nim-eth/tests/utp/test_utp_socket_sack.nim

328 lines
11 KiB
Nim
Raw Normal View History

# Copyright (c) 2021-2022 Status Research & Development GmbH
# Licensed and distributed under either of
# * MIT license (license terms in the root directory or at https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT).
# * Apache v2 license (license terms in the root directory or at https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0).
# at your option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed except according to those terms.
{.used.}
import
std/[options, sequtils],
chronos,
stew/bitops2,
testutils/unittests,
./test_utils,
../../eth/utp/utp_router,
../../eth/utp/utp_socket,
../../eth/utp/packets,
../../eth/keys,
../stubloglevel
procSuite "Utp socket selective acks unit test":
let rng = newRng()
let testAddress = initTAddress("127.0.0.1", 9079)
let defaultBufferSize = 1024'u32
proc connectAndProcessMissingPacketWithIndexes(idxs: seq[int]): Future[array[4, uint8]] {.async.} =
let initialRemoteSeq = 1'u16
let q = newAsyncQueue[Packet]()
let data = @[0'u8]
let (outgoingSocket, initialPacket) = connectOutGoingSocket(initialRemoteSeq, q)
var dataPackets: seq[Packet] = @[]
for i in idxs:
let dataP =
dataPacket(
# initialRemoteSeq is next expected packet, so n represent how far from the
# future is this packet
initialRemoteSeq + uint16(i),
initialPacket.header.connectionId,
initialPacket.header.seqNr,
defaultBufferSize,
data,
0
)
dataPackets.add(dataP)
for p in dataPackets:
await outgoingSocket.processPacket(p)
await waitUntil(proc (): bool = outgoingSocket.numOfEventsInEventQueue() == 0)
let extArray = outgoingSocket.generateSelectiveAckBitMask()
await outgoingSocket.destroyWait()
return extArray
proc numOfSetBits(arr: openArray[byte]): int =
var numOfSetBits = 0
for b in arr:
numOfSetBits = numOfSetBits + countOnes(b)
return numOfSetBits
2022-06-17 20:45:37 +00:00
proc hasOnlyOneBitSet(arr: openArray[byte]): bool =
return numOfSetBits(arr) == 1
asyncTest "Socket with empty buffer should generate array with only zeros":
let q = newAsyncQueue[Packet]()
let initialRemoteSeq = 10'u16
let (outgoingSocket, _) = connectOutGoingSocket(initialRemoteSeq, q)
let extArray = outgoingSocket.generateSelectiveAckBitMask()
check:
extArray == [0'u8, 0, 0, 0]
2022-06-17 20:45:37 +00:00
asyncTest "Socket should generate correct bit mask for each missing packet":
# 1 means that received packet is packet just after expected packet i.e
# packet.seqNr - receivingSocket.ackNr = 2
# 32 means that received packet is 32 packets after expected one i.e
# packet.seqNr - receivingSocket.ackNr = 32
# First byte represents packets [ack_nr + 2, ack_nr + 9] in reverse order
# Second byte represents packets [ack_nr + 10, ack_nr + 17] in reverse order
# Third byte represents packets [ack_nr + 18, ack_nr + 25] in reverse order
# Fourth byte represents packets [ack_nr + 26, ack_nr + 33] in reverse order
let afterExpected = 1..32
for i in afterExpected:
# bit mask should have max 4 bytes
let bitMask = await connectAndProcessMissingPacketWithIndexes(@[i])
check:
# only one bit should have been set as only one packet has been processed
# out of order
hasOnlyOneBitSet(bitMask)
getBit(bitMask, i - 1)
asyncTest "Socket should generate correct bit mask if there is more than one missing packet":
# Each testcase defines which out of order packets should be processed i.e
# @[1] - packet just after expected will be processed
# @[3, 5] - packet three packets after will be processed and then packet 5 packets
# after expected will be processed
let testCases = @[
@[1],
@[1, 2],
@[1, 9, 11, 18],
@[1, 3, 8, 15, 18, 22, 27, 32]
]
for missingIndexes in testCases:
let bitMask = await connectAndProcessMissingPacketWithIndexes(missingIndexes)
check:
numOfSetBits(bitMask) == len(missingIndexes)
2022-06-17 20:45:37 +00:00
for idx in missingIndexes:
check:
getBit(bitMask, idx - 1)
asyncTest "Socket should generate max 4 bytes bit mask even if there is more missing packets":
let testCases = @[
toSeq(1..40)
]
for missingIndexes in testCases:
let bitMask = await connectAndProcessMissingPacketWithIndexes(missingIndexes)
check:
numOfSetBits(bitMask) == 32
len(bitMask) == 4
2022-06-17 20:45:37 +00:00
type TestCase = object
2022-11-16 16:44:00 +00:00
# number of packet to generate by writing side
numOfPackets: int
# indexes of packets which should be delivered to remote
packetsDelivered: seq[int]
# indexes of packets which should be re-sent in resend testcases
packetsResent: seq[int]
let selectiveAckTestCases = @[
TestCase(numOfPackets: 2, packetsDelivered: @[1]),
TestCase(numOfPackets: 10, packetsDelivered: @[1, 3, 5, 7, 9]),
TestCase(numOfPackets: 10, packetsDelivered: @[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]),
TestCase(numOfPackets: 15, packetsDelivered: @[1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14]),
TestCase(numOfPackets: 20, packetsDelivered: @[1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19]),
TestCase(numOfPackets: 33, packetsDelivered: @[32]),
TestCase(numOfPackets: 33, packetsDelivered: @[25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32]),
TestCase(numOfPackets: 33, packetsDelivered: toSeq(1..32))
]
proc setupTestCase(
dataToWrite: seq[byte],
initialRemoteSeq: uint16,
outgoingQueue: AsyncQueue[Packet],
incomingQueue: AsyncQueue[Packet],
testCase: TestCase): Future[(UtpSocket[TransportAddress], UtpSocket[TransportAddress], seq[Packet])] {.async.} =
2022-06-17 20:45:37 +00:00
let (outgoingSocket, incomingSocket) =
connectOutGoingSocketWithIncoming(
initialRemoteSeq,
outgoingQueue,
incomingQueue
)
var packets: seq[Packet] = @[]
for _ in 0..<testCase.numOfPackets:
discard await outgoingSocket.write(dataToWrite)
let packet = await outgoingQueue.get()
packets.add(packet)
2022-06-17 20:45:37 +00:00
for toDeliver in testCase.packetsDelivered:
await incomingSocket.processPacket(packets[toDeliver])
await waitUntil(proc (): bool = incomingSocket.numOfEventsInEventQueue() == 0)
return (outgoingSocket, incomingSocket, packets)
asyncTest "Socket should calculate number of bytes acked by selective acks":
let dataSize = 10
let initialRemoteSeq = 10'u16
2022-06-17 20:45:37 +00:00
let smallData = rng[].generateBytes(10)
for testCase in selectiveAckTestCases:
let outgoingQueue = newAsyncQueue[Packet]()
let incomingQueue = newAsyncQueue[Packet]()
let (outgoingSocket, incomingSocket, _) = await setupTestCase(
smallData,
initialRemoteSeq,
outgoingQueue,
incomingQueue,
testCase
)
let finalAck = incomingSocket.generateAckPacket()
check:
finalAck.eack.isSome()
let mask = finalAck.eack.unsafeGet().acks
check:
numOfSetBits(mask) == len(testCase.packetsDelivered)
for idx in testCase.packetsDelivered:
check:
getBit(mask, idx - 1)
let ackedBytes = outgoingSocket.calculateSelectiveAckBytes(finalAck.header.ackNr, finalAck.eack.unsafeGet())
2022-06-17 20:45:37 +00:00
check:
int(ackedBytes) == len(testCase.packetsDelivered) * dataSize
await outgoingSocket.destroyWait()
await incomingSocket.destroyWait()
asyncTest "Socket should ack packets based on selective ack packet":
let initialRemoteSeq = 10'u16
2022-06-17 20:45:37 +00:00
let smallData = rng[].generateBytes(10)
for testCase in selectiveAckTestCases:
let outgoingQueue = newAsyncQueue[Packet]()
let incomingQueue = newAsyncQueue[Packet]()
2022-06-17 20:45:37 +00:00
let (outgoingSocket, incomingSocket, _) = await setupTestCase(
smallData,
initialRemoteSeq,
outgoingQueue,
incomingQueue,
testCase
)
let finalAck = incomingSocket.generateAckPacket()
check:
finalAck.eack.isSome()
let mask = finalAck.eack.unsafeGet().acks
check:
numOfSetBits(mask) == len(testCase.packetsDelivered)
for idx in testCase.packetsDelivered:
check:
getBit(mask, idx - 1)
check:
outgoingSocket.numPacketsInOutGoingBuffer() == testCase.numOfPackets
await outgoingSocket.processPacket(finalAck)
let expectedPackets = testCase.numOfPackets - len(testCase.packetsDelivered)
2022-06-17 20:45:37 +00:00
await waitUntil(proc (): bool = outgoingSocket.numPacketsInOutGoingBuffer() == expectedPackets)
check:
outgoingSocket.numPacketsInOutGoingBuffer() == expectedPackets
await outgoingSocket.destroyWait()
await incomingSocket.destroyWait()
let packetResendTestCases = @[
TestCase(numOfPackets: 4, packetsDelivered: @[2, 3], packetsResent: @[]),
TestCase(numOfPackets: 4, packetsDelivered: @[1, 2, 3], packetsResent: @[0]),
TestCase(numOfPackets: 5, packetsDelivered: @[2, 3, 4], packetsResent: @[0, 1]),
TestCase(numOfPackets: 6, packetsDelivered: @[3, 4, 5], packetsResent: @[0, 1, 2]),
TestCase(numOfPackets: 7, packetsDelivered: @[4, 5, 6], packetsResent: @[0, 1, 2, 3]),
TestCase(numOfPackets: 8, packetsDelivered: @[5, 6, 7], packetsResent: @[0, 1, 2, 3]),
TestCase(numOfPackets: 10, packetsDelivered: @[3, 7, 8], packetsResent: @[0, 1, 2]),
TestCase(numOfPackets: 10, packetsDelivered: @[1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9], packetsResent: @[0, 4, 5, 6]),
TestCase(numOfPackets: 10, packetsDelivered: @[1, 8, 9], packetsResent: @[0])
]
asyncTest "Socket should re-send packets when there are at least 3 packets acked ahead":
let initialRemoteSeq = 10'u16
2022-06-17 20:45:37 +00:00
let smallData = rng[].generateBytes(10)
for testCase in packetResendTestCases:
let outgoingQueue = newAsyncQueue[Packet]()
let incomingQueue = newAsyncQueue[Packet]()
let (outgoingSocket, incomingSocket, initialPackets) = await setupTestCase(
smallData,
initialRemoteSeq,
outgoingQueue,
incomingQueue,
testCase
)
let initialBufferSize = outgoingSocket.currentMaxWindowSize()
let finalAck = incomingSocket.generateAckPacket()
check:
finalAck.eack.isSome()
let mask = finalAck.eack.unsafeGet().acks
let numOfDeliveredPackets = len(testCase.packetsDelivered)
check:
numOfSetBits(mask) == numOfDeliveredPackets
await outgoingSocket.processPacket(finalAck)
await waitUntil(proc (): bool = outgoingSocket.numOfEventsInEventQueue() == 0)
for idx in testCase.packetsResent:
let resentPacket = await outgoingQueue.get()
check:
resentPacket.header.seqNr == initialPackets[idx].header.seqNr
let endBufferSize = outgoingSocket.currentMaxWindowSize()
2022-06-17 20:45:37 +00:00
if len(testCase.packetsResent) == 0:
check:
# when there is no packet loss (no resent packets), buffer size increases
# due to packets acked by selective ack
endBufferSize > initialBufferSize
else:
check:
# due to ledbat congestion control we cannot assert on precise end buffer size,
2022-11-16 16:44:00 +00:00
# but due to packet loss we are sure it should be smaller that at the beginning
# because of 0.5 multiplayer
endBufferSize < initialBufferSize