2023-05-11 15:25:29 +01:00
|
|
|
# nimbus-eth1
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
# Copyright (c) 2023-2025 Status Research & Development GmbH
|
2023-05-11 15:25:29 +01:00
|
|
|
# Licensed under either of
|
|
|
|
# * Apache License, version 2.0, ([LICENSE-APACHE](LICENSE-APACHE) or
|
|
|
|
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)
|
|
|
|
# * MIT license ([LICENSE-MIT](LICENSE-MIT) or
|
|
|
|
# http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
|
|
|
|
# at your option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
|
|
|
|
# except according to those terms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{.push raises: [].}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import
|
2023-05-30 22:21:15 +01:00
|
|
|
std/[algorithm, sequtils, sets, strutils, tables],
|
2024-06-22 22:33:37 +02:00
|
|
|
eth/common,
|
2023-08-21 15:58:30 +01:00
|
|
|
results,
|
2024-02-22 08:24:58 +00:00
|
|
|
stew/[byteutils, interval_set],
|
2023-09-05 14:57:20 +01:00
|
|
|
./aristo_desc/desc_backend,
|
2023-09-15 16:23:53 +01:00
|
|
|
./aristo_init/[memory_db, memory_only, rocks_db],
|
2024-09-19 10:39:06 +02:00
|
|
|
"."/[aristo_desc, aristo_get, aristo_layers,
|
No ext update (#2494)
* Imported/rebase from `no-ext`, PR #2485
Store extension nodes together with the branch
Extension nodes must be followed by a branch - as such, it makes sense
to store the two together both in the database and in memory:
* fewer reads, writes and updates to traverse the tree
* simpler logic for maintaining the node structure
* less space used, both memory and storage, because there are fewer
nodes overall
There is also a downside: hashes can no longer be cached for an
extension - instead, only the extension+branch hash can be cached - this
seems like a fine tradeoff since computing it should be fast.
TODO: fix commented code
* Fix merge functions and `toNode()`
* Update `merkleSignCommit()` prototype
why:
Result is always a 32bit hash
* Update short Merkle hash key generation
details:
Ethereum reference MPTs use Keccak hashes as node links if the size of
an RLP encoded node is at least 32 bytes. Otherwise, the RLP encoded
node value is used as a pseudo node link (rather than a hash.) This is
specified in the yellow paper, appendix D.
Different to the `Aristo` implementation, the reference MPT would not
store such a node on the key-value database. Rather the RLP encoded node value is stored instead of a node link in a parent node
is stored as a node link on the parent database.
Only for the root hash, the top level node is always referred to by the
hash.
* Fix/update `Extension` sections
why:
Were commented out after removal of a dedicated `Extension` type which
left the system disfunctional.
* Clean up unused error codes
* Update unit tests
* Update docu
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
2024-07-16 19:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
aristo_serialise, aristo_utils]
|
2023-05-11 15:25:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
2023-09-05 14:57:20 +01:00
|
|
|
# Private functions
|
2023-05-11 15:25:29 +01:00
|
|
|
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
func orDefault(db: AristoTxRef): AristoTxRef =
|
|
|
|
if db.isNil: AristoTxRef(layer: LayerRef()) else: db
|
2023-12-19 12:39:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func toHex(w: VertexID): string =
|
2023-11-08 12:18:32 +00:00
|
|
|
w.uint64.toHex
|
2023-10-27 22:36:51 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func toHexLsb(w: int8): string =
|
2023-10-27 22:36:51 +01:00
|
|
|
$"0123456789abcdef"[w and 15]
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func sortedKeys(tab: Table): seq =
|
2024-02-22 08:24:58 +00:00
|
|
|
tab.keys.toSeq.sorted
|
2023-06-09 12:17:37 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func sortedKeys(pPrf: HashSet): seq =
|
2024-02-22 08:24:58 +00:00
|
|
|
pPrf.toSeq.sorted
|
2023-12-19 12:39:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func toPfx(indent: int; offset = 0): string =
|
2023-06-20 14:26:25 +01:00
|
|
|
if 0 < indent+offset: "\n" & " ".repeat(indent+offset) else: ""
|
2023-06-09 12:17:37 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func squeeze(s: string; hex = false; ignLen = false): string =
|
2023-05-11 15:25:29 +01:00
|
|
|
## For long strings print `begin..end` only
|
|
|
|
if hex:
|
|
|
|
let n = (s.len + 1) div 2
|
2023-05-30 22:21:15 +01:00
|
|
|
result = if s.len < 20: s else: s[0 .. 5] & ".." & s[s.len-8 .. ^1]
|
2023-05-11 15:25:29 +01:00
|
|
|
if not ignLen:
|
|
|
|
result &= "[" & (if 0 < n: "#" & $n else: "") & "]"
|
|
|
|
elif s.len <= 30:
|
|
|
|
result = s
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
result = if (s.len and 1) == 0: s[0 ..< 8] else: "0" & s[0 ..< 7]
|
|
|
|
if not ignLen:
|
|
|
|
result &= "..(" & $s.len & ")"
|
2023-05-30 22:21:15 +01:00
|
|
|
result &= ".." & s[s.len-16 .. ^1]
|
2023-05-11 15:25:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func stripZeros(a: string; toExp = false): string =
|
2023-12-04 20:39:26 +00:00
|
|
|
if 0 < a.len:
|
|
|
|
result = a.strip(leading=true, trailing=false, chars={'0'})
|
|
|
|
if result.len == 0:
|
|
|
|
result = "0"
|
|
|
|
elif result[^1] == '0' and toExp:
|
|
|
|
var n = 0
|
|
|
|
while result[^1] == '0':
|
|
|
|
let w = result.len
|
|
|
|
result.setLen(w-1)
|
|
|
|
n.inc
|
|
|
|
if n == 1:
|
|
|
|
result &= "0"
|
|
|
|
elif n == 2:
|
|
|
|
result &= "00"
|
|
|
|
elif 2 < n:
|
|
|
|
result &= "↑" & $n
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------
|
2023-05-11 15:25:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func ppKeyOk(
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
db: AristoTxRef;
|
2023-12-19 12:39:23 +00:00
|
|
|
key: HashKey;
|
2024-07-04 15:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
rvid: RootedVertexID;
|
2023-12-19 12:39:23 +00:00
|
|
|
): string =
|
2024-07-04 15:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
if key.isValid and rvid.isValid:
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
let rv = db.db.xMap.getOrVoid key
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
if rv.isValid:
|
|
|
|
if rvid != rv:
|
|
|
|
result = "(!)"
|
|
|
|
return
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
db.db.xMap[key] = rvid
|
2023-12-19 12:39:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func ppVid(vid: VertexID; pfx = true): string =
|
2023-06-20 14:26:25 +01:00
|
|
|
if pfx:
|
|
|
|
result = "$"
|
|
|
|
if vid.isValid:
|
2023-10-27 22:36:51 +01:00
|
|
|
result &= vid.toHex.stripZeros.toLowerAscii
|
2023-06-20 14:26:25 +01:00
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
result &= "ø"
|
2023-05-11 15:25:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func ppVid(sid: StorageID; pfx = true): string =
|
2024-08-07 13:28:01 +00:00
|
|
|
if sid.isValid or not sid.vid.isValid:
|
|
|
|
sid.vid.ppVid(pfx)
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
(if pfx: "$" else: "") & "®" & sid.vid.ppVid(false)
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func ppVid(rvid: RootedVertexID; pfx = true): string =
|
No ext update (#2494)
* Imported/rebase from `no-ext`, PR #2485
Store extension nodes together with the branch
Extension nodes must be followed by a branch - as such, it makes sense
to store the two together both in the database and in memory:
* fewer reads, writes and updates to traverse the tree
* simpler logic for maintaining the node structure
* less space used, both memory and storage, because there are fewer
nodes overall
There is also a downside: hashes can no longer be cached for an
extension - instead, only the extension+branch hash can be cached - this
seems like a fine tradeoff since computing it should be fast.
TODO: fix commented code
* Fix merge functions and `toNode()`
* Update `merkleSignCommit()` prototype
why:
Result is always a 32bit hash
* Update short Merkle hash key generation
details:
Ethereum reference MPTs use Keccak hashes as node links if the size of
an RLP encoded node is at least 32 bytes. Otherwise, the RLP encoded
node value is used as a pseudo node link (rather than a hash.) This is
specified in the yellow paper, appendix D.
Different to the `Aristo` implementation, the reference MPT would not
store such a node on the key-value database. Rather the RLP encoded node value is stored instead of a node link in a parent node
is stored as a node link on the parent database.
Only for the root hash, the top level node is always referred to by the
hash.
* Fix/update `Extension` sections
why:
Were commented out after removal of a dedicated `Extension` type which
left the system disfunctional.
* Clean up unused error codes
* Update unit tests
* Update docu
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
2024-07-16 19:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
if pfx:
|
|
|
|
result = "$"
|
|
|
|
result &= ppVid(rvid.root, pfx=false) & ":" & ppVid(rvid.vid, pfx=false)
|
2024-07-04 15:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2024-10-01 21:03:10 +00:00
|
|
|
func ppCodeHash(h: Hash32): string =
|
2023-12-04 20:39:26 +00:00
|
|
|
result = "¢"
|
2024-10-01 21:03:10 +00:00
|
|
|
if h == default(Hash32):
|
2023-12-04 20:39:26 +00:00
|
|
|
result &= "©"
|
|
|
|
elif h == EMPTY_CODE_HASH:
|
|
|
|
result &= "ø"
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
result &= h.data.toHex.squeeze(hex=true,ignLen=true)
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func ppVidList(vLst: openArray[VertexID]): string =
|
2024-05-30 18:48:38 +01:00
|
|
|
result = "["
|
2024-06-04 15:05:13 +00:00
|
|
|
if vLst.len <= 250:
|
|
|
|
result &= vLst.mapIt(it.ppVid).join(",")
|
2024-05-30 18:48:38 +01:00
|
|
|
else:
|
2024-06-04 15:05:13 +00:00
|
|
|
result &= vLst[0 .. 99].mapIt(it.ppVid).join(",")
|
2024-05-30 18:48:38 +01:00
|
|
|
result &= ",.."
|
2024-06-04 15:05:13 +00:00
|
|
|
result &= vLst[^100 .. ^1].mapIt(it.ppVid).join(",")
|
2024-05-30 18:48:38 +01:00
|
|
|
result &= "]"
|
2023-06-30 23:22:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
proc ppKey(key: HashKey; db: AristoTxRef; pfx = true): string =
|
2023-11-08 12:18:32 +00:00
|
|
|
if pfx:
|
|
|
|
result = "£"
|
2024-10-01 21:03:10 +00:00
|
|
|
if key.to(Hash32) == default(Hash32):
|
2023-12-04 20:39:26 +00:00
|
|
|
result &= "©"
|
2023-11-08 12:18:32 +00:00
|
|
|
elif not key.isValid:
|
2023-12-04 20:39:26 +00:00
|
|
|
result &= "ø"
|
2023-11-08 12:18:32 +00:00
|
|
|
else:
|
No ext update (#2494)
* Imported/rebase from `no-ext`, PR #2485
Store extension nodes together with the branch
Extension nodes must be followed by a branch - as such, it makes sense
to store the two together both in the database and in memory:
* fewer reads, writes and updates to traverse the tree
* simpler logic for maintaining the node structure
* less space used, both memory and storage, because there are fewer
nodes overall
There is also a downside: hashes can no longer be cached for an
extension - instead, only the extension+branch hash can be cached - this
seems like a fine tradeoff since computing it should be fast.
TODO: fix commented code
* Fix merge functions and `toNode()`
* Update `merkleSignCommit()` prototype
why:
Result is always a 32bit hash
* Update short Merkle hash key generation
details:
Ethereum reference MPTs use Keccak hashes as node links if the size of
an RLP encoded node is at least 32 bytes. Otherwise, the RLP encoded
node value is used as a pseudo node link (rather than a hash.) This is
specified in the yellow paper, appendix D.
Different to the `Aristo` implementation, the reference MPT would not
store such a node on the key-value database. Rather the RLP encoded node value is stored instead of a node link in a parent node
is stored as a node link on the parent database.
Only for the root hash, the top level node is always referred to by the
hash.
* Fix/update `Extension` sections
why:
Were commented out after removal of a dedicated `Extension` type which
left the system disfunctional.
* Clean up unused error codes
* Update unit tests
* Update docu
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
2024-07-16 19:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
# Reverse lookup
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
let rvid = db.db.xMap.getOrVoid key
|
No ext update (#2494)
* Imported/rebase from `no-ext`, PR #2485
Store extension nodes together with the branch
Extension nodes must be followed by a branch - as such, it makes sense
to store the two together both in the database and in memory:
* fewer reads, writes and updates to traverse the tree
* simpler logic for maintaining the node structure
* less space used, both memory and storage, because there are fewer
nodes overall
There is also a downside: hashes can no longer be cached for an
extension - instead, only the extension+branch hash can be cached - this
seems like a fine tradeoff since computing it should be fast.
TODO: fix commented code
* Fix merge functions and `toNode()`
* Update `merkleSignCommit()` prototype
why:
Result is always a 32bit hash
* Update short Merkle hash key generation
details:
Ethereum reference MPTs use Keccak hashes as node links if the size of
an RLP encoded node is at least 32 bytes. Otherwise, the RLP encoded
node value is used as a pseudo node link (rather than a hash.) This is
specified in the yellow paper, appendix D.
Different to the `Aristo` implementation, the reference MPT would not
store such a node on the key-value database. Rather the RLP encoded node value is stored instead of a node link in a parent node
is stored as a node link on the parent database.
Only for the root hash, the top level node is always referred to by the
hash.
* Fix/update `Extension` sections
why:
Were commented out after removal of a dedicated `Extension` type which
left the system disfunctional.
* Clean up unused error codes
* Update unit tests
* Update docu
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
2024-07-16 19:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
if rvid.isValid:
|
|
|
|
result &= rvid.ppVid(pfx=false)
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
let vtx = db.getVtx rvid
|
|
|
|
if vtx.isValid:
|
|
|
|
let rc = vtx.toNode(rvid.root, db)
|
|
|
|
if rc.isErr or key != rc.value.digestTo(HashKey):
|
|
|
|
result &= "≠"
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
result &= "∞"
|
No ext update (#2494)
* Imported/rebase from `no-ext`, PR #2485
Store extension nodes together with the branch
Extension nodes must be followed by a branch - as such, it makes sense
to store the two together both in the database and in memory:
* fewer reads, writes and updates to traverse the tree
* simpler logic for maintaining the node structure
* less space used, both memory and storage, because there are fewer
nodes overall
There is also a downside: hashes can no longer be cached for an
extension - instead, only the extension+branch hash can be cached - this
seems like a fine tradeoff since computing it should be fast.
TODO: fix commented code
* Fix merge functions and `toNode()`
* Update `merkleSignCommit()` prototype
why:
Result is always a 32bit hash
* Update short Merkle hash key generation
details:
Ethereum reference MPTs use Keccak hashes as node links if the size of
an RLP encoded node is at least 32 bytes. Otherwise, the RLP encoded
node value is used as a pseudo node link (rather than a hash.) This is
specified in the yellow paper, appendix D.
Different to the `Aristo` implementation, the reference MPT would not
store such a node on the key-value database. Rather the RLP encoded node value is stored instead of a node link in a parent node
is stored as a node link on the parent database.
Only for the root hash, the top level node is always referred to by the
hash.
* Fix/update `Extension` sections
why:
Were commented out after removal of a dedicated `Extension` type which
left the system disfunctional.
* Clean up unused error codes
* Update unit tests
* Update docu
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
2024-07-16 19:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
else:
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
let tag = if key.len < 32: "[#" & $key.len & "]" else: ""
|
No ext update (#2494)
* Imported/rebase from `no-ext`, PR #2485
Store extension nodes together with the branch
Extension nodes must be followed by a branch - as such, it makes sense
to store the two together both in the database and in memory:
* fewer reads, writes and updates to traverse the tree
* simpler logic for maintaining the node structure
* less space used, both memory and storage, because there are fewer
nodes overall
There is also a downside: hashes can no longer be cached for an
extension - instead, only the extension+branch hash can be cached - this
seems like a fine tradeoff since computing it should be fast.
TODO: fix commented code
* Fix merge functions and `toNode()`
* Update `merkleSignCommit()` prototype
why:
Result is always a 32bit hash
* Update short Merkle hash key generation
details:
Ethereum reference MPTs use Keccak hashes as node links if the size of
an RLP encoded node is at least 32 bytes. Otherwise, the RLP encoded
node value is used as a pseudo node link (rather than a hash.) This is
specified in the yellow paper, appendix D.
Different to the `Aristo` implementation, the reference MPT would not
store such a node on the key-value database. Rather the RLP encoded node value is stored instead of a node link in a parent node
is stored as a node link on the parent database.
Only for the root hash, the top level node is always referred to by the
hash.
* Fix/update `Extension` sections
why:
Were commented out after removal of a dedicated `Extension` type which
left the system disfunctional.
* Clean up unused error codes
* Update unit tests
* Update docu
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
2024-07-16 19:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
result &= @(key.data).toHex.squeeze(hex=true,ignLen=true) & tag
|
2023-05-11 15:25:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
func ppLeafTie(lty: LeafTie, db: AristoTxRef): string =
|
2024-06-22 22:33:37 +02:00
|
|
|
let pfx = lty.path.to(NibblesBuf)
|
2023-12-04 20:39:26 +00:00
|
|
|
"@" & lty.root.ppVid(pfx=false) & ":" &
|
|
|
|
($pfx).squeeze(hex=true,ignLen=(pfx.len==64))
|
2023-05-30 12:47:47 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func ppPathPfx(pfx: NibblesBuf): string =
|
2023-05-30 22:21:15 +01:00
|
|
|
let s = $pfx
|
|
|
|
if s.len < 20: s else: s[0 .. 5] & ".." & s[s.len-8 .. ^1] & ":" & $s.len
|
2023-05-30 12:47:47 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func ppNibble(n: int8): string =
|
2023-10-27 22:36:51 +01:00
|
|
|
if n < 0: "ø" elif n < 10: $n else: n.toHexLsb
|
2023-05-30 12:47:47 +01:00
|
|
|
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
proc ppEthAccount(a: Account, db: AristoTxRef): string =
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
result = "("
|
|
|
|
result &= ($a.nonce).stripZeros(toExp=true) & ","
|
|
|
|
result &= ($a.balance).stripZeros(toExp=true) & ","
|
|
|
|
result &= a.codeHash.ppCodeHash & ","
|
|
|
|
result &= a.storageRoot.to(HashKey).ppKey(db) & ")"
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func ppAriAccount(a: AristoAccount): string =
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
result = "("
|
|
|
|
result &= ($a.nonce).stripZeros(toExp=true) & ","
|
|
|
|
result &= ($a.balance).stripZeros(toExp=true) & ","
|
|
|
|
result &= a.codeHash.ppCodeHash & ")"
|
|
|
|
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
func ppPayload(p: LeafPayload, db: AristoTxRef): string =
|
2024-07-14 12:02:05 +02:00
|
|
|
case p.pType:
|
|
|
|
of AccountData:
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
result = "(" & p.account.ppAriAccount() & "," & p.stoID.ppVid & ")"
|
2024-07-14 12:02:05 +02:00
|
|
|
of StoData:
|
2024-08-14 08:54:44 +00:00
|
|
|
result = ($p.stoData).squeeze
|
2023-05-11 15:25:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
func ppVtx(nd: VertexRef, db: AristoTxRef, rvid: RootedVertexID): string =
|
2023-06-12 14:48:47 +01:00
|
|
|
if not nd.isValid:
|
2023-06-30 23:22:33 +01:00
|
|
|
result = "ø"
|
2023-05-11 15:25:29 +01:00
|
|
|
else:
|
2024-07-04 15:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
if not rvid.isValid:
|
No ext update (#2494)
* Imported/rebase from `no-ext`, PR #2485
Store extension nodes together with the branch
Extension nodes must be followed by a branch - as such, it makes sense
to store the two together both in the database and in memory:
* fewer reads, writes and updates to traverse the tree
* simpler logic for maintaining the node structure
* less space used, both memory and storage, because there are fewer
nodes overall
There is also a downside: hashes can no longer be cached for an
extension - instead, only the extension+branch hash can be cached - this
seems like a fine tradeoff since computing it should be fast.
TODO: fix commented code
* Fix merge functions and `toNode()`
* Update `merkleSignCommit()` prototype
why:
Result is always a 32bit hash
* Update short Merkle hash key generation
details:
Ethereum reference MPTs use Keccak hashes as node links if the size of
an RLP encoded node is at least 32 bytes. Otherwise, the RLP encoded
node value is used as a pseudo node link (rather than a hash.) This is
specified in the yellow paper, appendix D.
Different to the `Aristo` implementation, the reference MPT would not
store such a node on the key-value database. Rather the RLP encoded node value is stored instead of a node link in a parent node
is stored as a node link on the parent database.
Only for the root hash, the top level node is always referred to by the
hash.
* Fix/update `Extension` sections
why:
Were commented out after removal of a dedicated `Extension` type which
left the system disfunctional.
* Clean up unused error codes
* Update unit tests
* Update docu
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
2024-07-16 19:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
result = ["L(", "B("][nd.vType.ord]
|
2024-07-04 15:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
elif db.layersGetKey(rvid).isOk:
|
No ext update (#2494)
* Imported/rebase from `no-ext`, PR #2485
Store extension nodes together with the branch
Extension nodes must be followed by a branch - as such, it makes sense
to store the two together both in the database and in memory:
* fewer reads, writes and updates to traverse the tree
* simpler logic for maintaining the node structure
* less space used, both memory and storage, because there are fewer
nodes overall
There is also a downside: hashes can no longer be cached for an
extension - instead, only the extension+branch hash can be cached - this
seems like a fine tradeoff since computing it should be fast.
TODO: fix commented code
* Fix merge functions and `toNode()`
* Update `merkleSignCommit()` prototype
why:
Result is always a 32bit hash
* Update short Merkle hash key generation
details:
Ethereum reference MPTs use Keccak hashes as node links if the size of
an RLP encoded node is at least 32 bytes. Otherwise, the RLP encoded
node value is used as a pseudo node link (rather than a hash.) This is
specified in the yellow paper, appendix D.
Different to the `Aristo` implementation, the reference MPT would not
store such a node on the key-value database. Rather the RLP encoded node value is stored instead of a node link in a parent node
is stored as a node link on the parent database.
Only for the root hash, the top level node is always referred to by the
hash.
* Fix/update `Extension` sections
why:
Were commented out after removal of a dedicated `Extension` type which
left the system disfunctional.
* Clean up unused error codes
* Update unit tests
* Update docu
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
2024-07-16 19:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
result = ["l(", "b("][nd.vType.ord]
|
2023-05-30 22:21:15 +01:00
|
|
|
else:
|
No ext update (#2494)
* Imported/rebase from `no-ext`, PR #2485
Store extension nodes together with the branch
Extension nodes must be followed by a branch - as such, it makes sense
to store the two together both in the database and in memory:
* fewer reads, writes and updates to traverse the tree
* simpler logic for maintaining the node structure
* less space used, both memory and storage, because there are fewer
nodes overall
There is also a downside: hashes can no longer be cached for an
extension - instead, only the extension+branch hash can be cached - this
seems like a fine tradeoff since computing it should be fast.
TODO: fix commented code
* Fix merge functions and `toNode()`
* Update `merkleSignCommit()` prototype
why:
Result is always a 32bit hash
* Update short Merkle hash key generation
details:
Ethereum reference MPTs use Keccak hashes as node links if the size of
an RLP encoded node is at least 32 bytes. Otherwise, the RLP encoded
node value is used as a pseudo node link (rather than a hash.) This is
specified in the yellow paper, appendix D.
Different to the `Aristo` implementation, the reference MPT would not
store such a node on the key-value database. Rather the RLP encoded node value is stored instead of a node link in a parent node
is stored as a node link on the parent database.
Only for the root hash, the top level node is always referred to by the
hash.
* Fix/update `Extension` sections
why:
Were commented out after removal of a dedicated `Extension` type which
left the system disfunctional.
* Clean up unused error codes
* Update unit tests
* Update docu
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
2024-07-16 19:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
result = ["ł(", "þ("][nd.vType.ord]
|
2023-05-11 15:25:29 +01:00
|
|
|
case nd.vType:
|
|
|
|
of Leaf:
|
2024-09-13 18:55:17 +02:00
|
|
|
result &= nd.pfx.ppPathPfx & "," & nd.lData.ppPayload(db)
|
2023-05-11 15:25:29 +01:00
|
|
|
of Branch:
|
2024-09-13 18:55:17 +02:00
|
|
|
result &= nd.pfx.ppPathPfx & ":"
|
Pre-allocate vids for branches (#2882)
Each branch node may have up to 16 sub-items - currently, these are
given VertexID based when they are first needed leading to a
mostly-random order of vertexid for each subitem.
Here, we pre-allocate all 16 vertex ids such that when a branch subitem
is filled, it already has a vertexid waiting for it. This brings several
important benefits:
* subitems are sorted and "close" in their id sequencing - this means
that when rocksdb stores them, they are likely to end up in the same
data block thus improving read efficiency
* because the ids are consequtive, we can store just the starting id and
a bitmap representing which subitems are in use - this reduces disk
space usage for branches allowing more of them fit into a single disk
read, further improving disk read and caching performance - disk usage
at block 18M is down from 84 to 78gb!
* the in-memory footprint of VertexRef reduced allowing more instances
to fit into caches and less memory to be used overall.
Because of the increased locality of reference, it turns out that we no
longer need to iterate over the entire database to efficiently generate
the hash key database because the normal computation is now faster -
this significantly benefits "live" chain processing as well where each
dirtied key must be accompanied by a read of all branch subitems next to
it - most of the performance benefit in this branch comes from this
locality-of-reference improvement.
On a sample resync, there's already ~20% improvement with later blocks
seeing increasing benefit (because the trie is deeper in later blocks
leading to more benefit from branch read perf improvements)
```
blocks: 18729664, baseline: 190h43m49s, contender: 153h59m0s
Time (total): -36h44m48s, -19.27%
```
Note: clients need to be resynced as the PR changes the on-disk format
R.I.P. little bloom filter - your life in the repo was short but
valuable
2024-12-04 11:42:04 +01:00
|
|
|
for n in 0'u8..15'u8:
|
|
|
|
if nd.bVid(n).isValid:
|
|
|
|
result &= nd.bVid(n).ppVid
|
2023-05-30 22:21:15 +01:00
|
|
|
if n < 15:
|
|
|
|
result &= ","
|
2023-05-11 15:25:29 +01:00
|
|
|
result &= ")"
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc ppNode(
|
|
|
|
nd: NodeRef;
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
db: AristoTxRef;
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
rvid = default(RootedVertexID);
|
|
|
|
): string =
|
|
|
|
if not nd.isValid:
|
|
|
|
result = "ø"
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
if not rvid.isValid:
|
2024-09-13 18:55:17 +02:00
|
|
|
result = ["L(", "B("][nd.vtx.vType.ord]
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
elif db.layersGetKey(rvid).isOk:
|
2024-09-13 18:55:17 +02:00
|
|
|
result = ["l(", "b("][nd.vtx.vType.ord]
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
else:
|
2024-09-13 18:55:17 +02:00
|
|
|
result = ["ł(", "þ("][nd.vtx.vType.ord]
|
|
|
|
case nd.vtx.vType:
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
of Leaf:
|
2024-09-13 18:55:17 +02:00
|
|
|
result &= nd.vtx.pfx.ppPathPfx & ","
|
|
|
|
if nd.vtx.lData.pType == AccountData:
|
|
|
|
result &= "(" & nd.vtx.lData.account.ppAriAccount() & ","
|
|
|
|
if nd.vtx.lData.stoID.isValid:
|
|
|
|
let tag = db.ppKeyOk(nd.key[0],(rvid.root,nd.vtx.lData.stoID.vid))
|
|
|
|
result &= nd.vtx.lData.stoID.ppVid & tag
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
else:
|
2024-09-13 18:55:17 +02:00
|
|
|
result &= nd.vtx.lData.stoID.ppVid
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
if nd.key[0].isValid:
|
|
|
|
result &= nd.key[0].ppKey(db)
|
|
|
|
result &= ")"
|
|
|
|
else:
|
2024-09-13 18:55:17 +02:00
|
|
|
result &= nd.vtx.lData.ppPayload(db)
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
of Branch:
|
Pre-allocate vids for branches (#2882)
Each branch node may have up to 16 sub-items - currently, these are
given VertexID based when they are first needed leading to a
mostly-random order of vertexid for each subitem.
Here, we pre-allocate all 16 vertex ids such that when a branch subitem
is filled, it already has a vertexid waiting for it. This brings several
important benefits:
* subitems are sorted and "close" in their id sequencing - this means
that when rocksdb stores them, they are likely to end up in the same
data block thus improving read efficiency
* because the ids are consequtive, we can store just the starting id and
a bitmap representing which subitems are in use - this reduces disk
space usage for branches allowing more of them fit into a single disk
read, further improving disk read and caching performance - disk usage
at block 18M is down from 84 to 78gb!
* the in-memory footprint of VertexRef reduced allowing more instances
to fit into caches and less memory to be used overall.
Because of the increased locality of reference, it turns out that we no
longer need to iterate over the entire database to efficiently generate
the hash key database because the normal computation is now faster -
this significantly benefits "live" chain processing as well where each
dirtied key must be accompanied by a read of all branch subitems next to
it - most of the performance benefit in this branch comes from this
locality-of-reference improvement.
On a sample resync, there's already ~20% improvement with later blocks
seeing increasing benefit (because the trie is deeper in later blocks
leading to more benefit from branch read perf improvements)
```
blocks: 18729664, baseline: 190h43m49s, contender: 153h59m0s
Time (total): -36h44m48s, -19.27%
```
Note: clients need to be resynced as the PR changes the on-disk format
R.I.P. little bloom filter - your life in the repo was short but
valuable
2024-12-04 11:42:04 +01:00
|
|
|
let keyOnly = nd.vtx.subVids.toSeq.filterIt(it.isValid).len == 0
|
2024-09-13 18:55:17 +02:00
|
|
|
result &= nd.vtx.pfx.ppPathPfx & ":"
|
Pre-allocate vids for branches (#2882)
Each branch node may have up to 16 sub-items - currently, these are
given VertexID based when they are first needed leading to a
mostly-random order of vertexid for each subitem.
Here, we pre-allocate all 16 vertex ids such that when a branch subitem
is filled, it already has a vertexid waiting for it. This brings several
important benefits:
* subitems are sorted and "close" in their id sequencing - this means
that when rocksdb stores them, they are likely to end up in the same
data block thus improving read efficiency
* because the ids are consequtive, we can store just the starting id and
a bitmap representing which subitems are in use - this reduces disk
space usage for branches allowing more of them fit into a single disk
read, further improving disk read and caching performance - disk usage
at block 18M is down from 84 to 78gb!
* the in-memory footprint of VertexRef reduced allowing more instances
to fit into caches and less memory to be used overall.
Because of the increased locality of reference, it turns out that we no
longer need to iterate over the entire database to efficiently generate
the hash key database because the normal computation is now faster -
this significantly benefits "live" chain processing as well where each
dirtied key must be accompanied by a read of all branch subitems next to
it - most of the performance benefit in this branch comes from this
locality-of-reference improvement.
On a sample resync, there's already ~20% improvement with later blocks
seeing increasing benefit (because the trie is deeper in later blocks
leading to more benefit from branch read perf improvements)
```
blocks: 18729664, baseline: 190h43m49s, contender: 153h59m0s
Time (total): -36h44m48s, -19.27%
```
Note: clients need to be resynced as the PR changes the on-disk format
R.I.P. little bloom filter - your life in the repo was short but
valuable
2024-12-04 11:42:04 +01:00
|
|
|
for n in 0'u8..15'u8:
|
|
|
|
if nd.vtx.bVid(n).isValid:
|
|
|
|
let tag = db.ppKeyOk(nd.key[n],(rvid.root,nd.vtx.bVid(n)))
|
|
|
|
result &= nd.vtx.bVid(n).ppVid & tag
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
elif keyOnly and nd.key[n].isValid:
|
|
|
|
result &= nd.key[n].ppKey(db)
|
|
|
|
if n < 15:
|
|
|
|
result &= ","
|
|
|
|
result &= ")"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func ppXTab[T: VertexRef|NodeRef](
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
tab: Table[RootedVertexID,T];
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
db: AristoTxRef;
|
2023-06-30 23:22:33 +01:00
|
|
|
indent = 4;
|
|
|
|
): string =
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
proc ppT(v: T; r: RootedVertexID): string =
|
|
|
|
when T is VertexRef:
|
|
|
|
v.ppVtx(db, r)
|
|
|
|
elif T is NodeRef:
|
|
|
|
v.ppNode(db, r)
|
|
|
|
"{" & tab.sortedKeys
|
|
|
|
.mapIt((it, tab.getOrDefault it))
|
|
|
|
.mapIt("(" & it[0].ppVid & "," & it[1].ppT(it[0]) & ")")
|
|
|
|
.join(indent.toPfx(1)) & "}"
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-30 23:22:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-05-30 22:21:15 +01:00
|
|
|
proc ppXMap*(
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
db: AristoTxRef;
|
2024-07-04 15:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
kMap: Table[RootedVertexID,HashKey];
|
2023-05-30 22:21:15 +01:00
|
|
|
indent: int;
|
|
|
|
): string =
|
2023-11-08 12:18:32 +00:00
|
|
|
let pfx = indent.toPfx(1)
|
|
|
|
|
No ext update (#2494)
* Imported/rebase from `no-ext`, PR #2485
Store extension nodes together with the branch
Extension nodes must be followed by a branch - as such, it makes sense
to store the two together both in the database and in memory:
* fewer reads, writes and updates to traverse the tree
* simpler logic for maintaining the node structure
* less space used, both memory and storage, because there are fewer
nodes overall
There is also a downside: hashes can no longer be cached for an
extension - instead, only the extension+branch hash can be cached - this
seems like a fine tradeoff since computing it should be fast.
TODO: fix commented code
* Fix merge functions and `toNode()`
* Update `merkleSignCommit()` prototype
why:
Result is always a 32bit hash
* Update short Merkle hash key generation
details:
Ethereum reference MPTs use Keccak hashes as node links if the size of
an RLP encoded node is at least 32 bytes. Otherwise, the RLP encoded
node value is used as a pseudo node link (rather than a hash.) This is
specified in the yellow paper, appendix D.
Different to the `Aristo` implementation, the reference MPT would not
store such a node on the key-value database. Rather the RLP encoded node value is stored instead of a node link in a parent node
is stored as a node link on the parent database.
Only for the root hash, the top level node is always referred to by the
hash.
* Fix/update `Extension` sections
why:
Were commented out after removal of a dedicated `Extension` type which
left the system disfunctional.
* Clean up unused error codes
* Update unit tests
* Update docu
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
2024-07-16 19:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
# Sort keys by root,
|
|
|
|
# entry int: 0=no-key 1=no-vertex 2=cant-compile 3=key-mistmatch 4=key-ok
|
|
|
|
var keyLst: seq[(VertexID,seq[(VertexID,HashKey,int)])]
|
2023-12-19 12:39:23 +00:00
|
|
|
block:
|
No ext update (#2494)
* Imported/rebase from `no-ext`, PR #2485
Store extension nodes together with the branch
Extension nodes must be followed by a branch - as such, it makes sense
to store the two together both in the database and in memory:
* fewer reads, writes and updates to traverse the tree
* simpler logic for maintaining the node structure
* less space used, both memory and storage, because there are fewer
nodes overall
There is also a downside: hashes can no longer be cached for an
extension - instead, only the extension+branch hash can be cached - this
seems like a fine tradeoff since computing it should be fast.
TODO: fix commented code
* Fix merge functions and `toNode()`
* Update `merkleSignCommit()` prototype
why:
Result is always a 32bit hash
* Update short Merkle hash key generation
details:
Ethereum reference MPTs use Keccak hashes as node links if the size of
an RLP encoded node is at least 32 bytes. Otherwise, the RLP encoded
node value is used as a pseudo node link (rather than a hash.) This is
specified in the yellow paper, appendix D.
Different to the `Aristo` implementation, the reference MPT would not
store such a node on the key-value database. Rather the RLP encoded node value is stored instead of a node link in a parent node
is stored as a node link on the parent database.
Only for the root hash, the top level node is always referred to by the
hash.
* Fix/update `Extension` sections
why:
Were commented out after removal of a dedicated `Extension` type which
left the system disfunctional.
* Clean up unused error codes
* Update unit tests
* Update docu
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
2024-07-16 19:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
var root = VertexID(0)
|
|
|
|
for w in kMap.sortedKeys:
|
|
|
|
if w.root != root:
|
|
|
|
keyLst.add (w.root,newSeq[typeof keyLst[0][1][0]](0))
|
|
|
|
root = w.root
|
|
|
|
let
|
|
|
|
key = kMap.getOrVoid w
|
|
|
|
mode = block:
|
|
|
|
if key == VOID_HASH_KEY:
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
else:
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
db.db.xMap[key] = w
|
No ext update (#2494)
* Imported/rebase from `no-ext`, PR #2485
Store extension nodes together with the branch
Extension nodes must be followed by a branch - as such, it makes sense
to store the two together both in the database and in memory:
* fewer reads, writes and updates to traverse the tree
* simpler logic for maintaining the node structure
* less space used, both memory and storage, because there are fewer
nodes overall
There is also a downside: hashes can no longer be cached for an
extension - instead, only the extension+branch hash can be cached - this
seems like a fine tradeoff since computing it should be fast.
TODO: fix commented code
* Fix merge functions and `toNode()`
* Update `merkleSignCommit()` prototype
why:
Result is always a 32bit hash
* Update short Merkle hash key generation
details:
Ethereum reference MPTs use Keccak hashes as node links if the size of
an RLP encoded node is at least 32 bytes. Otherwise, the RLP encoded
node value is used as a pseudo node link (rather than a hash.) This is
specified in the yellow paper, appendix D.
Different to the `Aristo` implementation, the reference MPT would not
store such a node on the key-value database. Rather the RLP encoded node value is stored instead of a node link in a parent node
is stored as a node link on the parent database.
Only for the root hash, the top level node is always referred to by the
hash.
* Fix/update `Extension` sections
why:
Were commented out after removal of a dedicated `Extension` type which
left the system disfunctional.
* Clean up unused error codes
* Update unit tests
* Update docu
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
2024-07-16 19:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
let vtx = db.getVtx(w)
|
|
|
|
if not vtx.isValid:
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
let rc = vtx.toNode(w.root, db)
|
|
|
|
if rc.isErr:
|
|
|
|
2
|
2024-07-17 13:48:21 +00:00
|
|
|
elif key != rc.value.digestTo(HashKey):
|
No ext update (#2494)
* Imported/rebase from `no-ext`, PR #2485
Store extension nodes together with the branch
Extension nodes must be followed by a branch - as such, it makes sense
to store the two together both in the database and in memory:
* fewer reads, writes and updates to traverse the tree
* simpler logic for maintaining the node structure
* less space used, both memory and storage, because there are fewer
nodes overall
There is also a downside: hashes can no longer be cached for an
extension - instead, only the extension+branch hash can be cached - this
seems like a fine tradeoff since computing it should be fast.
TODO: fix commented code
* Fix merge functions and `toNode()`
* Update `merkleSignCommit()` prototype
why:
Result is always a 32bit hash
* Update short Merkle hash key generation
details:
Ethereum reference MPTs use Keccak hashes as node links if the size of
an RLP encoded node is at least 32 bytes. Otherwise, the RLP encoded
node value is used as a pseudo node link (rather than a hash.) This is
specified in the yellow paper, appendix D.
Different to the `Aristo` implementation, the reference MPT would not
store such a node on the key-value database. Rather the RLP encoded node value is stored instead of a node link in a parent node
is stored as a node link on the parent database.
Only for the root hash, the top level node is always referred to by the
hash.
* Fix/update `Extension` sections
why:
Were commented out after removal of a dedicated `Extension` type which
left the system disfunctional.
* Clean up unused error codes
* Update unit tests
* Update docu
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
2024-07-16 19:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
keyLst[^1][1].add (w.vid,key,mode)
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
# Join increasing sequences for pretty printing
|
|
|
|
var keySubLst: seq[(VertexID,seq[seq[(VertexID,HashKey,int)]])]
|
|
|
|
for (root,rootQ) in keyLst:
|
|
|
|
var
|
|
|
|
q: seq[(VertexID,HashKey,int)]
|
|
|
|
subQ: seq[typeof q]
|
|
|
|
for (vid,key,state) in rootQ:
|
|
|
|
if q.len == 0:
|
|
|
|
q.add (vid,key,state)
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
if q[^1][0]+1 == vid and q[^1][2] == state:
|
|
|
|
q.add (vid,key,state)
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
# Otherwise new sub queue
|
|
|
|
subQ.add q
|
|
|
|
q = @[(vid,key,state)]
|
|
|
|
if 0 < q.len:
|
|
|
|
subQ.add q
|
|
|
|
keySubLst.add (root,subQ)
|
|
|
|
|
No ext update (#2494)
* Imported/rebase from `no-ext`, PR #2485
Store extension nodes together with the branch
Extension nodes must be followed by a branch - as such, it makes sense
to store the two together both in the database and in memory:
* fewer reads, writes and updates to traverse the tree
* simpler logic for maintaining the node structure
* less space used, both memory and storage, because there are fewer
nodes overall
There is also a downside: hashes can no longer be cached for an
extension - instead, only the extension+branch hash can be cached - this
seems like a fine tradeoff since computing it should be fast.
TODO: fix commented code
* Fix merge functions and `toNode()`
* Update `merkleSignCommit()` prototype
why:
Result is always a 32bit hash
* Update short Merkle hash key generation
details:
Ethereum reference MPTs use Keccak hashes as node links if the size of
an RLP encoded node is at least 32 bytes. Otherwise, the RLP encoded
node value is used as a pseudo node link (rather than a hash.) This is
specified in the yellow paper, appendix D.
Different to the `Aristo` implementation, the reference MPT would not
store such a node on the key-value database. Rather the RLP encoded node value is stored instead of a node link in a parent node
is stored as a node link on the parent database.
Only for the root hash, the top level node is always referred to by the
hash.
* Fix/update `Extension` sections
why:
Were commented out after removal of a dedicated `Extension` type which
left the system disfunctional.
* Clean up unused error codes
* Update unit tests
* Update docu
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
2024-07-16 19:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
proc pp(w: (VertexID,HashKey,int)): string =
|
|
|
|
proc pp(k: HashKey): string =
|
|
|
|
result = w[1].data.toHex.squeeze(hex=true,ignLen=true)
|
|
|
|
if k.len < 32:
|
|
|
|
result &= "[#" & $k.len & "]"
|
|
|
|
w[0].ppVid(pfx=false) & (
|
|
|
|
case w[2]:
|
|
|
|
of 0: "=ø"
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
of 1: "∞"
|
No ext update (#2494)
* Imported/rebase from `no-ext`, PR #2485
Store extension nodes together with the branch
Extension nodes must be followed by a branch - as such, it makes sense
to store the two together both in the database and in memory:
* fewer reads, writes and updates to traverse the tree
* simpler logic for maintaining the node structure
* less space used, both memory and storage, because there are fewer
nodes overall
There is also a downside: hashes can no longer be cached for an
extension - instead, only the extension+branch hash can be cached - this
seems like a fine tradeoff since computing it should be fast.
TODO: fix commented code
* Fix merge functions and `toNode()`
* Update `merkleSignCommit()` prototype
why:
Result is always a 32bit hash
* Update short Merkle hash key generation
details:
Ethereum reference MPTs use Keccak hashes as node links if the size of
an RLP encoded node is at least 32 bytes. Otherwise, the RLP encoded
node value is used as a pseudo node link (rather than a hash.) This is
specified in the yellow paper, appendix D.
Different to the `Aristo` implementation, the reference MPT would not
store such a node on the key-value database. Rather the RLP encoded node value is stored instead of a node link in a parent node
is stored as a node link on the parent database.
Only for the root hash, the top level node is always referred to by the
hash.
* Fix/update `Extension` sections
why:
Were commented out after removal of a dedicated `Extension` type which
left the system disfunctional.
* Clean up unused error codes
* Update unit tests
* Update docu
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
2024-07-16 19:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
of 2: "=" & w[1].pp()
|
|
|
|
of 3: "≠" & w[1].pp()
|
|
|
|
else: "")
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
result &= "{"
|
|
|
|
|
No ext update (#2494)
* Imported/rebase from `no-ext`, PR #2485
Store extension nodes together with the branch
Extension nodes must be followed by a branch - as such, it makes sense
to store the two together both in the database and in memory:
* fewer reads, writes and updates to traverse the tree
* simpler logic for maintaining the node structure
* less space used, both memory and storage, because there are fewer
nodes overall
There is also a downside: hashes can no longer be cached for an
extension - instead, only the extension+branch hash can be cached - this
seems like a fine tradeoff since computing it should be fast.
TODO: fix commented code
* Fix merge functions and `toNode()`
* Update `merkleSignCommit()` prototype
why:
Result is always a 32bit hash
* Update short Merkle hash key generation
details:
Ethereum reference MPTs use Keccak hashes as node links if the size of
an RLP encoded node is at least 32 bytes. Otherwise, the RLP encoded
node value is used as a pseudo node link (rather than a hash.) This is
specified in the yellow paper, appendix D.
Different to the `Aristo` implementation, the reference MPT would not
store such a node on the key-value database. Rather the RLP encoded node value is stored instead of a node link in a parent node
is stored as a node link on the parent database.
Only for the root hash, the top level node is always referred to by the
hash.
* Fix/update `Extension` sections
why:
Were commented out after removal of a dedicated `Extension` type which
left the system disfunctional.
* Clean up unused error codes
* Update unit tests
* Update docu
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
2024-07-16 19:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
var qfx = ""
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
for (root,subQ) in keySubLst:
|
|
|
|
result &= qfx & "£" & root.ppVid(pfx=false) & ":"
|
No ext update (#2494)
* Imported/rebase from `no-ext`, PR #2485
Store extension nodes together with the branch
Extension nodes must be followed by a branch - as such, it makes sense
to store the two together both in the database and in memory:
* fewer reads, writes and updates to traverse the tree
* simpler logic for maintaining the node structure
* less space used, both memory and storage, because there are fewer
nodes overall
There is also a downside: hashes can no longer be cached for an
extension - instead, only the extension+branch hash can be cached - this
seems like a fine tradeoff since computing it should be fast.
TODO: fix commented code
* Fix merge functions and `toNode()`
* Update `merkleSignCommit()` prototype
why:
Result is always a 32bit hash
* Update short Merkle hash key generation
details:
Ethereum reference MPTs use Keccak hashes as node links if the size of
an RLP encoded node is at least 32 bytes. Otherwise, the RLP encoded
node value is used as a pseudo node link (rather than a hash.) This is
specified in the yellow paper, appendix D.
Different to the `Aristo` implementation, the reference MPT would not
store such a node on the key-value database. Rather the RLP encoded node value is stored instead of a node link in a parent node
is stored as a node link on the parent database.
Only for the root hash, the top level node is always referred to by the
hash.
* Fix/update `Extension` sections
why:
Were commented out after removal of a dedicated `Extension` type which
left the system disfunctional.
* Clean up unused error codes
* Update unit tests
* Update docu
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
2024-07-16 19:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
qfx = pfx
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
var closeBracket = ""
|
|
|
|
if 1 < subQ.len or 1 < subQ[0].len:
|
No ext update (#2494)
* Imported/rebase from `no-ext`, PR #2485
Store extension nodes together with the branch
Extension nodes must be followed by a branch - as such, it makes sense
to store the two together both in the database and in memory:
* fewer reads, writes and updates to traverse the tree
* simpler logic for maintaining the node structure
* less space used, both memory and storage, because there are fewer
nodes overall
There is also a downside: hashes can no longer be cached for an
extension - instead, only the extension+branch hash can be cached - this
seems like a fine tradeoff since computing it should be fast.
TODO: fix commented code
* Fix merge functions and `toNode()`
* Update `merkleSignCommit()` prototype
why:
Result is always a 32bit hash
* Update short Merkle hash key generation
details:
Ethereum reference MPTs use Keccak hashes as node links if the size of
an RLP encoded node is at least 32 bytes. Otherwise, the RLP encoded
node value is used as a pseudo node link (rather than a hash.) This is
specified in the yellow paper, appendix D.
Different to the `Aristo` implementation, the reference MPT would not
store such a node on the key-value database. Rather the RLP encoded node value is stored instead of a node link in a parent node
is stored as a node link on the parent database.
Only for the root hash, the top level node is always referred to by the
hash.
* Fix/update `Extension` sections
why:
Were commented out after removal of a dedicated `Extension` type which
left the system disfunctional.
* Clean up unused error codes
* Update unit tests
* Update docu
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
2024-07-16 19:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
result &= "["
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
closeBracket = "]"
|
|
|
|
for q in subQ:
|
|
|
|
if q.len < 3:
|
|
|
|
result &= q.mapIt(it.pp).join(",")
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
result &= q[0].pp & ".." & q[^1].pp
|
|
|
|
result &= ","
|
|
|
|
result.setLen(result.len - 1)
|
|
|
|
result &= closeBracket
|
|
|
|
|
No ext update (#2494)
* Imported/rebase from `no-ext`, PR #2485
Store extension nodes together with the branch
Extension nodes must be followed by a branch - as such, it makes sense
to store the two together both in the database and in memory:
* fewer reads, writes and updates to traverse the tree
* simpler logic for maintaining the node structure
* less space used, both memory and storage, because there are fewer
nodes overall
There is also a downside: hashes can no longer be cached for an
extension - instead, only the extension+branch hash can be cached - this
seems like a fine tradeoff since computing it should be fast.
TODO: fix commented code
* Fix merge functions and `toNode()`
* Update `merkleSignCommit()` prototype
why:
Result is always a 32bit hash
* Update short Merkle hash key generation
details:
Ethereum reference MPTs use Keccak hashes as node links if the size of
an RLP encoded node is at least 32 bytes. Otherwise, the RLP encoded
node value is used as a pseudo node link (rather than a hash.) This is
specified in the yellow paper, appendix D.
Different to the `Aristo` implementation, the reference MPT would not
store such a node on the key-value database. Rather the RLP encoded node value is stored instead of a node link in a parent node
is stored as a node link on the parent database.
Only for the root hash, the top level node is always referred to by the
hash.
* Fix/update `Extension` sections
why:
Were commented out after removal of a dedicated `Extension` type which
left the system disfunctional.
* Clean up unused error codes
* Update unit tests
* Update docu
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
2024-07-16 19:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
result &= "}"
|
2023-05-30 22:21:15 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-07-18 21:32:32 +00:00
|
|
|
proc ppBalancer(
|
|
|
|
fl: LayerRef;
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
db: AristoTxRef;
|
2023-11-08 12:18:32 +00:00
|
|
|
indent: int;
|
|
|
|
): string =
|
2023-08-10 21:01:28 +01:00
|
|
|
## Walk over filter tables
|
|
|
|
let
|
|
|
|
pfx = indent.toPfx
|
|
|
|
pfx1 = indent.toPfx(1)
|
|
|
|
pfx2 = indent.toPfx(2)
|
2024-07-17 19:27:33 +00:00
|
|
|
result = "<balancer>"
|
2023-08-17 14:42:01 +01:00
|
|
|
if fl.isNil:
|
2023-08-10 21:01:28 +01:00
|
|
|
result &= " n/a"
|
|
|
|
return
|
2024-06-04 15:05:13 +00:00
|
|
|
result &= pfx & "vTop=" & fl.vTop.ppVid
|
2023-08-18 20:46:55 +01:00
|
|
|
result &= pfx & "sTab" & pfx1 & "{"
|
2023-08-10 21:01:28 +01:00
|
|
|
for n,vid in fl.sTab.sortedKeys:
|
|
|
|
let vtx = fl.sTab.getOrVoid vid
|
|
|
|
if 0 < n: result &= pfx2
|
|
|
|
result &= $(1+n) & "(" & vid.ppVid & "," & vtx.ppVtx(db,vid) & ")"
|
|
|
|
result &= "}" & pfx & "kMap" & pfx1 & "{"
|
|
|
|
for n,vid in fl.kMap.sortedKeys:
|
|
|
|
let key = fl.kMap.getOrVoid vid
|
|
|
|
if 0 < n: result &= pfx2
|
2024-02-14 19:11:59 +00:00
|
|
|
result &= $(1+n) & "(" & vid.ppVid & "," & key.ppKey(db) & ")"
|
2023-08-10 21:01:28 +01:00
|
|
|
result &= "}"
|
|
|
|
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
proc ppBe[T](be: T; db: AristoTxRef; limit: int; indent: int): string =
|
2023-06-20 14:26:25 +01:00
|
|
|
## Walk over backend tables
|
2023-06-22 12:13:24 +01:00
|
|
|
let
|
|
|
|
pfx = indent.toPfx
|
|
|
|
pfx1 = indent.toPfx(1)
|
|
|
|
pfx2 = indent.toPfx(2)
|
2023-06-20 14:26:25 +01:00
|
|
|
result = "<" & $be.kind & ">"
|
2024-04-03 15:48:35 +00:00
|
|
|
var (dump,dataOk) = ("",false)
|
|
|
|
block:
|
2024-06-04 15:05:13 +00:00
|
|
|
let rc = be.getTuvFn()
|
|
|
|
if rc.isOk:
|
|
|
|
dump &= pfx & "vTop=" & rc.value.ppVid
|
2024-04-03 15:48:35 +00:00
|
|
|
dataOk = true
|
2023-12-20 16:19:00 +00:00
|
|
|
block:
|
2024-04-03 15:48:35 +00:00
|
|
|
dump &= pfx & "sTab"
|
|
|
|
var (n, data) = (0, "")
|
2023-12-20 16:19:00 +00:00
|
|
|
for (vid,vtx) in be.walkVtx:
|
|
|
|
n.inc
|
2024-05-30 18:48:38 +01:00
|
|
|
if n < limit:
|
|
|
|
if 1 < n: data &= pfx2
|
|
|
|
data &= $n & "(" & vid.ppVid & "," & vtx.ppVtx(db,vid) & ")"
|
|
|
|
elif n == limit:
|
|
|
|
data &= pfx2 & ".."
|
2024-04-03 15:48:35 +00:00
|
|
|
dump &= "(" & $n & ")"
|
|
|
|
if 0 < n:
|
|
|
|
dataOk = true
|
|
|
|
dump &= pfx1
|
|
|
|
dump &= "{" & data & "}"
|
2023-12-20 16:19:00 +00:00
|
|
|
block:
|
2024-04-03 15:48:35 +00:00
|
|
|
dump &= pfx & "kMap"
|
|
|
|
var (n, data) = (0, "")
|
2023-12-20 16:19:00 +00:00
|
|
|
for (vid,key) in be.walkKey:
|
|
|
|
n.inc
|
2024-05-30 18:48:38 +01:00
|
|
|
if n < limit:
|
|
|
|
if 1 < n: data &= pfx2
|
|
|
|
data &= $n & "(" & vid.ppVid & "," & key.ppKey(db) & ")"
|
|
|
|
elif n == limit:
|
|
|
|
data &= pfx2 & ".."
|
2024-04-03 15:48:35 +00:00
|
|
|
dump &= "(" & $n & ")"
|
|
|
|
if 0 < n:
|
|
|
|
dataOk = true
|
|
|
|
dump &= pfx1
|
|
|
|
dump &= "{" & data & "}"
|
|
|
|
if dataOk:
|
|
|
|
result &= dump
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
result &= "[]"
|
2023-06-20 14:26:25 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-08-10 21:01:28 +01:00
|
|
|
proc ppLayer(
|
2023-08-18 20:46:55 +01:00
|
|
|
layer: LayerRef;
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
db: AristoTxRef;
|
2024-06-04 15:05:13 +00:00
|
|
|
vTopOk: bool;
|
2023-06-30 23:22:33 +01:00
|
|
|
sTabOk: bool;
|
|
|
|
kMapOk: bool;
|
|
|
|
indent = 4;
|
|
|
|
): string =
|
|
|
|
let
|
2023-08-17 14:42:01 +01:00
|
|
|
pfx1 = indent.toPfx(1)
|
|
|
|
pfx2 = indent.toPfx(2)
|
2024-07-03 22:21:57 +02:00
|
|
|
nOKs = vTopOk.ord + sTabOk.ord + kMapOk.ord
|
2023-08-11 18:23:57 +01:00
|
|
|
tagOk = 1 < nOKs
|
2023-06-30 23:22:33 +01:00
|
|
|
var
|
|
|
|
pfy = ""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc doPrefix(s: string; dataOk: bool): string =
|
|
|
|
var rc: string
|
|
|
|
if tagOk:
|
2024-06-04 15:05:13 +00:00
|
|
|
rc = pfy
|
|
|
|
if 0 < s.len:
|
|
|
|
rc &= s & (if dataOk: pfx2 else: "")
|
2023-06-30 23:22:33 +01:00
|
|
|
pfy = pfx1
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
rc = pfy
|
|
|
|
pfy = pfx2
|
|
|
|
rc
|
|
|
|
|
2023-08-10 21:01:28 +01:00
|
|
|
if not layer.isNil:
|
2023-08-17 14:42:01 +01:00
|
|
|
if 2 < nOKs:
|
|
|
|
result &= "<layer>".doPrefix(false)
|
2024-06-04 15:05:13 +00:00
|
|
|
if vTopOk:
|
2024-07-18 21:32:32 +00:00
|
|
|
result &= "".doPrefix(true) & "vTop=" & layer.vTop.ppVid
|
2023-06-30 23:22:33 +01:00
|
|
|
if sTabOk:
|
|
|
|
let
|
2024-07-18 21:32:32 +00:00
|
|
|
tLen = layer.sTab.len
|
2023-06-30 23:22:33 +01:00
|
|
|
info = "sTab(" & $tLen & ")"
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
result &= info.doPrefix(0 < tLen) & layer.sTab.ppXTab(db,indent+2)
|
2023-06-30 23:22:33 +01:00
|
|
|
if kMapOk:
|
|
|
|
let
|
2024-07-18 21:32:32 +00:00
|
|
|
tLen = layer.kMap.len
|
No ext update (#2494)
* Imported/rebase from `no-ext`, PR #2485
Store extension nodes together with the branch
Extension nodes must be followed by a branch - as such, it makes sense
to store the two together both in the database and in memory:
* fewer reads, writes and updates to traverse the tree
* simpler logic for maintaining the node structure
* less space used, both memory and storage, because there are fewer
nodes overall
There is also a downside: hashes can no longer be cached for an
extension - instead, only the extension+branch hash can be cached - this
seems like a fine tradeoff since computing it should be fast.
TODO: fix commented code
* Fix merge functions and `toNode()`
* Update `merkleSignCommit()` prototype
why:
Result is always a 32bit hash
* Update short Merkle hash key generation
details:
Ethereum reference MPTs use Keccak hashes as node links if the size of
an RLP encoded node is at least 32 bytes. Otherwise, the RLP encoded
node value is used as a pseudo node link (rather than a hash.) This is
specified in the yellow paper, appendix D.
Different to the `Aristo` implementation, the reference MPT would not
store such a node on the key-value database. Rather the RLP encoded node value is stored instead of a node link in a parent node
is stored as a node link on the parent database.
Only for the root hash, the top level node is always referred to by the
hash.
* Fix/update `Extension` sections
why:
Were commented out after removal of a dedicated `Extension` type which
left the system disfunctional.
* Clean up unused error codes
* Update unit tests
* Update docu
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
2024-07-16 19:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
info = "kMap(" & $tLen & ")"
|
|
|
|
result &= info.doPrefix(0 < tLen)
|
2024-07-18 21:32:32 +00:00
|
|
|
result &= db.ppXMap(layer.kMap, indent+2)
|
2023-06-30 23:22:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-05-30 22:21:15 +01:00
|
|
|
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
# Public functions
|
|
|
|
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func pp*(w: Hash32; codeHashOk: bool): string =
|
2024-04-03 15:48:35 +00:00
|
|
|
if codeHashOk:
|
|
|
|
w.ppCodeHash
|
|
|
|
elif w == EMPTY_ROOT_HASH:
|
2023-11-20 20:22:27 +00:00
|
|
|
"EMPTY_ROOT_HASH"
|
2024-10-01 21:03:10 +00:00
|
|
|
elif w == default(Hash32):
|
|
|
|
"default(Hash32)"
|
2023-11-20 20:22:27 +00:00
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
w.data.toHex.squeeze(hex=true,ignLen=true)
|
2023-11-08 12:18:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func pp*(n: NibblesBuf): string =
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
n.ppPathPfx()
|
|
|
|
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
proc pp*(w: HashKey; db = AristoTxRef(nil)): string =
|
2024-02-14 19:11:59 +00:00
|
|
|
w.ppKey(db.orDefault)
|
2023-05-30 22:21:15 +01:00
|
|
|
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
proc pp*(w: Hash32; db = AristoTxRef(nil)): string =
|
No ext update (#2494)
* Imported/rebase from `no-ext`, PR #2485
Store extension nodes together with the branch
Extension nodes must be followed by a branch - as such, it makes sense
to store the two together both in the database and in memory:
* fewer reads, writes and updates to traverse the tree
* simpler logic for maintaining the node structure
* less space used, both memory and storage, because there are fewer
nodes overall
There is also a downside: hashes can no longer be cached for an
extension - instead, only the extension+branch hash can be cached - this
seems like a fine tradeoff since computing it should be fast.
TODO: fix commented code
* Fix merge functions and `toNode()`
* Update `merkleSignCommit()` prototype
why:
Result is always a 32bit hash
* Update short Merkle hash key generation
details:
Ethereum reference MPTs use Keccak hashes as node links if the size of
an RLP encoded node is at least 32 bytes. Otherwise, the RLP encoded
node value is used as a pseudo node link (rather than a hash.) This is
specified in the yellow paper, appendix D.
Different to the `Aristo` implementation, the reference MPT would not
store such a node on the key-value database. Rather the RLP encoded node value is stored instead of a node link in a parent node
is stored as a node link on the parent database.
Only for the root hash, the top level node is always referred to by the
hash.
* Fix/update `Extension` sections
why:
Were commented out after removal of a dedicated `Extension` type which
left the system disfunctional.
* Clean up unused error codes
* Update unit tests
* Update docu
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
2024-07-16 19:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
w.to(HashKey).ppKey(db.orDefault)
|
|
|
|
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
proc pp*(w: openArray[HashKey]; db = AristoTxRef(nil)): string =
|
2024-04-03 15:48:35 +00:00
|
|
|
"[" & @w.mapIt(it.ppKey(db.orDefault)).join(",") & "]"
|
|
|
|
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
func pp*(lty: LeafTie, db = AristoTxRef(nil)): string =
|
2023-12-19 12:39:23 +00:00
|
|
|
lty.ppLeafTie(db.orDefault)
|
2023-06-09 12:17:37 +01:00
|
|
|
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
proc pp*(a: Account, db = AristoTxRef(nil)): string =
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
a.ppEthAccount(db.orDefault)
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func pp*(vid: VertexID): string =
|
2023-05-30 22:21:15 +01:00
|
|
|
vid.ppVid
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func pp*(rvid: RootedVertexID): string =
|
No ext update (#2494)
* Imported/rebase from `no-ext`, PR #2485
Store extension nodes together with the branch
Extension nodes must be followed by a branch - as such, it makes sense
to store the two together both in the database and in memory:
* fewer reads, writes and updates to traverse the tree
* simpler logic for maintaining the node structure
* less space used, both memory and storage, because there are fewer
nodes overall
There is also a downside: hashes can no longer be cached for an
extension - instead, only the extension+branch hash can be cached - this
seems like a fine tradeoff since computing it should be fast.
TODO: fix commented code
* Fix merge functions and `toNode()`
* Update `merkleSignCommit()` prototype
why:
Result is always a 32bit hash
* Update short Merkle hash key generation
details:
Ethereum reference MPTs use Keccak hashes as node links if the size of
an RLP encoded node is at least 32 bytes. Otherwise, the RLP encoded
node value is used as a pseudo node link (rather than a hash.) This is
specified in the yellow paper, appendix D.
Different to the `Aristo` implementation, the reference MPT would not
store such a node on the key-value database. Rather the RLP encoded node value is stored instead of a node link in a parent node
is stored as a node link on the parent database.
Only for the root hash, the top level node is always referred to by the
hash.
* Fix/update `Extension` sections
why:
Were commented out after removal of a dedicated `Extension` type which
left the system disfunctional.
* Clean up unused error codes
* Update unit tests
* Update docu
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
2024-07-16 19:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
rvid.ppVid
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func pp*(vLst: openArray[VertexID]): string =
|
2024-06-04 15:05:13 +00:00
|
|
|
vLst.ppVidList
|
2023-05-30 22:21:15 +01:00
|
|
|
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
func pp*(p: LeafPayload, db = AristoTxRef(nil)): string =
|
2023-12-19 12:39:23 +00:00
|
|
|
p.ppPayload(db.orDefault)
|
2023-05-30 22:21:15 +01:00
|
|
|
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
func pp*(nd: VertexRef, db = AristoTxRef(nil)): string =
|
2024-07-04 15:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
nd.ppVtx(db.orDefault, default(RootedVertexID))
|
|
|
|
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
proc pp*(nd: NodeRef, db = AristoTxRef(nil)): string =
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
nd.ppNode(db.orDefault, default(RootedVertexID))
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func pp*(e: (VertexID,AristoError)): string =
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
"(" & e[0].pp & "," & $e[1] & ")"
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func pp*[T](rc: Result[T,(VertexID,AristoError)]): string =
|
2024-02-08 16:32:16 +00:00
|
|
|
if rc.isOk:
|
|
|
|
result = "ok("
|
|
|
|
when T isnot void:
|
|
|
|
result &= ".."
|
|
|
|
result &= ")"
|
|
|
|
else:
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
result = "err(" & rc.error.pp & ")"
|
2024-02-08 16:32:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func pp*(
|
2024-07-04 15:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
sTab: Table[RootedVertexID,VertexRef];
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
db = AristoTxRef(nil);
|
2023-07-04 19:24:03 +01:00
|
|
|
indent = 4;
|
|
|
|
): string =
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
sTab.ppXTab(db.orDefault)
|
2023-06-09 12:17:37 +01:00
|
|
|
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
proc pp*(leg: Leg; root: VertexID; db = AristoTxRef(nil)): string =
|
2023-12-19 12:39:23 +00:00
|
|
|
let db = db.orDefault()
|
2023-06-09 12:17:37 +01:00
|
|
|
result = "(" & leg.wp.vid.ppVid & ","
|
2023-12-19 12:39:23 +00:00
|
|
|
block:
|
2024-07-04 15:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
let key = db.layersGetKeyOrVoid (root, leg.wp.vid)
|
2024-02-14 19:11:59 +00:00
|
|
|
if not key.isValid:
|
2023-06-20 14:26:25 +01:00
|
|
|
result &= "ø"
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
elif (root, leg.wp.vid) != db.db.xMap.getOrVoid key:
|
2024-02-14 19:11:59 +00:00
|
|
|
result &= key.ppKey(db)
|
2023-06-20 14:26:25 +01:00
|
|
|
result &= ","
|
|
|
|
if 0 <= leg.nibble:
|
|
|
|
result &= $leg.nibble.ppNibble
|
|
|
|
result &= "," & leg.wp.vtx.pp(db) & ")"
|
2023-05-30 22:21:15 +01:00
|
|
|
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
proc pp*(hike: Hike; db = AristoTxRef(nil); indent = 4): string =
|
2023-12-19 12:39:23 +00:00
|
|
|
let
|
|
|
|
db = db.orDefault()
|
|
|
|
pfx = indent.toPfx(1)
|
2023-06-09 12:17:37 +01:00
|
|
|
result = "["
|
|
|
|
if hike.legs.len == 0:
|
|
|
|
result &= "(" & hike.root.ppVid & ")"
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
if hike.legs[0].wp.vid != hike.root:
|
|
|
|
result &= "(" & hike.root.ppVid & ")" & pfx
|
2024-08-01 10:41:20 +00:00
|
|
|
result &= hike.legs.mapIt(it.pp(hike.root, db)).join(pfx)
|
2023-06-09 12:17:37 +01:00
|
|
|
result &= pfx & "(" & hike.tail.ppPathPfx & ")"
|
2023-05-30 12:47:47 +01:00
|
|
|
result &= "]"
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func pp*[T: NodeRef|VertexRef|HashKey](
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
q: seq[(HashKey,T)];
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
db = AristoTxRef(nil);
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
indent = 4;
|
|
|
|
): string =
|
|
|
|
let db = db.orDefault
|
|
|
|
proc ppT(v: T): string =
|
|
|
|
when T is VertexID or T is RootedVertexID:
|
|
|
|
v.pp()
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
v.pp(db)
|
|
|
|
"{" & q.mapIt("(" & it[0].ppKey(db) & "," & it[1].ppT & ")")
|
|
|
|
.join("," & indent.toPfx(1)) & "}"
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func pp*[T: NodeRef|VertexRef|HashKey](
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
t: Table[HashKey,T];
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
db = AristoTxRef(nil);
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
indent = 4;
|
|
|
|
): string =
|
|
|
|
## Sort hash keys by associated vertex ID were possible
|
|
|
|
let db = db.orDefault
|
|
|
|
var
|
|
|
|
t0: Table[RootedVertexID,(HashKey,T)]
|
|
|
|
t1: Table[HashKey,T]
|
|
|
|
for (key,val) in t.pairs:
|
|
|
|
db.xMap.withValue(key,rv):
|
|
|
|
t0[rv[]] = (key,val)
|
|
|
|
do:
|
|
|
|
t1[key] = val
|
|
|
|
let
|
|
|
|
q0 = t0.sortedKeys.mapIt(t0.getOrDefault it)
|
|
|
|
q1 = t1.sortedKeys.mapIt((it, t1.getOrDefault it))
|
|
|
|
(q0 & q1).pp(db,indent)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc pp*[T: HashKey](
|
|
|
|
t: Table[T,RootedVertexID];
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
db = AristoTxRef(nil);
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
indent = 4;
|
|
|
|
): string =
|
|
|
|
## Sort by second tab item vertex ID
|
|
|
|
let db = db.orDefault
|
|
|
|
proc ppT(v: T): string =
|
|
|
|
when T is VertexID or T is RootedVertexID:
|
|
|
|
v.pp()
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
v.pp(db)
|
|
|
|
var rev: Table[RootedVertexID,seq[T]]
|
|
|
|
for (key,rvid) in t.pairs:
|
|
|
|
rev.withValue(rvid,val):
|
|
|
|
val[].add key
|
|
|
|
do:
|
|
|
|
rev[rvid] = @[key]
|
|
|
|
var flat: seq[(HashKey,RootedVertexID)]
|
|
|
|
for rvid in rev.keys.toSeq.sorted:
|
|
|
|
rev.withValue(rvid,keysPtr):
|
|
|
|
for key in keysPtr[]:
|
|
|
|
flat.add (key,rvid)
|
|
|
|
# Now sorted vy values
|
|
|
|
"{" & flat.mapIt("(" & it[0].ppT & "," & it[1].pp & ")")
|
2023-06-09 12:17:37 +01:00
|
|
|
.join("," & indent.toPfx(1)) & "}"
|
2023-05-30 12:47:47 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func pp*[T: HashKey](
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
t: TableRef[HashKey,T];
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
db = AristoTxRef(nil);
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
indent = 4;
|
|
|
|
): string =
|
|
|
|
pp(t[],db,indent)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc pp*(
|
|
|
|
kMap: Table[RootedVertexID,HashKey];
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
db: AristoTxRef;
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
indent = 4;
|
|
|
|
): string =
|
2024-02-22 08:24:58 +00:00
|
|
|
db.ppXMap(kMap, indent)
|
2023-12-19 12:39:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------
|
2023-05-30 12:47:47 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2024-10-26 05:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
func pp*(tx: AristoTxRef): string =
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
result = "(" & repr(pointer(addr(tx[])))
|
Core db and aristo updates for destructor and tx logic (#1894)
* Disable `TransactionID` related functions from `state_db.nim`
why:
Functions `getCommittedStorage()` and `updateOriginalRoot()` from
the `state_db` module are nowhere used. The emulation of a legacy
`TransactionID` type functionality is administratively expensive to
provide by `Aristo` (the legacy DB version is only partially
implemented, anyway).
As there is no other place where `TransactionID`s are used, they will
not be provided by the `Aristo` variant of the `CoreDb`. For the
legacy DB API, nothing will change.
* Fix copyright headers in source code
* Get rid of compiler warning
* Update Aristo code, remove unused `merge()` variant, export `hashify()`
why:
Adapt to upcoming `CoreDb` wrapper
* Remove synced tx feature from `Aristo`
why:
+ This feature allowed to synchronise transaction methods like begin,
commit, and rollback for a group of descriptors.
+ The feature is over engineered and not needed for `CoreDb`, neither
is it complete (some convergence features missing.)
* Add debugging helpers to `Kvt`
also:
Update database iterator, add count variable yield argument similar
to `Aristo`.
* Provide optional destructors for `CoreDb` API
why;
For the upcoming Aristo wrapper, this allows to control when certain
smart destruction and update can take place. The auto destructor works
fine in general when the storage/cache strategy is known and acceptable
when creating descriptors.
* Add update option for `CoreDb` API function `hash()`
why;
The hash function is typically used to get the state root of the MPT.
Due to lazy hashing, this might be not available on the `Aristo` DB.
So the `update` function asks for re-hashing the gurrent state changes
if needed.
* Update API tracking log mode: `info` => `debug
* Use shared `Kvt` descriptor in new Ledger API
why:
No need to create a new descriptor all the time
2023-11-16 19:35:03 +00:00
|
|
|
if not tx.parent.isNil:
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
result &= ", par=" & pp(tx.parent)
|
Core db and aristo updates for destructor and tx logic (#1894)
* Disable `TransactionID` related functions from `state_db.nim`
why:
Functions `getCommittedStorage()` and `updateOriginalRoot()` from
the `state_db` module are nowhere used. The emulation of a legacy
`TransactionID` type functionality is administratively expensive to
provide by `Aristo` (the legacy DB version is only partially
implemented, anyway).
As there is no other place where `TransactionID`s are used, they will
not be provided by the `Aristo` variant of the `CoreDb`. For the
legacy DB API, nothing will change.
* Fix copyright headers in source code
* Get rid of compiler warning
* Update Aristo code, remove unused `merge()` variant, export `hashify()`
why:
Adapt to upcoming `CoreDb` wrapper
* Remove synced tx feature from `Aristo`
why:
+ This feature allowed to synchronise transaction methods like begin,
commit, and rollback for a group of descriptors.
+ The feature is over engineered and not needed for `CoreDb`, neither
is it complete (some convergence features missing.)
* Add debugging helpers to `Kvt`
also:
Update database iterator, add count variable yield argument similar
to `Aristo`.
* Provide optional destructors for `CoreDb` API
why;
For the upcoming Aristo wrapper, this allows to control when certain
smart destruction and update can take place. The auto destructor works
fine in general when the storage/cache strategy is known and acceptable
when creating descriptors.
* Add update option for `CoreDb` API function `hash()`
why;
The hash function is typically used to get the state root of the MPT.
Due to lazy hashing, this might be not available on the `Aristo` DB.
So the `update` function asks for re-hashing the gurrent state changes
if needed.
* Update API tracking log mode: `info` => `debug
* Use shared `Kvt` descriptor in new Ledger API
why:
No need to create a new descriptor all the time
2023-11-16 19:35:03 +00:00
|
|
|
result &= ")"
|
|
|
|
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
func pp*(wp: VidVtxPair; db: AristoTxRef): string =
|
2023-12-04 20:39:26 +00:00
|
|
|
"(" & wp.vid.pp & "," & wp.vtx.pp(db) & ")"
|
|
|
|
|
2023-05-30 22:21:15 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-08-10 21:01:28 +01:00
|
|
|
proc pp*(
|
2023-08-18 20:46:55 +01:00
|
|
|
layer: LayerRef;
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
db: AristoTxRef;
|
2023-08-10 21:01:28 +01:00
|
|
|
indent = 4;
|
2024-07-18 21:32:32 +00:00
|
|
|
sTabOk = true,
|
|
|
|
kMapOk = true,
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
vTopOk = true,
|
2023-08-10 21:01:28 +01:00
|
|
|
): string =
|
2024-07-29 20:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
layer.ppLayer(
|
|
|
|
db.orDefault(), vTopOk=vTopOk, sTabOk=sTabOk, kMapOk=kMapOk, indent=indent)
|
2023-05-30 22:21:15 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-20 14:26:25 +01:00
|
|
|
proc pp*(
|
2023-09-05 14:57:20 +01:00
|
|
|
be: BackendRef;
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
db: AristoTxRef;
|
2024-05-30 18:48:38 +01:00
|
|
|
limit = 100;
|
2023-06-20 14:26:25 +01:00
|
|
|
indent = 4;
|
|
|
|
): string =
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
result = db.layer.ppBalancer(db, indent+1) & indent.toPfx
|
2023-09-05 14:57:20 +01:00
|
|
|
case be.kind:
|
2023-06-20 14:26:25 +01:00
|
|
|
of BackendMemory:
|
2024-05-30 18:48:38 +01:00
|
|
|
result &= be.MemBackendRef.ppBe(db, limit, indent+1)
|
2025-02-14 09:40:22 +01:00
|
|
|
of BackendRocksDB:
|
2024-05-30 18:48:38 +01:00
|
|
|
result &= be.RdbBackendRef.ppBe(db, limit, indent+1)
|
2023-08-11 18:23:57 +01:00
|
|
|
of BackendVoid:
|
2023-09-15 16:23:53 +01:00
|
|
|
result &= "<NoBackend>"
|
2023-06-20 14:26:25 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-09-11 21:38:49 +01:00
|
|
|
proc pp*(
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
db: AristoTxRef;
|
2023-09-11 21:38:49 +01:00
|
|
|
indent = 4;
|
2023-12-04 20:39:26 +00:00
|
|
|
backendOk = false;
|
2024-06-03 20:10:35 +00:00
|
|
|
balancerOk = true;
|
2024-03-22 17:31:56 +00:00
|
|
|
topOk = true;
|
|
|
|
stackOk = true;
|
2024-04-03 15:48:35 +00:00
|
|
|
kMapOk = true;
|
2024-07-18 21:32:32 +00:00
|
|
|
sTabOk = true;
|
2024-05-30 18:48:38 +01:00
|
|
|
limit = 100;
|
2023-09-11 21:38:49 +01:00
|
|
|
): string =
|
aristo: fork support via layers/txframes (#2960)
* aristo: fork support via layers/txframes
This change reorganises how the database is accessed: instead holding a
"current frame" in the database object, a dag of frames is created based
on the "base frame" held in `AristoDbRef` and all database access
happens through this frame, which can be thought of as a consistent
point-in-time snapshot of the database based on a particular fork of the
chain.
In the code, "frame", "transaction" and "layer" is used to denote more
or less the same thing: a dag of stacked changes backed by the on-disk
database.
Although this is not a requirement, in practice each frame holds the
change set of a single block - as such, the frame and its ancestors
leading up to the on-disk state represents the state of the database
after that block has been applied.
"committing" means merging the changes to its parent frame so that the
difference between them is lost and only the cumulative changes remain -
this facility enables frames to be combined arbitrarily wherever they
are in the dag.
In particular, it becomes possible to consolidate a set of changes near
the base of the dag and commit those to disk without having to re-do the
in-memory frames built on top of them - this is useful for "flattening"
a set of changes during a base update and sending those to storage
without having to perform a block replay on top.
Looking at abstractions, a side effect of this change is that the KVT
and Aristo are brought closer together by considering them to be part of
the "same" atomic transaction set - the way the code gets organised,
applying a block and saving it to the kvt happens in the same "logical"
frame - therefore, discarding the frame discards both the aristo and kvt
changes at the same time - likewise, they are persisted to disk together
- this makes reasoning about the database somewhat easier but has the
downside of increased memory usage, something that perhaps will need
addressing in the future.
Because the code reasons more strictly about frames and the state of the
persisted database, it also makes it more visible where ForkedChain
should be used and where it is still missing - in particular, frames
represent a single branch of history while forkedchain manages multiple
parallel forks - user-facing services such as the RPC should use the
latter, ie until it has been finalized, a getBlock request should
consider all forks and not just the blocks in the canonical head branch.
Another advantage of this approach is that `AristoDbRef` conceptually
becomes more simple - removing its tracking of the "current" transaction
stack simplifies reasoning about what can go wrong since this state now
has to be passed around in the form of `AristoTxRef` - as such, many of
the tests and facilities in the code that were dealing with "stack
inconsistency" are now structurally prevented from happening. The test
suite will need significant refactoring after this change.
Once this change has been merged, there are several follow-ups to do:
* there's no mechanism for keeping frames up to date as they get
committed or rolled back - TODO
* naming is confused - many names for the same thing for legacy reason
* forkedchain support is still missing in lots of code
* clean up redundant logic based on previous designs - in particular the
debug and introspection code no longer makes sense
* the way change sets are stored will probably need revisiting - because
it's a stack of changes where each frame must be interrogated to find an
on-disk value, with a base distance of 128 we'll at minimum have to
perform 128 frame lookups for *every* database interaction - regardless,
the "dag-like" nature will stay
* dispose and commit are poorly defined and perhaps redundant - in
theory, one could simply let the GC collect abandoned frames etc, though
it's likely an explicit mechanism will remain useful, so they stay for
now
More about the changes:
* `AristoDbRef` gains a `txRef` field (todo: rename) that "more or less"
corresponds to the old `balancer` field
* `AristoDbRef.stack` is gone - instead, there's a chain of
`AristoTxRef` objects that hold their respective "layer" which has the
actual changes
* No more reasoning about "top" and "stack" - instead, each
`AristoTxRef` can be a "head" that "more or less" corresponds to the old
single-history `top` notion and its stack
* `level` still represents "distance to base" - it's computed from the
parent chain instead of being stored
* one has to be careful not to use frames where forkedchain was intended
- layers are only for a single branch of history!
* fix layer vtop after rollback
* engine fix
* Fix test_txpool
* Fix test_rpc
* Fix copyright year
* fix simulator
* Fix copyright year
* Fix copyright year
* Fix tracer
* Fix infinite recursion bug
* Remove aristo and kvt empty files
* Fic copyright year
* Fix fc chain_kvt
* ForkedChain refactoring
* Fix merge master conflict
* Fix copyright year
* Reparent txFrame
* Fix test
* Fix txFrame reparent again
* Cleanup and fix test
* UpdateBase bugfix and fix test
* Fixe newPayload bug discovered by hive
* Fix engine api fcu
* Clean up call template, chain_kvt, andn txguid
* Fix copyright year
* work around base block loading issue
* Add test
* Fix updateHead bug
* Fix updateBase bug
* Change func commitBase to proc commitBase
* Touch up and fix debug mode crash
---------
Co-authored-by: jangko <jangko128@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 08:04:50 +01:00
|
|
|
# if topOk:
|
|
|
|
# result = db.layersCc.ppLayer(
|
|
|
|
# db, sTabOk=sTabOk, kMapOk=kMapOk, vTopOk=true, indent=indent)
|
|
|
|
# let stackOnlyOk = stackOk and not (topOk or balancerOk or backendOk)
|
|
|
|
# if not stackOnlyOk:
|
|
|
|
# result &= indent.toPfx(1) & "level=" & $db.stack.len
|
|
|
|
# if (stackOk and 0 < db.stack.len) or stackOnlyOk:
|
|
|
|
# let layers = @[db.top] & db.stack.reversed
|
|
|
|
# var lStr = ""
|
|
|
|
# for n,w in layers:
|
|
|
|
# let
|
|
|
|
# m = layers.len - n - 1
|
|
|
|
# l = db.layersCc m
|
|
|
|
# a = w.kMap.values.toSeq.filterIt(not it.isValid).len
|
|
|
|
# c = l.kMap.values.toSeq.filterIt(not it.isValid).len
|
|
|
|
# result &= "(" & $(w.kMap.len - a) & "," & $a & ")"
|
|
|
|
# lStr &= " " & $m & "=(" & $(l.kMap.len - c) & "," & $c & ")"
|
|
|
|
# result &= " =>" & lStr
|
|
|
|
# if backendOk:
|
|
|
|
# result &= indent.toPfx & db.backend.pp(db, limit=limit, indent)
|
|
|
|
# elif balancerOk:
|
|
|
|
# result &= indent.toPfx & db.balancer.ppBalancer(db, indent+1)
|
|
|
|
discard #TODO
|
2023-05-11 15:25:29 +01:00
|
|
|
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
# End
|
|
|
|
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|