Fixes#868 "Gas usage consensus error at Mainnet block 6001128", and equivalent
on other networks. Mainnet sync is able to continue past 6001128 after this.
Here's a trace:
```
TRC 2021-09-29 15:13:21.532+01:00 Persisting blocks file=persist_blocks.nim:43 fromBlock=6000961 toBlock=6001152
...
DBG 2021-09-29 15:14:35.925+01:00 gasUsed neq cumulativeGasUsed file=process_block.nim:68 gasUsed=7999726 cumulativeGasUsed=7989726
TRC 2021-09-29 15:14:35.925+01:00 peer disconnected file=blockchain_sync.nim:407 peer=<PEER:IP>
```
Similar output is seen at many blocks in the range 6001128..6001204.
The bug is when handling a combination of `CREATE` or `CREATE2`, along with
`SELFDESTRUCT` applied to the new contract address.
Init code for a contract can't return non-empty code and do `SELFDESTRUCT` at
the same time, because `SELFDESTRUCT` returns empty data.
But it is possible to return non-empty code in a newly created, self-destructed
account if the init code calls `DELEGATECALL` or `CALLCODE` to other code which
uses `SELFDESTRUCT`.
In this case we must still charge gas and write the code. This shows on
Mainnet blocks 6001128..6001204, where the gas difference matters. The code
must be written because the new code can be called later in the transaction
too, before self-destruction wipes the account at the end.
There are actually three semantic changes here for a self-destructed, new
contract:
- Gas is charged.
- The code is written to the account.
- It can fail due to insufficient gas.
This patch almost exactly reverts a15805e4 "fix applyCreateMessage" from
2019-02-28. I wonder what that fixed.
Signed-off-by: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Fixes an off by 1 error where `EIP170_CODE_SIZE_LIMIT` was being treated as the
lowest invalid value by EVM code, but the highest valid value by witness code.
To remove confusion, this is renamed to `EIP170_MAX_CODE_SIZE` with value
0x6000, which matches the name (`MAX_CODE_SIZE`) and value used for this limit
in [EIP-170](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-170).
Signed-off-by: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Fixes#864 "Sync progress stops at Goerli block 4494913", and equivalent on
other networks.
The block body fetcher in `blockchain_sync.nim` had an incorrect assumption
about how peers respond to `GetBlockBodies`. It was issuing requests for N
block bodies and incorrectly handling replies which contained fewer than N
bodies.
Having received up to 192 headers in a batch, it split the range into smaller
`GetBlockBodies` requests, fetched each reply, then combined replies. The
effect was Nimbus requested batches of 128+64 block bodies, received gaps in
the reply sequence, then aborted.
That meant it repeatedly fetched data, then discarded it, and fetched it again,
dropping good peers in the process.
Aborted and restarted batches occurred with earlier blocks too, but this became
more pronounced until there were no suitable peers at batch 4494913..4495104.
Here's a trace:
```
TRC 2021-09-29 02:40:24.977+01:00 Requesting block headers file=blockchain_sync.nim:224 start=4494913 count=192 peer=<ENODE>
TRC 2021-09-29 02:40:24.977+01:00 >> Sending eth.GetBlockHeaders (0x03) file=protocol_eth65.nim:51 peer=<PEER> startBlock=4494913 max=192
TRC 2021-09-29 02:40:25.005+01:00 << Got reply eth.BlockHeaders (0x04) file=protocol_eth65.nim:51 peer=<PEER> count=192
TRC 2021-09-29 02:40:25.007+01:00 >> Sending eth.GetBlockBodies (0x05) file=protocol_eth65.nim:51 peer=<PEER> count=128
TRC 2021-09-29 02:40:25.209+01:00 << Got reply eth.BlockBodies (0x06) file=protocol_eth65.nim:51 peer=<PEER> count=13
TRC 2021-09-29 02:40:25.210+01:00 >> Sending eth.GetBlockBodies (0x05) file=protocol_eth65.nim:51 peer=<PEER> count=64
TRC 2021-09-29 02:40:25.290+01:00 << Got reply eth.BlockBodies (0x06) file=protocol_eth65.nim:51 peer=<PEER> count=64
WRN 2021-09-29 02:40:25.306+01:00 Bodies len != headers.len file=blockchain_sync.nim:276 bodies=77 headers=192
TRC 2021-09-29 02:40:25.306+01:00 peer disconnected file=blockchain_sync.nim:403 peer=<PEER>
TRC 2021-09-29 02:40:25.306+01:00 Finished obtaining blocks file=blockchain_sync.nim:303 peer=<PEER>
```
In practice, for modern peers, Nimbus received shorter replies than it assumed
depending on the block sizes on the chain. Geth/Erigon has 2MiB `BlockBodies`
response size soft limit. OpenEthereum has 4MiB.
Up to Berlin (EIP-2929), Nimbus's fetcher failed often, but there were still
some peers serving what Nimbus needed.
Just after the start of Berlin, at batch 4494913..4495104 on Goerli, zero peers
responded with full size replies for the whole batch, so Nimbus couldn't
progress past that point. But there was already a problem happening before
that for large blocks, dropping good peers and repeatedly fetching the same
block data.
Signed-off-by: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
pre EIP1559 max(gasCost) is tx.gasLimit * tx.gasPrice
the new EIP1559 max(gasCost) before the transaction can be executed is
tx.gasLimit * tx.maxFeePerGas
* Add a basic ContentDB for Portal networks
* Use ContentDB in StateNetwork
* Avoid probably some form of sandwich problem by re-exporting kvstore_sqlite3 from content_db
premix parser:
- fix incorrect tx type comparison
- fix chainId parser to support both graphql and json returned data
graphql_downloadse:
- allow downloader to skip parsing transactions
* Allow for passing Portal specific bootstrap nodes
* Fix to also replaceNode when decodeMessage fails
* Add portal bootstrap node tests and reorder test cases
- persist: fix related to new config
- parser: add EIP 2930 and EIP 1559 features in parseBlockHeader
and parseTransaction
- add graphql_downloader as a supplement json-rpc downloader
features:
- playground: add support to run inside docker
- add secure mode to graphql http server
- add secure mode to graphql http client
- httpclient: add unzip dan chunked transfer of HTTP 1.1
bugfixes:
- fix accept-encoding bug in httpserver
EIP-2718:
- chainID: Long! of Query
- chainID: Long of Transaction
EIP-1559:
- baseFeePerGas: BigInt of Block
- effectiveGasPrice: BigInt of Transaction
- maxFeePerGas: BigInt of Transaction
- maxPriorityFeePerGas: BigInt of Transaction
The Portal Network tests fail with the custom functions,
on one part due to the fact that the portal tests still
uses the xor functions, but also because the
`neighboursAtDistances` call appears to filter them out.
The reverse calculation might be off.
jangko
Kim De Mey
Jamie Lokier
KonradStaniec
sacha