340 lines
13 KiB
Nim
340 lines
13 KiB
Nim
|
# Nimbus
|
||
|
|
# Copyright (c) 2018-2019 Status Research & Development GmbH
|
||
|
|
# Licensed under either of
|
||
|
|
# * Apache License, version 2.0, ([LICENSE-APACHE](LICENSE-APACHE) or
|
||
|
|
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)
|
||
|
|
# * MIT license ([LICENSE-MIT](LICENSE-MIT) or
|
||
|
|
# http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
|
||
|
|
# at your option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed except
|
||
|
|
# according to those terms.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Test cases from https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-225.md
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
import
|
||
|
|
../../nimbus/p2p/clique/clique_defs
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
type
|
||
|
|
TesterVote* = object ## VoterBlock represents a single block signed by a
|
||
|
|
## particular account, where the account may or may not
|
||
|
|
## have cast a Clique vote.
|
||
|
|
signer*: string ## Account that signed this particular block
|
||
|
|
voted*: string ## Optional value if the signer voted on
|
||
|
|
## adding/removing ## someone
|
||
|
|
auth*: bool ## Whether the vote was to authorize (or
|
||
|
|
## deauthorize)
|
||
|
|
checkpoint*: seq[string] ## List of authorized signers if this is an epoch
|
||
|
|
## block
|
||
|
|
newbatch*: bool
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs* = object ## Define the various voting scenarios to test
|
||
|
|
id*: int ## Test id
|
||
|
|
info*: string ## Test description
|
||
|
|
epoch*: uint64 ## Number of blocks in an epoch (unset = 30000)
|
||
|
|
signers*: seq[string] ## Initial list of authorized signers in the
|
||
|
|
## genesis
|
||
|
|
votes*: seq[TesterVote] ## Chain of signed blocks, potentially influencing
|
||
|
|
## auths
|
||
|
|
results*: seq[string] ## Final list of authorized signers after all
|
||
|
|
## blocks
|
||
|
|
failure*: CliqueErrorType ## Failure if some block is invalid according to
|
||
|
|
## the rules
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
const
|
||
|
|
# Define the various voting scenarios to test
|
||
|
|
voterSamples* = [
|
||
|
|
# clique/snapshot_test.go(108): {
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 1,
|
||
|
|
info: "Single signer, no votes cast",
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[TesterVote(signer: "A")],
|
||
|
|
results: @["A"]),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 2,
|
||
|
|
info: "Single signer, voting to add two others (only accept first, "&
|
||
|
|
"second needs 2 votes)",
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "B", auth: true),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "C", auth: true)],
|
||
|
|
results: @["A", "B"]),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 3,
|
||
|
|
info: "Two signers, voting to add three others (only accept first " &
|
||
|
|
"two, third needs 3 votes already)",
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A", "B"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "C", auth: true),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "C", auth: true),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "D", auth: true),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "D", auth: true),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "C"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "E", auth: true),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "E", auth: true)],
|
||
|
|
results: @["A", "B", "C", "D"]),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 4,
|
||
|
|
info: "Single signer, dropping itself (weird, but one less " &
|
||
|
|
"cornercase by explicitly allowing this)",
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "A")]),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 5,
|
||
|
|
info: "Two signers, actually needing mutual consent to drop either " &
|
||
|
|
"of them (not fulfilled)",
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A", "B"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "B")],
|
||
|
|
results: @["A", "B"]),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 6,
|
||
|
|
info: "Two signers, actually needing mutual consent to drop either " &
|
||
|
|
"of them (fulfilled)",
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A", "B"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "B"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "B")],
|
||
|
|
results: @["A"]),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 7,
|
||
|
|
info: "Three signers, two of them deciding to drop the third",
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A", "B", "C"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "C"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "C")],
|
||
|
|
results: @["A", "B"]),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 8,
|
||
|
|
info: "Four signers, consensus of two not being enough to drop anyone",
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A", "B", "C", "D"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "C"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "C")],
|
||
|
|
results: @["A", "B", "C", "D"]),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 9,
|
||
|
|
info: "Four signers, consensus of three already being enough to " &
|
||
|
|
"drop someone",
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A", "B", "C", "D"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "D"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "D"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "C", voted: "D")],
|
||
|
|
results: @["A", "B", "C"]),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 10,
|
||
|
|
info: "Authorizations are counted once per signer per target",
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A", "B"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "C", auth: true),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "C", auth: true),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "C", auth: true)],
|
||
|
|
results: @["A", "B"]),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 11,
|
||
|
|
info: "Authorizing multiple accounts concurrently is permitted",
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A", "B"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "C", auth: true),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "D", auth: true),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "D", auth: true),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "C", auth: true)],
|
||
|
|
results: @["A", "B", "C", "D"]),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 12,
|
||
|
|
info: "Deauthorizations are counted once per signer per target",
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A", "B"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "B"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "B"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "B")],
|
||
|
|
results: @["A", "B"]),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 13,
|
||
|
|
info: "Deauthorizing multiple accounts concurrently is permitted",
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A", "B", "C", "D"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "C"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "C"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "D"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "C"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "D"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "C", voted: "D"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "C")],
|
||
|
|
results: @["A", "B"]),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 14,
|
||
|
|
info: "Votes from deauthorized signers are discarded immediately " &
|
||
|
|
"(deauth votes)",
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A", "B", "C"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[TesterVote(signer: "C", voted: "B"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "C"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "C"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "B")],
|
||
|
|
results: @["A", "B"]),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 15,
|
||
|
|
info: "Votes from deauthorized signers are discarded immediately " &
|
||
|
|
"(auth votes)",
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A", "B", "C"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[TesterVote(signer: "C", voted: "D", auth: true),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "C"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "C"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "D", auth: true)],
|
||
|
|
results: @["A", "B"]),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 16,
|
||
|
|
info: "Cascading changes are not allowed, only the account being " &
|
||
|
|
"voted on may change",
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A", "B", "C", "D"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "C"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "C"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "D"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "C"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "C"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "D"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "C", voted: "D")],
|
||
|
|
results: @["A", "B", "C"]),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 17,
|
||
|
|
info: "Changes reaching consensus out of bounds (via a deauth) " &
|
||
|
|
"execute on touch",
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A", "B", "C", "D"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "C"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "C"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "D"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "C"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "C"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "D"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "C", voted: "D"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "C", voted: "C", auth: true)],
|
||
|
|
results: @["A", "B"]),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 18,
|
||
|
|
info: "Changes reaching consensus out of bounds (via a deauth) " &
|
||
|
|
"may go out of consensus on first touch",
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A", "B", "C", "D"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "C"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "C"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "D"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "C"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "C"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "D"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "C", voted: "D"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "C", auth: true)],
|
||
|
|
results: @["A", "B", "C"]),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 19,
|
||
|
|
info: "Ensure that pending votes don't survive authorization status " &
|
||
|
|
"changes. This corner case can only appear if a signer is " &
|
||
|
|
"quickly added, removed and then readded (or the inverse), " &
|
||
|
|
"while one of the original voters dropped. If a past vote is " &
|
||
|
|
"left cached in the system somewhere, this will interfere " &
|
||
|
|
"with the final signer outcome.",
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A", "B", "C", "D", "E"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[
|
||
|
|
# Authorize F, 3 votes needed
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "F", auth: true),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "F", auth: true),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "C", voted: "F", auth: true),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Deauthorize F, 4 votes needed (leave A's previous vote "unchanged")
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "D", voted: "F"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "E", voted: "F"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "F"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "C", voted: "F"),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Almost authorize F, 2/3 votes needed
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "D", voted: "F", auth: true),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "E", voted: "F", auth: true),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Deauthorize A, 3 votes needed
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "A"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "C", voted: "A"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "D", voted: "A"),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Finish authorizing F, 3/3 votes needed
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "F", auth: true)],
|
||
|
|
results: @["B", "C", "D", "E", "F"]),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 20,
|
||
|
|
info: "Epoch transitions reset all votes to allow chain checkpointing",
|
||
|
|
epoch: 3,
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A", "B"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[TesterVote(signer: "A", voted: "C", auth: true),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A", checkpoint: @["A", "B"]),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B", voted: "C", auth: true)],
|
||
|
|
results: @["A", "B"]),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 21,
|
||
|
|
info: "An unauthorized signer should not be able to sign blocks",
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[TesterVote(signer: "B")],
|
||
|
|
failure: errUnauthorizedSigner),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 22,
|
||
|
|
info: "An authorized signer that signed recenty should not be able " &
|
||
|
|
"to sign again",
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A", "B"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[TesterVote(signer: "A"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A")],
|
||
|
|
failure: errRecentlySigned),
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TestSpecs(
|
||
|
|
id: 23,
|
||
|
|
info: "Recent signatures should not reset on checkpoint blocks " &
|
||
|
|
"imported in a batch " &
|
||
|
|
"(https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/issues/17593). "&
|
||
|
|
"Whilst this seems overly specific and weird, it was a "&
|
||
|
|
"Rinkeby consensus split.",
|
||
|
|
epoch: 3,
|
||
|
|
signers: @["A", "B", "C"],
|
||
|
|
votes: @[TesterVote(signer: "A"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "B"),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A", checkpoint: @["A", "B", "C"]),
|
||
|
|
TesterVote(signer: "A", newbatch: true)],
|
||
|
|
failure: errRecentlySigned)]
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
static:
|
||
|
|
# For convenience, make sure that IDs are increasing
|
||
|
|
for n in 1 ..< voterSamples.len:
|
||
|
|
if voterSamples[n-1].id < voterSamples[n].id:
|
||
|
|
continue
|
||
|
|
echo "voterSamples[", n, "] == ", voterSamples[n].id, " expected ",
|
||
|
|
voterSamples[n-1].id + 1, " or greater"
|
||
|
|
doAssert voterSamples[n-1].id < voterSamples[n].id
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# End
|