nimbus-eth2/docs/cpu_features.md

150 lines
6.6 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Normal View History

# CPU Features for Nimbus
This document describes the CPU-specific features and compilation flags that significantly improves Nimbus performance.
We focus on x86-64 and ARMv8 (64 bits).
Given that the major bottleneck of Nimbus is big integer for cryptography, 64-bit architecture improves elliptic curve cryptography processing by ~2x over 32 bits since we can divide the number of low-level assembly operations by half.
_Note: SHA256 isn't improved by 64-bit since it uses 32-bit operations by design_
The major bottlenecks that can be improved by CPU specific instructions are:
- Elliptic curve cryptography for BLS12-381
- SHA256 hashing
## x86
### SSSE3 (Supplemental SSE3)
Intel: Core 2, 2006\
AMD: Bulldozer, 2011\
Flag: `-mssse3`
Configuration: https://github.com/supranational/blst/blob/v0.3.4/build/assembly.S#L3-L6
SSSE3 improves SHA256 computations. SHA256 is used **recursively** to hash all consensus objects and to build a merkle tree.
Thanks to caching, SHA256 computation speed is mostly relevant only when receiving new blocks and attestations from the network, but state transitions do not depend on it (unlike a naive spec implementation).
**SSSE3 must not be confused with SSE3 from Pentium 3 (2004) and Athlon 64 (2005)**
```
git clone https://github.com/status-im/nim-blscurve
cd nim-blscurve
git submodule update --init
nim c -r -d:danger --passC:"-D__BLST_PORTABLE__" --outdir:build benchmarks/bench_sha256.nim
nim c -r -d:danger --outdir:build benchmarks/bench_sha256.nim
```
Due to tree hashing, hashing 32 bytes is the most important benchmark.
**Without SSSE3**
```
Backend: BLST, mode: 64-bit
==================================================================================
SHA256 - 32B - BLST 4524886.878 ops/s 221 ns/op 660 cycles
SHA256 - 128B - BLST 1776198.934 ops/s 563 ns/op 1689 cycles
SHA256 - 5MB - BLST 70.723 ops/s 14139678 ns/op 42419720 cycles
```
**With SSSE3**
```
Backend: BLST, mode: 64-bit
==================================================================================
SHA256 - 32B - BLST 5376344.086 ops/s 186 ns/op 555 cycles
SHA256 - 128B - BLST 2183406.114 ops/s 458 ns/op 1376 cycles
SHA256 - 5MB - BLST 87.142 ops/s 11475557 ns/op 34427254 cycles
```
### BMI2 & ADX
Intel: Broadwell, 2015\
AMD: Ryzen, 2017\
Configuration: https://github.com/supranational/blst/blob/v0.3.4/build/assembly.S#L18
The MULX instruction (BMI2), ADCX and ADOX (ADX) significantly improves big integer multiplication and squaring.
The speedup is about 20~25% depending on the custom assembly implementation.
All CPUs that support ADX support BMI2.
```
git clone https://github.com/status-im/nim-blscurve
cd nim-blscurve
git submodule update --init
nim c -r -d:danger --hints:off --warnings:off --verbosity:0 --outdir:build benchmarks/bls_signature.nim
nim c -r -d:danger --passC:"-mbmi2 -madx" --hints:off --warnings:off --verbosity:0 --outdir:build benchmarks/bls_signature.nim
```
**Verification** is the bottleneck as it must be done for each block and attestation or aggregate received
and verifying a block requires verifying up to 6 signatures (block proposer, RANDAO, aggregate verifification of attestations, proposer slashings, attester slashings, voluntary exits).
**Signing** can become a bottleneck when a node has many validators.
**Without BMI2 & ADX**
```
Backend: BLST, mode: 64-bit
=============================================================================================================
BLS signature 1960.023 ops/s 510198 ns/op 1530624 cycles
BLS verification 743.122 ops/s 1345674 ns/op 4037105 cycles
BLS agg verif of 1 msg by 128 pubkeys 704.634 ops/s 1419176 ns/op 4257591 cycles
BLS verif of 6 msgs by 6 pubkeys 120.588 ops/s 8292683 ns/op 24878257 cycles
Serial batch verify 6 msgs by 6 pubkeys (with blinding) 218.027 ops/s 4586595 ns/op 13759932 cycles
```
**With BMI2 & ADX**
```
Backend: BLST, mode: 64-bit
=============================================================================================================
BLS signature 2550.084 ops/s 392144 ns/op 1176454 cycles
BLS verification 930.081 ops/s 1075175 ns/op 3225589 cycles
BLS agg verif of 1 msg by 128 pubkeys 878.672 ops/s 1138081 ns/op 3414286 cycles
BLS verif of 6 msgs by 6 pubkeys 154.833 ops/s 6458588 ns/op 19376076 cycles
Serial batch verify 6 msgs by 6 pubkeys (with blinding) 282.562 ops/s 3539046 ns/op 10617328 cycles
```
### SHA-NI
The hardware SHA instructions has NOT been available in Intel consumer hardware until 2021.
AMD has made it available in Zen architecture since 2017.
Intel:
- Rocket Lake (2021)
- Ice Lake (low-power laptops 2018)
- Goldmont (Apollo Lake Pentiums & Celerons 2016, Denverton Atoms 2017)
AMD: Ryzen, 2017\
Flag: `-msha`
Configuration: https://github.com/supranational/blst/blob/v0.3.4/src/sha256.h#L11-L12
On Ryzen, **hardware SHA is 4X faster** than when using SIMD instructions (Table 1, p14).
- SoK: A Performance Evaluation of Cryptographic InstructionSets on Modern Architectures\
Armando Faz-Hernández, Julio López, Ana Karina D. S. de Oliveira, 2018\
https://www.lasca.ic.unicamp.br/media/publications/p9-faz-hernandez.pdf
## ARM
32-bit ARM (ARMv6) has a multiplication instruction 32x32 -> 64 called UMULL.
Unfortunately, 64-bit ARM (ARMv8) unlike x86-64 doesn't have a single 64x64 -> 128 multiplication instruction. MUL and UMULH instruction needs to be used for extended precision multiplication.
- Multiprecision Multiplication on ARMv8\
Zhe Liu, Kimmo Jarvinenadl, Weiqiang Liu, Hwajeong Seo\
http://arith24.arithsymposium.org/slides/s2-liu.pdf
Concretely, this means that ARMv8 CPUs are impaired compared to x86-64 at equivalent frequency for big integers and cryptography (for example Apple M1).
### Cryptographic extensions
Except for Raspberry Pi, ARMv8 processors support the crypto extensions which include hardware implementation of SHA256.
This is detected via
- `__ARM_FEATURE_CRYPTO` https://github.com/supranational/blst/blob/v0.3.4/src/sha256.h#L14-L15
The compilation flag should be either
- `-mfpu=crypto-neon-fp-armv8`
- or `-march=armv8-a+crypto`
The speedup is expected to be 2x faster than without.\
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20150316154835.GA31336@google.com/