nimbus-eth1/nimbus/sync/snap/worker/heal_accounts.nim

400 lines
15 KiB
Nim
Raw Normal View History

Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
# Nimbus
# Copyright (c) 2021 Status Research & Development GmbH
# Licensed under either of
# * Apache License, version 2.0, ([LICENSE-APACHE](LICENSE-APACHE) or
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)
# * MIT license ([LICENSE-MIT](LICENSE-MIT) or
# http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
# at your option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
# except according to those terms.
## Heal accounts DB:
## =================
##
## Flow chart for healing algorithm
## --------------------------------
## ::
## START with {state-root}
## |
## | +--------------------------------+
## | | |
## v v |
## <inspect-trie> |
## | |
## | +--------------------------+ |
## | | +--------------------+ | |
## | | | | | |
## v v v | | |
## {missing-nodes} | | |
## | | | |
## v | | |
## <get-trie-nodes-via-snap/1> ---+ | |
## | | |
## v | |
## <merge-nodes-into-database> -----+ |
## | | |
## v v |
## {leaf-nodes} {check-nodes} -------+
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
## |
## v \
## <update-accounts-batch> |
## | | similar actions for single leaf
## v \ nodes that otherwise would be
## {storage-roots} / done for account hash ranges in
## | | the function storeAccounts()
## v |
## <update-storage-processor-batch> /
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
##
## Legend:
## * `<..>`: some action, process, etc.
## * `{missing-nodes}`: list implemented as `env.fetchAccounts.missingNodes`
## * `(state-root}`: implicit argument for `getAccountNodeKey()` when
## the argument list is empty
## * `{leaf-nodes}`: list is optimised out
## * `{check-nodes}`: list implemented as `env.fetchAccounts.checkNodes`
## * `{storage-roots}`: list implemented as `env.fetchStorage`
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
##
## Discussion of flow chart
## ------------------------
## * Input nodes for `<inspect-trie>` are checked for dangling child node
## links which in turn are collected as output.
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
##
## * Nodes of the `{missing-nodes}` list are fetched from the network and
## merged into the persistent accounts trie database.
## + Successfully merged non-leaf nodes are collected in the `{check-nodes}`
## list which is fed back into the `<inspect-trie>` process.
## + Successfully merged leaf nodes are processed as single entry accounts
## node ranges.
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
##
## * If there is a problem with a node travelling from the source list
## `{missing-nodes}` towards either target list `{leaf-nodes}` or
## `{check-nodes}`, this problem node will fed back to the `{missing-nodes}`
## source list.
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
##
## * In order to avoid double processing, the `{missing-nodes}` list is
## regularly checked for whether nodes are still missing or some other
## process has done the magic work of merging some of then into the
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
## trie database.
##
## Competing with other trie algorithms
## ------------------------------------
## * Healing runs (semi-)parallel to processing *GetAccountRange* network
## messages from the `snap/1` protocol (see `storeAccounts()`). Considering
## network bandwidth, the *GetAccountRange* message processing is way more
## efficient in comparison with the healing algorithm as there are no
## intermediate trie nodes involved.
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
##
## * The healing algorithm visits all nodes of a complete trie unless it is
## stopped in between.
##
## * If a trie node is missing, it can be fetched directly by the healing
## algorithm or one can wait for another process to do the job. Waiting for
## other processes to do the job also applies to problem nodes (and vice
## versa.)
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
##
## * Network bandwidth can be saved if nodes are fetched by the more efficient
## *GetAccountRange* message processing (if that is available.) This suggests
## that fetching missing trie nodes by the healing algorithm should kick in
## very late when the trie database is nearly complete.
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
##
## * Healing applies to a hexary trie database associated with the currently
## latest *state root*, where tha latter may change occasionally. This
## suggests to start the healing algorithm very late at a time when most of
## the accounts have been updated by any *state root*, already. There is a
## good chance that the healing algorithm detects and activates account data
## from previous *state roots* that have not changed.
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
import
std/sequtils,
chronicles,
chronos,
eth/[common/eth_types, p2p, trie/nibbles, trie/trie_defs, rlp],
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
stew/[interval_set, keyed_queue],
../../../utils/prettify,
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
../../sync_desc,
".."/[range_desc, worker_desc],
./com/[com_error, get_trie_nodes],
./db/[hexary_desc, hexary_error, snapdb_accounts]
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
{.push raises: [Defect].}
logScope:
topics = "snap-heal"
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
const
extraTraceMessages = false or true
## Enabled additional logging noise
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Private logging helpers
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
proc healingCtx(buddy: SnapBuddyRef): string =
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
let
ctx = buddy.ctx
env = buddy.data.pivotEnv
"[" &
"nAccounts=" & $env.nAccounts & "," &
("covered=" & env.fetchAccounts.unprocessed.emptyFactor.toPC(0) & "/" &
ctx.data.coveredAccounts.fullFactor.toPC(0)) & "," &
"nCheckNodes=" & $env.fetchAccounts.checkNodes.len & "," &
"nMissingNodes=" & $env.fetchAccounts.missingNodes.len & "]"
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Private functions
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
proc updateMissingNodesList(buddy: SnapBuddyRef) =
## Check whether previously missing nodes from the `missingNodes` list
## have been magically added to the database since it was checked last
## time. These nodes will me moved to `checkNodes` for further processing.
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
let
ctx = buddy.ctx
db = ctx.data.snapDb
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
peer = buddy.peer
env = buddy.data.pivotEnv
stateRoot = env.stateHeader.stateRoot
var
nodes: seq[Blob]
when extraTraceMessages:
trace "Start accounts healing", peer, ctx=buddy.healingCtx()
for accKey in env.fetchAccounts.missingNodes:
let rc = db.getAccountsNodeKey(peer, stateRoot, accKey)
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
if rc.isOk:
# Check nodes for dangling links
env.fetchAccounts.checkNodes.add accKey
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
else:
# Node is still missing
nodes.add acckey
env.fetchAccounts.missingNodes = nodes
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
proc appendMoreDanglingNodesToMissingNodesList(buddy: SnapBuddyRef): bool =
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
## Starting with a given set of potentially dangling account nodes
## `checkNodes`, this set is filtered and processed. The outcome is
## fed back to the vey same list `checkNodes`
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
let
ctx = buddy.ctx
db = ctx.data.snapDb
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
peer = buddy.peer
env = buddy.data.pivotEnv
stateRoot = env.stateHeader.stateRoot
rc = db.inspectAccountsTrie(peer, stateRoot, env.fetchAccounts.checkNodes)
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
if rc.isErr:
when extraTraceMessages:
error "Accounts healing failed => stop", peer,
ctx=buddy.healingCtx(), error=rc.error
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
# Attempt to switch peers, there is not much else we can do here
buddy.ctrl.zombie = true
return false
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
# Global/env batch list to be replaced by by `rc.value.leaves` return value
env.fetchAccounts.checkNodes.setLen(0)
env.fetchAccounts.missingNodes =
env.fetchAccounts.missingNodes & rc.value.dangling
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
true
proc getMissingNodesFromNetwork(
buddy: SnapBuddyRef;
): Future[seq[Blob]]
{.async.} =
## Extract from `missingNodes` the next batch of nodes that need
## to be merged it into the database
let
ctx = buddy.ctx
peer = buddy.peer
env = buddy.data.pivotEnv
stateRoot = env.stateHeader.stateRoot
nMissingNodes = env.fetchAccounts.missingNodes.len
inxLeft = max(0, nMissingNodes - maxTrieNodeFetch)
# There is no point in processing too many nodes at the same time. So leave
# the rest on the `missingNodes` queue to be handled later.
let fetchNodes = env.fetchAccounts.missingNodes[inxLeft ..< nMissingNodes]
env.fetchAccounts.missingNodes.setLen(inxLeft)
# Fetch nodes from the network. Note that the remainder of the `missingNodes`
# list might be used by another process that runs semi-parallel.
let rc = await buddy.getTrieNodes(stateRoot, fetchNodes.mapIt(@[it]))
if rc.isOk:
# Register unfetched missing nodes for the next pass
env.fetchAccounts.missingNodes =
env.fetchAccounts.missingNodes & rc.value.leftOver.mapIt(it[0])
return rc.value.nodes
# Restore missing nodes list now so that a task switch in the error checker
# allows other processes to access the full `missingNodes` list.
env.fetchAccounts.missingNodes = env.fetchAccounts.missingNodes & fetchNodes
let error = rc.error
if await buddy.ctrl.stopAfterSeriousComError(error, buddy.data.errors):
discard
when extraTraceMessages:
trace "Error fetching account nodes for healing => stop", peer,
ctx=buddy.healingCtx(), error
else:
discard
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
when extraTraceMessages:
trace "Error fetching account nodes for healing", peer,
ctx=buddy.healingCtx(), error
return @[]
proc kvAccountLeaf(
buddy: SnapBuddyRef;
partialPath: Blob;
node: Blob;
): (bool,NodeKey,Account)
{.gcsafe, raises: [Defect,RlpError]} =
## Read leaf node from persistent database (if any)
let
peer = buddy.peer
nodeRlp = rlpFromBytes node
(_,prefix) = hexPrefixDecode partialPath
(_,segment) = hexPrefixDecode nodeRlp.listElem(0).toBytes
nibbles = prefix & segment
if nibbles.len == 64:
let data = nodeRlp.listElem(1).toBytes
return (true, nibbles.getBytes.convertTo(NodeKey), rlp.decode(data,Account))
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
when extraTraceMessages:
trace "Isolated node path for healing => ignored", peer,
ctx=buddy.healingCtx()
proc registerAccountLeaf(
buddy: SnapBuddyRef;
accKey: NodeKey;
acc: Account) =
## Process single account node as would be done with an interval by
## the `storeAccounts()` function
let
peer = buddy.peer
env = buddy.data.pivotEnv
pt = accKey.to(NodeTag)
# Find range set (from list) containing `pt`
var ivSet: NodeTagRangeSet
block foundCoveringRange:
for w in env.fetchAccounts.unprocessed:
if 0 < w.covered(pt,pt):
ivSet = w
break foundCoveringRange
return # already processed, forget this account leaf
# Register this isolated leaf node that was added
env.nAccounts.inc
discard ivSet.reduce(pt,pt)
discard buddy.ctx.data.coveredAccounts.merge(pt,pt)
# Update storage slots batch
if acc.storageRoot != emptyRlpHash:
env.fetchStorage.merge AccountSlotsHeader(
accHash: Hash256(data: accKey.ByteArray32),
storageRoot: acc.storageRoot)
when extraTraceMessages:
trace "Isolated account for healing", peer,
ctx=buddy.healingCtx(), accKey=pt
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Public functions
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
proc healAccountsDb*(buddy: SnapBuddyRef) {.async.} =
## Fetching and merging missing account trie database nodes.
let
ctx = buddy.ctx
db = ctx.data.snapDb
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
peer = buddy.peer
env = buddy.data.pivotEnv
# Only start healing if there is some completion level, already.
#
# We check against the global coverage factor, i.e. a measure for how
# much of the total of all accounts have been processed. Even if the trie
# database for the current pivot state root is sparsely filled, there
# is a good chance that it can inherit some unchanged sub-trie from an
# earlier pivor state root download. The healing process then works like
# sort of glue.
#
if env.nAccounts == 0 or
ctx.data.coveredAccounts.fullFactor < healAccountsTrigger:
when extraTraceMessages:
trace "Accounts healing postponed", peer, ctx=buddy.healingCtx()
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
return
# Update for changes since last visit
buddy.updateMissingNodesList()
# If `checkNodes` is empty, healing is at the very start or was
# postponed in which case `missingNodes` is non-empty.
if env.fetchAccounts.checkNodes.len != 0 or
env.fetchAccounts.missingNodes.len == 0:
if not buddy.appendMoreDanglingNodesToMissingNodesList():
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
return
# Check whether the trie is complete.
if env.fetchAccounts.missingNodes.len == 0:
trace "Accounts healing complete", peer, ctx=buddy.healingCtx()
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
return # nothing to do
# Get next batch of nodes that need to be merged it into the database
let nodesData = await buddy.getMissingNodesFromNetwork()
if nodesData.len == 0:
return
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
# Store nodes to disk
let report = db.importRawAccountsNodes(peer, nodesData)
if 0 < report.len and report[^1].slot.isNone:
# Storage error, just run the next lap (not much else that can be done)
error "Accounts healing, error updating persistent database", peer,
ctx=buddy.healingCtx(), nNodes=nodesData.len, error=report[^1].error
env.fetchAccounts.missingNodes = env.fetchAccounts.missingNodes & nodesData
return
when extraTraceMessages:
trace "Accounts healing, nodes merged into database", peer,
ctx=buddy.healingCtx(), nNodes=nodesData.len
# Filter out error and leaf nodes
for w in report:
if w.slot.isSome: # non-indexed entries appear typically at the end, though
let
inx = w.slot.unsafeGet
nodePath = nodesData[inx]
if w.error != NothingSerious or w.kind.isNone:
# error, try downloading again
env.fetchAccounts.missingNodes.add nodePath
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
elif w.kind.unsafeGet != Leaf:
# re-check this node
env.fetchAccounts.checkNodes.add nodePath
else:
# Node has been stored, double check
let (isLeaf, key, acc) = buddy.kvAccountLeaf(nodePath, nodesData[inx])
if isLeaf:
# Update `uprocessed` registry, collect storage roots (if any)
buddy.registerAccountLeaf(key, acc)
else:
env.fetchAccounts.checkNodes.add nodePath
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
when extraTraceMessages:
trace "Accounts healing job done", peer, ctx=buddy.healingCtx()
Prep for full sync after snap (#1253) * Split fetch accounts into sub-modules details: There will be separated modules for accounts snapshot, storage snapshot, and healing for either. * Allow to rebase pivot before negotiated header why: Peers seem to have not too many snapshots available. By setting back the pivot block header slightly, the chances might be higher to find more peers to serve this pivot. Experiment on mainnet showed that setting back too much (tested with 1024), the chances to find matching snapshot peers seem to decrease. * Add accounts healing * Update variable/field naming in `worker_desc` for readability * Handle leaf nodes in accounts healing why: There is no need to fetch accounts when they had been added by the healing process. On the flip side, these accounts must be checked for storage data and the batch queue updated, accordingly. * Reorganising accounts hash ranges batch queue why: The aim is to formally cover as many accounts as possible for different pivot state root environments. Formerly, this was tried by starting the accounts batch queue at a random value for each pivot (and wrapping around.) Now, each pivot environment starts with an interval set mutually disjunct from any interval set retrieved with other pivot state roots. also: Stop fishing for more pivots in `worker` if 100% download is reached * Reorganise/update accounts healing why: Error handling was wrong and the (math. complexity of) whole process could be better managed. details: Much of the algorithm is now documented at the top of the file `heal_accounts.nim`
2022-10-08 17:20:50 +00:00
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# End
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------