Use a hard-coded number instead of the same expression as the client, so that
bugs introduced via that expression are detected. Using the same expression as
the client can hide issues when the value is wrong in both places.
When the expected value genuinely changes, it'll be obvious.
Just change this number.
Signed-off-by: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
after EIP2718/EIP2930, we have additional fields:
type AccessTuple {
address: Address!
storageKeys : [Bytes32!]
}
type Transaction {
r: BigInt!
s: BigInt!
v: BigInt!
# Envelope transaction support
type: Int
accessList: [AccessTuple!]
}
close#606