|
|
|
@ -354,7 +354,8 @@ func processSlot(state: var BeaconState, latest_block: BeaconBlock) =
|
|
|
|
|
previous_block_root = Eth2Digest(data: hash_tree_root(latest_block))
|
|
|
|
|
for i in 0 ..< state.latest_block_roots.len - 1:
|
|
|
|
|
state.latest_block_roots[i] = state.latest_block_roots[i + 1]
|
|
|
|
|
state.latest_block_roots[^1] = previous_block_root
|
|
|
|
|
state.latest_block_roots[state.latest_block_roots.len - 1] =
|
|
|
|
|
previous_block_root
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if state.slot mod LATEST_BLOCK_ROOTS_COUNT == 0:
|
|
|
|
|
state.batched_block_roots.add(merkle_root(state.latest_block_roots))
|
|
|
|
@ -393,278 +394,355 @@ func lowerThan(candidate, current: Eth2Digest): bool =
|
|
|
|
|
if v > candidate.data[i]: return true
|
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func processEpoch(state: var BeaconState, blck: BeaconBlock) =
|
|
|
|
|
## Epoch processing happens every time we've passed EPOCH_LENGTH blocks.
|
|
|
|
|
## Because some slots may be skipped, it may happen that we go through the
|
|
|
|
|
## loop more than once - each time the latest_state_recalculation_slot will be
|
|
|
|
|
## increased by EPOCH_LENGTH.
|
|
|
|
|
##
|
|
|
|
|
func processEpoch(state: var BeaconState) =
|
|
|
|
|
## https://github.com/ethereum/eth2.0-specs/blob/master/specs/core/0_beacon-chain.md#per-epoch-processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while blck.slot >= EPOCH_LENGTH.uint64 + state.latest_state_recalculation_slot:
|
|
|
|
|
# Convenience shortcut, from spec
|
|
|
|
|
let s = state.latest_state_recalculation_slot
|
|
|
|
|
if state.slot mod EPOCH_LENGTH != 0:
|
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Precomputation
|
|
|
|
|
# Precomputation
|
|
|
|
|
let
|
|
|
|
|
active_validator_indices =
|
|
|
|
|
get_active_validator_indices(state.validator_registry)
|
|
|
|
|
total_balance = sum_effective_balances(state, active_validator_indices)
|
|
|
|
|
total_balance_in_eth = total_balance div GWEI_PER_ETH
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# The per-slot maximum interest rate is `2/reward_quotient`.)
|
|
|
|
|
base_reward_quotient = BASE_REWARD_QUOTIENT * int_sqrt(total_balance_in_eth)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func base_reward(v: ValidatorRecord): uint64 =
|
|
|
|
|
get_effective_balance(v) div base_reward_quotient.uint64 div 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func inactivity_penalty(
|
|
|
|
|
v: ValidatorRecord, slots_since_finality: uint64): uint64 =
|
|
|
|
|
base_reward(v) +
|
|
|
|
|
get_effective_balance(v) *
|
|
|
|
|
slots_since_finality div INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# TODO doing this with iterators failed:
|
|
|
|
|
# https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/issues/9827
|
|
|
|
|
let
|
|
|
|
|
this_epoch_attestations =
|
|
|
|
|
filterIt(state.latest_attestations,
|
|
|
|
|
state.slot <= it.data.slot + EPOCH_LENGTH and
|
|
|
|
|
it.data.slot < state.slot)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this_epoch_boundary_attestations =
|
|
|
|
|
boundary_attestations(
|
|
|
|
|
state, get_block_root(state, state.slot-EPOCH_LENGTH),
|
|
|
|
|
this_epoch_attestations)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this_epoch_boundary_attesters =
|
|
|
|
|
get_epoch_boundary_attesters(state, this_epoch_attestations)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance =
|
|
|
|
|
sum_effective_balances(state, this_epoch_boundary_attesters)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_attestations = filterIt(
|
|
|
|
|
state.latest_attestations,
|
|
|
|
|
state.slot <= it.data.slot + 2 * EPOCH_LENGTH and
|
|
|
|
|
it.data.slot + EPOCH_LENGTH < state.slot)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_attesters = flatten(mapIt(
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_attestations,
|
|
|
|
|
get_attestation_participants(state, it.data, it.participation_bitfield)
|
|
|
|
|
))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let # Previous epoch justified
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_justified_attestations = filterIt(
|
|
|
|
|
concat(this_epoch_attestations, previous_epoch_attestations),
|
|
|
|
|
it.data.justified_slot == state.previous_justified_slot
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_justified_attesters = flatten(mapIt(
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_justified_attestations,
|
|
|
|
|
get_attestation_participants(state, it.data, it.participation_bitfield)
|
|
|
|
|
))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_justified_attesting_balance =
|
|
|
|
|
sum_effective_balances(state, previous_epoch_justified_attesters)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let # Previous epoch boundary
|
|
|
|
|
# TODO check this with spec...
|
|
|
|
|
negative_uint_hack =
|
|
|
|
|
if state.slot < 2 * EPOCH_LENGTH: 0'u64 else: state.slot - 2 * EPOCH_LENGTH
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_boundary_attestations =
|
|
|
|
|
boundary_attestations(
|
|
|
|
|
state, get_block_root(state, negative_uint_hack),
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_attestations)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_boundary_attesters = flatten(mapIt(
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_boundary_attestations,
|
|
|
|
|
get_attestation_participants(state, it.data, it.participation_bitfield)
|
|
|
|
|
))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance =
|
|
|
|
|
sum_effective_balances(state, previous_epoch_boundary_attesters)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let # Previous epoch head
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_head_attestations =
|
|
|
|
|
filterIt(
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_attestations,
|
|
|
|
|
it.data.beacon_block_root == get_block_root(state, it.data.slot))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_head_attesters = flatten(mapIt(
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_head_attestations,
|
|
|
|
|
get_attestation_participants(state, it.data, it.participation_bitfield)
|
|
|
|
|
))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_head_attesting_balance =
|
|
|
|
|
sum_effective_balances(state, previous_epoch_head_attesters)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# TODO this is really hairy - we cannot capture `state` directly, but we
|
|
|
|
|
# can capture a pointer to it - this is safe because we don't leak
|
|
|
|
|
# these closures outside this scope, but still..
|
|
|
|
|
let statePtr = state.addr
|
|
|
|
|
func attesting_validators(
|
|
|
|
|
shard_committee: ShardCommittee, shard_block_root: Eth2Digest): seq[Uint24] =
|
|
|
|
|
flatten(
|
|
|
|
|
mapIt(
|
|
|
|
|
filterIt(concat(this_epoch_attestations, previous_epoch_attestations),
|
|
|
|
|
it.data.shard == shard_committee.shard and
|
|
|
|
|
it.data.shard_block_root == shard_block_root),
|
|
|
|
|
get_attestation_participants(statePtr[], it.data, it.participation_bitfield)))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func winning_hash(obj: ShardCommittee): Eth2Digest =
|
|
|
|
|
# * Let `winning_hash(obj)` be the winning `shard_block_root` value.
|
|
|
|
|
# ... such that `sum([get_effective_balance(v) for v in attesting_validators(obj, shard_block_root)])`
|
|
|
|
|
# is maximized (ties broken by favoring lower `shard_block_root` values).
|
|
|
|
|
let candidates =
|
|
|
|
|
mapIt(
|
|
|
|
|
filterIt(concat(this_epoch_attestations, previous_epoch_attestations),
|
|
|
|
|
it.data.shard == obj.shard),
|
|
|
|
|
it.data.shard_block_root)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# TODO not covered by spec!
|
|
|
|
|
if candidates.len == 0:
|
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var max_hash = candidates[0]
|
|
|
|
|
var max_val =
|
|
|
|
|
sum_effective_balances(statePtr[], attesting_validators(obj, max_hash))
|
|
|
|
|
for candidate in candidates[1..^1]:
|
|
|
|
|
let val = sum_effective_balances(statePtr[], attesting_validators(obj, candidate))
|
|
|
|
|
if val > max_val or (val == max_val and candidate.lowerThan(max_hash)):
|
|
|
|
|
max_hash = candidate
|
|
|
|
|
max_val = val
|
|
|
|
|
max_hash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func attesting_validators(obj: ShardCommittee): seq[Uint24] =
|
|
|
|
|
attesting_validators(obj, winning_hash(obj))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func total_attesting_balance(obj: ShardCommittee): uint64 =
|
|
|
|
|
sum_effective_balances(statePtr[], attesting_validators(obj))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func total_balance_sac(obj: ShardCommittee): uint64 =
|
|
|
|
|
sum_effective_balances(statePtr[], obj.committee)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func inclusion_slot(v: Uint24): uint64 =
|
|
|
|
|
for a in statePtr[].latest_attestations:
|
|
|
|
|
if v in get_attestation_participants(statePtr[], a.data, a.participation_bitfield):
|
|
|
|
|
return a.slot_included
|
|
|
|
|
assert false # shouldn't happen..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func inclusion_distance(v: Uint24): uint64 =
|
|
|
|
|
for a in statePtr[].latest_attestations:
|
|
|
|
|
if v in get_attestation_participants(statePtr[], a.data, a.participation_bitfield):
|
|
|
|
|
return a.slot_included - a.data.slot
|
|
|
|
|
assert false # shouldn't happen..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block: # Receipt roots
|
|
|
|
|
if state.slot mod POW_RECEIPT_ROOT_VOTING_PERIOD == 0:
|
|
|
|
|
for x in state.candidate_pow_receipt_roots:
|
|
|
|
|
if x.votes * 2 >= POW_RECEIPT_ROOT_VOTING_PERIOD:
|
|
|
|
|
state.processed_pow_receipt_root = x.candidate_pow_receipt_root
|
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
|
state.candidate_pow_receipt_roots = @[]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block: # Justification
|
|
|
|
|
state.previous_justified_slot = state.justified_slot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# TODO where's that bitfield type when you need it?
|
|
|
|
|
# TODO why are all bits kept?
|
|
|
|
|
state.justification_bitfield = state.justification_bitfield shl 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if 3'u64 * previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance >=
|
|
|
|
|
2'u64 * total_balance:
|
|
|
|
|
state.justification_bitfield = state.justification_bitfield or 2
|
|
|
|
|
state.justified_slot = state.slot - 2 * EPOCH_LENGTH
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if 3'u64 * this_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance >=
|
|
|
|
|
2'u64 * total_balance:
|
|
|
|
|
state.justification_bitfield = state.justification_bitfield or 1
|
|
|
|
|
state.justified_slot = state.slot - 1 * EPOCH_LENGTH
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block: # Finalization
|
|
|
|
|
if
|
|
|
|
|
(state.previous_justified_slot == state.slot - 2 * EPOCH_LENGTH and
|
|
|
|
|
state.justification_bitfield mod 4 == 3) or
|
|
|
|
|
(state.previous_justified_slot == state.slot - 3 * EPOCH_LENGTH and
|
|
|
|
|
state.justification_bitfield mod 8 == 7) or
|
|
|
|
|
(state.previous_justified_slot == state.slot - 4 * EPOCH_LENGTH and
|
|
|
|
|
state.justification_bitfield mod 16 in [15'u64, 14]):
|
|
|
|
|
state.finalized_slot = state.justified_slot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block: # Crosslinks
|
|
|
|
|
for sac in state.shard_committees_at_slots:
|
|
|
|
|
for shard_committee in sac:
|
|
|
|
|
if 3'u64 * total_attesting_balance(shard_committee) >=
|
|
|
|
|
2'u64 * total_balance_sac(shard_committee):
|
|
|
|
|
state.latest_crosslinks[shard_committee.shard] = CrosslinkRecord(
|
|
|
|
|
slot: state.latest_state_recalculation_slot + EPOCH_LENGTH,
|
|
|
|
|
shard_block_root: winning_hash(shard_committee))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block: # Justification and finalization
|
|
|
|
|
let
|
|
|
|
|
active_validator_indices =
|
|
|
|
|
get_active_validator_indices(state.validator_registry)
|
|
|
|
|
total_balance = sum_effective_balances(state, active_validator_indices)
|
|
|
|
|
total_balance_in_eth = total_balance div GWEI_PER_ETH
|
|
|
|
|
slots_since_finality = state.slot - state.finalized_slot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# The per-slot maximum interest rate is `2/reward_quotient`.)
|
|
|
|
|
reward_quotient = BASE_REWARD_QUOTIENT * int_sqrt(total_balance_in_eth)
|
|
|
|
|
if slots_since_finality <= 4'u64 * EPOCH_LENGTH:
|
|
|
|
|
# Expected FFG source
|
|
|
|
|
for v in previous_epoch_justified_attesters:
|
|
|
|
|
state.validator_registry[v].balance += adjust_for_inclusion_distance(
|
|
|
|
|
base_reward(state.validator_registry[v]) *
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_justified_attesting_balance div total_balance,
|
|
|
|
|
inclusion_distance(v))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# TODO not in spec, convenient
|
|
|
|
|
epoch_boundary_root = get_block_root(state, s)
|
|
|
|
|
for v in active_validator_indices:
|
|
|
|
|
if v notin previous_epoch_justified_attesters:
|
|
|
|
|
state.validator_registry[v].balance -=
|
|
|
|
|
base_reward(state.validator_registry[v])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc base_reward(v: ValidatorRecord): uint64 =
|
|
|
|
|
get_effective_balance(v) div reward_quotient.uint64
|
|
|
|
|
# Expected FFG target:
|
|
|
|
|
for v in previous_epoch_boundary_attesters:
|
|
|
|
|
state.validator_registry[v].balance += adjust_for_inclusion_distance(
|
|
|
|
|
base_reward(state.validator_registry[v]) *
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance div total_balance,
|
|
|
|
|
inclusion_distance(v))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# TODO doing this with iterators failed:
|
|
|
|
|
# https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/issues/9827
|
|
|
|
|
let
|
|
|
|
|
this_epoch_attestations = filterIt(state.latest_attestations,
|
|
|
|
|
s <= it.data.slot and it.data.slot < s + EPOCH_LENGTH)
|
|
|
|
|
for v in active_validator_indices:
|
|
|
|
|
if v notin previous_epoch_boundary_attesters:
|
|
|
|
|
state.validator_registry[v].balance -=
|
|
|
|
|
base_reward(state.validator_registry[v])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this_epoch_boundary_attestations =
|
|
|
|
|
boundary_attestations(state, epoch_boundary_root,
|
|
|
|
|
this_epoch_attestations)
|
|
|
|
|
# Expected beacon chain head:
|
|
|
|
|
for v in previous_epoch_head_attesters:
|
|
|
|
|
state.validator_registry[v].balance += adjust_for_inclusion_distance(
|
|
|
|
|
base_reward(state.validator_registry[v]) *
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_head_attesting_balance div total_balance,
|
|
|
|
|
inclusion_distance(v))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this_epoch_boundary_attesters =
|
|
|
|
|
get_epoch_boundary_attesters(state, this_epoch_attestations)
|
|
|
|
|
for v in active_validator_indices:
|
|
|
|
|
if v notin previous_epoch_head_attesters:
|
|
|
|
|
state.validator_registry[v].balance -=
|
|
|
|
|
base_reward(state.validator_registry[v])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance =
|
|
|
|
|
sum_effective_balances(state, this_epoch_boundary_attesters)
|
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
|
for v in active_validator_indices:
|
|
|
|
|
let validator = addr state.validator_registry[v]
|
|
|
|
|
if v notin previous_epoch_justified_attesters:
|
|
|
|
|
validator[].balance -=
|
|
|
|
|
inactivity_penalty(validator[], slots_since_finality)
|
|
|
|
|
if v notin previous_epoch_boundary_attesters:
|
|
|
|
|
validator[].balance -=
|
|
|
|
|
inactivity_penalty(validator[], slots_since_finality)
|
|
|
|
|
if v notin previous_epoch_head_attesters:
|
|
|
|
|
validator[].balance -=
|
|
|
|
|
inactivity_penalty(validator[], slots_since_finality)
|
|
|
|
|
if validator[].status == EXITED_WITH_PENALTY:
|
|
|
|
|
validator[].balance -=
|
|
|
|
|
3'u64 * inactivity_penalty(validator[], slots_since_finality)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_attestations = filterIt(state.latest_attestations,
|
|
|
|
|
s <= it.data.slot + EPOCH_LENGTH and it.data.slot < s)
|
|
|
|
|
block: # Attestation inclusion
|
|
|
|
|
for v in previous_epoch_attesters:
|
|
|
|
|
let proposer_index =
|
|
|
|
|
get_beacon_proposer_index(state, inclusion_slot(v))
|
|
|
|
|
state.validator_registry[proposer_index].balance +=
|
|
|
|
|
base_reward(state.validator_registry[v]) div INCLUDER_REWARD_QUOTIENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_boundary_attestations =
|
|
|
|
|
boundary_attestations(state, epoch_boundary_root,
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_attestations)
|
|
|
|
|
block: # Crosslinks
|
|
|
|
|
for sac in state.shard_committees_at_slots[0 ..< EPOCH_LENGTH]:
|
|
|
|
|
for obj in sac:
|
|
|
|
|
for vindex in obj.committee:
|
|
|
|
|
let v = state.validator_registry[vindex].addr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_boundary_attesters =
|
|
|
|
|
get_epoch_boundary_attesters(state, previous_epoch_boundary_attestations)
|
|
|
|
|
if vindex in attesting_validators(obj):
|
|
|
|
|
v.balance += adjust_for_inclusion_distance(
|
|
|
|
|
base_reward(v[]) * total_attesting_balance(obj) div
|
|
|
|
|
total_balance_sac(obj),
|
|
|
|
|
inclusion_distance(vindex))
|
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
|
v.balance -= base_reward(v[])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance =
|
|
|
|
|
sum_effective_balances(state, this_epoch_boundary_attesters)
|
|
|
|
|
block: # Validator registry
|
|
|
|
|
if state.finalized_slot > state.validator_registry_latest_change_slot and
|
|
|
|
|
allIt(state.shard_committees_at_slots,
|
|
|
|
|
allIt(it,
|
|
|
|
|
state.latest_crosslinks[it.shard].slot >
|
|
|
|
|
state.validator_registry_latest_change_slot)):
|
|
|
|
|
update_validator_registry(state)
|
|
|
|
|
state.validator_registry_latest_change_slot = state.slot
|
|
|
|
|
for i in 0..<EPOCH_LENGTH:
|
|
|
|
|
state.shard_committees_at_slots[i] =
|
|
|
|
|
state.shard_committees_at_slots[EPOCH_LENGTH + i]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# TODO this is really hairy - we cannot capture `state` directly, but we
|
|
|
|
|
# can capture a pointer to it - this is safe because we don't leak
|
|
|
|
|
# these closures outside this scope, but still..
|
|
|
|
|
let statePtr = state.addr
|
|
|
|
|
func attesting_validators(
|
|
|
|
|
obj: ShardCommittee, shard_block_root: Eth2Digest): seq[Uint24] =
|
|
|
|
|
flatten(
|
|
|
|
|
mapIt(
|
|
|
|
|
filterIt(concat(this_epoch_attestations, previous_epoch_attestations),
|
|
|
|
|
it.data.shard == obj.shard and
|
|
|
|
|
it.data.shard_block_root == shard_block_root),
|
|
|
|
|
get_attestation_participants(statePtr[], it.data, it.participation_bitfield)))
|
|
|
|
|
let next_start_shard =
|
|
|
|
|
(state.shard_committees_at_slots[^1][^1].shard + 1) mod SHARD_COUNT
|
|
|
|
|
for i, v in get_new_shuffling(
|
|
|
|
|
state.next_seed, state.validator_registry, next_start_shard):
|
|
|
|
|
state.shard_committees_at_slots[i + EPOCH_LENGTH] = v
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func winning_hash(obj: ShardCommittee): Eth2Digest =
|
|
|
|
|
# * Let `winning_hash(obj)` be the winning `shard_block_root` value.
|
|
|
|
|
# ... such that `sum([get_effective_balance(v) for v in attesting_validators(obj, shard_block_root)])`
|
|
|
|
|
# is maximized (ties broken by favoring lower `shard_block_root` values).
|
|
|
|
|
let candidates =
|
|
|
|
|
mapIt(
|
|
|
|
|
filterIt(concat(this_epoch_attestations, previous_epoch_attestations),
|
|
|
|
|
it.data.shard == obj.shard),
|
|
|
|
|
it.data.shard_block_root)
|
|
|
|
|
state.next_seed = state.randao_mix
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var max_hash = candidates[0]
|
|
|
|
|
var max_val =
|
|
|
|
|
sum_effective_balances(statePtr[], attesting_validators(obj, max_hash))
|
|
|
|
|
for candidate in candidates[1..^1]:
|
|
|
|
|
let val = sum_effective_balances(statePtr[], attesting_validators(obj, candidate))
|
|
|
|
|
if val > max_val or (val == max_val and candidate.lowerThan(max_hash)):
|
|
|
|
|
max_hash = candidate
|
|
|
|
|
max_val = val
|
|
|
|
|
max_hash
|
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
|
# If a validator registry change does NOT happen
|
|
|
|
|
for i in 0..<EPOCH_LENGTH:
|
|
|
|
|
state.shard_committees_at_slots[i] =
|
|
|
|
|
state.shard_committees_at_slots[EPOCH_LENGTH + i]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func attesting_validators(obj: ShardCommittee): seq[Uint24] =
|
|
|
|
|
attesting_validators(obj, winning_hash(obj))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func total_attesting_balance(obj: ShardCommittee): uint64 =
|
|
|
|
|
sum_effective_balances(statePtr[], attesting_validators(obj))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func total_balance_sac(obj: ShardCommittee): uint64 =
|
|
|
|
|
sum_effective_balances(statePtr[], obj.committee)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func inclusion_slot(v: Uint24): uint64 =
|
|
|
|
|
for a in statePtr[].latest_attestations:
|
|
|
|
|
if v in get_attestation_participants(statePtr[], a.data, a.participation_bitfield):
|
|
|
|
|
return a.slot_included
|
|
|
|
|
assert false # shouldn't happen..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func inclusion_distance(v: Uint24): uint64 =
|
|
|
|
|
for a in statePtr[].latest_attestations:
|
|
|
|
|
if v in get_attestation_participants(statePtr[], a.data, a.participation_bitfield):
|
|
|
|
|
return a.slot_included - a.data.slot
|
|
|
|
|
assert false # shouldn't happen..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block: # Receipt roots
|
|
|
|
|
if state.slot mod POW_RECEIPT_ROOT_VOTING_PERIOD == 0:
|
|
|
|
|
for x in state.candidate_pow_receipt_roots:
|
|
|
|
|
if x.votes * 2 >= POW_RECEIPT_ROOT_VOTING_PERIOD:
|
|
|
|
|
state.processed_pow_receipt_root = x.candidate_pow_receipt_root
|
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
|
state.candidate_pow_receipt_roots = @[]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block: # Justification
|
|
|
|
|
state.previous_justified_slot = state.justified_slot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# TODO where's that bitfield type when you need it?
|
|
|
|
|
# TODO why are all bits kept?
|
|
|
|
|
state.justification_bitfield = state.justification_bitfield shl 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if 3'u64 * previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance >=
|
|
|
|
|
2'u64 * total_balance:
|
|
|
|
|
state.justification_bitfield = state.justification_bitfield or 2
|
|
|
|
|
state.justified_slot = state.slot - 2 * EPOCH_LENGTH
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if 3'u64 * this_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance >=
|
|
|
|
|
2'u64 * total_balance:
|
|
|
|
|
state.justification_bitfield = state.justification_bitfield or 1
|
|
|
|
|
state.justified_slot = state.slot - 1 * EPOCH_LENGTH
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block: # Finalization
|
|
|
|
|
if
|
|
|
|
|
(state.previous_justified_slot == state.slot - 2 * EPOCH_LENGTH and
|
|
|
|
|
state.justification_bitfield mod 4 == 3) or
|
|
|
|
|
(state.previous_justified_slot == state.slot - 3 * EPOCH_LENGTH and
|
|
|
|
|
state.justification_bitfield mod 8 == 7) or
|
|
|
|
|
(state.previous_justified_slot == state.slot - 4 * EPOCH_LENGTH and
|
|
|
|
|
state.justification_bitfield mod 16 in [15'u64, 14]):
|
|
|
|
|
state.finalized_slot = state.justified_slot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block: # Crosslinks
|
|
|
|
|
for sac in state.shard_committees_at_slots:
|
|
|
|
|
for obj in sac:
|
|
|
|
|
if 3'u64 * total_attesting_balance(obj) >=
|
|
|
|
|
2'u64 * total_balance_sac(obj):
|
|
|
|
|
state.latest_crosslinks[obj.shard] = CrosslinkRecord(
|
|
|
|
|
slot: state.latest_state_recalculation_slot + EPOCH_LENGTH,
|
|
|
|
|
shard_block_root: winning_hash(obj))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block: # Justification and finalization rewards and penalties
|
|
|
|
|
let
|
|
|
|
|
slots_since_finality = blck.slot - state.finalized_slot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if slots_since_finality <= 4'u64 * EPOCH_LENGTH:
|
|
|
|
|
for v in previous_epoch_boundary_attesters:
|
|
|
|
|
state.validator_registry[v].balance += adjust_for_inclusion_distance(
|
|
|
|
|
base_reward(state.validator_registry[v]) *
|
|
|
|
|
previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance div total_balance,
|
|
|
|
|
inclusion_distance(v))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for v in active_validator_indices:
|
|
|
|
|
if v notin previous_epoch_boundary_attesters:
|
|
|
|
|
state.validator_registry[v].balance -=
|
|
|
|
|
base_reward(state.validator_registry[v])
|
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
|
# Any validator in `prev_cycle_boundary_attesters` sees their balance
|
|
|
|
|
# unchanged.
|
|
|
|
|
# Others might get penalized:
|
|
|
|
|
for vindex, v in state.validator_registry.mpairs():
|
|
|
|
|
if (v.status == ACTIVE and
|
|
|
|
|
vindex.Uint24 notin previous_epoch_boundary_attesters) or
|
|
|
|
|
v.status == EXITED_WITH_PENALTY:
|
|
|
|
|
v.balance -= base_reward(v) +
|
|
|
|
|
get_effective_balance(v) * slots_since_finality div
|
|
|
|
|
INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for v in previous_epoch_boundary_attesters:
|
|
|
|
|
let proposer_index =
|
|
|
|
|
get_beacon_proposer_index(state, inclusion_slot(v))
|
|
|
|
|
state.validator_registry[proposer_index].balance +=
|
|
|
|
|
base_reward(state.validator_registry[v]) div
|
|
|
|
|
INCLUDER_REWARD_QUOTIENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block: # Crosslink rewards and penalties
|
|
|
|
|
for sac in state.shard_committees_at_slots[0 ..< EPOCH_LENGTH]:
|
|
|
|
|
for obj in sac:
|
|
|
|
|
for vindex in obj.committee:
|
|
|
|
|
let v = state.validator_registry[vindex].addr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if vindex in attesting_validators(obj):
|
|
|
|
|
v.balance += adjust_for_inclusion_distance(
|
|
|
|
|
base_reward(v[]) * total_attesting_balance(obj) div total_balance_sac(obj),
|
|
|
|
|
inclusion_distance(vindex))
|
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
|
v.balance -= base_reward(v[])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block: # Validator registry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if state.finalized_slot > state.validator_registry_latest_change_slot and
|
|
|
|
|
allIt(state.shard_committees_at_slots,
|
|
|
|
|
allIt(it,
|
|
|
|
|
state.latest_crosslinks[it.shard].slot >
|
|
|
|
|
state.validator_registry_latest_change_slot)):
|
|
|
|
|
update_validator_registry(state)
|
|
|
|
|
state.validator_registry_latest_change_slot = state.slot
|
|
|
|
|
for i in 0..<EPOCH_LENGTH:
|
|
|
|
|
state.shard_committees_at_slots[i] =
|
|
|
|
|
state.shard_committees_at_slots[EPOCH_LENGTH + i]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let next_start_shard =
|
|
|
|
|
(state.shard_committees_at_slots[^1][^1].shard + 1) mod SHARD_COUNT
|
|
|
|
|
let slots_since_finality =
|
|
|
|
|
state.slot - state.validator_registry_latest_change_slot
|
|
|
|
|
let start_shard = state.shard_committees_at_slots[0][0].shard
|
|
|
|
|
if slots_since_finality * EPOCH_LENGTH <=
|
|
|
|
|
MIN_VALIDATOR_REGISTRY_CHANGE_INTERVAL or
|
|
|
|
|
is_power_of_2(slots_since_finality):
|
|
|
|
|
for i, v in get_new_shuffling(
|
|
|
|
|
state.next_seed, state.validator_registry, next_start_shard):
|
|
|
|
|
state.next_seed, state.validator_registry, start_shard):
|
|
|
|
|
state.shard_committees_at_slots[i + EPOCH_LENGTH] = v
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
state.next_seed = state.randao_mix
|
|
|
|
|
# Note that `start_shard` is not changed from the last epoch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
|
# If a validator registry change does NOT happen
|
|
|
|
|
for i in 0..<EPOCH_LENGTH:
|
|
|
|
|
state.shard_committees_at_slots[i] =
|
|
|
|
|
state.shard_committees_at_slots[EPOCH_LENGTH + i]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let slots_since_finality =
|
|
|
|
|
state.slot - state.validator_registry_latest_change_slot
|
|
|
|
|
let start_shard = state.shard_committees_at_slots[0][0].shard
|
|
|
|
|
if slots_since_finality * EPOCH_LENGTH <=
|
|
|
|
|
MIN_VALIDATOR_REGISTRY_CHANGE_INTERVAL or
|
|
|
|
|
is_power_of_2(slots_since_finality):
|
|
|
|
|
for i, v in get_new_shuffling(
|
|
|
|
|
state.next_seed, state.validator_registry, start_shard):
|
|
|
|
|
state.shard_committees_at_slots[i + EPOCH_LENGTH] = v
|
|
|
|
|
state.next_seed = state.randao_mix
|
|
|
|
|
# Note that `start_shard` is not changed from the last epoch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block: # Proposer reshuffling
|
|
|
|
|
let active_validator_indices = get_active_validator_indices(state.validator_registry)
|
|
|
|
|
let num_validators_to_reshuffle =
|
|
|
|
|
len(active_validator_indices) div
|
|
|
|
|
SHARD_PERSISTENT_COMMITTEE_CHANGE_PERIOD.int
|
|
|
|
|
for i in 0..<num_validators_to_reshuffle:
|
|
|
|
|
# Multiplying i to 2 to ensure we have different input to all the required hashes in the shuffling
|
|
|
|
|
# and none of the hashes used for entropy in this loop will be the same
|
|
|
|
|
let validator_index = 0.Uint24 # active_validator_indices[hash(state.randao_mix + bytes8(i * 2)) mod len(active_validator_indices)]
|
|
|
|
|
let new_shard = 0'u64 # hash(state.randao_mix + bytes8(i * 2 + 1)) mod SHARD_COUNT
|
|
|
|
|
let shard_reassignment_record = ShardReassignmentRecord(
|
|
|
|
|
validator_index: validator_index,
|
|
|
|
|
shard: new_shard,
|
|
|
|
|
slot: s + SHARD_PERSISTENT_COMMITTEE_CHANGE_PERIOD
|
|
|
|
|
block: # Proposer reshuffling
|
|
|
|
|
let num_validators_to_reshuffle =
|
|
|
|
|
len(active_validator_indices) div
|
|
|
|
|
SHARD_PERSISTENT_COMMITTEE_CHANGE_PERIOD.int
|
|
|
|
|
for i in 0..<num_validators_to_reshuffle:
|
|
|
|
|
# Multiplying i to 2 to ensure we have different input to all the required hashes in the shuffling
|
|
|
|
|
# and none of the hashes used for entropy in this loop will be the same
|
|
|
|
|
let
|
|
|
|
|
validator_index = 0.Uint24 # active_validator_indices[hash(state.randao_mix + bytes8(i * 2)) mod len(active_validator_indices)]
|
|
|
|
|
new_shard = 0'u64 # hash(state.randao_mix + bytes8(i * 2 + 1)) mod SHARD_COUNT
|
|
|
|
|
shard_reassignment_record = ShardReassignmentRecord(
|
|
|
|
|
validator_index: validator_index,
|
|
|
|
|
shard: new_shard,
|
|
|
|
|
slot: state.slot + SHARD_PERSISTENT_COMMITTEE_CHANGE_PERIOD
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
state.persistent_committee_reassignments.add(shard_reassignment_record)
|
|
|
|
|
state.persistent_committee_reassignments.add(shard_reassignment_record)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while len(state.persistent_committee_reassignments) > 0 and
|
|
|
|
|
state.persistent_committee_reassignments[0].slot <= s:
|
|
|
|
|
let reassignment = state.persistent_committee_reassignments[0]
|
|
|
|
|
state.persistent_committee_reassignments.delete(0)
|
|
|
|
|
for committee in state.persistent_committees.mitems():
|
|
|
|
|
if reassignment.validator_index in committee:
|
|
|
|
|
committee.delete(committee.find(reassignment.validator_index))
|
|
|
|
|
state.persistent_committees[reassignment.shard.int].add(
|
|
|
|
|
reassignment.validator_index)
|
|
|
|
|
while len(state.persistent_committee_reassignments) > 0 and
|
|
|
|
|
state.persistent_committee_reassignments[0].slot <= state.slot:
|
|
|
|
|
let reassignment = state.persistent_committee_reassignments[0]
|
|
|
|
|
state.persistent_committee_reassignments.delete(0)
|
|
|
|
|
for committee in state.persistent_committees.mitems():
|
|
|
|
|
if reassignment.validator_index in committee:
|
|
|
|
|
committee.delete(committee.find(reassignment.validator_index))
|
|
|
|
|
state.persistent_committees[reassignment.shard.int].add(
|
|
|
|
|
reassignment.validator_index)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block: # Final updates
|
|
|
|
|
# TODO Remove all attestation records older than slot `s`.
|
|
|
|
|
state.latest_block_roots = state.latest_block_roots[EPOCH_LENGTH..^1]
|
|
|
|
|
block: # Final updates
|
|
|
|
|
state.latest_attestations.keepItIf(
|
|
|
|
|
not (it.data.slot + EPOCH_LENGTH < state.slot)
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc updateState*(state: BeaconState, latest_block: BeaconBlock,
|
|
|
|
|
new_block: Option[BeaconBlock]):
|
|
|
|
@ -716,7 +794,7 @@ proc updateState*(state: BeaconState, latest_block: BeaconBlock,
|
|
|
|
|
true
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Heavy updates that happen for every epoch - these never fail (or so we hope)
|
|
|
|
|
processEpoch(new_state, latest_block)
|
|
|
|
|
processEpoch(new_state)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# State update never fails, but block validation might...
|
|
|
|
|
(new_state, block_ok)
|
|
|
|
|