
# store.finalized_checkpoint.root
|
|
let
|
|
finalized_checkpoint = dag.headState.data.data.finalized_checkpoint
|
|
ancestor = get_ancestor(
|
|
parent_ref, compute_start_slot_at_epoch(finalized_checkpoint.epoch))
|
|
|
|
if ancestor.isNil:
|
|
debug "couldn't find ancestor block"
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Ignore, Invalid)) # might not've received block
|
|
|
|
if not (finalized_checkpoint.root in [ancestor.root, Eth2Digest()]):
|
|
debug "block not descendent of finalized block"
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Reject, Invalid))
|
|
|
|
# [REJECT] The block is proposed by the expected proposer_index for the
|
|
# block's slot in the context of the current shuffling (defined by
|
|
# parent_root/slot). If the proposer_index cannot immediately be verified
|
|
# against the expected shuffling, the block MAY be queued for later
|
|
# processing while proposers for the block's branch are calculated -- in such
|
|
# a case do not REJECT, instead IGNORE this message.
|
|
let
|
|
proposer = getProposer(dag, parent_ref, signed_beacon_block.message.slot)
|
|
|
|
if proposer.isNone:
|
|
warn "cannot compute proposer for message"
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Ignore, Invalid)) # internal issue
|
|
|
|
if proposer.get()[0] !=
|
|
ValidatorIndex(signed_beacon_block.message.proposer_index):
|
|
notice "block had unexpected proposer",
|
|
expected_proposer = proposer.get()[0]
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Reject, Invalid))
|
|
|
|
# [REJECT] The proposer signature, signed_beacon_block.signature, is valid
|
|
# with respect to the proposer_index pubkey.
|
|
if not verify_block_signature(
|
|
dag.headState.data.data.fork,
|
|
dag.headState.data.data.genesis_validators_root,
|
|
signed_beacon_block.message.slot,
|
|
signed_beacon_block.message,
|
|
proposer.get()[1],
|
|
signed_beacon_block.signature):
|
|
debug "block failed signature verification",
|
|
signature = shortLog(signed_beacon_block.signature)
|
|
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Reject, Invalid))
|
|
|
|
ok()
|
|
|
|
|
|
# https://github.com/ethereum/eth2.0-specs/blob/v1.0.1/specs/phase0/p2p-interface.md#attester_slashing
|
|
proc validateAttesterSlashing*(
|
|
pool: var ExitPool, attester_slashing: AttesterSlashing):
|
|
Result[bool, (ValidationResult, cstring)] =
|
|
# [IGNORE] At least one index in the intersection of the attesting indices of
|
|
# each attestation has not yet been seen in any prior attester_slashing (i.e.
|
|
# attester_slashed_indices = set(attestation_1.attesting_indices).intersection(attestation_2.attesting_indices),
|
|
# verify if any(attester_slashed_indices.difference(prior_seen_attester_slashed_indices))).
|
|
# TODO sequtils2 should be able to make this more reasonable, from asSeq on
|
|
# down, and can sort and just find intersection that way
|
|
let
|
|
attestation_1_indices =
|
|
attester_slashing.attestation_1.attesting_indices.asSeq
|
|
attestation_2_indices =
|
|
attester_slashing.attestation_2.attesting_indices.asSeq
|
|
attester_slashed_indices =
|
|
toIntSet(attestation_1_indices) * toIntSet(attestation_2_indices)
|
|
|
|
if not disjoint(
|
|
attester_slashed_indices, pool.prior_seen_attester_slashed_indices):
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Ignore, cstring(
|
|
"validateAttesterSlashing: attester-slashed index already attester-slashed")))
|
|
|
|
# [REJECT] All of the conditions within process_attester_slashing pass
|
|
# validation.
|
|
let attester_slashing_validity =
|
|
check_attester_slashing(
|
|
pool.chainDag.headState.data.data, attester_slashing, {})
|
|
if attester_slashing_validity.isErr:
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Reject, attester_slashing_validity.error))
|
|
|
|
pool.prior_seen_attester_slashed_indices.incl attester_slashed_indices
|
|
pool.attester_slashings.addExitMessage(
|
|
attester_slashing, ATTESTER_SLASHINGS_BOUND)
|
|
|
|
ok(true)
|
|
|
|
# https://github.com/ethereum/eth2.0-specs/blob/v1.0.1/specs/phase0/p2p-interface.md#proposer_slashing
|
|
proc validateProposerSlashing*(
|
|
pool: var ExitPool, proposer_slashing: ProposerSlashing):
|
|
Result[bool, (ValidationResult, cstring)] =
|
|
# Not from spec; the rest of NBC wouldn't have correctly processed it either.
|
|
if proposer_slashing.signed_header_1.message.proposer_index > high(int).uint64:
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Ignore, cstring(
|
|
"validateProposerSlashing: proposer-slashed index too high")))
|
|
|
|
# [IGNORE] The proposer slashing is the first valid proposer slashing
|
|
# received for the proposer with index
|
|
# proposer_slashing.signed_header_1.message.proposer_index.
|
|
if proposer_slashing.signed_header_1.message.proposer_index.int in
|
|
pool.prior_seen_proposer_slashed_indices:
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Ignore, cstring(
|
|
"validateProposerSlashing: proposer-slashed index already proposer-slashed")))
|
|
|
|
# [REJECT] All of the conditions within process_proposer_slashing pass validation.
|
|
let proposer_slashing_validity =
|
|
check_proposer_slashing(
|
|
pool.chainDag.headState.data.data, proposer_slashing, {})
|
|
if proposer_slashing_validity.isErr:
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Reject, proposer_slashing_validity.error))
|
|
|
|
pool.prior_seen_proposer_slashed_indices.incl(
|
|
proposer_slashing.signed_header_1.message.proposer_index.int)
|
|
pool.proposer_slashings.addExitMessage(
|
|
proposer_slashing, PROPOSER_SLASHINGS_BOUND)
|
|
|
|
ok(true)
|
|
|
|
# https://github.com/ethereum/eth2.0-specs/blob/v1.0.1/specs/phase0/p2p-interface.md#voluntary_exit
|
|
proc validateVoluntaryExit*(
|
|
pool: var ExitPool, signed_voluntary_exit: SignedVoluntaryExit):
|
|
Result[void, (ValidationResult, cstring)] =
|
|
# [IGNORE] The voluntary exit is the first valid voluntary exit received for
|
|
# the validator with index signed_voluntary_exit.message.validator_index.
|
|
if signed_voluntary_exit.message.validator_index >=
|
|
pool.chainDag.headState.data.data.validators.lenu64:
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Ignore, cstring(
|
|
"validateVoluntaryExit: validator index too high")))
|
|
|
|
# Since pool.chainDag.headState.data.data.validators is a seq, this means
|
|
# signed_voluntary_exit.message.validator_index.int is already valid, but
|
|
# check explicitly if one changes that data structure.
|
|
if signed_voluntary_exit.message.validator_index.int in
|
|
pool.prior_seen_voluntary_exit_indices:
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Ignore, cstring(
|
|
"validateVoluntaryExit: validator index already voluntarily exited")))
|
|
|
|
# [REJECT] All of the conditions within process_voluntary_exit pass
|
|
# validation.
|
|
let voluntary_exit_validity =
|
|
check_voluntary_exit(
|
|
pool.chainDag.headState.data.data, signed_voluntary_exit, {})
|
|
if voluntary_exit_validity.isErr:
|
|
return err((ValidationResult.Reject, voluntary_exit_validity.error))
|
|
|
|
pool.prior_seen_voluntary_exit_indices.incl(
|
|
signed_voluntary_exit.message.validator_index.int)
|
|
pool.voluntary_exits.addExitMessage(
|
|
signed_voluntary_exit, VOLUNTARY_EXITS_BOUND)
|
|
|
|
ok()
|