nimbus-eth1/nimbus/evm/computation.nim

484 lines
15 KiB
Nim
Raw Normal View History

# Nimbus
# Copyright (c) 2018-2024 Status Research & Development GmbH
# Licensed under either of
# * Apache License, version 2.0, ([LICENSE-APACHE](LICENSE-APACHE) or
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)
# * MIT license ([LICENSE-MIT](LICENSE-MIT) or
# http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
# at your option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed except
# according to those terms.
{.push raises: [].}
import
".."/[db/ledger, constants],
2022-12-02 04:35:41 +00:00
"."/[code_stream, memory, message, stack, state],
"."/[types],
./interpreter/[gas_meter, gas_costs, op_codes],
2022-12-02 04:35:41 +00:00
../common/[common, evmforks],
../utils/utils,
stew/byteutils,
2022-12-02 04:35:41 +00:00
chronicles, chronos,
eth/[keys],
sets
2022-12-02 04:35:41 +00:00
export
common
2022-12-02 04:35:41 +00:00
logScope:
topics = "vm computation"
when defined(evmc_enabled):
import
evmc/evmc,
evmc_helpers,
evmc_api,
stew/ptrops
export
evmc,
evmc_helpers,
evmc_api,
ptrops
const
evmc_enabled* = defined(evmc_enabled)
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Helpers
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
proc generateContractAddress(c: Computation, salt: ContractSalt): EthAddress =
if c.msg.kind == EVMC_CREATE:
2022-04-08 04:54:11 +00:00
let creationNonce = c.vmState.readOnlyStateDB().getNonce(c.msg.sender)
result = generateAddress(c.msg.sender, creationNonce)
else:
result = generateSafeAddress(c.msg.sender, salt, c.msg.data)
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Public functions
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
template getCoinbase*(c: Computation): EthAddress =
when evmc_enabled:
c.host.getTxContext().block_coinbase
else:
c.vmState.coinbase
template getTimestamp*(c: Computation): uint64 =
when evmc_enabled:
cast[uint64](c.host.getTxContext().block_timestamp)
else:
c.vmState.blockCtx.timestamp.uint64
2022-04-08 04:54:11 +00:00
template getBlockNumber*(c: Computation): UInt256 =
when evmc_enabled:
c.host.getBlockNumber()
else:
c.vmState.blockNumber.blockNumberToVmWord
template getDifficulty*(c: Computation): DifficultyInt =
when evmc_enabled:
UInt256.fromEvmc c.host.getTxContext().block_prev_randao
else:
c.vmState.difficultyOrPrevRandao
template getGasLimit*(c: Computation): GasInt =
when evmc_enabled:
c.host.getTxContext().block_gas_limit.GasInt
else:
c.vmState.blockCtx.gasLimit
2022-04-08 04:54:11 +00:00
template getBaseFee*(c: Computation): UInt256 =
when evmc_enabled:
UInt256.fromEvmc c.host.getTxContext().block_base_fee
else:
c.vmState.blockCtx.fee.get(0.u256)
template getChainId*(c: Computation): uint64 =
when evmc_enabled:
c.host.getChainId()
else:
c.vmState.com.chainId.uint64
template getOrigin*(c: Computation): EthAddress =
when evmc_enabled:
c.host.getTxContext().tx_origin
else:
c.vmState.txCtx.origin
template getGasPrice*(c: Computation): GasInt =
when evmc_enabled:
UInt256.fromEvmc(c.host.getTxContext().tx_gas_price).truncate(GasInt)
else:
c.vmState.txCtx.gasPrice
template getVersionedHash*(c: Computation, index: int): VersionedHash =
when evmc_enabled:
cast[ptr UncheckedArray[VersionedHash]](c.host.getTxContext().blob_hashes)[index]
else:
c.vmState.txCtx.versionedHashes[index]
template getVersionedHashesLen*(c: Computation): int =
when evmc_enabled:
c.host.getTxContext().blob_hashes_count.int
else:
c.vmState.txCtx.versionedHashes.len
template getBlobBaseFee*(c: Computation): UInt256 =
when evmc_enabled:
UInt256.fromEvmc c.host.getTxContext().blob_base_fee
else:
c.vmState.txCtx.blobBaseFee
proc getBlockHash*(c: Computation, number: UInt256): Hash256
{.gcsafe, raises: [CatchableError].} =
when evmc_enabled:
let
blockNumber = c.host.getTxContext().block_number.u256
ancestorDepth = blockNumber - number - 1
if ancestorDepth >= constants.MAX_PREV_HEADER_DEPTH:
return
if number >= blockNumber:
return
c.host.getBlockHash(number)
else:
let
blockNumber = c.vmState.blockNumber
ancestorDepth = blockNumber - number - 1
if ancestorDepth >= constants.MAX_PREV_HEADER_DEPTH:
return
if number >= blockNumber:
return
c.vmState.getAncestorHash(number.vmWordToBlockNumber)
template accountExists*(c: Computation, address: EthAddress): bool =
when evmc_enabled:
c.host.accountExists(address)
else:
if c.fork >= FkSpurious:
not c.vmState.readOnlyStateDB.isDeadAccount(address)
else:
c.vmState.readOnlyStateDB.accountExists(address)
2022-04-08 04:54:11 +00:00
template getStorage*(c: Computation, slot: UInt256): UInt256 =
when evmc_enabled:
c.host.getStorage(c.msg.contractAddress, slot)
else:
c.vmState.readOnlyStateDB.getStorage(c.msg.contractAddress, slot)
2022-04-08 04:54:11 +00:00
template getBalance*(c: Computation, address: EthAddress): UInt256 =
when evmc_enabled:
c.host.getBalance(address)
else:
c.vmState.readOnlyStateDB.getBalance(address)
template getCodeSize*(c: Computation, address: EthAddress): uint =
when evmc_enabled:
c.host.getCodeSize(address)
else:
uint(c.vmState.readOnlyStateDB.getCodeSize(address))
template getCodeHash*(c: Computation, address: EthAddress): Hash256 =
when evmc_enabled:
c.host.getCodeHash(address)
else:
let
db = c.vmState.readOnlyStateDB
if not db.accountExists(address) or db.isEmptyAccount(address):
default(Hash256)
else:
db.getCodeHash(address)
template selfDestruct*(c: Computation, address: EthAddress) =
when evmc_enabled:
c.host.selfDestruct(c.msg.contractAddress, address)
else:
c.execSelfDestruct(address)
template getCode*(c: Computation, address: EthAddress): seq[byte] =
when evmc_enabled:
c.host.copyCode(address)
else:
c.vmState.readOnlyStateDB.getCode(address)
template setTransientStorage*(c: Computation, slot, val: UInt256) =
when evmc_enabled:
c.host.setTransientStorage(c.msg.contractAddress, slot, val)
else:
c.vmState.stateDB.
setTransientStorage(c.msg.contractAddress, slot, val)
template getTransientStorage*(c: Computation, slot: UInt256): UInt256 =
when evmc_enabled:
c.host.getTransientStorage(c.msg.contractAddress, slot)
else:
c.vmState.readOnlyStateDB.
getTransientStorage(c.msg.contractAddress, slot)
proc newComputation*(vmState: BaseVMState, sysCall: bool, message: Message,
salt: ContractSalt = ZERO_CONTRACTSALT): Computation =
new result
result.vmState = vmState
result.msg = message
result.memory = Memory()
result.stack = newStack()
result.returnStack = @[]
result.gasMeter.init(message.gas)
result.sysCall = sysCall
if result.msg.isCreate():
result.msg.contractAddress = result.generateContractAddress(salt)
result.code = newCodeStream(message.data)
message.data = @[]
else:
result.code = newCodeStream(
2022-04-08 04:54:11 +00:00
vmState.readOnlyStateDB.getCode(message.codeAddress))
func newComputation*(vmState: BaseVMState, sysCall: bool,
message: Message, code: seq[byte]): Computation =
new result
result.vmState = vmState
result.msg = message
result.memory = Memory()
result.stack = newStack()
result.returnStack = @[]
result.gasMeter.init(message.gas)
result.code = newCodeStream(code)
result.sysCall = sysCall
template gasCosts*(c: Computation): untyped =
c.vmState.gasCosts
template fork*(c: Computation): untyped =
c.vmState.fork
template isSuccess*(c: Computation): bool =
c.error.isNil
template isError*(c: Computation): bool =
not c.isSuccess
func shouldBurnGas*(c: Computation): bool =
c.isError and c.error.burnsGas
proc snapshot*(c: Computation) =
2022-04-08 04:54:11 +00:00
c.savePoint = c.vmState.stateDB.beginSavepoint()
proc commit*(c: Computation) =
c.vmState.stateDB.commit(c.savePoint)
proc dispose*(c: Computation) =
c.vmState.stateDB.safeDispose(c.savePoint)
c.savePoint = nil
proc rollback*(c: Computation) =
c.vmState.stateDB.rollback(c.savePoint)
func setError*(c: Computation, msg: string, burnsGas = false) =
c.error = Error(evmcStatus: EVMC_FAILURE, info: msg, burnsGas: burnsGas)
func setError*(c: Computation, code: evmc_status_code, burnsGas = false) =
c.error = Error(evmcStatus: code, info: $code, burnsGas: burnsGas)
func setError*(
c: Computation, code: evmc_status_code, msg: string, burnsGas = false) =
c.error = Error(evmcStatus: code, info: msg, burnsGas: burnsGas)
func evmcStatus*(c: Computation): evmc_status_code =
if c.isSuccess:
EVMC_SUCCESS
else:
c.error.evmcStatus
func errorOpt*(c: Computation): Option[string] =
if c.isSuccess:
return none(string)
if c.error.evmcStatus == EVMC_REVERT:
return none(string)
some(c.error.info)
proc writeContract*(c: Computation)
{.gcsafe, raises: [CatchableError].} =
EVM: `writeContract` fixes, never return contract code as `RETURNDATA` This fixes #867 "EIP-170 related consensus error at Goerli block 5080941", and equivalent on other networks. This combines a change on the EVM-caller side with an EVM-side change from @jangko 6548ff98 "fixes CREATE/CREATE2's `returndata` bug", making the caller EVM ignore any data except from `REVERT`. Either change works by itself. The reason for both is to ensure we definitely comply with ambiguous EVMC expectations from either side of that boundary, and it makes the internal API clearer. As well as fixing a specific consensus issue, there are some other EVM logic changes too: Refactored `writeContract`, how `RETURNDATA` is handled inside the EVM, and changed behaviour with quirks before EIP-2 (Homestead). The fix allows sync to pass block 5080941 on Goerli, and probably equivalent on other networks. Here's a trace at batch 5080897..5081088: ``` TRC 2021-10-01 21:18:12.883+01:00 Persisting blocks file=persist_blocks.nim:43 fromBlock=5080897 toBlock=5081088 ... DBG 2021-10-01 21:18:13.270+01:00 Contract code size exceeds EIP170 topics="vm computation" file=computation.nim:236 limit=24577 actual=31411 DBG 2021-10-01 21:18:13.271+01:00 gasUsed neq cumulativeGasUsed file=process_block.nim:68 block=5080941/0A3537BC5BDFC637349E1C77D9648F2F65E2BF973ABF7956618F854B769DF626 gasUsed=3129669 cumulativeGasUsed=3132615 TRC 2021-10-01 21:18:13.271+01:00 peer disconnected file=blockchain_sync.nim:407 peer=<IP:PORT> ``` Although it says "Contract code size" and "gasUsed", this bug is more general than either contract size or gas. It's due to incorrect behaviour of EVM instructions `RETURNDATA` and `RETURNDATASIZE`. Sometimes when `writeContract` decides to reject writing the contract for any of several reasons (for example just insufficient gas), the unwritten contract code was being used as the "return data", and given to the caller. If the caller used `RETURNDATA` or `RETURNDATASIZE` ops, those incorrectly reported the contract code that didn't get written. EIP-211 (https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-211) describes `RETURNDATA`: > "`CREATE` and `CREATE2` are considered to return the empty buffer in the > success case and the failure data in the failure case". The language is ambiguous. In fact "failure case" means when the contract uses `REVERT` to finish. It doesn't mean other failures like out of gas, EIP-170 limit, EIP-3541, etc. To be thorough, and to ensure we always do the right thing with real EVMC when that's finalised, this patch fixes the `RETURNDATA` issue in two places, either of which make Goerli block 5080941 pass. `writeContract` has been refactored to be caller, and so has where it's called. It sets an error in the usual way if contract writing is rejected -- that's anticipating EVMC, where we'll use different error codes later. Overall four behaviour changes: 1. On the callee side, it doesn't set `c.outputData` except for `REVERT`. 2. On the caller side, it doesn't read `child.outputData` except for `REVERT`. 3. There was a bug in processing before Homestead fork (EIP-2). We did not match the spec or other implementations; now we do. When there's insufficient gas, before Homestead it's treated as success but with an empty contract. https://github.com/ethereum/pyethereum/blob/d117c8f3fd93359fc641fd850fa799436f7c43b5/ethereum/processblock.py#L304 https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/blob/401354976bb4/core/vm/instructions.go#L586 4. The Byzantium check has been removed, as it's unnecessary. Signed-off-by: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
2021-12-02 19:44:51 +00:00
template withExtra(tracer: untyped, args: varargs[untyped]) =
tracer args, newContract=($c.msg.contractAddress),
Redesign of BaseVMState descriptor (#923) * Redesign of BaseVMState descriptor why: BaseVMState provides an environment for executing transactions. The current descriptor also provides data that cannot generally be known within the execution environment, e.g. the total gasUsed which is available not before after all transactions have finished. Also, the BaseVMState constructor has been replaced by a constructor that does not need pre-initialised input of the account database. also: Previous constructor and some fields are provided with a deprecated annotation (producing a lot of noise.) * Replace legacy directives in production sources * Replace legacy directives in unit test sources * fix CI (missing premix update) * Remove legacy directives * chase CI problem * rebased * Re-introduce 'AccountsCache' constructor optimisation for 'BaseVmState' re-initialisation why: Constructing a new 'AccountsCache' descriptor can be avoided sometimes when the current state root is properly positioned already. Such a feature existed already as the update function 'initStateDB()' for the 'BaseChanDB' where the accounts cache was linked into this desctiptor. The function 'initStateDB()' was removed and re-implemented into the 'BaseVmState' constructor without optimisation. The old version was of restricted use as a wrong accounts cache state would unconditionally throw an exception rather than conceptually ask for a remedy. The optimised 'BaseVmState' re-initialisation has been implemented for the 'persistBlocks()' function. also: moved some test helpers to 'test/replay' folder * Remove unused & undocumented fields from Chain descriptor why: Reduces attack surface in general & improves reading the code.
2022-01-18 16:19:32 +00:00
blockNumber=c.vmState.blockNumber,
parentHash=($c.vmState.parent.blockHash)
EVM: `writeContract` fixes, never return contract code as `RETURNDATA` This fixes #867 "EIP-170 related consensus error at Goerli block 5080941", and equivalent on other networks. This combines a change on the EVM-caller side with an EVM-side change from @jangko 6548ff98 "fixes CREATE/CREATE2's `returndata` bug", making the caller EVM ignore any data except from `REVERT`. Either change works by itself. The reason for both is to ensure we definitely comply with ambiguous EVMC expectations from either side of that boundary, and it makes the internal API clearer. As well as fixing a specific consensus issue, there are some other EVM logic changes too: Refactored `writeContract`, how `RETURNDATA` is handled inside the EVM, and changed behaviour with quirks before EIP-2 (Homestead). The fix allows sync to pass block 5080941 on Goerli, and probably equivalent on other networks. Here's a trace at batch 5080897..5081088: ``` TRC 2021-10-01 21:18:12.883+01:00 Persisting blocks file=persist_blocks.nim:43 fromBlock=5080897 toBlock=5081088 ... DBG 2021-10-01 21:18:13.270+01:00 Contract code size exceeds EIP170 topics="vm computation" file=computation.nim:236 limit=24577 actual=31411 DBG 2021-10-01 21:18:13.271+01:00 gasUsed neq cumulativeGasUsed file=process_block.nim:68 block=5080941/0A3537BC5BDFC637349E1C77D9648F2F65E2BF973ABF7956618F854B769DF626 gasUsed=3129669 cumulativeGasUsed=3132615 TRC 2021-10-01 21:18:13.271+01:00 peer disconnected file=blockchain_sync.nim:407 peer=<IP:PORT> ``` Although it says "Contract code size" and "gasUsed", this bug is more general than either contract size or gas. It's due to incorrect behaviour of EVM instructions `RETURNDATA` and `RETURNDATASIZE`. Sometimes when `writeContract` decides to reject writing the contract for any of several reasons (for example just insufficient gas), the unwritten contract code was being used as the "return data", and given to the caller. If the caller used `RETURNDATA` or `RETURNDATASIZE` ops, those incorrectly reported the contract code that didn't get written. EIP-211 (https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-211) describes `RETURNDATA`: > "`CREATE` and `CREATE2` are considered to return the empty buffer in the > success case and the failure data in the failure case". The language is ambiguous. In fact "failure case" means when the contract uses `REVERT` to finish. It doesn't mean other failures like out of gas, EIP-170 limit, EIP-3541, etc. To be thorough, and to ensure we always do the right thing with real EVMC when that's finalised, this patch fixes the `RETURNDATA` issue in two places, either of which make Goerli block 5080941 pass. `writeContract` has been refactored to be caller, and so has where it's called. It sets an error in the usual way if contract writing is rejected -- that's anticipating EVMC, where we'll use different error codes later. Overall four behaviour changes: 1. On the callee side, it doesn't set `c.outputData` except for `REVERT`. 2. On the caller side, it doesn't read `child.outputData` except for `REVERT`. 3. There was a bug in processing before Homestead fork (EIP-2). We did not match the spec or other implementations; now we do. When there's insufficient gas, before Homestead it's treated as success but with an empty contract. https://github.com/ethereum/pyethereum/blob/d117c8f3fd93359fc641fd850fa799436f7c43b5/ethereum/processblock.py#L304 https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/blob/401354976bb4/core/vm/instructions.go#L586 4. The Byzantium check has been removed, as it's unnecessary. Signed-off-by: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
2021-12-02 19:44:51 +00:00
# In each check below, they are guarded by `len > 0`. This includes writing
# out the code, because the account already has zero-length code to handle
# nested calls (this is specified). May as well simplify other branches.
let (len, fork) = (c.output.len, c.fork)
if len == 0:
return
# EIP-3541 constraint (https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3541).
if fork >= FkLondon and c.output[0] == 0xEF.byte:
withExtra trace, "New contract code starts with 0xEF byte, not allowed by EIP-3541"
c.setError(EVMC_CONTRACT_VALIDATION_FAILURE, true)
EVM: `writeContract` fixes, never return contract code as `RETURNDATA` This fixes #867 "EIP-170 related consensus error at Goerli block 5080941", and equivalent on other networks. This combines a change on the EVM-caller side with an EVM-side change from @jangko 6548ff98 "fixes CREATE/CREATE2's `returndata` bug", making the caller EVM ignore any data except from `REVERT`. Either change works by itself. The reason for both is to ensure we definitely comply with ambiguous EVMC expectations from either side of that boundary, and it makes the internal API clearer. As well as fixing a specific consensus issue, there are some other EVM logic changes too: Refactored `writeContract`, how `RETURNDATA` is handled inside the EVM, and changed behaviour with quirks before EIP-2 (Homestead). The fix allows sync to pass block 5080941 on Goerli, and probably equivalent on other networks. Here's a trace at batch 5080897..5081088: ``` TRC 2021-10-01 21:18:12.883+01:00 Persisting blocks file=persist_blocks.nim:43 fromBlock=5080897 toBlock=5081088 ... DBG 2021-10-01 21:18:13.270+01:00 Contract code size exceeds EIP170 topics="vm computation" file=computation.nim:236 limit=24577 actual=31411 DBG 2021-10-01 21:18:13.271+01:00 gasUsed neq cumulativeGasUsed file=process_block.nim:68 block=5080941/0A3537BC5BDFC637349E1C77D9648F2F65E2BF973ABF7956618F854B769DF626 gasUsed=3129669 cumulativeGasUsed=3132615 TRC 2021-10-01 21:18:13.271+01:00 peer disconnected file=blockchain_sync.nim:407 peer=<IP:PORT> ``` Although it says "Contract code size" and "gasUsed", this bug is more general than either contract size or gas. It's due to incorrect behaviour of EVM instructions `RETURNDATA` and `RETURNDATASIZE`. Sometimes when `writeContract` decides to reject writing the contract for any of several reasons (for example just insufficient gas), the unwritten contract code was being used as the "return data", and given to the caller. If the caller used `RETURNDATA` or `RETURNDATASIZE` ops, those incorrectly reported the contract code that didn't get written. EIP-211 (https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-211) describes `RETURNDATA`: > "`CREATE` and `CREATE2` are considered to return the empty buffer in the > success case and the failure data in the failure case". The language is ambiguous. In fact "failure case" means when the contract uses `REVERT` to finish. It doesn't mean other failures like out of gas, EIP-170 limit, EIP-3541, etc. To be thorough, and to ensure we always do the right thing with real EVMC when that's finalised, this patch fixes the `RETURNDATA` issue in two places, either of which make Goerli block 5080941 pass. `writeContract` has been refactored to be caller, and so has where it's called. It sets an error in the usual way if contract writing is rejected -- that's anticipating EVMC, where we'll use different error codes later. Overall four behaviour changes: 1. On the callee side, it doesn't set `c.outputData` except for `REVERT`. 2. On the caller side, it doesn't read `child.outputData` except for `REVERT`. 3. There was a bug in processing before Homestead fork (EIP-2). We did not match the spec or other implementations; now we do. When there's insufficient gas, before Homestead it's treated as success but with an empty contract. https://github.com/ethereum/pyethereum/blob/d117c8f3fd93359fc641fd850fa799436f7c43b5/ethereum/processblock.py#L304 https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/blob/401354976bb4/core/vm/instructions.go#L586 4. The Byzantium check has been removed, as it's unnecessary. Signed-off-by: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
2021-12-02 19:44:51 +00:00
return
# EIP-170 constraint (https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3541).
if fork >= FkSpurious and len > EIP170_MAX_CODE_SIZE:
withExtra trace, "New contract code exceeds EIP-170 limit",
codeSize=len, maxSize=EIP170_MAX_CODE_SIZE
c.setError(EVMC_OUT_OF_GAS, true)
EVM: `writeContract` fixes, never return contract code as `RETURNDATA` This fixes #867 "EIP-170 related consensus error at Goerli block 5080941", and equivalent on other networks. This combines a change on the EVM-caller side with an EVM-side change from @jangko 6548ff98 "fixes CREATE/CREATE2's `returndata` bug", making the caller EVM ignore any data except from `REVERT`. Either change works by itself. The reason for both is to ensure we definitely comply with ambiguous EVMC expectations from either side of that boundary, and it makes the internal API clearer. As well as fixing a specific consensus issue, there are some other EVM logic changes too: Refactored `writeContract`, how `RETURNDATA` is handled inside the EVM, and changed behaviour with quirks before EIP-2 (Homestead). The fix allows sync to pass block 5080941 on Goerli, and probably equivalent on other networks. Here's a trace at batch 5080897..5081088: ``` TRC 2021-10-01 21:18:12.883+01:00 Persisting blocks file=persist_blocks.nim:43 fromBlock=5080897 toBlock=5081088 ... DBG 2021-10-01 21:18:13.270+01:00 Contract code size exceeds EIP170 topics="vm computation" file=computation.nim:236 limit=24577 actual=31411 DBG 2021-10-01 21:18:13.271+01:00 gasUsed neq cumulativeGasUsed file=process_block.nim:68 block=5080941/0A3537BC5BDFC637349E1C77D9648F2F65E2BF973ABF7956618F854B769DF626 gasUsed=3129669 cumulativeGasUsed=3132615 TRC 2021-10-01 21:18:13.271+01:00 peer disconnected file=blockchain_sync.nim:407 peer=<IP:PORT> ``` Although it says "Contract code size" and "gasUsed", this bug is more general than either contract size or gas. It's due to incorrect behaviour of EVM instructions `RETURNDATA` and `RETURNDATASIZE`. Sometimes when `writeContract` decides to reject writing the contract for any of several reasons (for example just insufficient gas), the unwritten contract code was being used as the "return data", and given to the caller. If the caller used `RETURNDATA` or `RETURNDATASIZE` ops, those incorrectly reported the contract code that didn't get written. EIP-211 (https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-211) describes `RETURNDATA`: > "`CREATE` and `CREATE2` are considered to return the empty buffer in the > success case and the failure data in the failure case". The language is ambiguous. In fact "failure case" means when the contract uses `REVERT` to finish. It doesn't mean other failures like out of gas, EIP-170 limit, EIP-3541, etc. To be thorough, and to ensure we always do the right thing with real EVMC when that's finalised, this patch fixes the `RETURNDATA` issue in two places, either of which make Goerli block 5080941 pass. `writeContract` has been refactored to be caller, and so has where it's called. It sets an error in the usual way if contract writing is rejected -- that's anticipating EVMC, where we'll use different error codes later. Overall four behaviour changes: 1. On the callee side, it doesn't set `c.outputData` except for `REVERT`. 2. On the caller side, it doesn't read `child.outputData` except for `REVERT`. 3. There was a bug in processing before Homestead fork (EIP-2). We did not match the spec or other implementations; now we do. When there's insufficient gas, before Homestead it's treated as success but with an empty contract. https://github.com/ethereum/pyethereum/blob/d117c8f3fd93359fc641fd850fa799436f7c43b5/ethereum/processblock.py#L304 https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/blob/401354976bb4/core/vm/instructions.go#L586 4. The Byzantium check has been removed, as it's unnecessary. Signed-off-by: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
2021-12-02 19:44:51 +00:00
return
Bugfix: Incorrect processing of self-destructed, new contract Fixes #868 "Gas usage consensus error at Mainnet block 6001128", and equivalent on other networks. Mainnet sync is able to continue past 6001128 after this. Here's a trace: ``` TRC 2021-09-29 15:13:21.532+01:00 Persisting blocks file=persist_blocks.nim:43 fromBlock=6000961 toBlock=6001152 ... DBG 2021-09-29 15:14:35.925+01:00 gasUsed neq cumulativeGasUsed file=process_block.nim:68 gasUsed=7999726 cumulativeGasUsed=7989726 TRC 2021-09-29 15:14:35.925+01:00 peer disconnected file=blockchain_sync.nim:407 peer=<PEER:IP> ``` Similar output is seen at many blocks in the range 6001128..6001204. The bug is when handling a combination of `CREATE` or `CREATE2`, along with `SELFDESTRUCT` applied to the new contract address. Init code for a contract can't return non-empty code and do `SELFDESTRUCT` at the same time, because `SELFDESTRUCT` returns empty data. But it is possible to return non-empty code in a newly created, self-destructed account if the init code calls `DELEGATECALL` or `CALLCODE` to other code which uses `SELFDESTRUCT`. In this case we must still charge gas and write the code. This shows on Mainnet blocks 6001128..6001204, where the gas difference matters. The code must be written because the new code can be called later in the transaction too, before self-destruction wipes the account at the end. There are actually three semantic changes here for a self-destructed, new contract: - Gas is charged. - The code is written to the account. - It can fail due to insufficient gas. This patch almost exactly reverts a15805e4 "fix applyCreateMessage" from 2019-02-28. I wonder what that fixed. Signed-off-by: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
2021-10-19 11:52:01 +00:00
# Charge gas and write the code even if the code address is self-destructed.
# Non-empty code in a newly created, self-destructed account is possible if
# the init code calls `DELEGATECALL` or `CALLCODE` to other code which uses
# `SELFDESTRUCT`. This shows on Mainnet blocks 6001128..6001204, where the
# gas difference matters. The new code can be called later in the
# transaction too, before self-destruction wipes the account at the end.
EVM: `writeContract` fixes, never return contract code as `RETURNDATA` This fixes #867 "EIP-170 related consensus error at Goerli block 5080941", and equivalent on other networks. This combines a change on the EVM-caller side with an EVM-side change from @jangko 6548ff98 "fixes CREATE/CREATE2's `returndata` bug", making the caller EVM ignore any data except from `REVERT`. Either change works by itself. The reason for both is to ensure we definitely comply with ambiguous EVMC expectations from either side of that boundary, and it makes the internal API clearer. As well as fixing a specific consensus issue, there are some other EVM logic changes too: Refactored `writeContract`, how `RETURNDATA` is handled inside the EVM, and changed behaviour with quirks before EIP-2 (Homestead). The fix allows sync to pass block 5080941 on Goerli, and probably equivalent on other networks. Here's a trace at batch 5080897..5081088: ``` TRC 2021-10-01 21:18:12.883+01:00 Persisting blocks file=persist_blocks.nim:43 fromBlock=5080897 toBlock=5081088 ... DBG 2021-10-01 21:18:13.270+01:00 Contract code size exceeds EIP170 topics="vm computation" file=computation.nim:236 limit=24577 actual=31411 DBG 2021-10-01 21:18:13.271+01:00 gasUsed neq cumulativeGasUsed file=process_block.nim:68 block=5080941/0A3537BC5BDFC637349E1C77D9648F2F65E2BF973ABF7956618F854B769DF626 gasUsed=3129669 cumulativeGasUsed=3132615 TRC 2021-10-01 21:18:13.271+01:00 peer disconnected file=blockchain_sync.nim:407 peer=<IP:PORT> ``` Although it says "Contract code size" and "gasUsed", this bug is more general than either contract size or gas. It's due to incorrect behaviour of EVM instructions `RETURNDATA` and `RETURNDATASIZE`. Sometimes when `writeContract` decides to reject writing the contract for any of several reasons (for example just insufficient gas), the unwritten contract code was being used as the "return data", and given to the caller. If the caller used `RETURNDATA` or `RETURNDATASIZE` ops, those incorrectly reported the contract code that didn't get written. EIP-211 (https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-211) describes `RETURNDATA`: > "`CREATE` and `CREATE2` are considered to return the empty buffer in the > success case and the failure data in the failure case". The language is ambiguous. In fact "failure case" means when the contract uses `REVERT` to finish. It doesn't mean other failures like out of gas, EIP-170 limit, EIP-3541, etc. To be thorough, and to ensure we always do the right thing with real EVMC when that's finalised, this patch fixes the `RETURNDATA` issue in two places, either of which make Goerli block 5080941 pass. `writeContract` has been refactored to be caller, and so has where it's called. It sets an error in the usual way if contract writing is rejected -- that's anticipating EVMC, where we'll use different error codes later. Overall four behaviour changes: 1. On the callee side, it doesn't set `c.outputData` except for `REVERT`. 2. On the caller side, it doesn't read `child.outputData` except for `REVERT`. 3. There was a bug in processing before Homestead fork (EIP-2). We did not match the spec or other implementations; now we do. When there's insufficient gas, before Homestead it's treated as success but with an empty contract. https://github.com/ethereum/pyethereum/blob/d117c8f3fd93359fc641fd850fa799436f7c43b5/ethereum/processblock.py#L304 https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/blob/401354976bb4/core/vm/instructions.go#L586 4. The Byzantium check has been removed, as it's unnecessary. Signed-off-by: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
2021-12-02 19:44:51 +00:00
let gasParams = GasParams(kind: Create, cr_memLength: len)
let codeCost = c.gasCosts[Create].c_handler(0.u256, gasParams).gasCost
EVM: `writeContract` fixes, never return contract code as `RETURNDATA` This fixes #867 "EIP-170 related consensus error at Goerli block 5080941", and equivalent on other networks. This combines a change on the EVM-caller side with an EVM-side change from @jangko 6548ff98 "fixes CREATE/CREATE2's `returndata` bug", making the caller EVM ignore any data except from `REVERT`. Either change works by itself. The reason for both is to ensure we definitely comply with ambiguous EVMC expectations from either side of that boundary, and it makes the internal API clearer. As well as fixing a specific consensus issue, there are some other EVM logic changes too: Refactored `writeContract`, how `RETURNDATA` is handled inside the EVM, and changed behaviour with quirks before EIP-2 (Homestead). The fix allows sync to pass block 5080941 on Goerli, and probably equivalent on other networks. Here's a trace at batch 5080897..5081088: ``` TRC 2021-10-01 21:18:12.883+01:00 Persisting blocks file=persist_blocks.nim:43 fromBlock=5080897 toBlock=5081088 ... DBG 2021-10-01 21:18:13.270+01:00 Contract code size exceeds EIP170 topics="vm computation" file=computation.nim:236 limit=24577 actual=31411 DBG 2021-10-01 21:18:13.271+01:00 gasUsed neq cumulativeGasUsed file=process_block.nim:68 block=5080941/0A3537BC5BDFC637349E1C77D9648F2F65E2BF973ABF7956618F854B769DF626 gasUsed=3129669 cumulativeGasUsed=3132615 TRC 2021-10-01 21:18:13.271+01:00 peer disconnected file=blockchain_sync.nim:407 peer=<IP:PORT> ``` Although it says "Contract code size" and "gasUsed", this bug is more general than either contract size or gas. It's due to incorrect behaviour of EVM instructions `RETURNDATA` and `RETURNDATASIZE`. Sometimes when `writeContract` decides to reject writing the contract for any of several reasons (for example just insufficient gas), the unwritten contract code was being used as the "return data", and given to the caller. If the caller used `RETURNDATA` or `RETURNDATASIZE` ops, those incorrectly reported the contract code that didn't get written. EIP-211 (https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-211) describes `RETURNDATA`: > "`CREATE` and `CREATE2` are considered to return the empty buffer in the > success case and the failure data in the failure case". The language is ambiguous. In fact "failure case" means when the contract uses `REVERT` to finish. It doesn't mean other failures like out of gas, EIP-170 limit, EIP-3541, etc. To be thorough, and to ensure we always do the right thing with real EVMC when that's finalised, this patch fixes the `RETURNDATA` issue in two places, either of which make Goerli block 5080941 pass. `writeContract` has been refactored to be caller, and so has where it's called. It sets an error in the usual way if contract writing is rejected -- that's anticipating EVMC, where we'll use different error codes later. Overall four behaviour changes: 1. On the callee side, it doesn't set `c.outputData` except for `REVERT`. 2. On the caller side, it doesn't read `child.outputData` except for `REVERT`. 3. There was a bug in processing before Homestead fork (EIP-2). We did not match the spec or other implementations; now we do. When there's insufficient gas, before Homestead it's treated as success but with an empty contract. https://github.com/ethereum/pyethereum/blob/d117c8f3fd93359fc641fd850fa799436f7c43b5/ethereum/processblock.py#L304 https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/blob/401354976bb4/core/vm/instructions.go#L586 4. The Byzantium check has been removed, as it's unnecessary. Signed-off-by: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
2021-12-02 19:44:51 +00:00
if codeCost <= c.gasMeter.gasRemaining:
c.gasMeter.consumeGas(codeCost, reason = "Write new contract code")
2022-04-08 04:54:11 +00:00
c.vmState.mutateStateDB:
EVM: `writeContract` fixes, never return contract code as `RETURNDATA` This fixes #867 "EIP-170 related consensus error at Goerli block 5080941", and equivalent on other networks. This combines a change on the EVM-caller side with an EVM-side change from @jangko 6548ff98 "fixes CREATE/CREATE2's `returndata` bug", making the caller EVM ignore any data except from `REVERT`. Either change works by itself. The reason for both is to ensure we definitely comply with ambiguous EVMC expectations from either side of that boundary, and it makes the internal API clearer. As well as fixing a specific consensus issue, there are some other EVM logic changes too: Refactored `writeContract`, how `RETURNDATA` is handled inside the EVM, and changed behaviour with quirks before EIP-2 (Homestead). The fix allows sync to pass block 5080941 on Goerli, and probably equivalent on other networks. Here's a trace at batch 5080897..5081088: ``` TRC 2021-10-01 21:18:12.883+01:00 Persisting blocks file=persist_blocks.nim:43 fromBlock=5080897 toBlock=5081088 ... DBG 2021-10-01 21:18:13.270+01:00 Contract code size exceeds EIP170 topics="vm computation" file=computation.nim:236 limit=24577 actual=31411 DBG 2021-10-01 21:18:13.271+01:00 gasUsed neq cumulativeGasUsed file=process_block.nim:68 block=5080941/0A3537BC5BDFC637349E1C77D9648F2F65E2BF973ABF7956618F854B769DF626 gasUsed=3129669 cumulativeGasUsed=3132615 TRC 2021-10-01 21:18:13.271+01:00 peer disconnected file=blockchain_sync.nim:407 peer=<IP:PORT> ``` Although it says "Contract code size" and "gasUsed", this bug is more general than either contract size or gas. It's due to incorrect behaviour of EVM instructions `RETURNDATA` and `RETURNDATASIZE`. Sometimes when `writeContract` decides to reject writing the contract for any of several reasons (for example just insufficient gas), the unwritten contract code was being used as the "return data", and given to the caller. If the caller used `RETURNDATA` or `RETURNDATASIZE` ops, those incorrectly reported the contract code that didn't get written. EIP-211 (https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-211) describes `RETURNDATA`: > "`CREATE` and `CREATE2` are considered to return the empty buffer in the > success case and the failure data in the failure case". The language is ambiguous. In fact "failure case" means when the contract uses `REVERT` to finish. It doesn't mean other failures like out of gas, EIP-170 limit, EIP-3541, etc. To be thorough, and to ensure we always do the right thing with real EVMC when that's finalised, this patch fixes the `RETURNDATA` issue in two places, either of which make Goerli block 5080941 pass. `writeContract` has been refactored to be caller, and so has where it's called. It sets an error in the usual way if contract writing is rejected -- that's anticipating EVMC, where we'll use different error codes later. Overall four behaviour changes: 1. On the callee side, it doesn't set `c.outputData` except for `REVERT`. 2. On the caller side, it doesn't read `child.outputData` except for `REVERT`. 3. There was a bug in processing before Homestead fork (EIP-2). We did not match the spec or other implementations; now we do. When there's insufficient gas, before Homestead it's treated as success but with an empty contract. https://github.com/ethereum/pyethereum/blob/d117c8f3fd93359fc641fd850fa799436f7c43b5/ethereum/processblock.py#L304 https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/blob/401354976bb4/core/vm/instructions.go#L586 4. The Byzantium check has been removed, as it's unnecessary. Signed-off-by: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
2021-12-02 19:44:51 +00:00
db.setCode(c.msg.contractAddress, c.output)
withExtra trace, "Writing new contract code"
return
if fork >= FkHomestead:
# EIP-2 (https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2).
c.setError(EVMC_OUT_OF_GAS, true)
else:
EVM: `writeContract` fixes, never return contract code as `RETURNDATA` This fixes #867 "EIP-170 related consensus error at Goerli block 5080941", and equivalent on other networks. This combines a change on the EVM-caller side with an EVM-side change from @jangko 6548ff98 "fixes CREATE/CREATE2's `returndata` bug", making the caller EVM ignore any data except from `REVERT`. Either change works by itself. The reason for both is to ensure we definitely comply with ambiguous EVMC expectations from either side of that boundary, and it makes the internal API clearer. As well as fixing a specific consensus issue, there are some other EVM logic changes too: Refactored `writeContract`, how `RETURNDATA` is handled inside the EVM, and changed behaviour with quirks before EIP-2 (Homestead). The fix allows sync to pass block 5080941 on Goerli, and probably equivalent on other networks. Here's a trace at batch 5080897..5081088: ``` TRC 2021-10-01 21:18:12.883+01:00 Persisting blocks file=persist_blocks.nim:43 fromBlock=5080897 toBlock=5081088 ... DBG 2021-10-01 21:18:13.270+01:00 Contract code size exceeds EIP170 topics="vm computation" file=computation.nim:236 limit=24577 actual=31411 DBG 2021-10-01 21:18:13.271+01:00 gasUsed neq cumulativeGasUsed file=process_block.nim:68 block=5080941/0A3537BC5BDFC637349E1C77D9648F2F65E2BF973ABF7956618F854B769DF626 gasUsed=3129669 cumulativeGasUsed=3132615 TRC 2021-10-01 21:18:13.271+01:00 peer disconnected file=blockchain_sync.nim:407 peer=<IP:PORT> ``` Although it says "Contract code size" and "gasUsed", this bug is more general than either contract size or gas. It's due to incorrect behaviour of EVM instructions `RETURNDATA` and `RETURNDATASIZE`. Sometimes when `writeContract` decides to reject writing the contract for any of several reasons (for example just insufficient gas), the unwritten contract code was being used as the "return data", and given to the caller. If the caller used `RETURNDATA` or `RETURNDATASIZE` ops, those incorrectly reported the contract code that didn't get written. EIP-211 (https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-211) describes `RETURNDATA`: > "`CREATE` and `CREATE2` are considered to return the empty buffer in the > success case and the failure data in the failure case". The language is ambiguous. In fact "failure case" means when the contract uses `REVERT` to finish. It doesn't mean other failures like out of gas, EIP-170 limit, EIP-3541, etc. To be thorough, and to ensure we always do the right thing with real EVMC when that's finalised, this patch fixes the `RETURNDATA` issue in two places, either of which make Goerli block 5080941 pass. `writeContract` has been refactored to be caller, and so has where it's called. It sets an error in the usual way if contract writing is rejected -- that's anticipating EVMC, where we'll use different error codes later. Overall four behaviour changes: 1. On the callee side, it doesn't set `c.outputData` except for `REVERT`. 2. On the caller side, it doesn't read `child.outputData` except for `REVERT`. 3. There was a bug in processing before Homestead fork (EIP-2). We did not match the spec or other implementations; now we do. When there's insufficient gas, before Homestead it's treated as success but with an empty contract. https://github.com/ethereum/pyethereum/blob/d117c8f3fd93359fc641fd850fa799436f7c43b5/ethereum/processblock.py#L304 https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/blob/401354976bb4/core/vm/instructions.go#L586 4. The Byzantium check has been removed, as it's unnecessary. Signed-off-by: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
2021-12-02 19:44:51 +00:00
# Before EIP-2, when out of gas for code storage, the account ends up with
# zero-length code and no error. No gas is charged. Code cited in EIP-2:
# https://github.com/ethereum/pyethereum/blob/d117c8f3fd93/ethereum/processblock.py#L304
# https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/blob/401354976bb4/core/vm/instructions.go#L586
# The account already has zero-length code to handle nested calls.
withExtra trace, "New contract given empty code by pre-Homestead rules"
template chainTo*(c: Computation,
toChild: typeof(c.child),
shouldRaise: static[bool],
after: untyped) =
when shouldRaise:
{.pragma: chainToPragma, gcsafe, raises: [CatchableError].}
else:
{.pragma: chainToPragma, gcsafe, raises: [].}
c.child = toChild
c.continuation = proc() {.chainToPragma.} =
c.continuation = nil
after
Added basic async capabilities for vm2. (#1260) * Added basic async capabilities for vm2. This is a whole new Git branch, not the same one as last time (https://github.com/status-im/nimbus-eth1/pull/1250) - there wasn't much worth salvaging. Main differences: I didn't do the "each opcode has to specify an async handler" junk that I put in last time. Instead, in oph_memory.nim you can see sloadOp calling asyncChainTo and passing in an async operation. That async operation is then run by the execCallOrCreate (or asyncExecCallOrCreate) code in interpreter_dispatch.nim. In the test code, the (previously existing) macro called "assembler" now allows you to add a section called "initialStorage", specifying fake data to be used by the EVM computation run by that test. (In the long run we'll obviously want to write tests that for-real use the JSON-RPC API to asynchronously fetch data; for now, this was just an expedient way to write a basic unit test that exercises the async-EVM code pathway.) There's also a new macro called "concurrentAssemblers" that allows you to write a test that runs multiple assemblers concurrently (and then waits for them all to finish). There's one example test using this, in test_op_memory_lazy.nim, though you can't actually see it doing so unless you uncomment some echo statements in async_operations.nim (in which case you can see the two concurrently running EVM computations each printing out what they're doing, and you'll see that they interleave). A question: is it possible to make EVMC work asynchronously? (For now, this code compiles and "make test" passes even if ENABLE_EVMC is turned on, but it doesn't actually work asynchronously, it just falls back on doing the usual synchronous EVMC thing. See FIXME-asyncAndEvmc.) * Moved the AsyncOperationFactory to the BaseVMState object. * Made the AsyncOperationFactory into a table of fn pointers. Also ditched the plain-data Vm2AsyncOperation type; it wasn't really serving much purpose. Instead, the pendingAsyncOperation field directly contains the Future. * Removed the hasStorage idea. It's not the right solution to the "how do we know whether we still need to fetch the storage value or not?" problem. I haven't implemented the right solution yet, but at least we're better off not putting in a wrong one. * Added/modified/removed some comments. (Based on feedback on the PR.) * Removed the waitFor from execCallOrCreate. There was some back-and-forth in the PR regarding whether nested waitFor calls are acceptable: https://github.com/status-im/nimbus-eth1/pull/1260#discussion_r998587449 The eventual decision was to just change the waitFor to a doAssert (since we probably won't want this extra functionality when running synchronously anyway) to make sure that the Future is already finished.
2022-11-01 15:35:46 +00:00
# Register an async operation to be performed before the continuation is called.
template asyncChainTo*(c: Computation,
asyncOperation: Future[void],
after: untyped) =
Added basic async capabilities for vm2. (#1260) * Added basic async capabilities for vm2. This is a whole new Git branch, not the same one as last time (https://github.com/status-im/nimbus-eth1/pull/1250) - there wasn't much worth salvaging. Main differences: I didn't do the "each opcode has to specify an async handler" junk that I put in last time. Instead, in oph_memory.nim you can see sloadOp calling asyncChainTo and passing in an async operation. That async operation is then run by the execCallOrCreate (or asyncExecCallOrCreate) code in interpreter_dispatch.nim. In the test code, the (previously existing) macro called "assembler" now allows you to add a section called "initialStorage", specifying fake data to be used by the EVM computation run by that test. (In the long run we'll obviously want to write tests that for-real use the JSON-RPC API to asynchronously fetch data; for now, this was just an expedient way to write a basic unit test that exercises the async-EVM code pathway.) There's also a new macro called "concurrentAssemblers" that allows you to write a test that runs multiple assemblers concurrently (and then waits for them all to finish). There's one example test using this, in test_op_memory_lazy.nim, though you can't actually see it doing so unless you uncomment some echo statements in async_operations.nim (in which case you can see the two concurrently running EVM computations each printing out what they're doing, and you'll see that they interleave). A question: is it possible to make EVMC work asynchronously? (For now, this code compiles and "make test" passes even if ENABLE_EVMC is turned on, but it doesn't actually work asynchronously, it just falls back on doing the usual synchronous EVMC thing. See FIXME-asyncAndEvmc.) * Moved the AsyncOperationFactory to the BaseVMState object. * Made the AsyncOperationFactory into a table of fn pointers. Also ditched the plain-data Vm2AsyncOperation type; it wasn't really serving much purpose. Instead, the pendingAsyncOperation field directly contains the Future. * Removed the hasStorage idea. It's not the right solution to the "how do we know whether we still need to fetch the storage value or not?" problem. I haven't implemented the right solution yet, but at least we're better off not putting in a wrong one. * Added/modified/removed some comments. (Based on feedback on the PR.) * Removed the waitFor from execCallOrCreate. There was some back-and-forth in the PR regarding whether nested waitFor calls are acceptable: https://github.com/status-im/nimbus-eth1/pull/1260#discussion_r998587449 The eventual decision was to just change the waitFor to a doAssert (since we probably won't want this extra functionality when running synchronously anyway) to make sure that the Future is already finished.
2022-11-01 15:35:46 +00:00
c.pendingAsyncOperation = asyncOperation
c.continuation = proc() {.gcsafe, raises: [].} =
c.continuation = nil
after
template asyncChainToRaise*(c: Computation,
asyncOperation: Future[void],
RaisesTypes: untyped,
after: untyped) =
c.pendingAsyncOperation = asyncOperation
c.continuation = proc() {.gcsafe, raises: RaisesTypes.} =
Added basic async capabilities for vm2. (#1260) * Added basic async capabilities for vm2. This is a whole new Git branch, not the same one as last time (https://github.com/status-im/nimbus-eth1/pull/1250) - there wasn't much worth salvaging. Main differences: I didn't do the "each opcode has to specify an async handler" junk that I put in last time. Instead, in oph_memory.nim you can see sloadOp calling asyncChainTo and passing in an async operation. That async operation is then run by the execCallOrCreate (or asyncExecCallOrCreate) code in interpreter_dispatch.nim. In the test code, the (previously existing) macro called "assembler" now allows you to add a section called "initialStorage", specifying fake data to be used by the EVM computation run by that test. (In the long run we'll obviously want to write tests that for-real use the JSON-RPC API to asynchronously fetch data; for now, this was just an expedient way to write a basic unit test that exercises the async-EVM code pathway.) There's also a new macro called "concurrentAssemblers" that allows you to write a test that runs multiple assemblers concurrently (and then waits for them all to finish). There's one example test using this, in test_op_memory_lazy.nim, though you can't actually see it doing so unless you uncomment some echo statements in async_operations.nim (in which case you can see the two concurrently running EVM computations each printing out what they're doing, and you'll see that they interleave). A question: is it possible to make EVMC work asynchronously? (For now, this code compiles and "make test" passes even if ENABLE_EVMC is turned on, but it doesn't actually work asynchronously, it just falls back on doing the usual synchronous EVMC thing. See FIXME-asyncAndEvmc.) * Moved the AsyncOperationFactory to the BaseVMState object. * Made the AsyncOperationFactory into a table of fn pointers. Also ditched the plain-data Vm2AsyncOperation type; it wasn't really serving much purpose. Instead, the pendingAsyncOperation field directly contains the Future. * Removed the hasStorage idea. It's not the right solution to the "how do we know whether we still need to fetch the storage value or not?" problem. I haven't implemented the right solution yet, but at least we're better off not putting in a wrong one. * Added/modified/removed some comments. (Based on feedback on the PR.) * Removed the waitFor from execCallOrCreate. There was some back-and-forth in the PR regarding whether nested waitFor calls are acceptable: https://github.com/status-im/nimbus-eth1/pull/1260#discussion_r998587449 The eventual decision was to just change the waitFor to a doAssert (since we probably won't want this extra functionality when running synchronously anyway) to make sure that the Future is already finished.
2022-11-01 15:35:46 +00:00
c.continuation = nil
after
func merge*(c, child: Computation) =
c.gasMeter.refundGas(child.gasMeter.gasRefunded)
when evmc_enabled:
{.pragma: selfDesructPragma, gcsafe, raises: [CatchableError].}
else:
{.pragma: selfDesructPragma, gcsafe, raises: [].}
proc execSelfDestruct*(c: Computation, beneficiary: EthAddress)
{.selfDesructPragma.} =
c.vmState.mutateStateDB:
let localBalance = c.getBalance(c.msg.contractAddress)
# Register the account to be deleted
if c.fork >= FkCancun:
# Zeroing contract balance except beneficiary
# is the same address
db.subBalance(c.msg.contractAddress, localBalance)
# Transfer to beneficiary
db.addBalance(beneficiary, localBalance)
db.selfDestruct6780(c.msg.contractAddress)
else:
# Transfer to beneficiary
db.addBalance(beneficiary, localBalance)
db.selfDestruct(c.msg.contractAddress)
trace "SELFDESTRUCT",
contractAddress = c.msg.contractAddress.toHex,
localBalance = localBalance.toString,
beneficiary = beneficiary.toHex
func addLogEntry*(c: Computation, log: Log) =
c.vmState.stateDB.addLogEntry(log)
func getGasRefund*(c: Computation): GasInt =
if c.isSuccess:
result = c.gasMeter.gasRefunded
func refundSelfDestruct*(c: Computation) =
let cost = gasFees[c.fork][RefundSelfDestruct]
let num = c.vmState.stateDB.selfDestructLen
c.gasMeter.refundGas(cost * num)
func tracingEnabled*(c: Computation): bool =
c.vmState.tracingEnabled
func traceOpCodeStarted*(c: Computation, op: Op): int {.raises: [].} =
c.vmState.captureOpStart(
c,
c.code.pc - 1,
op,
c.gasMeter.gasRemaining,
c.msg.depth + 1)
func traceOpCodeEnded*(c: Computation, op: Op, opIndex: int) {.raises: [].} =
c.vmState.captureOpEnd(
c,
c.code.pc - 1,
op,
c.gasMeter.gasRemaining,
c.gasMeter.gasRefunded,
c.returnData,
c.msg.depth + 1,
opIndex)
func traceError*(c: Computation) {.raises: [].} =
c.vmState.captureFault(
c,
c.code.pc - 1,
c.instr,
c.gasMeter.gasRemaining,
c.gasMeter.gasRefunded,
c.returnData,
c.msg.depth + 1,
c.errorOpt)
func prepareTracer*(c: Computation) =
c.vmState.capturePrepare(c, c.msg.depth)
func opcodeGastCost*(
c: Computation, op: Op, gasCost: GasInt, reason: string)
{.raises: [OutOfGas, ValueError].} =
c.vmState.captureGasCost(
c,
op,
gasCost,
c.gasMeter.gasRemaining,
c.msg.depth + 1)
c.gasMeter.consumeGas(gasCost, reason)
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# End
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------