Sign the blinded blocks only if they provide better value than the EL block
This commit is contained in:
parent
d784672c10
commit
a2dc33e024
|
@ -571,31 +571,28 @@ proc blindedBlockCheckSlashingAndSign[T](
|
|||
|
||||
return ok blindedBlock
|
||||
|
||||
proc getBlindedBeaconBlock[
|
||||
proc getUnsignedBlindedBeaconBlock[
|
||||
T: bellatrix_mev.SignedBlindedBeaconBlock |
|
||||
capella_mev.SignedBlindedBeaconBlock](
|
||||
node: BeaconNode, slot: Slot, validator: AttachedValidator,
|
||||
validator_index: ValidatorIndex, forkedBlock: ForkedBeaconBlock,
|
||||
executionPayloadHeader: bellatrix.ExecutionPayloadHeader |
|
||||
capella.ExecutionPayloadHeader):
|
||||
Future[Result[T, string]] {.async.} =
|
||||
capella.ExecutionPayloadHeader): Result[T, string] =
|
||||
withBlck(forkedBlock):
|
||||
when consensusFork >= ConsensusFork.Deneb:
|
||||
debugRaiseAssert $denebImplementationMissing & ": getBlindedBeaconBlock"
|
||||
return err("getBlindedBeaconBlock: Deneb blinded block creation not implemented")
|
||||
debugRaiseAssert $denebImplementationMissing & ": getUnsignedBlindedBeaconBlock"
|
||||
return err("getUnsignedBlindedBeaconBlock: Deneb blinded block creation not implemented")
|
||||
elif consensusFork >= ConsensusFork.Bellatrix:
|
||||
when not (
|
||||
(T is bellatrix_mev.SignedBlindedBeaconBlock and
|
||||
consensusFork == ConsensusFork.Bellatrix) or
|
||||
(T is capella_mev.SignedBlindedBeaconBlock and
|
||||
consensusFork == ConsensusFork.Capella)):
|
||||
return err("getBlindedBeaconBlock: mismatched block/payload types")
|
||||
return err("getUnsignedBlindedBeaconBlock: mismatched block/payload types")
|
||||
else:
|
||||
return await blindedBlockCheckSlashingAndSign(
|
||||
node, slot, validator, validator_index,
|
||||
constructSignableBlindedBlock[T](blck, executionPayloadHeader))
|
||||
return ok constructSignableBlindedBlock[T](blck, executionPayloadHeader)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
return err("getBlindedBeaconBlock: attempt to construct pre-Bellatrix blinded block")
|
||||
return err("getUnsignedBlindedBeaconBlock: attempt to construct pre-Bellatrix blinded block")
|
||||
|
||||
proc getBlindedBlockParts[EPH: ForkyExecutionPayloadHeader](
|
||||
node: BeaconNode, head: BlockRef, pubkey: ValidatorPubKey,
|
||||
|
@ -678,7 +675,8 @@ proc getBuilderBid[
|
|||
node: BeaconNode, head: BlockRef, validator: AttachedValidator, slot: Slot,
|
||||
randao: ValidatorSig, validator_index: ValidatorIndex):
|
||||
Future[BlindedBlockResult[SBBB]] {.async.} =
|
||||
# Used by the BN's own validators, but not the REST server
|
||||
## Returns the unsigned blinded block obtained from the Builder API.
|
||||
## Used by the BN's own validators, but not the REST server
|
||||
when SBBB is bellatrix_mev.SignedBlindedBeaconBlock:
|
||||
type EPH = bellatrix.ExecutionPayloadHeader
|
||||
elif SBBB is capella_mev.SignedBlindedBeaconBlock:
|
||||
|
@ -698,38 +696,14 @@ proc getBuilderBid[
|
|||
# proposal through the relay network.
|
||||
let (executionPayloadHeader, bidValue, forkedBlck) = blindedBlockParts.get
|
||||
|
||||
# This is only substantively asynchronous with a remote key signer, whereas
|
||||
# using local key signing, the await can't stall indefinitely any more than
|
||||
# any other await. However, by imposing an arbitrary timeout, it risks that
|
||||
# getBlindedBeaconBlock will check slashing conditions, register that block
|
||||
# in the database to avoid future slashing, then take long enough to exceed
|
||||
# any specific timeout provided. It's always better to at least try to send
|
||||
# this proposal. Furthermore, because one attempt to propose on that slot's
|
||||
# already been registered, the EL fallback will refuses to function, so the
|
||||
# timeout ensures missing both by builder and engine APIs.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# When using web3signer or some other remote signer, this is to some extent
|
||||
# difficult to avoid entirely, because some timeout should exist, so Nimbus
|
||||
# can still fall back to EL block production in time. For local signing, it
|
||||
# simply therefore uses `await` and avoids this potential race.
|
||||
let blindedBlock =
|
||||
case validator.kind
|
||||
of ValidatorKind.Local:
|
||||
await getBlindedBeaconBlock[SBBB](
|
||||
let unsignedBlindedBlock = getUnsignedBlindedBeaconBlock[SBBB](
|
||||
node, slot, validator, validator_index, forkedBlck,
|
||||
executionPayloadHeader)
|
||||
of ValidatorKind.Remote:
|
||||
awaitWithTimeout(
|
||||
getBlindedBeaconBlock[SBBB](
|
||||
node, slot, validator, validator_index, forkedBlck,
|
||||
executionPayloadHeader),
|
||||
1.seconds):
|
||||
Result[SBBB, string].err("getBlindedBlock timed out")
|
||||
|
||||
if blindedBlock.isErr:
|
||||
return err blindedBlock.error()
|
||||
if unsignedBlindedBlock.isErr:
|
||||
return err unsignedBlindedBlock.error()
|
||||
|
||||
return ok (blindedBlock.get, bidValue)
|
||||
return ok (unsignedBlindedBlock.get, bidValue)
|
||||
|
||||
proc proposeBlockMEV(node: BeaconNode, blindedBlock: auto):
|
||||
Future[Result[BlockRef, string]] {.async.} =
|
||||
|
@ -916,18 +890,20 @@ proc proposeBlockAux(
|
|||
|
||||
if useBuilderBlock:
|
||||
let
|
||||
blindedBlock = payloadBuilderBidFut.read
|
||||
blindedBlock = (await blindedBlockCheckSlashingAndSign(
|
||||
node, slot, validator, validator_index,
|
||||
payloadBuilderBidFut.read.get.blindedBlckPart)).valueOr:
|
||||
return head
|
||||
# Before proposeBlockMEV, can fall back to EL; after, cannot without
|
||||
# risking slashing.
|
||||
maybeUnblindedBlock = await proposeBlockMEV(
|
||||
node, blindedBlock.get.blindedBlckPart)
|
||||
maybeUnblindedBlock = await proposeBlockMEV(node, blindedBlock)
|
||||
|
||||
return maybeUnblindedBlock.valueOr:
|
||||
warn "Blinded block proposal incomplete",
|
||||
head = shortLog(head), slot, validator_index,
|
||||
validator = shortLog(validator),
|
||||
err = maybeUnblindedBlock.error,
|
||||
blindedBlck = shortLog(blindedBlock.get().blindedBlckPart)
|
||||
blindedBlck = shortLog(blindedBlock)
|
||||
beacon_block_builder_missed_without_fallback.inc()
|
||||
return head
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue