nimbus-eth1/nimbus/sync/snap/worker/store_accounts.nim

188 lines
6.0 KiB
Nim
Raw Normal View History

Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
# Nimbus
# Copyright (c) 2021 Status Research & Development GmbH
# Licensed under either of
# * Apache License, version 2.0, ([LICENSE-APACHE](LICENSE-APACHE) or
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)
# * MIT license ([LICENSE-MIT](LICENSE-MIT) or
# http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
# at your option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
# except according to those terms.
## Fetch accounts stapshot
## =======================
##
## Worker items state diagram:
## ::
## unprocessed | peer workers + |
## account ranges | account database update | unprocessed storage slots
## ========================================================================
##
## +---------------------------------------+
## | |
## v |
## <unprocessed> -----+------> <worker-0> ------+-----> OUTPUT
## | |
## +------> <worker-1> ------+
## | |
## +------> <worker-2> ------+
## : :
##
import
chronicles,
chronos,
eth/[common, p2p],
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
stew/[interval_set, keyed_queue],
stint,
../../sync_desc,
".."/[range_desc, worker_desc],
./com/[com_error, get_account_range],
./db/snapdb_accounts
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
{.push raises: [Defect].}
logScope:
topics = "snap-fetch"
const
extraTraceMessages = false or true
## Enabled additional logging noise
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Private helpers
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
proc withMaxLen(
buddy: SnapBuddyRef;
iv: NodeTagRange;
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
maxlen: UInt256;
): NodeTagRange =
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
## Reduce accounts interval to maximal size
if 0 < iv.len and iv.len <= maxLen:
iv
else:
NodeTagRange.new(iv.minPt, iv.minPt + (maxLen - 1.u256))
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Private functions
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
proc getUnprocessed(buddy: SnapBuddyRef): Result[NodeTagRange,void] =
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
## Fetch an interval from one of the account range lists.
let
env = buddy.data.pivotEnv
accountRangeMax = high(UInt256) div buddy.ctx.buddiesMax.u256
for ivSet in env.fetchAccounts.unprocessed:
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
let rc = ivSet.ge()
if rc.isOk:
let iv = buddy.withMaxLen(rc.value, accountRangeMax)
discard ivSet.reduce(iv)
return ok(iv)
err()
proc putUnprocessed(buddy: SnapBuddyRef; iv: NodeTagRange) =
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
## Shortcut
discard buddy.data.pivotEnv.fetchAccounts.unprocessed[1].merge(iv)
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
proc delUnprocessed(buddy: SnapBuddyRef; iv: NodeTagRange) =
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
## Shortcut
discard buddy.data.pivotEnv.fetchAccounts.unprocessed[1].reduce(iv)
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
proc markGloballyProcessed(buddy: SnapBuddyRef; iv: NodeTagRange) =
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
## Shortcut
discard buddy.ctx.data.coveredAccounts.merge(iv)
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Public functions
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
proc storeAccounts*(buddy: SnapBuddyRef) {.async.} =
## Fetch accounts and store them in the database.
let
ctx = buddy.ctx
peer = buddy.peer
env = buddy.data.pivotEnv
stateRoot = env.stateHeader.stateRoot
# Get a range of accounts to fetch from
let iv = block:
let rc = buddy.getUnprocessed()
if rc.isErr:
when extraTraceMessages:
trace "Currently no unprocessed accounts", peer, stateRoot
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
return
rc.value
# Process received accounts and stash storage slots to fetch later
let dd = block:
let rc = await buddy.getAccountRange(stateRoot, iv)
if rc.isErr:
buddy.putUnprocessed(iv) # fail => interval back to pool
let error = rc.error
if await buddy.ctrl.stopAfterSeriousComError(error, buddy.data.errors):
when extraTraceMessages:
trace "Error fetching accounts => stop", peer,
stateRoot, req=iv.len, error
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
return
# Reset error counts for detecting repeated timeouts
buddy.data.errors.nTimeouts = 0
rc.value
let
gotAccounts = dd.data.accounts.len
gotStorage = dd.withStorage.len
when extraTraceMessages:
trace "Fetched accounts", peer, gotAccounts, gotStorage,
stateRoot, req=iv.len, got=dd.consumed
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
block:
let rc = ctx.data.snapDb.importAccounts(peer, stateRoot, iv.minPt, dd.data)
if rc.isErr:
# Bad data, just try another peer
buddy.putUnprocessed(iv)
buddy.ctrl.zombie = true
when extraTraceMessages:
let error = ComImportAccountsFailed
trace "Accounts import failed => stop", peer, gotAccounts, gotStorage,
stateRoot, req=iv.len, got=dd.consumed, error
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
return
# Statistics
env.nAccounts.inc(gotAccounts)
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
# Register consumed intervals on the accumulator over all state roots
buddy.markGloballyProcessed(dd.consumed)
# Register consumed and bulk-imported (well, not yet) accounts range
block registerConsumed:
block:
# Both intervals `min(iv)` and `min(dd.consumed)` are equal
let rc = iv - dd.consumed
if rc.isOk:
# Now, `dd.consumed` < `iv`, return some unused range
buddy.putUnprocessed(rc.value)
break registerConsumed
block:
# The processed interval might be a bit larger
let rc = dd.consumed - iv
if rc.isOk:
# Remove from unprocessed data. If it is not unprocessed, anymore
# then it was doubly processed which is ok.
buddy.delUnprocessed(rc.value)
break registerConsumed
# End registerConsumed
# Store accounts on the storage TODO list.
env.fetchStorage.merge dd.withStorage
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
when extraTraceMessages:
trace "Done fetching accounts", peer, gotAccounts, gotStorage,
stateRoot, req=iv.len, got=dd.consumed
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# End
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------