* Activate wire protocol eth/66
and:
Disentangle protocol_eth66.nim from import sections
why:
Importing the protocol_eth66 module is not necessary. There is
no need to know too many details of the underlying wire protocol. All
that is needed will be exported by blockchain_sync.nim.
* fixes, and rebase
* Update nimbus/p2p/blockchain_sync.nim
Co-authored-by: Kim De Mey <kim.demey@gmail.com>
* Fixes and rebase
Co-authored-by: Kim De Mey <kim.demey@gmail.com>
The format is reasonably useful and not too large, when looking at the
behaviour of sync processes. It doesn't try to show all the details of
packets, just something at a useful level of detail to see what's going on.
The consistent presentation has proven helpful too, e.g. when grepping.
Signed-off-by: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
This constant shouldn't be used outside `protocol_eth65`.
When we support multiple `eth/NN` versions side by side, or even just have
multiple code files, there's a risk some code would import just one of the
files (e.g. `protocol_eth65`), use `protocolVersion`, and incorrectly act as
though that version is the one active on the node.
In fact that happened, and now it can't happen. Other code needs to query the
`EtheruemNode` to find what versions are really active.
Signed-off-by: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Turns out `{.rlpInline.}` doesn't do anything.
It's documented but not implemented.
Due to this, whenever a peer sent us a `NewBlock` message, we had an RLP
decoding error processing it, and disconnected the peer thinking it was the
peer's error.
These messages are sent often by good peers, so whenever we connected to a
really good peer, we'd end up disconnecting from it due to this.
Because a block body is a list of transactions, the parse errors looked
suspiciously like EIP-2718/2976/2930/1559 typed transaction RLP errors.
But it was a failure to parse `BlockBody` inline.
Conveniently, the `EthBlock` type defined for another reason is encoded exactly
the way `NewBlockAnnounce` needs to be, so we can reuse that type.
This didn't stand out before updating to `eth/65`, because with old protocols
we tend to only connect to old peers, which may be out of date themselves and
have no new blocks to send. Also, we didn't really investigate occasional
disconnects before, we assumed they're just part of P2P life.
Signed-off-by: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
This patch adds the `eth/65` protocol, documented at
https://github.com/ethereum/devp2p/blob/master/caps/eth.md.
This is an intentionally simple patch, designed to not break, change or depend
on other functionality much, so that the "_old_ sync" methods can be run
usefully again and observed. This patch isn't "new sync" (a different set of
sync algorithms), but it is one of the foundations.
For a while now Nimbus Eth1 only supported protocol `eth/63`. But that's
obsolete, and very few nodes still support it. This meant Nimbus Eth1 would
make slow progress trying to sync, as most up to date clients rejected it.
The current specification is `eth/66`, and the functionality we really need is
in `eth/64`.
So why `eth/65`?
- `eth/64` is essential because of the `forkId` feature. But `eth/64` is on
its way out as well. Many clients, especially the most up to date Geth
running the current hard-forks (Berlin/London) don't talk `eth/64` any more.
- `eth/66` is the current specification, but some clients don't talk `eth/66`
yet. We'd like to have the best peer connectivity during tests, and
currently everything that talks `eth/66` also talks `eth/65`.
- Nimbus Eth1 RLPx only talks one version at a time. (Without changes to the
RLPx module. When those go in we'll add `eth/64..eth/66` for greater peer
reach and testing the `eth/66` behaviour. For simplicity and decoupling,
this patch contains just one version, the most useful.)
What are `eth/64` and `eth/65`?
- `eth/64` (EIP-2364) added `forkId` which allows nodes to distinguish between
Ethereum (ETH) and Ethereum Classic (ETC) blockchains, which share the same
genesis block. `forkId` also protects the system when a new hard fork is
going to be rolled out, by blocking interaction with out of date nodes. The
feature is required nowadays.
We send the right details to allow connection (this has been tested a lot),
but don't apply the full validation rules of EIP-2124/EIP-2364 in this patch.
It's to keep this patch simple (in its effects) and because those rules have
consequences best tested separately. In practice the other node will reject
us when we would reject it, so this is ok for testing, as long as it doesn't
get seriously deployed.
- `eth/65` added more efficient transaction pool methods.
- Then a later version of `eth/65` (without a new number) added typed
transactions, described in [EIP-2976](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2976).
Why it's moved to `nimbus-eth1`:
- Mainly because `eth/64` onwards depend on the current state of block
synchronisation, as well as the blockchain's sequence of hard-fork block
numbers, both of which are part of `nimbus-eth1` run-time state. These
aren't available to pure `nim-eth` code. Although it would be possible to
add an API to let `nimbus-eth1` set these numbers, there isn't any point
because the protocol would still only be useful to `nimbus-eth1`.
Signed-off-by: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
jangko
Jordan Hrycaj
bmoo
Jamie Lokier